swansont

Explain what you mean by secure.

You forgot the illuminati and the freemasons. But you can't even cite the right conspiracies; the so-called deep state doesn’t control the president, they are the minions that carry out the woke agenda of the democrats.

These two statements have a significant disconnect, which is is at the heart of the problem

All forces are two-way processes. If A is exerting a force on B, B must exert the same force on A, in the opposite direction If your masses are point particles, you will only have a gravitational force acting in one dimension. (if they aren’t, but they are spherically symmetric, it will act the same as if they are point masses)

How do you know there is a mismatch, if you’re asking a question to which you don’t know the answer?

I think it’s a mistake to put the blame on the user, for a product marketed to the masses. It’s like selling cars and letting just anyone drive.

Nobody rules the waves

Moderator NoteAn engineer should know how to do math and use equations This is closed. Don’t bring the topic up again.

You haven’t explained your equations or use them in examples. Why shouldn’t this thread be permanently closed?

ST:TNG Darmok (S5E2)

That’s like going to a foreign country and refusing to speak their language. And “reasoned ontology” does not dictate physics. Science has to be compared to experiment/observation, so it must make testable predictions. If it disagrees with experiment, it’s wrong. If it can’t be compared, even in principle, it’s not science.

There is no t<0 physics. “alpha physics” is also, AFAICT, not a thing, but that could be because you’re not using standard terminology (so it is, quite literally, gibberish, though that does not mean it is meaningless) You have to communicate more clearly. Being supporting does not mean being credulous.

Moderator NoteWe keep running into this same issue. You need to cite the source of the claims you post, so that it can be checked for context and credibility

Being met with skepticism is not any indication that your material has validity. “But the fact that some geniuses were laughed at does not imply that all who are laughed at are geniuses. They laughed at Columbus, they laughed at Fulton, they laughed at the Wright brothers. But they also laughed at Bozo the Clown.” ―Carl Sagan,

“some of the 12,000 images are nearly identical to each other or even the same file just in a different size. Some aren’t even that impressive; blurry or overexposed. But there are also some unseen gems in there. PetaPixel has picked out some of the best ones.” https://petapixel.com/2026/05/04/nasa-releases-thousands-of-unseen-artemis-ii-photos/