dimreepr

You keep repeating yourself with no, it seems, attempt to clarify your point, or actually address questions posed by any of the poster's; what's the point of being the messiah (the only one with the knowledge of heaven), if you can't explain it to other people, and we've got some proper brainy buggers, in this thread, trying to understand. Repetition is not a cogent argument, nor is nobody 'can' understand me, if you're as clever as you claim to be, how do you think, that can be? If you actually understand a topic, the one thing you can do, at least, is explain it to your peers even if it's out of the intellectual reach of 99% of, 'the other's'... 😉

What you seem to be missing is, a computer's universe (information) is infinately smaller than ours, your under the illusion that a bee has no choice but to obey it's DNA (which is kinda true, but that's not this rabbit hole), different bee's have different job's, how do you know they didn't choose their job? You can define reality in any way you like, but you also said "you can't cross the same river twice" which is the antipode of binary; Schrodinger's cat, is basically saying "I cross the same river everyday for 50 year's, and then, yesterday it moved and my bridge no longer work's"... I wish I could be so aloof, but I do love a challenge. 😇

Schrodinger's cat makes nonsense of that, ask your AI... Indeed, but in the context of this thread, I think, it's a reasonably accurate metaphor to describe the LLM's shortfalls, presently.

That depends... who are you going to believe

You talk as if one word is truer than another, that's nonsense talk if your logic is fallacious.

If you don't know for sure, ultimately, it's just a guess and just luck if you're right. It reminds me of a professional sportsman's take on luck "The more I practice, the luckier I get", it works for all professionals, even the thinkers. 😉 Just for clarity, I'm not a professional, the epithet I hope to achieve is, talented amateur. An LLM will never have enough information to do more than just guess, bc being, even being a bee is more than the automation of a dry circuit, primarily bc our world is analogue/wet, which is impossible to reproduce digitally, ask your AI about a computers attempt to create a truely random number/event, and get back to me...

This is exactly the response I'd expect from an AI, it's very human centric/biased, is it direct from your AI or do I detect a smattering of paraphrasing? It's us humans that assume animal's lack assumptions, and it's us human's that assume we're uniquely human and so have a unique perspective on reality bc we're a magical type of animal that stands apart from nature. After all you have stated that you are uniquely priveliged, in that you understand things better than a professional student, they don't just give PhD's away, willy nilly...

No shit Sherlock, did it show you pictures of fairies?

Every value statement is complicated, that's why we value a fact, in law, beyond reasonable doubt, is enough to jail them, but not enough of a fact that we should just kill them, even if it saves money...

Both are true, unless the observer actually observed the fact, for instance, a murder, eveyone else, sane or otherwise, are second degree observer's IOW their observations are via an editor.

Not everyone makes sense to everyone, for instance two people from different culture's, definitely struggle and without a shared premise have very little chance to comunicate, luckily we all share a need to eat, drink and sleep, so we all share a fundamental premise; that's not true of an AI human interaction, anything you gain from your interaction with 'your' AI is ultimately from your own projections and so, at best, it's circular reasoning, like in "Taxy driver" the mirror scene "You talkin to me"... As an example, this post screams of trying to sound convincing, from a vox box of misunderstood aphorisms.

No, you've just been very trying, you haven't even attempted to communicate, you've just assumed correctness; your world seems wrong, in a fascistic sort of way.

Bee's have many different job's, some clean the hive, some feed the Queen who's only job is to spit out offspring, some are nannie's, some are guarding the hive, some are etc. and some of the abnormal bee's also found their place in the hive; it's kinda fundamental knowledge nowadays, the abnormal is responsible for evolution. It's how 'we' the hive came to be... 😉 I If my mechanic is able to get my car running, whilst I failed to elicit a spark, with my random hammer blows in the general direction of the engine block; I'd be forced to conlude that he knows more than me, so logically one of us is, at least, more correct than the other; unless we're talking about Dr nobody, the professor of philosophical indecision.

what do you actually know, about what you think you understand?

Your getting yourself confused, we have inherited our way of thinking it's called 'our culture', there's an old saying that's pertinent "It takes a village to raise a child" or "No man is an island, in and of himself". Humans think therefore we are; not a perfectly logical thought, but it's close enough... 😉 What if I too have an oak that fits the description? In fact, that is the fundamental rule of conveying meaning, we have to share an experience, tree et all, for the information to have any 'real' meaning.