dimreepr

I'm not sure I share that hope, if we feedback human bias on a scientific basis, we could create a Nietsche type god replacement that we all have faith in.

That is exciting, but do you think that's a step toward AGI or just another AI that can out think us in very specific way's?

Just a thought about the nature of economics...

I think it was a joke, I'm clearly not as funny as I think I am. 🤔

Does that mean, if someone disagrees with you, they can't???

Mary had a little lamb his fleece was very red the reason for this, was you see it had a pickaxe in his head. But my favourite is a Haiku from Dr John Cooper-Clark. To convey one's mood in seventeen syllables is very diffic.

Point well missed, winners dictate history they never learn from it, ChatGPT may evolve into something that could teach us, so called winner's, how to be better humans, even you... 😉

Winners of what???

Depends on the quality of the teacher, ChatGPT's children might actually learn from human history...

How can you stop every Tom, Dick and Harriet from using what they think, is a useful tool (for a blacksmith)? Everyday we hear report's of AI growing crops more efficiently and curing cancer etc. and the media sc/treaming how this is the universal remote control to any chanel we want. This topic is still very much in the 'human' political arena.

I don't think AGI is inevitable, but if it is, I think it's way off. What would be the point of trying to develope it, if we can build every individual AI in a different aspect of humanity? Besides I think humanity will learn to adapt to that reality, well most of us, but some of us will always ask question's of the reality that's before us and maybe inspire a reality adjustment.

Not everyone thinks it's wrong... The comfortable among us think we're in something approaching the sunlight upland's, whilst trudging through the swamp of despair; the light at the end of the tunnel might be an approaching train...

Indeed, no one is immune to the human condition, we make emotional decisions and then try to legitimise it with rational reasoning, it doesn't really matter where we get our validation, as long as we respect the author; Deep Blue, Watson et al, beat the best humans, what better validation? For those who don't really understand why the et al don't represent intelligence...

So then we become the savages?

The problem is people just want their somer and will, "March cheerfully out of obscurity into the dream" - Pink Floyd - Sheep lyrics,to get some more. Edit, darn it, now I've got to go utube and listen the the album. The Moving Finger writes; and, having writ, Moves on: nor all thy Piety nor Wit Shall lure it back to cancel half a Line, Nor all thy Tears wash out a Word of it. -Omar Khayyam, translated by by Edward FitzGerald The fuse is lit, lets hope the government invested in sand bags.