hoola
Senior Members
Content Count
723 
Joined

Last visited
Community Reputation
6 NeutralAbout hoola

Rank
Molecule
 Birthday 06/17/1951
Profile Information

Location
colorado, usa

Interests
electronics, music, theoretical physics, philosophy, politics

College Major/Degree
none

Favorite Area of Science
physics

Biography
retired electronics technician, antique/vintage electronics collector

Occupation
none/ recycling center volunteer

would a black hole's hawking radiation increase if it's rotation were to be faster ?

Another take on: Something from nothing? (split thread)
hoola replied to hoola's topic in Speculations
possibly a premature action to close this thread..only a few years ago the Tegmark team had a hint of G waves embedded in the CMB which might have offered the first glimpse before the bang. Unfortunately, intergalactic dust foiled the test. There is also the primal neutrino relic which may offer some results. Since there is another possible test, and a possible retesting of the CMB with improved measures, please leave this thread open. Thanks 
Another take on: Something from nothing? (split thread)
hoola replied to hoola's topic in Speculations
correct, as "science" deals with direct evidence and I deal without, unless gravitational waves or neutrinos can peer before the big bang and some evidence may be forthcoming. Hopefully someday that will happen and I will be quite happy to have my idea falsified if that be the case. 
Another take on: Something from nothing? (split thread)
hoola replied to hoola's topic in Speculations
not really, many qualified mathematicans have stated as much.(the discovered, not invented part)..hence my leaning towards my intuition as viable possibility. I agree with your dismissive attitude however. I am attempting to ascertain fundamentals, the premath of the maths, and realize the futility of the attempt. 
Another take on: Something from nothing? (split thread)
hoola replied to hoola's topic in Speculations
I have no evidence that equations are only discovered, not invented, only intuition. 
Another take on: Something from nothing? (split thread)
hoola replied to hoola's topic in Speculations
the relationship between the radius and circumference of a circle and how it relates to the early proto universe, would seem to indicate base 2 calculations. Base 26 calculations of PI is an interesting question perhaps someone else might have some insights, but Occam's Razor would seem to limit the processing base to "least action" to accomplish the task, whatever base that calculation was made in. 
Another take on: Something from nothing? (split thread)
hoola replied to hoola's topic in Speculations
Equations are there to be discovered, not invented. 
Another take on: Something from nothing? (split thread)
hoola replied to hoola's topic in Speculations
the measured diameter of circle as relates to it's circumference offers a long lasting and perhaps non repeating numerical result...that in itself may not be an equation per se, but equations do exist that closely approximate it. That's what I meant. As long as the information cranked out by the approximation goes on, and is faithful to the fundamental premise of the metric, my assertion seems valid. 
Another take on: Something from nothing? (split thread)
hoola replied to hoola's topic in Speculations
the number PI is but one of many such equations, also E, sq rt of 2, etc..some of the "bones" delineating physical reality as ordered by classic logic. More ephemeral states seem ordered by sq rt minus one, in the companion quantum logic system, which among other things, determines empty space properties, with virtual particles as the observable effects. 
Another take on: Something from nothing? (split thread)
hoola replied to hoola's topic in Speculations
not really, only that there are two levels of "unrealness", with them. You can't hold a 6 in your hand, but a 6 does have some overall effect when combined with a near infinite number of associated digits, and they are ordered about in a reliable fashion over aeons in a rapidly branching algorithmic evolution of equations. The MPR was the "least real" of the species, but became "more real" by relating to all other numbers, thus become real enough to "do work" along with all the rest. With this, is an inference of 2 levels or realness, or functionality with numbers. The solitary MPR, and all the rest. However, the void is long gone, filled up with stuff, and with it, that MPR status that was the kick start part of the process, gone with it. 
yeah, bowling with black holes to get a perfect strike seems something an advanced species might do to see if the results matched prediction.

Another take on: Something from nothing? (split thread)
hoola replied to hoola's topic in Speculations
a Mathematical Proxy Representation, is the "stand in" of a number, before there were any numbers to "fill that spot". In this case I posit that this MPR number (one nothing) was not a number until other numbers appeared and developed relationships with the MPR via a developing logic system. This is akin to today's "nothing exists without an observer" effect, as expressed in it's earliest form, as applied to the question of how math could have evolved from this simple start in a natural, organic way. No need for god or eternality in the system as described. If it is relevant to ask why anything today, it seems relevant to ask why mathematics then. 
I agree that is is very unlikely, perhaps impossible unless arranged somehow. I was more interested in the merger efficiency, that is, how much mass loss would be given by such a theoretical merger vs. the standard orbiting one. I was hoping that if a numerical simulation had been done, it would be reported here. Thanks.

Another take on: Something from nothing? (split thread)
hoola replied to hoola's topic in Speculations
well, my conjecture is that there was no nothing, allowing the minimum state of a supposed void to have a mathematical proxy representation of exactly one. How many voids were there? Three? Nine? ...could several voids be separated by a "less than void" state, differentiating them? Seems unlikely....the irreducible "one and only one void", or void singularity, is the "bit" that "it" came from which I further conjecture was the seed of mathematic constructs of the various branches that eventually led to complex mathematical, and therefore complex physical structures. I venture that this first bit was "unreal math", and only when math evolved additional potentialities (other numbers), did the original bit have a comparison to "measure" itself with, and become "less unreal" in a conventional sense, mostly due to persistence , or durability of internal value, which we see and confirm in routine fashion in relation to other numbers using simple arithmetic. just google "john wheeler it from bit" on utube and you will get several interviews which discuss this. 
Another take on: Something from nothing? (split thread)
hoola replied to hoola's topic in Speculations
I thought Wheeler's comment was common knowledge....I have no direct citation, and pardon me if I am incorrect, but I have seen lectures concerning Wheeler's legacy, and that statement was listed as one of them. I will find a lecture and list it later. My overall statements are relevant to the thread title of "something from nothing" , supposing that the void (the nothing) spit out that bit (the something).