PrimalMinister

Senior Members
  • Content Count

    139
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

-39

About PrimalMinister

  • Rank
    Baryon

Profile Information

  • Favorite Area of Science
    AI

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. PrimalMinister

    Theory of everything of final theory

    But even if the universe is somehow by chance, it is still inevitable. So the quantum foam is a random universe generator, it generates universes. Prior to generating our universe it must have had the potential to generate else it couldn't have actually created it. So our universe existed as potential in the quantum foam before it even existed. Now lets say the quantum foam can generate an infinite amount of universes, given enough time (and we have eternity), it will eventually create our universe, meaning that is inevitable.
  2. PrimalMinister

    Theory of everything of final theory

    I am not saying there is an intelligence behind our actual universe, I am saying there is one behind Laurance Krausss theory that is 'making it so' through his will alone becaucse there is no scientific explanation for why, only how. The why is not explained by the creator (Laurance Krauss), he says it will accord to quantum mechanics, and so his will is done, thats it. I am not saying there is an intelligence behind the universe, I am saying there is an intelligence behind Laurance Krauss's theory. As I said above, he explains how the foam will accord to quantum mechanics, but not why, how he is going to make it so. He just says it will accord to quantum mechanics and his will is done with no explaination on why it should accord to quantum mechanics, at present the only thing making it so is his will, he says it will accord to quantum mechanics and his will is done. It sounds like something to me. I know science doesn't know, this is my point, yes we have a vast amount of knowledge, it looks like we have it nearly worked all out, but there is a mystery. I have analysed that mystery of why, or how it is actually going to made so, and I have a logic that potentially explain the why, how it is so. My idea, simple as it is, with a bit of imagination, could explain the why, the how it is so. You are not exactly explaining what is wrong with my logic. Ok, so it is chance that things are the way they are, but that only applies at the point of creation, not after the point of creation, after the point of creation fixed laws apply, these are not random, by chance.
  3. PrimalMinister

    Theory of everything of final theory

    Look, I looked at the universe from nothing, where it actually comes from a quantum foam. This quantum foam still has the same mystery our universe does. He explains that the quantum foam will evolve according to rules, with no explaination as to why it is going to accord to those rules. In Lawrance Krauss theory a universe from nothing, the only explaination is the will of the creator, and I don't mean God, I mean Laurance Krauss, he is the creator of the universe (the one where it comes out nothing) and his will makes the quantum foam evolve time, not quantum mechanics. Quantum mechanics is the design, not the implementation, it explains the how, but not the why, this is fact. This is the mystery of physics.
  4. PrimalMinister

    Theory of everything of final theory

    On one hand we clearly have knowledge, a vast amount, and I am not disputing all of it, just some it. Most of this stuff I am disputing and introducing is surrounded by 'we dont know'.
  5. PrimalMinister

    Theory of everything of final theory

    I am not just opposing for the sake it, as it is become clearer, science has no idea what underpins everything. Science hasn't got a clue what is going on, it doesn't know. Well somebody told me, in this thread, there was no space or time before the big bang. Who do I believe? It doesnt' matter anyway, despite all our knowledge it appear we have no idea how the universe actually works. This is why I asked for the official story, the authorative answer.
  6. PrimalMinister

    Theory of everything of final theory

    I thought the universe kept expanding until it expriences a heat/freeze death?
  7. PrimalMinister

    Theory of everything of final theory

    Yes, I know. On one hand you know, and on the other you don't. Which one is it? Ok, so what is the [whatever] story, from beginning to end?
  8. PrimalMinister

    Theory of everything of final theory

    Ok... So that is the offical story? After you said there was none.
  9. PrimalMinister

    Theory of everything of final theory

    I don't know what sciences story is exactly, all I want to now is what happens, from beginning to end. What is the official story?
  10. PrimalMinister

    Theory of everything of final theory

    It doesn't matter, the main central logic doesn't change, all the different universes are still based on some law. The problem is you are taking a philosophical approach to the question where I am taking a technical approach. You say I have a problem of infinite regression, but I don't, our current models do. First, I am told reality came into being with the big bang, I was told it was branes knocking together, then no its nothing existed before the big bang, now the universe came out of quantum foam, what did the quantum foam come out of? I assume there is some law underlying it all? To go from no law, to some law is impossible, there has to be some foundation.
  11. PrimalMinister

    Theory of everything of final theory

    Of course we do, thats why we have laws. Throw a ball up, it comes down according to gravity, that law is being enforced, somehow.
  12. PrimalMinister

    Theory of everything of final theory

    No, it is a framework for a theory of everything, not a theory of everything. I think there could be problems with both of them, I don't know enough to say what might be incorrect about them. Maybe the universe did come into being via a big bang as described, I accept I could be wrong. But every fibre of my being tells me something is not quite right with it. This is worsened by the fact I have my own ideas about the universe and believe (I could be wrong) that I have read the mind of God. What I mean by this is, is that God doesn't roll dice. I don't believe in any God, but the universe, I believe has a design, a profound and sublime design, its not chance, its not a random accident. That is my own personal belief, I can't prove it at this stage. Now I may not have *the* solution to a perplexing problem with physics, but I have *a* solution and it could be, there is a chance, that it could be *the* solution. I am intelligent enough to know this.
  13. PrimalMinister

    Theory of everything of final theory

    Look, we know the universe evolves according to laws (which you seem to think by keeping telling me I will somehow understand further) but we don't know why (at this point you could say its Gods will). This to me is a problem looking for a solution. You may say its philosophy but if you examine the problem further the question becomes this: We know the universe evolves according to laws, we know the laws are enforced, but we don't know why/how they are enforced. This is a problem looking for a solution. I have studied the facts and the theorys and was encouraged to think for myself. When phycists say there was no time or space before the big bang, I just cant believe that. And we had it wrong before, we thought the sun revolved around the earth. I have a framework for a theory of everything, not a theory of everything, I am not claiming to have the things you say I don't have. Its quite literally the beginning of this hypothosis, it needs more work for sure. But what I do have is interesting, even if you don't see it yet. I brought Einsteins quote imagination is more important than knowledge because of the lack of imagination in the answers. Stephen Wolfram showed that simple processes can have complex outcomes, it doesn't take a lot to get complexity, I think underlying the complexity of the universe is essentially a simple process. The question is, can this simple process account for all we see around us, and even at this early stage there is a possibility that it can, considering all a theory of everything has to do is explain the movement of all things.
  14. PrimalMinister

    Theory of everything of final theory

    So our universe has an edge, beyond which other universes exist? And inbetween them there is quanutm foam? You see some times I feel like the kid in the crowd who shouts the king is wearing nothing when he is supposedly garments of the finest material. Some things physicts say, I just can't believe. Maybe the big bang happened, maybe I am wrong, but personally, I can't accept it. Somehow the logic is no where near as elegant as the equations.
  15. PrimalMinister

    Theory of everything of final theory

    These two statements seem to contradict each other, if there where other big bangs before this one, that implies things where changing and therefore time. And how can this quantum foam be fluxulated if there is not time, if its changing, there is time.