Speculations

we know about the E=mc^2 of Einstein recipe, it's not distinguish radioactive or non-radioactive substance, even though 1kg water H(2)O such as power to Uranium 235 constant! But in one react of battery reducting Hydrogen, people consider it very low power, and because of MOL (mole 6,023 x 10^23 in 12gr Carbon) material, so it can add or multiply from lowest level power to a bigger. But if you think opposite, one react reducting an Hydrogen is the biggest, and the reason level of power is medium, this beacuse of quantity of react is being against each other, beacuse i think if two battery is being contrast + with + and - with - is no or very low power output. …

Hi, This post is about suggesting a (maybe new ?) kind of maths with a different start for integers to your appreciation (that's why I put it speculations) The idea is to modify Peano, to create a set, with a start and a end, (no, it's not really modular arithmetic with unknown modulus) So we create two extremum : 0 at left, inf at right the function succ(x) exist y=succ(x) for x != inf the function prec(x) exist y=prec(x) for x != 0 We have addition etc, subtraction multiplication etc. all within the limit for "succ" that imply that operations are have no solutions close to inf every relation…

Hello, I think this may interest you. I propose a new mathematical definition making no distinction between the set of prime numbers and the numbers 0 and 1. Here is an overview of my attached article (or linked below): “According to a new mathematical definition, whole numbers are divided into two sets, one of which is the merger of the sequence of prime numbers and numbers zero and one. Three other definitions, deduced from this first, subdivide the set of whole numbers into four classes of numbers with own and unique arithmetic properties. The geometric distribution of these different types of whole numbers, in various closed matrices, is organized into …

Hello everyone, My real name is Marc Michalik and I have a great deal of experience speaking in science forums even though I am not a scientist. I was one of the top "Ufologists" of the X-Files era and was the chief rival of Philip J Klass on UseNet known as "The One & Only Great Wall Debunker" or "The Teflon Believer". I don't want to talk about UFO's here but if there is interest in that, I will talk about that in a separate discussion since all of the answers that people like Phil & I had arrived at have been forgotten. What I would really like to talk about is the fact that FIVE YEARS AGO I invented what the rest of the world calls "The Matrix". I…

...Also known as ORME, ormus, or m-state elements. http://www.asc-alchemy.com/hudson.html Basically this guy has found a way to extract 2400 ounces to the ton of rare metals(mainly from the platinum group) out of regular soil found on his farm in Arizona. He also claims this metal extract exhibits extremely odd properties such as acting as a superconductor at room temperate. Its very good read even though most of it is likely pseudoscience.

Okay. How simple nature is arranged. All of these quantum gravity, string theory and loop quantum gravity complicate things. All of them cannot properly obtain the space-time geometry from more distinct constructions. Now I will show that strings / loops are dual to each other, that is, like the duality of electric and magnetic fields. The idea is based on the fact that Maxwell's equations are applicable not only to electric and magnetic fields, but also to two quantum non-commutative fields, string E and loop A field . {E, A} = i Quantum gravity is expressed in the form of the Maxwell equation of a string-loop field. div E = 0 div A = 0 rot …

How much does it matter if I can move matter in what appears to be 29 in hg on my gauge from 30 inches? only reason I ask is because I cant get the gauge to read lower.

Proof of Riemann hypothesis on one page. Who would be excited if RH was proven today?

NASA researchers conducted experiments in Antarctica and found evidence that a parallel universe, like our own, was formed as a result of the Big Bang. https://www.forbes.com/sites/jamiecartereurope/2020/05/21/has-nasa-found-a-parallel-universe-where-time-flows-backwards-the-truth-behind-the-headlines/#211c18e0646d NASA researchers discovered high-energy neutrinos in Antarctica that were moving away from the center of the earth into space. This should not happen because high energy neutrinos that came from space from the other side of the earth should be absorbed in the earth's core. But since they were discovered, it was concluded that they came from a parallel…

My publisher is in India and is hung up a while. But there are people with time on their hands who could be considering my work. It is a paper about particle and field theory. It is my life's work. I think the google drive link is: LINK DELETED William LaMar

Hi all, I would like to refer to the following video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1THwiaXZfzA which implies that what we see here is some kind of an "aliens spaceship" from out of space. I think that this is Ridiculous. Check minute 0:50 and minute 1:15 in the video - that is the so called "UFO" that they saw. I claim that this is just a small insect on the camera lens, and I don't understand how people can be so blind and not see it. The aircraft's infrared camera sits inside a pod as you can see here: https://www.raytheon.com/sites/default/files/inline-images/rtn_475606.jpg The insect probably got inside when maintenance …

Dear scienceforum.net, As of late i've been trying to investigate the non-mainstream claim i've heard around on certain "crank" youtube channels or in comment sections in relation to relativistic acceleration (constant proper acceleration). Some of these layman or non-mainstream critics of special relativity have claimed that because the electromagnetic interaction is finite in speed (rather than being instantaneous) that the slow drop off to a constant velocity in the long run (never reaching the speed of the interaction "c") can be fully explained or expected under a classical model of the interaction. What this model is or how it explains nor mathematically reali…

Hello all, Dr.Phillis is specialist in what is called "Sacred Geometries".He is physicist (Ph.D) and seems to devote whole his life to demonstrate connection between "sacred geometries" of various traditions and modern science,especially superstring theories of physics.His latest book is titled "Mathematical coonection between religion and science". Here is his website: http://www.smphillips.8m.com/ From this article in his website (http://www.smphillips.8m.com/article-2.html) it also follows that he is literal believer in Theosophy. What do you guys think? My point is: if he is right then,well...he should be considered one the most brilliant minids,and mo…

Hello, in my research to a new logic I also encountered the following more physical problem: According to my theory it could be that the interaction of two particles was different (or not possible) if both have previously had different interactions (e.g. since the Big Bang or on a pool table). In practice, particles or billiard balls can always interact with each other, no matter how many and different interactions preceded. Ockham's razor therefore says that the interaction stories are not relevant. I counter this with the "pocket knife of my imagination": We can also assume that all interactions in the universe are always counted, an…

So one of the reasons people don't believe in aliens is because we all think they would breath oxygen right? Well lets think about it what are the chances of aliens being exactly like us: breathing oxygen and having to eat and drink just think about it ok?

You need to encase a circular array of polarized light filters in a donut shaped mirror and let one spot open for sunlight (a sorting demon like doorway) or your flashlight to get into it and see if you can't get more energy than you put in. The first time around the energy put in will drop to 75% but adding another ray along side that 75% should give you 150% by letting the second ray in by opening the door and not letting out the first beam. You can't harness this vacuum energy unless apart of the donut is just magnifying glass. At thousands of percent energy input one could collide spiraling rays of gamma shifted photons, and then on top another quasi…

The deviation should not be as perfectly symmetrical as your charts indicate. First of all what is particle duality, there must be a hidden world of variables, like dark matter - causing two specific effects as well as a particle being in two places at once: Double slit, if it's dark matter take the elementary particle and reverse it's charge to get your hidden variable. Particle asymmetry is broken after a duration passes, reverse that asymmetry and you get your pair which is tangible. So for the double slit, the photons used to see into the beam adds thermal energy to the system, this heat is like glue. But if you have a hidden world of asymmetric particles at that…

Nothing is infinite part2 To prove nothing can reach infinity I will present you the physics of engineering. Please refer to the illustrations of the diagram attached to my theory before reading on. 1 pound can lift a trillion tons. This is possible with the physics of the engineering of the lever where a bar is placed on a fulcrum and the fulcrum is situated underneath the right location under the bar. In other words, if you place a trillion ton weight on one end of the bar. The fulcrum can be placed under anywhere under the bar near the trillion ton weight. To execute the one pound weight on the other end of the bar to lift the trillion tons you must extend t…

An alternative equation for the wavefunction and its eigenfunctions is provided in the linked video. These alternative equations result in graphs that look the same as those of the wavefunction and its eigenfunctions despite the fact the mathematics are unrecognizably different. This new equation is, in its simplest form, what looks like an x eigenfunction but with spins 1/2, 1 or 0. This single equation is divided by copies of itself to form the energy and momentum eigenfunctions. The zero spin x eigenfunction is argued to be the equation for a particle and an expression of an x axis that is relativistic and the change in the location of x=0 over time traces the path of …

There are three major holes in our current understanding of cosmology including the big bang(inflation). Scientists are dying to know the answers to them. our current model predicts many specific things that have been confirmed repeatedly to extremely accurate levels, but a refinement is needed for this theory and I know it sounds crazy of me but I feel like ive done it simply and logically in a way that a high school kid could understand. If this interests you but you don't know physics, here is a simple explanation of the three main holes so that you can simply grasp the rest of a refined straightforward hypothesis that if correct would be groundbreakingly huge. …

All digital reverses order KE=kinetic energy PE=potential energy Kinetic energy is equal to potential energy or the equation is as follows KE=PE + 0. Manipulate it and you get KE-PE=0. The zero refers to digital zero. An identical equation is KE=PE(1). Manipulate it and you get KE/PE=1. The one refers to digital one. From the equation KE=PE you get 4 identical versions listed below: 1) KE=PE + 0 --> KE-PE=0 2) PE=KE + 0 --> -KE+PE=0 3) KE=PE(1) --> KE/PE=1 4) (-1)KE=(-1)PE(1) --> -KE=-PE(1) --> -KE/-PE=1 In equation 1, kinetic energy is positive while potential energy is negative. In equation 2, …

Interesting the use of a prism, let me tell you a story. if all things are created naturally then it stands to reason that all elements are crystals with their own designs. it is this shape in the crystalline structure a natural process that can refract energy that is everywhere around us but yet to be proven. the energy comes from a place outside our universe it is a constant supply and will be for what is considered an infinite amount of time. The crystalline structures are stimulated into a symmetrical shape so fast that the refractions land into the middle of this action creating what is called neutron. the proton are really just tips of a stimulated crystal as…

All physics equations are essentially functions. All functions extend infinitely. In the case of E=MC squared because mass and energy is conserved the function on the graph cannot extend forever it will come to an abrupt halt in converting mass into energy. The term terminal velocity describes why nothing can accelerate forever. The velocity of the object or particle will render the function finite. In the case of relativity which states an object with mass would require an infinite amount of inertial mass and kinetic energy as it approaches infinitely closer to the speed of light. Due to terminal velocity that function which extends infinitely on a graph will end s…

I think all the information is already there. No one has been able to put all the pieces together. If you merge a new interpretation of String Theory with QM and Relativity, you can explain things. String theory proves that the universe exists in more than 4 dimensions. Relativity shows us that the universe works in a fluidic manner. If you assume that the extra dimensions of string theory is the missing fluid fabric of the universe, and the curled up dimensions are the molecules of the fluid, you explain a lot. With this concept quantum particles are in fact both particles and waves. They are waves in the extra dimensions. At the points where the wave reaches a r…

High energy state volumes such as the Sun transfers the volumes high energy to lower energy state volumes in transition . A volume of absolute space would effectively have E=0 and as a consequence of this , the maximum potential to gain energy as in accordance with thermodynamics , ''cold things reach room temperature'' . It is my belief that high energy is attracted to lower energy states , the force I assume is a gravitational transition ? >E attracted to <E volumes ? Force gravity = <E ? Thank you for your consideration and answers in advance .