Speculations

Previously, I have come up with two perpetual motion engine methods; [1] The oscillation method. This would be where we apply force to one side of the oscillator, and have it bounce back at nearly the same amount of energy, applying it into the 'mechanism.' This is added to by the addition of more energy from the source to a new area, maybe in a reversed circle, where the rotation will send more energy than was initial injected to the system. This comes from the balls rebounding and producing, basically, [90%] then [80%] then [70%] and so forth amounts of the initial energy as the balls bounce back and forth. [2] The suction method. This would be where we observ…

well I really wonder how 'something' can come from 'nothing' as the Big Bang implies. of course something like that can't be done, but it is also against all physical laws, right? So how do they explain then that 'something' came from 'nothing"?

Hi, There is now a very simple way to calculate Hubble's Constant, by inputting to an equation, the numerical value of Pi and the speed of light (C) from Maxwell's equations and the value of a parsec. NO space probe measurements (with their inevitable small measuring / interpretation errors) are now required. Hubble's Constant is 'fixed' at 70.98047 PRECISELY. This maths method removes the errors / tolerances that is always a part of attempting to measuring something as 'elusive' as Hubble's Constant. To save you labouring through Astrogeometry, the Hubble 'fixing' equation is :- 2 X by a meg parsec X by light speed (C). This is then divided by Pi to the power of …

If the sun, as predicted, will uncomfortably expand in the far future, couldn't a process be developed of sending mechanisms to enter the solar core to fission the heavier elements before that becomes a critical issue, thus maintaining an appropriate ratio and so keeping the unwanted eventuality at bay?

Hi all, I would like to pose some questions about Gravity as a zero-point-fluctuation force of Puthoff. The article: Zero Point Field cause an oscillation on fundamental particles. (electrons and quarks) and this cause a mutual interaction between those particles. Making the calculations Puthoff observes the correct dependence on distance. (r-2) The questions are: to simulate the presence of a particle outside a macroscopic object it should be sufficient to recreate the variable electromagnetic field that the particle would generate by oscillating. It would be enough to have such a field and the macroscopic object would be attracted by the gravity of the '…

What about an edge surrounding the Universe, acting as a black hole edge? This would explain the accelerated expansion, because the closer a galaxy approaches this massive edge, the faster it will be attracted to it.

Time and space are what make a universe but are they both fundamental things? What I am asking is one the source and the other emergent i.e. does time emerge from space or does space emerge from time? These two things are so closely related and interchangeable that I am asking if it is far more likely they are one in the same thing, for example if you are a certain distance from me you are also a proportional amount of time from me, to be here is to be now so are we really talking about two separate things or just one thing and that which emerges from it? There may be some speculative way to look at time and space that explains their compatibility while maintai…

Preface Now what I’m about to say will befuddle and confuse most of you, ……. and at first you won’t believe me …… because you may have never ever heard or read anything similar before now. Your conscious mind …… did not see …… what you are now reading on your PC monitor. Your optic nerves transmit two (2) channels of streaming video which they received via reflected/radiated light that entered the pupil of your eye, passed through the lens and struck the back of your eye. These inverted images are then transmitted to your subconscious mind which combines the two and with only the center portion of said image being in focus. If reading, …

Hello, first time poster here. Pre algebra mathematics level but fan of theoretical nomenclature and explainations. For a few years the idea of the Higg’s field being the result of white hole decay has haunted me. Most people assume black hole and white hole symmetry but forget to incorporate that Universe creation may symbolize an off symmetric white hole. After the creation of the Universe in dimension (edges), excess energy still existing forced these edges of highly charged space torwards the center. Constantly twisting a dimension of energy until a white hole was created at the center giving the above one integer. The universe in measure of expansion must open before…

1. In the laboratory on Earth, the 2 m long cylinder was filled with air at 20 atmospheres pressure. After opening the small measuring valve, the pressure in the cylinder drops to 10 atmospheres after 200 seconds. Questions: 1. What pressure will be present in this cylinder placed, along the direction of travel, in a spacecraft flying at 260,000 km /s? According to relativity theory at 260,000 km/s, the cylinder length will be contracted to 1 meter. 2. After what time, according to the light clock on the ship, the pressure in the cylinder will drop to half the value after opening the measuring valve? 3. What will be the above valu…

DERIVING THE G CONSTANT A GYROCENTRIC MODEL BY: ROBERT M. EVANS …

How can a electron, being a single point in space, have mass? If it has an infinitely small volume while having a certain mass then wouldn't that mean that it would have infinite density? I don't know I am probably wrong, maybe missing something.

As required by the Modulator I have started a new thread for you in Speculations. This is blatantly untrue as I specifically requested this one hour previously. Which is why I am asking you to explain and define the three terms, I have underlined below, you have introduced that I (and probably many others here) are not familiar with. In particular the re-propulsion idea. Are you, for instance, proposing that the same photon is emitted or what after a photo-atomic and photo-electron event ? I think Marcus is referring to change …

Perhaps time is subject to wave particle duality. Time dilation (especially gravitational time dilation) might point to particle behavior of time. Light interacts with a gravitational field just like time. ..and light is made of photons(particles). Time dilation is in a sense related to the dopplereffect....they are both about the effect of relative velocity between two observers(this is very simplified of course). And according to Wave–particle duality ..particles or quantum entities can be(partly) described as waves. So when you find time particles, then time is subject to wave particle duality I found this video about it:

has any thought been given to dark "matter" being not made of some alternative type matter, but is a collection of "squeezed space" itself, mimicking the presence of an invisible material ? If space is thought to be expanding, why can't it shrink at some points within that general expansion? if the early universe had some regions of space that were slightly denser, in a random placement among "normal" space, these slightly altered space components could seek each other out, thus clumping, and so be incorporated within galaxy formations, thus speeding up the stellar rotation rates.

If time is a wave many mysteries of quantum mechanics are solved instantly We notice many strange unexplained mysteries in quantum mechanics such as : Electron jumps as if it didn’t cross the distance ,disappear and appear . Pair entanglement mystery Matter and anti matter measurement mystery 2 split experiment Photon as a wave or a quanta Electron spin right or left We tend to think about time as if it flows in straight line from past to future smoothly What if time is actually a wave that moves in frequency (i suggest to test the frequency as Plank constant)time ticks and flow as a wave.during this ticks it flows faster …

if the interior of a black hole is a true void, without even the quantum flux present, would that not allow a theoretical absolute zero temperature to be maintained?

The rate at which any process can unfold is limited by the rate at which time passes. This is why the speed of light has a maximum value.

OK, so this is the stuff of sci-fi. But I would like to know whether it would theoretically be possible, however unlikely or experimental, for water to be transported from the oceans and away from the Earth via a wormhole and into (for instance) the orbit space? If there is some sort of theoretical model to allow this, would it be possible with a large quantity of water? And what exactly would be the scientific model behind this? For instance, I have read about a wormhole being used to transport a magnetic field, could the same thing be done with water? https://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/scientists-in-spain-create-first-ever-magnetic-wormhole-in-l…

It's difficult for me to get my head around this. What force moves the galaxies along with space time? One would think that space time would just flow around the galaxies. Are galaxies moving with space time because of dark energy?

is extraterrestrial, it(s origin) does NOT come from this world (earth). Or does it? I suspect nickel is a fusion product from the intense heat of (some) material entering the earth's atmosphere. Keyword: atmosphere. Asteroids are smaller objects without a significant atmosphere. The moon's atmosphere is also (probably) insignificant, as seen from fotos (dark background, no blue sky, nor clouds). But dust (from impacts), & impacts into sand can also get hot, as something (=material, other than air) to rub against (for the friction(al heat production))). Cosmic rays have been r…

A single particle has an indeterminate charge as charge can be said to be relative. Two particles with opposite charges but bound in a system consisting of the two has a neutral charge. Three particles, one with an unlike charge bound in a system has a 2/3 charge? I am referring to composite particles. Comments?

There can be up to 3 people given a Nobel for the same work, the languages that exist are much to arbitrary and I need assistance with proofs and formulas that will backup the things in this post which it and my other work are the most important work being done in any field if you could see how far-reaching and applicable these things are going to be. The membranes that are the fields of force that are what make up the dementions of space dont allow for the exsistance of any cardinal angles, there are no Cardinal angles that exist in all of existence there are only Cardinal curves, if you had sufficient magnification that was precise and accurate enough and inspected the…

A Logical Perspective on the Origins of Homo sapiens sapiens A genetically created, biological procreating, environmentally nurtured humanoid The Origins of Homo sapiens sapiens, otherwise known as humanoids or humans, has been a controversial subject for eons and eons. Or to be more exact, ever since any particular isolated group of humans became sufficiently nurtured by their environment to begin questioning their own origins or existence. There are three (3) schools of thought concerning the origins of humans. The 1st one is based in/on Religious beliefs that the heavens, the earth and everything upon the earth is the …

This is not a question, whereas it is an exercise. I would like to create a new language, one that is very simple and entirely based upon solely the English language. It has to be very simple and very efficient in informing another individual about what they are saying. It can use certain symbols but it must be able to be traced back to English words and terms. I do not have a name for it, just want to create it with people I have never met who are interested in the sciences and brain stuff.