Speculations

I've read in an article called How to Fly a Helicopter that it takes both hands and both feet to fly one of them. It shouldn't be that difficult. I have two computer games called Infiltrator 1 and Infiltrator 2 for the Commodore 64 (in the year 1986) that only requires 1 joystick with a fire button and a keyboard to fly an attack/defense helicopter. I'll describe how it works: First, use the keyboard to press B,S, and I for Battery, Systems and Ignition. Let the RPM indicator increase to 3240 RPM's. Pull back on the joystick to increase altitude to 2000 ft. Since your horizontal velocity is 0, you are in hover mode. If you wanted to go back down to 1000 ft., you would pus…

Anyone know about Bob Lazar's claim that UFOs of ET origin may be powered by an antimatter reactor using element 115. In recent interviews with Bob Lazar, he refused to say anything about 115. But he did describe the propulsion system of "Saucers" near Area 51 at S4. The 115-fueled antimatter reactor powers gravity amplifiers, output goes to gravity emitters. The saucers fly "belly first." I found some info about 115. Does any of this make sense to anyone? "As of 2017, about 100 atoms of moscovium have been produced. "Moscovium was called ununpentium (IUPAC system) or eka-bismuth (Mendeleev's naming system) before its official discovery. Most peopl…

Here is some idea I came accross recently. All fundamental properties of physical systems are described in terms of: - A background of empty 3d space which is filled in every part and every direction with fluctuating strands. Strands are featureless, but do not interpenetrate, and continue to the horizon of physical space. - All properties of matter and observables we can detect are based on strand crossings. The strands themselves are unobservable. From this miniscule description of physics he is able to show that all physical properties can be deduced, including general relativity, quantum field theory, the standard model, etc. He makes some bold predictions, for…

Due to this government’s lockdown policy, I have more time to have ‘mental analysis’ (or simply call it, ‘out of the box imagination'). There is this on-going argument between proponents of the what-so-called ‘flat Earth’ that defies the textbook defenders of the ‘round Earth’. If you search the Internet, there’s so many topics going on, one claiming that the Earth to be flat, why others, of course, as already been established, that the Earth is round. As to my own opinion, the Earth is indeed ‘round’. But why it looks seems flat, as many experiments, in a way, as others are claiming and keep on proving it (with some success), has something to do with my ‘sugges…

Hello! Quite some time has passed, since my last visit here and a lot of things changed... For example, it turned out, that I can in fact do some math and use it, to show you the only correct model of gravity and energy distribution in relative motion. I've spent around 6 weeks and wasted some 8 pages format a5 on calculations, while looking for the right formula - it took me so long, because I did such things for the first time in some 20 years or so and also, this was that part of physics, which as far as I remeber, I've always hated at most... I wonder, what then can explain all those generations of professional physicsts, who didn't even think about trying to calculat…

Hello. The stated principle is purely mathematical and will have to use unconventional terms. This is the construction of a three-dimensional matrix with one and the same particle in motion. This imaginary particle is simply guided by an ultra-powerful imaginary field. This field allows the oscillatory movement of the particle from a point A to a point B for example. The advantage or the physical challenge would be to be able to see the human eye several points or particles at the same time, and in several different places. In cinematography, it takes just 24 frames per second to perceive and obtain seamless fluency in all types of contiguous, local an…

I am an uneducated 72 year old former car cleaner, so I'm doubting that anyone on this forum will give my theory much creedence, but just in case I'm smarter than I think I am, I'll empty my heart and say my piece. My Theory I believe that only maths existed before the big bang, and I further believe that maths was looking for an answer that was unanswerable without the existence of a material universe. With an over heating CPU, maths blue screened. The universe it created was to provide a physical abacus, a playground of endless possibilities that would feed back information to the mainframe. If maths was there before the big bang then it's still there, not…

What do you thing about LITG and MOND ?

A fresh look at the underpinnings of Special Relativity is merited for the following reasons - 1. In earlier posts, I’ve shown how to view SR applications as Related Experiments - a pair of matched experiments in which charged particles are subjected to external electromagnetic fields. In the object experiment, the particle is given an initial velocity v and subjected to fields E and H. In the image experiment, fields E’ and H’ are applied to the particle at rest, where E’ and H’ are the transformed images of E and H under the SR field transformations. The 4-space motion of the particle in the image experiment (t’,x’,y’,z’) will then match up with the transfo…

I'm not as schooled on this subject in general, but I've read a couple of books and I've had a thought about Gravity: Given a simplified Newtonian formula of Gravity (F=G((msub1-msub2)/r2), Maxwell has a similar formula for the Magnetic Field (B=(μ0(I)/2πr). To my best understanding, the Magnetic Field is point in Planck space that sees Electrons traveling past Protons. And given Special Relativity, the Electrons appear to be stretched. Which makes that point see more positive charge from the Protons than the negative charge from the Electrons. "Seeing" the charge from the charged particles is basically when Electrons emit and absorb Photons when interacting with…

Are 10th dimension effects at work at microscopic levels? stringspace-e1417811256405.lnk

[ False claims about negative mass : Runaway motion problem, Vacuum instability problem, Wheel problem ] 1. The runaway motion problem is wrong. Runaway motion is an argument that the two masses continue to accelerate, in an ideal situation where the negative mass and the positive mass are exactly the same. Runaway motion is used as a rejection logic of negative mass. a) The difference in mass when creating the pair of negative mass and positive mass. As a general conjecture, when positive and negative mass are born, the mass will be exactly the same, but this conjecture is wrong. There is at least a gravitational potential energy (binding energ…

This short TEDx talk should be watched by anyone with even a passing interest in the UFO phenomena.The speaker puts quite well what I have been trying to say for years... Science should be interested in UFOs and should be trying to study them by doing more than there is no evidence as though evidence should fall from the sky. I am in CA right now hence the chance in IP address...

So after getting out of academia I must miss it... just after Christmas, this new year I was thinking about issues in cosmology and all this Dark Matter and Dark Energy theories, and had this crazy idea that's within Einstein's GR- maybe, but more so, it's within a non-flat curvature quantum theory, which we don't have so all this is speculation, but i thought perhaps tiny fluctuations in spacetime curvature (from moving masses in sub-atomic particles from distant parts of the universe), travelling in the same direction, in the same region of space, over billions of years, would interact and form very sharp curvatures in spacetime - on the scales 10e-18m to 10e-15m. …

Proving reincarnation is possible, by determining the mathematical chance that decayed matter is recycled, restored and involved in the production of a new living cell, which happens to be in charge or is a part of a collective group of cells responsible for controlling a body and giving consciousness. This task will require ground-breaking research on how multicellular organisms came about, it will also require knowledge on the specific cells that are responsible for thought and how cells combine collectively to allow thought and senses.

I wrote a paper about Division by zero available here Link removed Anyone interested in challenging it ?

I was reading reply that Mordred wrote the other day and it could just be that I misunderstood but I started trying to create the universe starting off with plank dimensions. Assuming that time is like an apple and that you either have an apple or you don't, so in some crazy sense it makes sense that you either have a plank unit of time or you don't, so not being able to attribute time to anything between t=0, and what was it? t=10-34th? Because, if it ain't a defined unit of time then it ain't time, kinda makes sense, well at least it does to me. Sort of, kind of. Then I proceeded to build the universe one plank unit of time at a time... Right away I realized I…

Simple verifiable explanation of 3 dimensional time 3 dimensional time is quite simple, it is a logical property of Einstein's time dilation in Special Relativity. If we blow up a balloon we know that it increases in 3 dimensions of space. If we have any two points marked on the balloon then as it inflates their distance in space increases. If we send information between these two points along the surface then the time it takes for the information to pass between them is increased in direct proportion to the increase in space. So at the quantum level it is not just the time between "particles" that causes time to dilate, it is time within …

Key: Wave functions are not the same thing as meant by fields, as a wave function is a probability calculation, but for the purposes of basic understanding they can be used interchangeably here. Dark Energy = Field pressure. Core theory: All matter in the universe consists of fields. Particles are what is observed when two or more matter fields interact with sufficient energy. A stable particle is what happens when two or more matter fields interact with sufficient energy constantly. Not all matter field interactions create particles, but can create pressure. Predictive/proofs: Quantum entanglement: We are observing two points of int…

Our Universe is three waves; spin, color, heat. We all know heat as charge but it doesn’t move between negative and positive It moves like a spherical radial vibration. positive, zero, and negative are the same wave just 90 degrees apart. Because there are three vibrations, the projections on the standard model appear that we can only see or measure 3 versions of each. Three charges, three colors, three generations of matter. Anti-particles are waves that are 180 degrees apart (a collapsing sphere or an expanding sphere). Spin flips each time the wave crosses zero. Imagine a spinning ball collapsing to zero then expanding out. The spin reve…

Cannot confirm, do not have the books myself. Perhaps from hundreds writing crap, some may guess it near right. A 2008 book : ========================================================================== A 1981 book: - Please delete if improper -

The theory of relativity claims that all clocks regardless of their design and principle of operation, slowdown their ticks in the following cases: - during its movement, according to the formula T = To / (1- (v / c) ^2)^0,5 - as gravity increases. It turns out that such a slowdown of the clock ticks, called time dilation, is true only for light clocks, which include atomic clocks, and does not apply to all clocks. This slowing down of the clock ticks is therefore only a technical feature of light clocks, and not a dilation of time as such. For example, the pendulum clock will not slow down but will tick faster when the gravity increases, as it shown in the f…

I have background, experience and education, in the psychology field, mainly social-psychology. I was given a few suggestions of where to put this thread, and I chose this because I do not want it to be a psych-social discussion only. At the same time, I am not necessarily looking for comment on why these theories (word used loosely) are wrong- I know they are by the way- but rather are these denial-beliefs (as in denial of established science and a belief in having been deceived' / 'the truth is out there' type of thing) growing in followers? If you want to post a brief description/method for how you would explain to these people why they are wrong, then please do. …

study & discuss their (great?) work, energy WE=m*a*d using linear_acceleration a (=v/t, =2*((vi/t)+(d/(t*t)), =F/m) & the force(d) distance d (=va*t) of a mass m (=F/a). That (linear accelerated) force is F=m*a, where the average (accelerated) speed (velocity) va (=(vi+vf)/2), & speed (velocity, difference) is v=vf-vi, for final_speed vf, minus initial_speed vi. ((Even) although it would also be possible to use factoring (an initial unit_speed of 1 m/s), instead). The (moving) kinetic_energy is KE=m*v*va, (pronounced key), or KE=m*((v^2)/2)+v*vi) using initial_speed vi, or KE…

Or perhaps someone here thinks we do know C in deep space? If so, how? To know any speed we need to know time. What time is like. On earth and the area of the solar system we do know that. We have probes that have gone almost one light day from here. Beyond this we do not really know what time is like. So, if time were not the same as here in this 'fishbowl', how we we know? We see and experience all things here in our time (and space_. Bottom line is that it is only assumed and believed that time is the same out in the distant universe. One implication of this would be that nothing in the universe could be said to have taken millions or billions of our years to…