Speculations

Friends, I am an accountant, MBA. I have worked for over 2 decades in corporate world including as CFO and CEO. I thought there were only 2 things humans had not yet been able to define correctly or measure. Love and the size of the universe. I defined love (or hate) for any person, pet, object, cause or spirit with the same 3 conditions and provided a mathematical formula to measure the love (or hate) in my book called "What is Love? Formula for all Relationships." Now I am working on to define the actual origin of the universe and measuring its size, and some related subjects. I think I can propose a different theory than big bang for the origin…

I am interested about so called Darkmosphere around the cosmos mass objects, and i think that maybe really must be something in the space around cosmic bodies, with variable density from the surface of them and beyond . But this something is not only DM (aka Planck charge of anti - mass, I suppose, but even electric charge +). This may explain why the density is more near the surface caused by electric attraction of DM with negative shell of surface, but not interacting with mass of surface of bodies via anti - mass repulsion. The space around the bodies is physics, with some anti-gravity property, i speculate, which may be the cause of some kind of levitation of ga…

I was looking at RedBarron's gravity generator, and my idea is to have two metal thin plates close together that have the edges joined as well, so it's a closed suface. Vibrating it sufficiently (with acceleration of the vibration) would suck air towards the flat surface that is empty inside. I figured it out by taking a piece of paper to make a torus, but not the usual way. I'll explain later, but the essential idea is join the 4 corners of the paper, and you end up with two holes and the other hole has to be closed. Now make a sphere out of it (join the top edge of that to the left edge and the right edge to the bottom). With the two holes, you get a flat piece of …

I only Have a B.B.A. but my I.Q. is 138. I think I know why there is an existence to anything including laws of physics. link to doc removed per rule 2.7

Have you ever considered superconductivity might be a frozen magnetism (effect) in the cooling fluid, around a (super)conductor (catalyst)? E.g. The cooling fluid has frozen magnetism around near the superconductor surface. That (surface) acts as a catalyst or seed starter for magnetism (domains). The effect is external to the conductor, not internal; & it is (very strongly) magnetic on the outside of the conductor. The superconductor's surface acts as a catalyst to kickstart the magnetic fluid's field, dealing with frozen magnetism in a cold fluid, requiring different temperatures …

This isn't a question of how to create Gravity rather a question on if anyone else has? At least what I'm going to call it till someone can prove it to be something else. It is a budget build version and in no way made in a lab with all the fancy stuff. I didn't just make something move air. This is an actual calculated device with numbers to go with. Whether or not the wheel inside the tube is made to specs is human error on welding and cutting. It was hand made. My first attempt ripped itself apart. It was made of plastic. You can see in the video it vibrates a lot. That's because its not balanced. Its rotating at and around 6k rpm peak. I observed something while osc…

Hi. I would like to read opinions regarding the following. There are old books and there are religions. We know with certainty that religions invoke parts of ancient books to justify the structure of this or that religion. Regardless of that, the old books are full of affirmations of all kinds, including some that we can discuss scientifically today. Take the Bible as an example, although the same thing appears in other ancient books. Regarding the genesis of what exists, it explains that the formation started from nothing. Do I commit abuse assuming that, in that context, the word nothing equals emptiness? In case of not committing abuse, let's continue. The se…

This is the most ABSOLUTE APPROPRIATE LOGICAL EFFECTIVE WAY TO APPROACH ANY PROBLEM IN MATHEMATICS AND PHYSICS OR in essence HIGHER PHYSICS. Infinite Levels of Observation and Perception.

Here'( i)s a spin_off (=sidetrack)) of Ewert's pulley experiment. The driving (=pulling) weight difference (force) (m2-m1)*g=(m1+m2)*a2 (of 2 different masses, stringed over a pully) must accelerate (to drive, all=) the ((total) whole=100%, =sum of) mass m3=m2+m1 (because the rest (=not_different=non_difference) is (equal=) equated_out (as the same, or identical)). a2=g*(m2-m1)/(m1+m2). & a1=-a2, so a1=-g*(m2-m1)/(m1+m2) or swapping the mass difference a1=g*(m1-m2)/(m1+m2) Thus we have the eccentric equation(s) & mass2('s excess, wrt mass1) determines i…

discusses a man named Aldo Costa who has constructed a ferris wheel with 256 (empty, & moveable) wine bottles, (middle in Paris). The mechanism appears rather obvious (to me): the bottles on half of the wheel (vertically seen, left vs right) are (~10 cm) further out radially from the axle, than the other (half) side. The bottles are pushed up at the top (most) & bottom (most parts) of the wheel's circumference using lever rods (at the bottom) & pivots (with guide at the stand's top). Once moved (~10 cm up) each bottle (rotated) stays in position because their pivots …

Hi, I have been recently looking into a thought experiment of a theoretical material which is composed of negative charges (electrons) fused together (with r=0) and positive charges (up quarks) fused together (r=0) so that the magnetic field would equal infinity. The idea with this material is to have the electron-electron pairs and up quark-up quark pairs be placed in orbit around each other and to have the orbits synchronized so that the same charged pairs can accelerate their counterparts up to a greater orbital speed (therefore increasing the magnetic field). Also the pairs with the same charge will have their spins synchronized as well so that they speed up…

please review my 4 page document and reply. EVC.doc

Dear all, Before asking your opinion on the subject that comes, I would first want to rule out a particular prejudice, that of extraterrestrials. A majority of scientists will retort me without delay: "The extraterrestrial life is not proven." Admit, and again the evidence abounds but who does not want to see anything sees nothing. I will answer on the subject of extraterrestrials: The absence of extraterrestrial life is not proven. No scientist in the world can give me wrong. So let's continue. This is the secret that is almost none but I want to bring it to your attention because the time you devote to your scientific research may leave yo…

I am trying to find a way, using psychology and visual recognition techniques, to teach kids from grade three to grade five the basics of maths, so they may learn my more advanced maths earlier. My goal is to filter the maths down, so they may gain confidence to approach science, and then take first year college subjects in high school, so as to prepare them for college studies, or, produce a competent high school graduate. In grades one and two, they should play rummy with cards, to learn to count and add and subtract. This number recognition is essential for higher grades, and, playing scrabble will lead to basic language education for the in a fun game for kids, o…

The human body and that of all organisms is where we find that it is merely something that reacts - matter that is less dense than that of metals yet more dense than gases. This is because the semi metals comprise life, and, they will always. True, that some metals are also there inhibiting us, but, these are there for gentle dissolving, where they slowly dissolve in our bodies and get a lot of influence due to their magnetic fields, of course. These fields will give off some form of radiation, warming the body, as, that is what they are there for. ~ This is like a floating pool cleaning device gives off a meagre amount of soap every now and then, but floats near the…

The Special Theory of Relativity claims that an observer in a spacecraft moving with the speed v relative to e.g. Earth, will always see that the clocks on Earth run more slowly than the clock in the spacecraft, according to the formula for time dilation T = To / (1- (v / c) ^ 2)) ^ 0.5. Let's check the credibility of this claim in the following example: T The reference clock on Earth simultaneously generates radio waves with the frequency f = 1000 Hz, and has an external, very large visible from space, digital display of the date measured by this clock. Assume that the spacecraft on 1.01.2020 takes off from Earth and at a speed of v = 180,000 km /s perfo…

So quick question, are our models of reality based on probability because we cannot observe the universe at certain scales due the thing that we need to observe messing up measurements like light and atom particles. Or is it the other way around? Being that we cannot observe things at such small scales because of the probability and uncertainty of the universe as a whole?

The Moderator has closed a topic of mine, with the following argument: Moderator Note We're a science discussion forum. If you wish to discuss your paper, please post it in the appropriate section, minus the emotional email distractions. If your paper doesn't follow mainstream science, you're welcome to post it in our Speculations section, where you can defend its merits with supportive evidence. Due to the fact that Fundamental Journals is a known predatory publisher, you'll need to present extraordinary evidence for any extraordinary claims. This thread is closed. Then let me exhibit an extraordinar…

Some people misuse the fact that dreams are not completely understood as a method to say that dreams may come from parallel universes. I am trying to win an argument with my friend concerning this topic and I need evidence that contradicts this statement. Though, the burden of proof argument comes into play, please don't comment that as it has already been stated. Surely there must be some logical rule that prevents dreams from occurring in parallel universes if you have an inkling please comment as it will be greatly appreciated.

I have couple questions about the time, measured by 2 light clocks in a frame, which moves at a constant velocity - where one clock is perpendicular and second one is parallel to the direction of motion: https://www.pitt.edu/~jdnorton/teaching/HPS_0410/chapters/Special_relativity_clocks_rods/index.html 1. First, the parallel one - according to SR, distance which is being passed by a photon is in this case reduced due to lenght contraction. When the photon is moving in the same direction, as the entire frame, lenght contraction cancels out the increased distance, caused by motion of the clock (as light is "chasing" the mirror) - this is why, the same time ca…

"The Law is not itself God, nor is God the Law." -Dietrich Bonhoeffer Attempts to achieve total conscienceness exhibit asymptotic freedom. Simplicity and clarity are signposts on the way to truth, but the approach of creationism produces a false simplicity at best. It's wrong to question motives, but the desire to "know" can become obsessive and can turn into a desire for there to be nothing unknown at all as an achievable goal. "Turn key" belief systems do not dispel mystery, they whitewashe it. Now then, to prove that classic creationism is in no way possible would be to prove that an omnipotent creator does not exist. And, quantum mechanics seems to allow f…

This I have been staring at for about half an hour now, and, have found that the elecronegativity can be worked out like the weights of elements I depicted at a earlier point. Basically, you take the atomic number, or, number or protons, and, observe that every time the number increases, (-1) [Atomic radius] (+1) [Ionization] (+1) [Electronegativity], coming to +2 per atomic listing. This means that Hydrogen is [3], and Lithium is [5], okay? Then, that number that it comes to is divided by the row it is on, times by half the column it is listed in, okay? ~ This is still a work in progress, so please help me find out the formula?

Exist borders between Physic’s and Metaphysic’s issues? I suppose that this is a broader list of issues, as the studies of nature are in so many fields. I am interested only in the issue of “particularity” of matter, and indeed in my last post question of why “electron and proton particles” are what they are, so stabile, and so different. As I remember I had “not any answer” on my post about this conundrum. And always, when I have not any satisfactory answer, I scratch my pot of speculation, for finding “whatever kind of a speculative answer” to satisfy myself. Here are my speculations: In Nature must be two kinds of frequencies: 1----“ El…

Isn't 'science' education" actually brainswashing? Yes of course it is, the whole 'education' system is here to dumb people down, take away their creativity and learn to conform. That's why the theories of 'scientists' are so very strange, they can't think straight anymore and confuse mathematics for the real world. It's a sad state of affairs.

This is where the attractive forces themselves come from. If they were not attracted to each other, the whole atom would fall apart, and, there would be no matter. So, if there was no attractive force between other things, due to electromagnetism, there would be no things, world or universe. This follows that the world is held together by electromagnetism and everything is affected by this fundamental force. The atom itself is held together by a neutron that bonds with the protons. This leads to zero friction, as they have bonded. Then,t he electron will be attracted to the proton, held back by the repulsion of the other electrons coming together like a fullerene com…