Jump to content

hypervalent_iodine

Administrators
  • Content Count

    4550
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    10

hypervalent_iodine last won the day on June 17

hypervalent_iodine had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

1339 Glorious Leader

About hypervalent_iodine

  • Rank
    Empress of Everything

Profile Information

  • Interests
    Organic and medicinal chemistry
  • College Major/Degree
    Ph.D. in medicinal / synthetic chemistry and mycology
  • Favorite Area of Science
    Organic Chemistry
  • Occupation
    Postdoctoral research fellow

Recent Profile Visitors

93815 profile views
  1. essereio has been permanently banned for repeated violations of rule 2.1.
  2. ! Moderator Note No, you're racist because you espouse racist beliefs, the expression of which on this forum (besides being wrong) is also against the rules. Consider yourself banned.
  3. What have you learnt? We can't do your homework for you, so you will need to make some attempt at this yourself before anyone can give you any guidance. Searching by chemical formula won't be helpful in this case. If they have got this far, they should already know how to construct IUPAC names and identify functional groups.
  4. It is a 14 year old thread, so it’s not totally surprising most of the links no longer work.
  5. Moreno has been banned for the rather insistent tendency towards racist rhetoric.
  6. ! Moderator Note We are not in the business of dispensing medical advice. I recommend you see a doctor when you can.
  7. Metal organic frameworks are very popular at the moment. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metal–organic_framework They contain organic components as well obviously, but the area sits much more squarely with inorganic chemistry. I suspect that the examples given by the OP were used to distinguish synthetic and naturally occurring macromolecules, though it is a bit confusing as rubber can also be naturally occurring.
  8. ! Moderator Note A question best answered elsewhere, lest this thread continue to get dragged off topic.
  9. It’s not just limited to proteins either. You can also engineer yeast and bacteria to produce complex chemicals, some requiring several enzymatic steps. For example, I remember a while back there were a couple of papers that did this for the production of codeine and other morphine type compounds. There were problems where some reactions were not compatible with others, so in one paper the authors compartmentalised the enzymatic steps in different organelles yeast, and in the other the authors used two strains of E. coli to complete different halves of the synthesis. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4924617/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26847395/ Chemoenzymatic synthesis is a very big area. In fact the Chemistry Nobel prize in 2018 was awarded to 3 people, one of whom (Frances Arnold) received it for pioneering the use of something called directed evolution. Essentially, her lab looks at enzymes that are able to perform reactions that are difficult to do outside of enzymes. They take the gene for the enzyme that is able to perform a given reaction that they are interested in, and create a library of mutants that are then transformed into whatever organism. The mutants are screened and the most active selected for the next round of mutagenesis, etc. They’ve used it towards greener syntheses of compounds used in, for example, pharmaceuticals and biofuels.
  10. I can see what you’re maybe getting at here, but it is confusing. The Keq would not be written like that as the equilibrium is not dependant on the concentration of the solid salt. The expression for Ksp is not actually different from how you would write other equilibrium expressions, since you typically don’t include terms for solid or liquid components in any expression for Keq. This is the same in, for example, expressions for Ka, where water is not included. The reasoning is that these components are normally in such large amounts relative to other components, that minor changes to their concentration has no effect on the overall equilibrium. This holds true for Ksp since we assume at a minimum that the solution is at saturation point; adding more salt has no effect on the concentration of ions in solution, and therefore no effect on the equilibrium. The answer to this is simply stoichiometry. If x number of moles of a salt has dissolved, and the ratio of it to one of its ions is 1:1, then x number of moles of that ion is in solution. Note of course that this concentration is not the same as the amount of salt that might have been added to solution, just how much at equilibrium is actually in solution. I think you understand most of the concepts here, so I don’t think you’re necessarily missing anything. Ksp and molar solubility are closely linked - if one is low, so is the other. We might use the numbers for different things or to work out other problems. Practically, molar solubility is a more useful and easily relatable number if you just want to know how soluble something is. However, if you want to know the ion concentration in more complicated scenarios (I’m talking common ion effect) or if you want to say predict whether something will precipitate in complex solutions, you would need to use Ksp. Perhaps have a read of this: https://www.chem.purdue.edu/gchelp/howtosolveit/Equilibrium/Solubility_Products.htm
  11. Inconclusive is one way of putting it. Their first paper with was highly suspect and contained a lot of concerning ethical elements. Their follow ups don't seem to add very much, and is at odds with a lot of the other data that has been published regarding HCQ. Derek Lowe's coverage on it has been quite informative: https://blogs.sciencemag.org/pipeline/archives/2020/04/16/more-small-molecule-clinical-data-against-covid-19-as-of-april-16 https://blogs.sciencemag.org/pipeline/archives/2020/04/11/the-latest-hydroxychloroquine-data-as-of-april-11 https://blogs.sciencemag.org/pipeline/archives/2020/03/29/more-on-cloroquine-azithromycin-and-on-dr-raoult
  12. I don't think there has necessarily been any political meddling. They are working with the data that they have, but I also think that this is where the issue potentially lies, since I don't believe there has been significant testing done in children to know what risk they actually pose to other people. I completely agree with you on your points about school closures - the long term economic effects would be disastrous. In addition to your points I would also comment that universities, which are already struggling with the loss of international student money, would surely go bust if they also lost an entire graduating year of domestic students.
  13. There was a paper circulating a little while ago that caught my attention, published in Nature. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2223-y To be honest, I am pretty baffled that it was published in Nature. The top leads identified in their screening assay are known as pan-assay interference compounds (PAINs). IOW, they are nuisance compounds and generally not something you would pursue in a drug design campaign. In fact, the seminal paper that discusses PAINs is a Nature paper (https://www.nature.com/news/chemistry-chemical-con-artists-foil-drug-discovery-1.15991), which makes this even more confusing. I can't imagine anyone with a med chem background would have reviewed this, as the red flags should have been very obvious. In any med chem journal, this paper would have been rejected since you have to screen for PAINs as part of their submission guidelines. I'm worried that this signals a general lowering of the bar when it comes to these sorts of publications, which will only make things more difficult in the long run. Derek Lowe has written some good blog posts on the matter: https://blogs.sciencemag.org/pipeline/archives/2020/04/10/more-on-screening-for-coronavirus-therapies
  14. I’d certainly believe it. A lot of the students I’ve dealt with over the last 5 years in the micro and genetics labs I’ve worked in don’t seem to realise that there is an inherent ambiguity, because that is just how they’ve always interpreted it.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.