J.C.MacSwell

Fortunately in this Universe you are welcome to feel that way, and are under no obligation to like it or use it. My choice also, at least in this one.

You might want to save that for many of the other universes, where Swantsont expressed some fascination.

They'd be looking for delicacies to set themselves apart from the commoners....never underestimate the power of elite alien snobbery.

I could be wrong, but I think with the eyes of America on Georgia, and Senate control hanging in the balance, the turnout could be every bit as high as it was in the Nov 3 election. Different set of problems or opportunities, but I think it could be both good and bad for Biden either way it goes.

There is. Trump himself is on another level, though unfortunately far from alone. That's the excuse. You can always fall back on that when none was made, with no concern whether it is accurate or not, because reasons. I didn't claim Biden was as bad as Trump. As bad as he may be at times he's not even close. Adam Schiff is a better comparison to Trump. Both are supported by their respective parties, though one is in a far less powerful position, for now...

A lot of that helpful "reasonable hyperbole" going around. Another name for it is lies. But that's okay because the GOP does it more, correct?

"Why is Joe Biden so quickly forming a Cabinet when my investigators have found hundreds of thousands of fraudulent votes, enough to “flip” at least four States, which in turn is more than enough to win the Election? Hopefully the Courts and/or Legislatures will have the COURAGE to do what has to be done to maintain the integrity of our Elections, and the United States of America itself. THE WORLD IS WATCHING!!!" Donald J. Trump Nov 21, 2020 I don't know Donald...maybe because there's still a remote chance he could become President?

Who exactly...would be left trying to detect it? 😃

Instead of claiming Mitt Romney would put African Americans back in chains?

It could certainly initiate stall of the rotor blades if there is too great an angle of attack. That could reduce lift quite abruptly but this should not happen close to the weight limit, or essentially safe lifting force limit. The design should include appropriate safety factors. Turbulence would create similar challenges

It would be good if Trump would concede the obvious for the sake of America, even if he doesn't owe that to the Democrats.

They're a pretty good, and very knowledgeable, group here. Hang in there. Not even remotely, given the evidence he's actually presented. Even his wildest claims seem to fall short, considering the gap. Adam Schiff level of credibility. Fortunately this won't take four years... Unfortunately now until January 20 may be the most critical phase of the pandemic.

No doubt

You do and +1. I'm not sure where you're heading with this but nothing you've said so far should be considered controversial. Maybe I'm just naive and iNow knows better.

Assuming you mean the latest Orwellian definition: He could possibly believe that...as suggested by my second question, but probably even for him only if the election was truly close, and there was potentially enough election fraud to make it questionable. So far there is no sign of that as a plausibility, despite his claims. If in fact he does have significant evidence he's done an excellent job of holding it back. Nor is there any sign that the Supreme Court would do any more than interpret the Laws and Constitution, and certainly nothing to the degree he would require, The most obvious reason for him to nominate the candidates he did was to keep the Court from becoming more "balanced" by Judges willing to change the actual meaning of the Laws and Constitution on grounds the Democrats consider moral, rather than have them changed by Congress. But that might be more the GOP than Trump himself, other than his being able to point to it as something he got done...