Jump to content


Senior Members
  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited

About DimaMazin

  • Birthday 01/16/1970

Profile Information

  • Location
  • Favorite Area of Science

Recent Profile Visitors

12148 profile views

DimaMazin's Achievements


Organism (8/13)



  1. Thanks. I thought black hole mass is defined without its KE like partcle mass. It deluded me.
  2. Do you think 9 solar massis were emitted before the collision? Then what their KE was emitted before the collision?
  3. If they fall directly toward each other then what mass would be after such collision? Why creation of gravitational waves ,before their collision, takes only their KE and no significant mass? Why creation of gravitational bubble,at the collision, takes only their mass and no significant KE?
  4. Then the rest mass after collision should be = m1 + m2 - energy of gravitational bubble /c2 +KE/c2 But really mass=m1 +m2 - energy of gravitational bubble /c2 + 0 Why so?
  5. Let's check your math. Ukraine missed only 1/4 part of missiles of 90 then how many missiles flew in Poland?
  6. To check work of Patriot.
  7. Ukraine has no missiles to attack far airfields. It is work of Biden. NATO is attacked by two missiles. Zero are downed of two. Ukraine shot down 73 missiles out of about 100. Who hump up?
  8. I mean gamma' = 1/(1 - escape velocity2/c2)1/2 For example distance of the fall is 1 trillion kilometers. Mass of the black hole is minimal. There is no initial velocity of the object relative to the black hole. If the gamma' = about 1 million then let's consider next example when black hole whith minimal mass is falling into black hole with minimal mass. If their kinetic energy > 2 millions minimal mass of black hole *c2 then where does the energy go after their collision?
  9. What is gamma factor of object, which is freely falling into black hole, on event horizon?
  10. Submarine may be destroyed by torpedo or missile. Not always you can define the destroyer. Sivil war can left missiles in silos without sequrity. Apply of the weapon leds you to new weapon of stouns and sticks.😛What is scientific sence there?
  11. Do you think nuklear weapon can be useful for Iran? Nuklear weapon is expensive and scientifically senceless. What is a sence to have the weapon when all have the same?
  12. For informational support of attak also. The war, between Russia and Ukraine, determines who is fool, who has lost nuclear weapon or who has nuclear weapon.
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.