Speculations
Pseudoscientific or speculatory threads belong here.
The Speculations forum is provided for those who like to hypothesize new ideas in science. To enrich our discussions above the level of Wild Ass Guesswork (WAG) and give as much meaning as possible to such speculations, we do have some special rules to follow:
- Speculations must be backed up by evidence or some sort of proof. If your speculation is untestable, or you don't give us evidence (or a prediction that is testable), your thread will be moved to the Trash Can. If you expect any scientific input, you need to provide a case that science can measure.
- Be civil. As wrong as someone might be, there is no reason to insult them, and there's no reason to get angry if someone points out the flaws in your theory, either.
- Keep it in the Speculations forum. Don't try to use your pet theory to answer questions in the mainstream science forums, and don't hijack other threads to advertise your new theory.
The movement of a thread into (or out of) Speculations is ultimately at the discretion of moderators, and will be determined on a case by case basis.
6798 topics in this forum
-
Good day. I have a project on power industry. I receive the electric power on the basis of a renewable energy resource. It will be possible to receive the electric power 24 hours a day, 365 days in a year, generation of the electric power will happen at one level all the time, that is, no stores of the electric power will be necessary and the electric power can be given directly to a electrical grid of the country. It will be possible to construct power plant of any power for electricity supply of the whole city or any country. Because the power plant works at a renewable energy resource it is not necessary to transport any energy carriers on power plant, that is, the ele…
-
0
Reputation Points
- 15 replies
- 2.1k views
- 2 followers
-
-
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Covalent_bond When you think about that atoms send out waves. You can see it here... Then you think about waves that erase by itself and leave a vacuum or at the othe way a pressure. The h2o molecule, maybe, sorry the picture is in gernan, but on the other side of the two atoms is maybe a vacuum that stabilize the molecule.
-
0
Reputation Points
- 1 reply
- 715 views
- 1 follower
-
-
Think about it, when you know about wave breakers at the coast. Maybe the wave that we call electrons are so sensible that gives only a point and explodes like a soap bulb, when this was correct then its nothing other as a wave. You can test it very easily, you must take a chamber or a same thing with a slit and then you dont put the detector in the direction of the slit where you can look. You must set the detector next to the slit behind the wall, then you can check if an electron is a wave or a particle. And important is that the walls of the chamber dont reflects the electrons then the experiment gone wrong. The detector was the wave breaker a…
-
0
Reputation Points
- 2 replies
- 816 views
- 1 follower
-
-
Regarding the alleged plenty of scientific evidence and experiments confirming the special and general relativity, the summary list of which is presented in the article "What is the experimental basis of Special Relativity?", available on the link: http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/SR/experiments.html , it is not possible to treat this list of experiments as confirmation of the truth of the SR. A significant part of the experiments quoted there concerns the null results of the Michelson-Morley experiment and many other similar experiments. In any case, these experiments can not be a confirmation of the truth of Special Relativity, because in fact…
-
0
Reputation Points
- 10 replies
- 2k views
- 2 followers
-
-
Awhile back I posted an engine design of just the cylinder where the piston goes up and down, and it wasn't complete. It had a row of X's that encircle the interior of the cylinder a bit below half way down just below the gas vapor entry points (the vapor entry points are facing each other from opposite sides of the cylinder). The point is that I'm trying to make it suck the piston down. The row of X's are metallic ribbons that poke up along the perimeter in repeated side-by-side X's. But you need two holes, and you shape them so it's difficult for air to blow out upon explosion, and easier to blow in from outside (I drew it so it curves in the drawing in the side dr…
-
0
Reputation Points
- 4 replies
- 1.1k views
- 1 follower
-
-
Bio-weapons better than nuclear weapons?
-
0
Reputation Points
- 6 replies
- 1.6k views
-
-
Related to global warming there will be many crises….how do you think the 'world' will react? Peaceful or WO3?
-
0
Reputation Points
- 11 replies
- 2.2k views
-
-
this is my last one I post here. life > nature > rationality Self conscious,irrationality and analogy, induction 1: Rational thinking and the self of rational thinking If and only if we know the definition of self in human thinking, can we know the structure of human thinking. I will start by discussing the basis of rational thinking-formal logic and use logical paradox as testing. There are three basic laws of formal logic. 1: The law of identity 2: The law of non-contradiction 3: The law of excluded middle The law of identity states that something i…
-
0
Reputation Points
- 1 reply
- 753 views
-
-
Chain fusion then chain fission repeat 1 Hydrogen > Uranium 2 Uranium > Hydrogen 3 repeat simplest formula of cyclical chain nuclear fusion/fission reaction This is the element modifying formula This will change the world Theoretical will become practical with radioactive protection that will be developed sooner, or later, or never, and this will make humans create, modify or destroy elements (material) as they feel like. Element creating/modifying vending machines or for homes use to create periodic table elements (discovered and undiscovered) there are possibly 1000s of undiscovered periodic elements that is human made so incom…
-
0
Reputation Points
- 16 replies
- 2.1k views
- 2 followers
-
-
Simultaneity: special relativity, matter wave, uncertainty principle and QM By Xuefeng Frank Yuan 1: Relational value and its correlational value: symmetry of relational values For any two associated physical quantities present, such as space and time or a pair of conjugate variables, the relational value reflecting the changes of two associated physical quantities, such as the speed or the product of conjugate variables changes, corresponds to a correlational value. This correlational value also reflects the changes of the associated physical quantities. The relational value and its correlational value satisfy two…
-
0
Reputation Points
- 2 replies
- 993 views
-
-
Non-real relational values and simultaneity: the relationship between special relativity, matter wave and uncertainty principle 1: For any two associated physical quantities present in physics, such as time and space or a pair of conjugate variables, the relational value reflecting the two associated physical quantities changes, such as the velocity or the product of conjugate variables, is the real relational value. It corresponds to a non-real relational value. The non-real relational value also reflects the changes of the associated physical quantities. The real relational value is defined by the relevant physical quantities, so it cannot alone prove the c…
-
0
Reputation Points
- 6 replies
- 1.2k views
- 2 followers
-
-
there is no wave, just act like wave. I have one article to prove superposition is equal to the law of middle or included the middle. another one is tell how a thing satisfy the law of middle exist. Superposition principle and irrationality.docx Non-real relational values and simultaneity.docx
-
0
Reputation Points
- 59 replies
- 6k views
- 2 followers
-
-
It is quite possible to construct a theory based on a false hypothesis and continue to create further ad hoc hypotheses to cover an entourage of anomalies as long as they keep on coming forth. This situation is true for both Big Bang Theory (Dark Matter, Dark Energy, Asymmetric Matter-Antimatter Reactions, Decomposing Dark Matter) and Quantum Theory (first created as a massless speed of light particle with negligible interaction with matter, explaining the range of beta emissions, and becoming a magic entity [non-conservational] like BigBangium] making it a panacaea of ad hoc covers across both extreme disciplines, from sub-PARTICLE physics [let’s face it] to cosmology!!…
-
0
Reputation Points
- 2 replies
- 932 views
- 1 follower
-
-
I propose that Rutherfords hypothesis of neutrons in the nucleus is incorrect, and that this hypothesis stands in the way of an understanding of gravity akin to that of magnetism. Magnetism has been shown to be a Special Relativistic effect of opposite charges in different inertial frames. Gravity may be understood as a General Relativistic effect of opposite charges in different non-inertial frames in similar manner. If correct, we have a basis for an expanding universe due to a gravitational dipole resulting from the opposite charges on the antiparticles of the electron and the proton. Fred Hoyle's Steady State Universe would then be possibility.
-
0
Reputation Points
- 43 replies
- 6.6k views
- 2 followers
-
-
Imagine a spherical volume of space and time representing a photon as 60 iterations that reduce, via sphere eversion, by one planck length at a time: x^2+y^2+z^2-n=4/3pix^3 x/((2(3^59))=1.616229e-35 x=1.616229e-35*((2(3^59))) x=4.56758796e-7 x^2+y^2+z^2+n=(4/3*pi*4.56758796e-7)^3 x+y+z=square root(7.0036847e-18-n) x+y+z=7.0036847e-18^(1/2)-n^(1/2) n^(1/2)=7.0036847e-18^(1/2)-(3(4.56758796e-7)) n=7.0036847e-18^(1/2)-(3(4.56758796e-7))^2 8x-6y-4z-7=2.6445699e-9 8x-6y-4z=2.6445699e-9+7 4x-3y-2z=(2.6445699e-9+7)/2 4x-3y-2z=3.50000000132 S(0)=x^2+y^2+z^2+4x-3y-2z-3.50000000132=0 S(60)=x^2+y^2+z^2+4x-3y-…
-
0
Reputation Points
- 6 replies
- 1.9k views
-
-
-
Hi Everyone I would firstly like to start by saying that I fully understand why us humans are not able to use quantum entanglement for FTL communication. It is because we can't force an outcome without breaking the entanglement and we can't detect as soon as a measurement has been made at the other end. My question is this: Does quantum entanglement mean that the Universe itself has privileged access to a means of FTL communication for its own administrative purposes? (I can't see how quantum entanglement would work otherwise.) Thank you very much Kind regards Tim
-
0
Reputation Points
- 25 replies
- 5.3k views
- 3 followers
-
-
I think no other war in history had so many potential alternative scenarios which could have easily change the course of entire history as WWII. It includes: 1) Why Japan chose to attack US in Dec. 1941 instead attacking USSR together with Germany and Italy in Jun. 1941? Wouldn't it have a much better chances of success? And what would happen if Japan would attack USSR instead of US? 2) Why Germany proclaimed war on US in Dec. 1941 right after US proclaimed war on Japan? If Japan failed Hitler and proclaimed neutrality in war in Europe, why Hitler decided to remember an ally obligations in Dec. 1941? Wouldn't it be much clever decision for Germany to abstain fro…
-
0
Reputation Points
- 6 replies
- 2.1k views
-
-
Irrationality and logical paradox 1: Rational thinking and the self of rational thinking If and only if we know the definition of self in human thinking, can we know the structure of human thinking. I will start by discussing the basis of rational thinking-formal logic and use logical paradox as testing. There are three basic laws of formal logic. 1: The law of identity 2: The law of non-contradiction 3: The law of excluded middle The law of identity states that something is what it is. Expressed as symbols: A = A. The law of non-contradiction says that a …
-
0
Reputation Points
- 1 reply
- 664 views
-
-
We are sensitive to music. What about matter? Is there a song that impresses protons, neutrons, or electrons? A song that can have testable physical or biological effects? The colors of the spectrum of light remind us of a chord of seven consecutive notes (built with musical intervals of seconds). Could chords on the radio spectrum be new lights to determine relevant scientific advances? For example one: 4243 Hz 4495 5045 5345 6000 6735 7560 equivalent to F# G A Bb C D E (frequency relation G: F # = 1.0594631) or a 7000 Hz 7857 8819 9899 11112 11773 13214 equivalent to F# G# A# B# C## D# E# Could chords like these at the right frequency …
-
0
Reputation Points
- 8 replies
- 1.8k views
-
-
Hi,is there a technique to slow down an asteroid with the help of other asteriodes or the gravity of jupiter?an asteriode with a speed of 10km / h to the pole would it be a risk for the earth?
-
0
Reputation Points
- 3 replies
- 909 views
- 1 follower
-
-
Do you think the gates of heaven are at the center of black holes (speculation)?
-
0
Reputation Points
- 3 replies
- 859 views
-
-
At the risk of being completely idiot here below something I wonder: Step1: the positive & negative on the number line. This above is a representation of the number line, the Real numbers going from zero to positives on the right & negative to the left. Step 2: When it comes to multiplication, we can show the sign rule in the following diagram. Where we have the product of 2 positives is positive. The product of a positive with a negative is a negative, the product of 2 negatives is a positive. Step 3: From the diagram above it comes out that the square of a Real number, positive or negative, is always positive. As shown below, t…
-
0
Reputation Points
- 83 replies
- 9.5k views
- 1 follower
-
-
What are the pros & cons? I have my own thoughts but do not want to limit the direction of the conversation by including them in the OP.
-
0
Reputation Points
- 216 replies
- 21.7k views
- 5 followers
-
-
All matter is dark matter. If gravity warps space (seems to have been proven back in 1917) then logically all matter is indeed dark matter (yes, even you) depending only on your position in space. This can be revealed by watching numerous videos where they show weights being laid on spandex and throwing marbles around to show how gravity warps space. It is watch the pretty marbles go until you put names on the objects. If there are two weights name one of them Andromeda and the other Milky Way, with a little electron on the back we will call earth. The little marbles call them: photons, x-rays, gamma rays, or any other electromagnetic wave. One can see that the vast…
-
0
Reputation Points
- 7 replies
- 1k views
- 1 follower
-