Speculations
Pseudoscientific or speculatory threads belong here.
The Speculations forum is provided for those who like to hypothesize new ideas in science. To enrich our discussions above the level of Wild Ass Guesswork (WAG) and give as much meaning as possible to such speculations, we do have some special rules to follow:
- Speculations must be backed up by evidence or some sort of proof. If your speculation is untestable, or you don't give us evidence (or a prediction that is testable), your thread will be moved to the Trash Can. If you expect any scientific input, you need to provide a case that science can measure.
- Be civil. As wrong as someone might be, there is no reason to insult them, and there's no reason to get angry if someone points out the flaws in your theory, either.
- Keep it in the Speculations forum. Don't try to use your pet theory to answer questions in the mainstream science forums, and don't hijack other threads to advertise your new theory.
The movement of a thread into (or out of) Speculations is ultimately at the discretion of moderators, and will be determined on a case by case basis.
6798 topics in this forum
-
I don't think the double slit should count as there is a good chance those two waves going through the slits are entangled. What do you know about unobserved quantum wave behavior?
-
0
Reputation Points
- 54 replies
- 8.8k views
- 3 followers
-
-
My Triple DNA Bases model based on modified pyrene(C16H10) molecules has a issue with "Tautomerism" !!! (First Image) So, I had to include the Tautomerism into my design !!! (Second Image)
-
0
Reputation Points
- 63 replies
- 28.5k views
- 3 followers
-
-
Let me introduce for your attention a very interesting mechanical system. It is called: "Varipend." Variable pendulum ( VariPend = VARIable + PENDulum) A pendulum of variable length and mass, implemented in an isolated system. - the case increases its mass - working moving mass decreases The mass of the entire system is unchanged! [math]M(t) = {m_{liquid}}(t) + {m_{case}}(t) = const[/math] The total momentum of the Varipend system: [math]{{\vec p}_{var}}(t) = {m_{liquid}}(t)\;{{\vec v}_1}(t) + {m_{case}}(t)\;{{\vec v}_2}(t)[/math] …
-
0
Reputation Points
- 73 replies
- 7.8k views
- 2 followers
-
-
My theories that Strange keeps locking may be vindicated ..and stolen at the same time. https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg24332440-600-quantum-weirdness-isnt-real-weve-just-got-space-and-time-all-wrong/
-
0
Reputation Points
- 17 replies
- 2k views
- 2 followers
-
-
Time doesn't pass in a black hole (past the event horizon) because unobserved quantum waves don't use time. If unobserved quantum waves don't use time, is it a safe bet they are using frequency instead? The quantum field is usually intermixed with spacetime, but apparently it doesn't always have to be.
-
0
Reputation Points
- 1 reply
- 774 views
- 1 follower
-
-
I have a theory for discussion that time is created by the expansion of space. I propose that every point of space in the universe is expanding at the speed of light and time as we perceive it is the measurement of the potential to move into the space created. This creates a reality horizon. A physical barrier if you like which is light speed. When you travel in space you are closer to the horizon in the direction you are moving meaning that space in front is effectively expanding slower creating a time dilation for the object in motion. Travelling at the speed of light would mean that space would not be expanding in the direction of travel at all so there woul…
-
0
Reputation Points
- 15 replies
- 2.2k views
- 1 follower
-
-
"Dark" implies something is unobservable. So that's what Dark Matter/Energy are. Dark Energy is the unobservable quantum field. Quantum objects don't use spacetime, but spacetime's gravity can bend the fabric of the quantum field. Dark Matter is matter that normally would convert over to spacetime naturally but doesn't. It's found in abundance as halos around galaxies. Which leads me to believe it's a substance that held together galaxies before spacetime was turned on.
-
0
Reputation Points
- 11 replies
- 1.5k views
- 2 followers
-
-
Over the past several years I posted inquiries in this forum a few times as I developed my theory. A few folks were considerate and helpful, in particular Mordred. Most were rude and derisive, so I stopped participating here. My final theory was published today as peer reviewed in the Journal of Cosmology, Vol. 26, #21, at: http://journalofcosmology.com/JOC26/General%20Relativity%20and%20Effects%20in%20Time%20as%20Causation%20JofC.pdf. I would now be interested in non-derisive discussion.......
-
0
Reputation Points
- 291 replies
- 32.2k views
- 5 followers
-
-
Just for a minute, think what the collapsing core of a black hole is doing to spacetime. It creates its own space and lots of it. There is vastly more space inside a black hole than it takes up in our universe. Looking from the outside, space is reversed, with more and more space as you approach the center. What this looks like from inside, is that the event horizion is in the center and the initial mass that collapsed is fleeing into outer space. There is a quantum leap at the event horizon. You either go slower than light on this side of the event horizon, or go slower than light on the other side of the event horizon. Time always elapses forward but space reverses. Rel…
-
0
Reputation Points
- 23 replies
- 2.5k views
- 2 followers
-
-
You have a double slit with opposite linear polarizers at each slit. You get an observed clump. You then add a 45 degree polarizer and the fringes come back. It's not because the which way information is getting erased. It's because the particle starts a new life when passing through multiple filters. The state of a particle is predetermined based on the path it will fly through. But something interesting happens with you place multiple detectors. The particles state is reassessed while passing through a polarizer. If it sees another polarizer in its path it's going to cycle back to being a wave. Atoms normally shake around with thermal energy ..but not a…
-
0
Reputation Points
- 3 replies
- 808 views
-
-
You make a request by setting something that can analyze the particle during its life/path. You are saying you want the particle to be real/physical. Double slit interpretation: Randomly shot particles are shot through a double slit, if no one places a detector in the path of the particle, the unobserved particle will be in the form of two waves (one for each slit) . Depending on the which wave ends up with more energy (after the split) ..the final position of a channel representing a fringe will be the final resting place of the now collapsed particle. If the energy wasn't unbalanced, I would expect to see only a single channel of fringe be filled in. Now …
-
0
Reputation Points
- 102 replies
- 13.8k views
- 6 followers
-
-
I had a random idea recently that popped in my head out of nowhere. The Idea itself is that mass such as Earth is occupying space. The space occupied therefore is now encompassing the mass in layers evenly around it. Space is not a substance and cannot exert pressure downward on mass. However space has been proven to constantly expand, Expansion is a form of movement which I could assume would also be a form of energy however undefined that energy may be. So if that energy of space expansion exists, Than the closer you are to the layers of space the stronger this energy becomes. I propose that the expansion force does exert constant flow towards all mass due to spa…
-
0
Reputation Points
- 22 replies
- 2.7k views
- 3 followers
-
-
Its my belief that the Universe has always been here. I believe time and space are both infinite. Its also my belief that Gravity is created by matter and only effects matter, without any effect on time or space.
-
0
Reputation Points
- 9 replies
- 1k views
- 2 followers
-
-
The scientific community’s understanding, at present, is that the spacetime continuum exists, but there is no clear understanding of how or what it’s made of. One of the major objectives of physics is to unify quantum mechanics with general relativity in a theory of everything. All expectations are that some very abstract mathematical equation will solve everything. However, it is possible to reason out the mechanism that causes QM and GR by considering some facts and their implications. Let’s start with an event and then consider the spacetime interval. The spacetime interval is a mathematical formulation that starts with an event that is seen by two observers…
-
0
Reputation Points
- 25 replies
- 4.6k views
- 1 follower
-
-
If space is defined as the first three dimension would you then define time as the next three dimensions also running perpendicular to each other in the same way as space does? If so would it create a system that works as: dimension zero (a point in space) dimension one (a line in space), dimension two (a plane in space), dimension three (an area in space), dimension four (a point in time), dimension five (a line in time), dimension six (a plane in time), dimension seven (an area in time), or a system that works as: dimension zero (a point in space) dimension one (a line in space), dimension two (a plane in spa…
-
0
Reputation Points
- 39 replies
- 4.8k views
- 3 followers
-
-
(E)=1(E·V1 /(U·I1) (E)E2 (Q2) where E=Eq(L) V1=Eq(V1-U-I) U1=Eq(U1-II) II=Eq(II-U2-1) (Eq(1)) = 2l/E (Eq(2)) = (1)(E0). = 2l/E U0=Eq(V0-E1-U1-I) I0=Eq(I0-II0-U2-1) (1)E = Eq(2) (2)E = Eq(4) (Equal): (1) E = Eq(3) In conclusion, For whatever reason this formula is so easy to apply to anything, that I would be curious to know, why it works with "nothing"?
-
0
Reputation Points
- 1 reply
- 586 views
- 1 follower
-
-
Hello All, I've posted here because, if you choose to engage, our discuss will primarily encompass my personal perspective of the research and metadata I've privately studied and amassed over several decades. My goal has been a personal understanding of the extraordinary capabilities of our unconscious mind relative to our consciousness. My hope is that this discussion will be accessible to all as I consider myself merely a layman on the subject and material. Before we begin in earnest, if you're still with me, we should probably agree on use and understanding of terms, which is no doubt a separate discussion in itself. Nevertheless: Mind- The environmen…
-
0
Reputation Points
- 13 replies
- 1.8k views
- 1 follower
-
-
Modern general theory of relativity considers gravity as the curvature of space-time. The theory is based on the principle of equivalence. All bodies fall with the same acceleration in the gravitational field, which is equivalent to locally accelerated reference systems. In this article, we will affirm the concept of gravity as the curvature of the relative wave function of the Universe. That is, a change in the phase of the universal wave function of the Universe near a massive body leads to a change in all other wave functions of bodies. The main task is to find the form of the relative wave function of the Universe, as well as a new equation of gravity for connecting t…
-
0
Reputation Points
- 4 replies
- 1.1k views
-
-
Does anyone agree that we should convert our understanding of spacetime into mechanisms of quantum mechanics? Something that explains time, distance, energy, mass into a more intuitive system?
-
0
Reputation Points
- 118 replies
- 21.5k views
- 3 followers
-
-
[disclaimer] don't ask for math, I can't do math! With observer effect there's a reference in time and space, thus time is calculable and will dilate in known measures. Without observer effect, there are no set reference in time and space, so time will dilate by say 100^10000000000 (random figure) and length contract. - this will explain quantum entanglement "spooky action from a distance" - this will also explain quantum tunneling since everything by trillion of years will be destroyed, so the photon can unhindered pass the destroyed space A beginning is defined by a set time with a reference in time and space, without a set time and reference in time a…
-
0
Reputation Points
- 98 replies
- 11.9k views
- 3 followers
-
-
This is an extract of "Appendix A" in my manuscript on a new theory which can be accessed through the link in my profile if someone would be interested. The real Equation of Force is F = ma Today's Physics is stating that the Equation of Force is F = dp/dt. We will analyze the equation of motion of rockets to see that the real Equation of Force is: F = ma A rocket has variable mass in its trajectory and it's important to see its motion equation. Let m be its variable mass at any instant in its movement composed by the mass of the rocket plus the mass of its contained fuel. I have made a search in the internet about rocket motion equatio…
-
0
Reputation Points
- 50 replies
- 10k views
- 3 followers
-
-
An amendment to the introduction/abstract of my paper of the Unified Field Theory explaining resistance is what leads to time and mass. The more resistance the more time and weight...in 3 dimensions. The field described here provides a foundation which makes for clear simple logical explanations of gravity, electromagnetism, quantum entanglement, light, matter, teleportation, radio waves, radiation with the underlying principle being that everything we perceive is essentially vibrations/energy passing through the field. The field is a flexible fabric made up of quantum balls/particles connected by quantum string which are invisible at rest becoming visible when exci…
-
0
Reputation Points
- 8 replies
- 1.6k views
- 2 followers
-
-
This is my equation for the observable Universe mass, based upon the Cosmic Energy Inventory (CEI) parameters and the Hubble Space Telescope (HST) parameters in (SI) units. Universe observable parameters: Universe total observable radius: [math]R_u = 4.408 \cdot 10^{26} \; \text{m} \; \; \; (46.6 \cdot 10^{9} \; \text{ly})[/math] CEI stellar Baryon density: [math]\Omega_s = 0.00205[/math] HST observable stellar number: [math]N_s = 10^{22}[/math] Solar mass: [math]M_{\odot} = 1.989 \cdot 10^{30} \; \text{kg}[/math] Observable Universe mass: [math]\boxed{M_u = \frac{N_s M_{\odot}}{\Omega_s}}[/math] [math]\boxed{M_u = 9.705 \cdot 10^{54} \; \text{kg}}[/math] Any disc…
-
0
Reputation Points
- 78 replies
- 21.5k views
- 2 followers
-
-
This topic is about the gravitational effects of the singularity. Get ready for shocking news ! "I dont understand why we the theory of quantum gravity would apply at a singularity of a black hole . Quantum gravity would describe the gravitational interactions between subatomic particles . On the other hand the mass of the black is too big for any quantum effects . But on the other hand we have a singularity which is dimensionless so it can be considered a quantum system . I think all the confusion begins from there : if we need to study the singularity as a quantum system or without quantum effects . " What does this mean? …
-
0
Reputation Points
- 27 replies
- 2.4k views
- 1 follower
-
-
Well this topic is about a crazy idea I came up about space-time . I was wondering how everything came from nothing . I mean we have positive mass and energy but in the beginning we should have an absolute 0 . Ok so what if space-time is a substance and is made of subatomic particles as well ? Earth bends space-time . And every object with big enough mass-energy bends it . But this bending doesn't it look like the space-time is "repulsed" from the object? I know it is very crazy but it explains how everything came to be . Before big bang there wasn't anything . And suddenly quantum fluctuations started happening and created positive and negative mass ( negative mass be…
-
0
Reputation Points
- 14 replies
- 1.1k views
- 1 follower
-