Jump to content

Edgard Neuman

Senior Members
  • Content Count

    195
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

-11 Bad

1 Follower

About Edgard Neuman

  • Rank
    Baryon

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://oneeyejack2.wordpress.com/

Profile Information

  • Favorite Area of Science
    Physics

Recent Profile Visitors

4078 profile views
  1. I'm sorry you don't understand my model. I'll do maybe some computer simulation one day. I've already simulated big classical pools of particles (IfI still can, I will publish here the results, even if they contradict me of course) So i may be right (even if you don't understand how), but nobody while never know because of the rules of the forum ? Be the way, anybody (I mean somebody who knows that stuff better than me) can do the math. Please be my guest. (I don't even want to be credited, that's not why I'm here and I respect the work of course)
  2. ok now the censoreship.. Good for you. Blind yourself and punish the others. That's how science works apparently. I'm so used to it, it's not even painfull anymore.
  3. As I explain you can also view planck constant as frequency of perturbation propagation of the vaccum. (It has to be to fit with wavelength of your model waves). In my model it's like a sound frequency equivalent : the wave of perturbation in the vaccum.. (but different. I don't precisely now how. Picture a sound propagating but with QED interactions)
  4. Here it is : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planck_constant You know my model has to fit with all the experiments ever done. So yes, that probably the number you're looking for.
  5. This is called the law of big numbers .Learn about that. You only see the stable result, the stable history that remains at the end of mess. And you have to understand the scale : the plank scale, where vaccuum noise exist is much much smaller that structures like atoms or molecule. A electron, is a very very lonely charge density anomalie in a very otherwise sea of equal proportions of both charges For the model to work, the vaccum density (the lenght of particle travelling without interactions) should be so small that it can still explain protons etc.. so yes very different scales.
  6. BECAUSE PHOTON CAN INTERACT WITH EACH OTHER TO GIVE ELECTRON AND POSITRON. The interaction is symetrical by time inversion of course . The vacuum contains much more photons : they create pairs when they interact. The interaction may still be classical. You know that positron have to be taken into account in any feynman diagram, or as a field in the mainstream theory. So even in your model they are present as virtual particles I have to explain to you the premise of the model again and again.. ?
  7. PLEASE. FLUCTUATION DENSITY OF VACCUM PARTICLE. BECAUSE A TYPE OF IT CANCELS THE EFFECT OF THE OTHER TYPE, THE WHOLE THING BEHAVE LIKE A WAVE. A WAVE. IN MY MODEL I SEE INTERFERENCES. If I gave you 10 $, and then I give you 10 anti-$. YOU HAVE NOW 0. THEY MAY BE CLASSICAL AND STILL CANCEL OUT INTO PHOTONS. And even better : the wave have a frequency depending on the vaccum density..
  8. What are you talking about now. My picture explain how vaccuum density fluctuation behave like waves. (YES WAVES destructive constructive, reacting to slits. WAVES. ) EMERGING FROM CLASSICAL PARTICLE . YES THATS POSSIBLE. Your slit experiment problem you try to pin on my model doesn't exist. SORRY. NO CLASSICAL SOLUTION IF only accound for real particle, In my model, VP PARTICLE are the vaccum particle. We can go in circle for years this way.
  9. Because he only account for real particle (air etc..).. In my model they are only SOME LOCAL DENSITY ANOMALY of charges in the vaccum. I SAID IT FIT YOUR EXPERIMENTS. I try but you obvioulsy aren't even able to picture a field of real particle. Even when I use pictures.
  10. And that explain the existence of virtual particle ? The average formula now have powers over matter ? Are you God ? My model fits your experiments, eventhough you don't understand how, I do.
  11. Do what you want ! I now what I choose to believe. (I don't think "you can only supply words and pictures" is a valid criteria, but you do what you want). Also that is just a model. I suppose some things have to be adjusted. Exactly how the interaction take place, the set of particles and possible interactions (I just have to be globally neutral).. for instance why the Fine-structure constant (1/137) I have no idea.
  12. No you really can't. You can't say : their maybe a cat in my empty room, so it explain the mess. The cat poped out and it disappear, only because, according to probabilities "there may be a cat in my room" . You just can't use your stastical description of reality to explain existence of thing (that not a "classical" or "quantum principle" that's the DEFINITION OF WHAT PROBABILITIES ARE.). Sorry. "I'm hungry and poor. but according to probabilities the average money is 10000 $ per person in america. I'm in america : let's spend that money then !" .NO YOU CAN'T.
  13. So you're talking about the temperature ASSOCIATED with a field of real photon using the black body formula. Is there a black body emiting those photons ? You know that real photon are photon with the right energy to interact. Black body interaction are real, but a body can be plonged into photon and only the right one interact. Do you understand that or not ?
  14. Well now that's enough talk. If you can't understand that, and how it is SIMPLER IN EVERY WAY. How you can deduce your physics from as statistical result of vaccum interaction.. If you don't see how to explain scattering, wave behavior, and everything from my model, this is just hopeless. I've inform you, use your brain or not, I don't care. I've done my part.
  15. Temperature is the measure of particle (real) agitation. if the scale of the brownian noise created by the vaccum is much smaller, it may not change agitation mass at atome or molecule scale. Because at larger scale than the noise, it statically flatten.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.