Speculations
Pseudoscientific or speculatory threads belong here.
The Speculations forum is provided for those who like to hypothesize new ideas in science. To enrich our discussions above the level of Wild Ass Guesswork (WAG) and give as much meaning as possible to such speculations, we do have some special rules to follow:
- Speculations must be backed up by evidence or some sort of proof. If your speculation is untestable, or you don't give us evidence (or a prediction that is testable), your thread will be moved to the Trash Can. If you expect any scientific input, you need to provide a case that science can measure.
- Be civil. As wrong as someone might be, there is no reason to insult them, and there's no reason to get angry if someone points out the flaws in your theory, either.
- Keep it in the Speculations forum. Don't try to use your pet theory to answer questions in the mainstream science forums, and don't hijack other threads to advertise your new theory.
The movement of a thread into (or out of) Speculations is ultimately at the discretion of moderators, and will be determined on a case by case basis.
6798 topics in this forum
-
A vehicle drives on the road being covering with water. Does it indicate that surface water is necessary for vehicle driving? I believe that everyone would give the answer “no”, for vehicles would drive smoothly without surface water on road. Vehicle driving does not need water as the medium. In the contrary, water would affect the driving speed of vehicle. If we assume the driving speed of vehicle is v0 when the water is static against the ground and the relative velocity of water against ground is x in the direction v0, then the driving speed of vehicle parallel to the flow direction is v0+x and the driving speed of vehicle against the flow direction is v0-x. Water flow…
-
0
Reputation Points
- 20 replies
- 3.3k views
- 5 followers
-
-
Matter is Light 200123.docx
-
0
Reputation Points
- 49 replies
- 5k views
- 3 followers
-
-
The day before yesterday there was good clear weather and I looked at Orion with the naked eye. The Rigel (in the lower right corner) shines the brightest there now, the brightness of Betelgeuse, Mintaka, Alnitaka, and Bellatrix is about the same.
-
0
Reputation Points
- 8 replies
- 978 views
-
-
Hello If we take [math]\Large{\frac{1}{\Lambda}}[/math] for the "entropic surface" [math]A[/math] with this value of [math]\Lambda=1.10242*10^{-52}m^{-2}[/math] (https://www.scienceforums.net/topic/118858-the-solution-of-the-cosmological-constant-problem/?do=findComment&comment=1118201) The value of [math]N*8\pi[/math] from entropic gravity is exactly the value of the vacuum catastrophe (about [math]8.73^{122}[/math]) when [math]\Lambda=1.10242*10^{-52}m^{-2}[/math] Is that right and what physical meaning can it have please ?
-
0
Reputation Points
- 22 replies
- 2.6k views
- 1 follower
-
-
Name it causal influence faster than light, whatever. You are, of course, free to hold your belief, but to save the Minkowski interpretation against the Lorentz ether you have to give up a lot: Realism (in the very weak form of the EPR criterion of reality), causality (in any form which contains Reichenbach's common cause principle) and, following my argumentation in Schmelzer, I. (2017). EPR-Bell realism as a part of logic, arxiv:1712.04334 even logic (the "logic of plausible reasoning" or the objective Bayesian interpretation of probability). Of course, this is only special pleading in defense of holy metaphysical principles about the fundament…
-
0
Reputation Points
- 40 replies
- 4.1k views
- 3 followers
-
-
Quantum theory is a theory with absolute time. So, there is no time travel in quantum theory.
-
0
Reputation Points
- 13 replies
- 1.7k views
-
-
-
0
Reputation Points
- 13 replies
- 1.6k views
- 2 followers
-
-
Several points: far and away the most important GHGs are h2o & o3-- and even they have mixed effects. While they both can delay the exit of IR wavelengths radiated as energy absorbed by the planet's surface is sent back off towards space, they both also intercept and reflect a great deal of incoming short wav radiation from the sun-- Everybody knows cloudy days are cooler than sunny days, but cloudy nights are warmer than cloudless nights...Notice that deserts (low atm [h2o]) get hot in the day and cold at night, while rain forests (hi atm [h2o]) are hot during the day and stay hot all night, but both have the same [co2]. ???? A reasonable person would deduce that co…
-
0
Reputation Points
- 14 replies
- 1.7k views
- 1 follower
-
-
Does this statement hold any truth? So by this logic could phones be harmful? Here is a link to the study: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/27903411/
-
0
Reputation Points
- 1 reply
- 742 views
-
-
when current passes through a conductor loop it makes a magnetic field within the loop according to this site: http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/magnetic/curloo.html according to the following site, the magnetic field direction of a current carrying wire goes from north to south with respect to the right hand rule: https://nationalmaglab.org/education/magnet-academy/watch-play/interactive/magnetic-field-around-a-wire-i in the following picture i drew i attempt to recreate this with an iron core, and represent the resulting respective pole in the color magenta: is my recreation of the general effect correct? -DT
-
0
Reputation Points
- 56 replies
- 6.2k views
- 3 followers
-
-
Now eroding, the shape of Stonehenge was once a large, full circle of large stones and small blue ones, with an inner, horseshoe shaped arrangement. A direct comparison with an image of the full moon, as seen from Stonehenge, also shows a similar, dark, horseshoe shape in the interior. (See attached image) As a gathering and ceremonial place, fires were lit at Stonehenge. Where exactly they were lit is unknown, however, when placed in certain patterns on or near the smaller, inner blue stones, they combine to simulate the waxing and waning moon. The larger interior stones and lintels resemble the dark shadows on the moon's surface. The architecture of Stonehe…
-
0
Reputation Points
- 27 replies
- 5.6k views
- 3 followers
-
-
What say you smarty pants? I was way into the impossible em drive, smoked a huuuuge bowl and discovered the basic idea. If the hypotenuse of a right triangle is open for charge carriers to be free, force applied to the system from the hypotenuse can be negated due to it not being physically attached. If 2 "circuits" are combined at the adjacent leg, the force on each of those legs is cancelled out in the system. What's left is force on the opposite legs. -DT Lol #winning https://www.reddit.com/u/DandelionTheory?utm_medium=android_app&utm_source=share
-
0
Reputation Points
- 68 replies
- 7.6k views
- 3 followers
-
-
What do u think about this? https://www.nytimes.com/1902/02/11/archives/giant-skeletons-found-archaeologists-to-send-expedition-to-explore.html There are many other news and research from different periods...
-
0
Reputation Points
- 16 replies
- 2.9k views
-
-
A hypothesis about the formation of stalactite By Jun Liu I'm a TV viewer. On January 28, 2019, I watched the CCTV-10 channel of China's Geographical China TV program. The title of the video is "Anomaly at the Bottom of the Pit", which demonstrates the content of stalactites generated in the karst cave. Among them, a section of stalactites growing sideways has attracted my attention. I have seen many stalactites in the cave before Some grow vertically, some vertically downward, and some vertically upward. I have not seen stalactites growing in the horizontal direction, which caused my question? Why do other stalactites grow downwards, but where are the stalactites gro…
-
0
Reputation Points
- 1 reply
- 856 views
-
-
Astronomers have recorded gravitational waves from the Betelgeuse star (ZN, ua) If we see a flash after some time, it will mean that the speed of gravity propagation is higher than the speed of light. Recently, I proposed a system of equations on this forum, which implies that the speed of gravity is higher than the speed of light. Url deleted
-
0
Reputation Points
- 94 replies
- 66k views
- 5 followers
-
-
Hello , This appears to violate physics but it is only a body phenomenon : A human can stand on toes tips, toes , or a compilation of toes and feet balls .It is possible for a human to stand on toes. But if a person put load equivalent to his body mass on toes " and without wearing shoes " the load will break joints. My hypothesis is: Human body mass can be determined by comparing the body with another mass in scale" nothing new here ".The gravity of the human body is its mass times acceleration “nothing change here " When a person stands on surface. The gravity force of body on a surface is far greater than the norm…
-
0
Reputation Points
- 9 replies
- 1.5k views
- 1 follower
-
-
I guess I hit a button by asking these questions? I thought they were legitimate questions. I really don't know why these methods are not considered to solve unification problems. I don't know why I wouldn't want to pursue it in the future.
-
0
Reputation Points
- 61 replies
- 6.3k views
- 1 follower
-
-
It says on google search However , it doesn't explain the force involved that divides mass by volume .
-
0
Reputation Points
- 91 replies
- 10.4k views
- 2 followers
-
-
Electrons are not all identical. They can travel at different orbitals around atoms and appear to be different colors.
-
0
Reputation Points
- 20 replies
- 2.4k views
- 1 follower
-
-
Gravity is a natural phenomenon that is best explained as forces as opposed to a unique singular force . Gravitational forces being the fundamental process of universal construction and additionally contributing to the natural momentum of matter in space , this inclusive of a photons momentum . Gravitational force can be most accurately explained as being two individual forces : 1) The linear force between masses 2) The linear force between matter and space The linear force between masses is the gravitational force that keeps us firmly footed on the ground and additionally the force that allows an apple to fall from a tree (Newton) ., gravity …
-
0
Reputation Points
- 15 replies
- 2.5k views
- 2 followers
-
-
Time only exists if there is change. The tick of a clock. The beating of your heart. A photon of light from the sun enters your eye instantaneously (zero time) in its frame of reference. This is because it has experienced no change. Its wave function has evolved as described by Schrodinger’s Equation – but it is only when the wave function collapses or decoheres does it experience time. Quantum Decoherence is the key to understanding time. What do you think?
-
0
Reputation Points
- 92 replies
- 11.9k views
- 3 followers
-
-
What will be the step to verify relativity in constant acceleration between earth and proxima centory ?
-
0
Reputation Points
- 32 replies
- 4.9k views
- 2 followers
-
-
This device, that is not complete on the video, aim the production of ether wave. Produced by the oscillation of an electric field, the Helium-3 atom, isotope of the natural Helium, will be victim of it's own inertia and will emit an beam of anti-particles. L ∂²i/∂²t + R ∂i/∂t + 1/C i = ω * A cos ( ω * t) Q = ∫ i * ∂t σ = Q / surface E = σ / (2 * є) ; є = 1 (air) F = E * q ; q = 1.6 E-19 C F = m * а ; m = 1.6 E-27 kg t = ½ * 1 / f s = ∫∫ а * ∂t = ½ * а * t² ½ * kernel of He-3 < s < kernel of He-3 This is the complete device, with it's strange oscillators I didn't have enough time to draw them corre…
-
0
Reputation Points
- 11 replies
- 2.1k views
- 1 follower
-
-
It seems to me that current science does not understand magnetism, at all.. I've searched the internet for hours and still no hard solid explanation of what this phenomena is by valid sources, I've only found a certain person which seems to clearly explain it in the best way possible, I've read his book and its really amazing! looks like science is currently wrong about what they think magnetism is so I want peoples opinion. VIDEO DELETED I've watched so many of his videos, and I've got to say! I'm sorry but solid facts and much more has led me to discover the logical truth and how to use my brain and not only maths to understand what is actually …
-
0
Reputation Points
- 7 replies
- 1.5k views
- 3 followers
-
-
Hydrogen has a single electron. Two forces may be associated with the electron of hydrogen. The forces act simultaneously. Force may be represented as a vector. The vectors of force may have a “radiant state” and a “steady state”. The states may be defined by “conditions” imposed upon the vectors. The steady state will return the binding energy of the electron, and the radiant state will give the Stephan-Boltzmann constant. Do conditions imposed upon the vectors represent different states of the electron? Reference; URL deleted 04 The States of Hydrogen
-
0
Reputation Points
- 2 replies
- 1.6k views
- 2 followers
-