Speculations

light creats information we are made up . so we cant travel faster than source of our information. we will be able to travel faster than current speed of light for our spacetime, it light shed of its radiation a little become lighter and travel with higher speed. or we enter vaccume through black holes and warm holes.

according to my reading- why electricity is treated independently?- its part of electromagnetism. electrons are basically waves with perticular energy- there is only one electron wave and what observed as an individual electron is local stationary particle of the electron wave field . its like when we measure average tempature of room as X, its an average of many particles in room with different temperatures x1, x2,x3.... etc. gluons are the forces which hold all elementary particles togather. decay should involve chaos and thermodynamics . everything ultimately evaporates as a radiation. its suspected that g…

all the forces in the universe are basically centripetal and centrifugal forces creating radiations with diff quantas perceivable universe is just radiations intereacting (in higgs field)and now its suspected that they originates from vaccume pulsations simphony thats only way to combine classical and quantum physics

I had the unorthodox idea that inside a black hole C might be exceeded for in falling matter and pass into imaginary time. I base this on letting v exceed c in: 1/((1-(v^2/c^2))^(1/2)) If C can't be violated then colonizing the stars is next to hopeless. I don't personally believe that C is absolute. I know this would be a major inconvience for Physics in general. I would venture that at some point Einstein's may of thinking will be replaced just like Newton's was.

be treated seriously. Would you pass class if you completed 15 percent of the exam? Really, one fact that I know is that none of the universe is missing, it's all there just where it belongs. The thing is to comprehend that we do not comprehend what the universe is. So is the universe wrong, the math wrong, or is the math right and we just have no vision to apply the math because what we see is not what we think we see.

So to make stem cells into skin and convert it to shoes

1. Hey Charon, what are the currently available methods for signaling molecules or crispr cas9 delivery into the entire body? What percentage of the body is covered using this method?

How can a person use a computer to design a computer better than itself? Or does it need a person to provide creativity?

A subatomic molecule is a portal. Because there are similar subatomic moleules making all of them connected. One indistinguishable from the other. For instance if you got two identical cups on the table, you dunno which one is your cup, and which one is my cup. But you cannot go through a subatomic particle, because it is too small, and it has an electric field. So you can condense it into a matter wave like Bose Einstein condensate and drop something through it?

Alright, so based on idea of smuggling and inflating a chromosome into a nucleus. I will have to prove that transdifferentiation is possible. And I speculate that dedifferentiation is a form of transdifferentiation. The way that somatic cells becomes induced pluripotent stem cell is a form of cellular transdifferentiation, and therefore all method of transdifferentiation is possible. Let it be liver cell to neuronal cell or muscle cell. I speculate that it should be possible for direct conversion.

I was reading about muon-catalyzed cold fusion, and I thought if muons don't work in cold fusion maybe some other negative subatomic particles would. Muons decay after 2.2 x 10 -6 s, which is too short for cold fusion. Kaons (K-): Charge-parity violation, which generates the matter-antimatter asymmetry of the universe, was discovered in the kaon system in 1964. The lifetime of the kaon is 1.238 x 10 -8 s, too short for cold fusion. Tau lepton: Has a lifetime of 2.9 x 10 -13 s, too short to be considered for cold fusion. We have discovered 64 events of the form e+ + e- > e+- + muon-+ + at least 2 undetected particles for which we have no conv…

Alright, forget bout crispr, there is never going to be a time where crispr can modify every single parts of the body and at a precise location. That gives two methods which is currently science fiction based. 1. Modify DNA with optogenetics. Simple as that, we got the light tweezer, we target a cell, and we use light to "cut" and "piece" together DNA to the desire strands we want. We either use one laser to modify every single cells in a fast pace, or have multiple beams that modify all cells at once. In other words it won't drift too far apart from magnetic field control. 2. Modify DNA with nanomachines Well, talk about advancement in machinery in th…

The goal of this paper is to provide a pragmatic solution to every problem we experience on our planet today. The idea is very simple. Everything we do should be done from the premise of, "I genuinely want what is best for myself and the planet." This means doing everything within the power of the individual to genuinely strive towards manifesting their "higher self" into this world. Practically speaking, this would mean forgiving anybody who has wronged you; spending more time with your children; travelling to the coast; taking that new job; starting a new hobby; learning about a new subject; standing up to whoever makes you feel guilty; confronting whoever makes y…

Who do you imagine has the answers to these questions, and where do you imagine that they got these answers

So if you believe Hubble, and you accept that Einstein was wrong, why do you fight that Einstein was right? Make sense people, and bye the way Einstein DID CERTAINLY PREDICT THAT the gravitational attraction would cause all matter to collapse into a single point. https://www.space.com/31055-removing-cosmological-constant-was-the-blunder.html One of the early implications is that because all matter attracts all other matter, a static universe would not long remain static. The gravitational attraction would cause all matter to collapse into a single point. And even if one did not start with a static universe, the mass distribution of the universe should evol…

I am referring to the possibility that time dilation is the mechanism by which we see not only gravity but also inertia. A metaphoric experiment if you will that describes this mechanism. Suppose we had a kiddie train track 100 m long. We place a student school desk that has track wheels attached to it on the track. We attach a digital timer to the desk and of course a drive mechanism that can maintain a constant velocity. On the track we place two switches that are some distance apart. The first turns the digital timer on and the second turns it off. We put a student in the desk and tell him how far apart the switches are and the total mass of his system. We ask the …

Not only have I lost my patience with all of this I'm debating it not only is what physicist are claiming these days but the point I'm at This throws out gravity no really it does I'm trying to develop a fourth primitive term to hilberts three primitive terms and well it's the logical next step I'll post more if people want me to To admin move there wherever you think it necessary

Hawking radiation derives energy from the black hole(to put it simply). Would we be able to test for the existence of a singularity inside of a black hole by looking at How powerful the Hawking Radiation is at the Event Horizon? I was curious because if a one-dimensional point of infinite density emits Hawking Radiation differently then a given amount of mass at the center of a black hole that has volume due to the distance required for Hawking radiation to "travel?" from the "surface" of the mass to the event horizon. If I'm right about what I just said above(I'm probably not. Someone correct me), then this would be how we could test it: Larger black …

A gravitational field is a model that explains a lot regarding gravitational phenomena but such a field has never been proven.

When I studied relativity I didn't like it because it was not logical. Time dilation? Length contraction? Curved space-time? I had some ideas to explain things differently, but only now, after 25-30 years, armed with new knowledge, I finally obtained a simple, phenomenological theory/model that makes time dilation, curved space-time, frame-dragging, twin paradox and all other peculiar things predicted by Einstein's relativity, and confirmed by experiments, easy to understand. My theory agrees with mainstream relativity in term of results (the math is the same, for now), but is not just a mathematical model that works ... The main idea is that the constancy of …

- The wavelength of light doesn't change at all in the galaxies because the space of the galaxies doesn't expand. - The wavelength of light should be different when it passes through the galaxy or not. However, this is contradictory to the observed result. So, the big bang theory is wrong. The space except galaxy clusters expands during lights pass through the clusters which do not expand. The present expansion ratio of space during lights pass through the cluster of 10 million light years size is H0 x 10 7 years = 7.25x10-4. This ratio corresponds to the variation of wavelength of light (λ2/λ1) in the space except clusters. Hubble constant is estimated as H…

Hello If we are alone in the universe then it is for a reason.Humans would not be a banality in a big universe.And our life will have an important meaning and an important role in this universe.the universe is a perfect organization of information so can humans be the organizers of this information.can organize all the information (Molecules) of the universe with the help of machines for example nanothechnology to change the universe into a livable place. Link removed by mod: as per Rule 2.7And if humans go to infinity then God would be an infinite human civilization.

http://www.baur-research.com/Physics/MPS.pdf

One cannot measure the speed of the wind while flying on a balloon. And no, you cannot prove that ether drag does not exist. You don’t even feel the Earth accelerating and deceleration in its motion.

Proof of 2 + 2 Spacetime corresponding to the two (approximate) inverse square laws: 1) In Special Relativity the transverse directions are not contracted 2) The Coulomb Force doesn't contract spacetime 3) The amplitude of light is contracted in Special Relativity 4) In the Schwarzchild Metric the transverse directions are not contracted 5) The Advancement of the Perihelion of Mercury stays in the orbital plane 6) The Speed of Light equals the Speed of Gravity 7) Kepler's Laws of Ellipses and Coulomb's Law of outer surfaces map spacetime