Jump to content


Senior Members
  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

5 Neutral

About hoola

  • Rank
  • Birthday 06/17/1951

Profile Information

  • Location
    colorado, usa
  • Interests
    electronics, music, theoretical physics, philosophy, politics
  • College Major/Degree
  • Favorite Area of Science
  • Biography
    retired electronics technician, antique/vintage electronics collector
  • Occupation
    none/ recycling center volunteer

Recent Profile Visitors

11686 profile views
  1. is not every phenomena in the universe subject to entropy...is this not a valid scientific principle?
  2. yes, they essentially become real particles, at least as stable as any free particle subject to decay. I see the "waste" energy of the annialation phase of virtual particles as dark energy, as the physical process has inherent inefficiencies.
  3. the longer virtual particles survive, the lower their energy? does this mean that the energy is lowered to zero as it is all converted to matter as in the case of Hawking radiation? Also, if the energy of long term survivors is less, so will the resultant minimum energy waste upon recombination, as in the source of dark energy idea, making it "weak space".
  4. correct, but closely related via the pair mechanism behaviors in various settings.
  5. to say the effects of the casimir test are electromagnetic in nature is not to say that they have nothing to do with gravitation. It seems to me that the "stretching of space" is accomplished within the virtual particle creation/annialation mechanism, and the duration of their brief existences has directly to do as to the "stretching" of the orbits of the pairs. The longer the pairs are kept separate mean more of an effect to the environment. The ultimate example of this is Hawking radiation, where particles are prevented from making the final step of the annialation process, therefore caused
  6. weak space is what I propose instead of the term dark matter, as that is described to be composed of invisible particles that only exhibit gravitational effects on mass. I say that the inherent inefficiency of all physical process applies also to virtual particles as they are indeed "real" albeit for a brief instant of time . During the time that they are extant in the universe, they must obey it's laws, therefore is held to the inefficiency of physical process. Conservation of energy means that waste energy must show up, so why not as the dark energy. Weak space means simply that the particul
  7. even though they are "virtual", they show up long enough to have a "real", albeit fleeting presence in the universe, or else the casimir experiment would not work. Doesn't any physical process have an inherent inefficiency? Why not these particle interactions?
  8. as to your statement: "(dark) energy doesn't have energy levels. Composite systems with attractive interactions do." Virtual particles are composite systems, with each particle/antiparticle pair under first repulsive, then attractive interactions of a certain total duration. Why not consider that the interaction periods are not identical between some pairs, then the force expression of pairs in the creation/annialation process would vary, allowing it's measured effect on the test to vary. I propose that the "waste product" of this process is what is termed dark energy and that force is pro
  9. Why can't dark energy have some variations, and if it does, how would one know? As I understand, the casimir test measures a reduction of forces as the region is restricted by the close plates. The test outputs would drop as the less propulsive space would enter the plates from one side. The drop would be temporary, and only offer a difference signal until the weak space region envelops the entire structure, thus offering no differences of pressures with which to gain a signal from. So, it would be a weak transit signal, showing only that a small blip in the readings occurred. This blip wou
  10. if dark energy has more than one energy level, it would have a tendency to congregate the lower energy points of space to areas embedded within the overall field of predominant higher energy. The higher positive forces of that field would congregate the lower energies, making those regions attractive to matter as it is carried along with the gradient of higher energy to lower. This could mimic the appearance of dark matter, and it not be a particle, but simply areas of "weak space". If this model has any validity, a possible test of what might be to do a long term casimir experiment, in that
  11. could this imply that the singularity is a solid point or region of collapsed pair or pairs, centered in a fluid of less compressed pairs? When you say "infinite density", does that mean infinite in a numerical sense, or simply the highest value allowed with physical laws present in this universe, and that this density could theoretically be measured at some point?
  12. If the BH interior is supposed to contain no material things, all converted to gravitation, could this action occur from a fluid like substance composed of virtual particle pairs so closely held together that they exhibit particle exchange, therefore becoming an analogue to a bose einsein fluid? It seems as though there should be a "something" inside the BH from which graviation to act from, and if not from material things, then perhaps virtual things.
  13. While the levels between drive and echo signals may be made more equal with the previous "edge contact" idea , it seems a more active arrangement will be necessary to achieve the desired equal values. The overall idea is to replicate the waveform present in the secondary stack that appears in the primary one, only much larger. If I have a signal direct from the primary stack going through a series of step down resistors, lowering the max voltage to the tube grids to some voltage driving the tubes appropriately, the echo signal will be too low to do much for a tube output in this direct path.
  14. further tests of the suspended stack offer no alternate frequencies of interest, so the usual frequencies of 115, 125 and 161khz are to be used initially in the tube driven arrangement. It does seem that any true thrust, or a "DC" component of the overall signal, is buried within the "AC" inevitable noise of the system, which is what the scale misread as weight change. The question of how to transfer a useful signal from the stack to the tubes without the drive signal, which is of a large P-P voltage, from overwhelming the "echo" of this stimulation that occurs during the delay time, which is
  15. The false thrust through vibrations means that the prior establishment of parameters used are very likely irrelevant to the parameters of a real thrust signal. A new series of parameter setting scans are being started to see if any stay effects might show up to offer a starting point for the tube driven arrangement. I have glued a 2mm thick pad of foam rubber onto the end of the stack thinking that will block vibrations more effectively than felt.
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.