Speculations

Hi, I have not been on the forum for a while but I am back after some thought and writing a fresh post. Some of it is science, some of it is about the attitudes to science, especially on this forum. I have a number of questions I will ask as I go through, I will summarise them at the end. I am an amatuer phycist but I plan to go to university in the years ahead to work on this further. In my twenties, I am now 42, I had what I believed to be a profound insight about the universe. This insight matured over the years and I am convinced I have a framework for a theory of everything or final theory. It’s not strictly a theory of everything as it doesn’t explain ev…

Hi everybody, I am working on a model that uses the solution to a 2nd order DE, Ψ(e,ε), e=elementary charge, ε=electric constant, as probability amplitude for the electromagnetic field, EΨ. Applying this to a point charge gives: - quantized values for particle energy - as function of a partial product of powers over the fine-structure constant α, see table below for spherical + 1st angular symmetry term; - a numerical approximation of the fine-structure constant 1/α ≈ 4π Γ(1/3)|Γ(-1/3)| ( Γ=Gamma function); - magnetic moments, calculated from electromagnetic fields; agreement with experiment within factor of 2; and on a speculative level - a …

Perhaps time can be expressed as $$ t=\frac{Gh}{c^4} \int \frac{dS}{r} $$ Where S is the entropy of entanglement of an arbitrary closed surface. r is the radius to the surface point. Integration over a closed surface. This is very similar to the analogy. Time behaves as a potential, and entropy as a charge. From this formula there are several possible consequences. Bekenstein Hawking entropy for the event horizon. Light cone case $$ ct=r $$ $$ S=\frac{c^3r^2}{Gh} $$ Gravitational time dilation. The case if matter inside a closed surface processes information at the quantum level according to …

First question. I will lay this out in a series of questions, so please try to follow this thread as it evolves. 0 applied to the universe represents a state of the universe that is absent of both space and time. This is a naturally absolute value, which we can also be identified as a finite state. Although theoretically impossible in our universe, it could also be considered theoretically possible, giving it potential. Given the impossible nature of this state, however, it's potential would be infinite over time from our perspective. Mathematically, it can be represented as x=x, where x=0, because it is only equal to itself in comparison. Nothing…

I think so. Every time I take one, I feel my consciousness slipping away. I was once told by an Egyptian gentleman, if you're on them 23 years since 17 you won't live long past 40. I think the NHS have got to cut us mental patients some slack, and find other ways to treat us rather than feeding us pills. Your input is valued, please contribute, thank you.

The boys recommed change this topic here Specluations Trust, this is wrong topic this subject, but maybe moderators does not accept the rest. I am did study ancient solar eclipeses, how they fit together with ancient chronologies. I is not can tell very large, so not to be interpreted as advertising. I want to make this thesis known, not to advertise something. But i can part my study so a liitle bit. Solar ecplise 13 October 1504 BC. > This was queen Hatshepsutin's 15th regnal year. Solar eclipse 12 May 1384 BC > This was pharao Akhenaten's 4th regnal year. Solar eclipse 15 July 1360 BC > This was Mursili II, king of …

Hello, I have made an experiment based on mathematical model of EMF generated in segment of wire moving in constant velocity in uniform magnetic field: Here is the link to the mathematical model: http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/magnetic/genwir3.html#c1 My problem is that I am not getting any voltage out of wire at any speed up to 100 m/s. The field is 0.5 T and the wire length L is 0.02m... Please advice...

Let’s we imagine a particle that is in a box and it hits the walls of the box with a certain frequency. Let's say that the energy of the box comes from the frequency with which the particle hits the walls. If we start to shrink, the box frequency will become bigger and the energy of the box will rise. But the smaller the box, the better we will know where the particle is, from where it follows that the uncertainty in momentum is going to get bigger. On the other hand, if we have a test object close enough to the box, this object will experience a greater gravitational pull from the box. I made a derivation using the Newtonian laws of gravity and I got this formula. …

This I believe is possibly a simple “conceptual breakthrough” in the effort to explain the origins of everything from nothing using simple mathematical logic. “Occam's razor is the problem-solving principle that essentially states that simpler solutions are more likely to be correct than complex ones” Wikipedia. The theory outlined hereunder is informed and motivated by this “problem-solving principle”. Theory: In Mathematics, the number zero (0) is unique and represents the absence of “anything” that can be measured, seen, touched, etc. Therefore, this is the logical starting point for the theory. Nothing = zer…

A thought occurred if spiders where huge and eat people when would they realize that if they left the victim alive they could produce blood again and be harvested again. I guess I’m asking when would they start to learn agriculture

That was actually good stuff that I just got the chance to read. I am more then happy to change from the tube to a chamber. I know it was crap for the first setup. how much would you spend? Im not using math for this. Einstein already solved that part. I'm showing functionality. Just because you can say what the horsepower is does not explain how to make it. I am merely trying to find an outside source to compare for proving or disproving. Shutting me down doesn't disprove anything. So can I proceed? Im sorry I didnt prove it immediately after other responses or are you controlling information? Can I continue because it doesn't effect your life at all? Because it is ef…

so had a dream last night about the universe an then in my dream I had an idea. (* Please note that under no circumstance should this idea be considered real science. Dreams do not compete in the slightest with real science works. It is only an idea from putting puzzle pieces together thank you*) what if gravity is impossible to observe because it tunes itself to the observer. Like a string on a guitar which is being played by the observed. The more you observe something the more in tune it becomes. And vise verse. So say you have a piece of mass you want to try an observe right? well, you can do that at larger scales, but at smaller scales, it become…

Watch the video on this site and tell me thats not what I have been posting about here on this site. This is exactly what I have been trying to point out gravity. Notice the rotation. Thats weird how thats what I have been saying about gravity! Just because I cant make sense of it doesn't mean I'm wrong. The waves are density differential. The lower density allows higher density to move to and same goes as higher density pushes into lower. The surrounding matter including gases change gravities effects because of density. The faster its moving the stronger the attraction. Slower rotating planets have much less gas surrounding them. It even says on the site "The strongest …

This is not a paper but just a silly idea from a secondary school student. Looking forward to hearing your comments. Thank you so much! Twin universes.docx

The following idea is wild speculation because I know little about lightning, so it probably deserves its legitimate place in the crank ideas subforum. You have been warned. ----- In the past years, bursts of X and gamma rays were observed during lightning strikes. This is a surprise and explanations are difficult because energy in a bolt isn't concentrated enough, so to say, to produce such photons: the temperature in the bolt is too low for thermal radiation of X and gamma, and the energy of electrons is too small as well - even if air gets a smaller density in the bolt, even if some electrons travel over a longer distance than the average between collisions. …

HYPOTHESIS FOR WAVE-PARTICLE DUALITY SOLUTION - EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Author: Mikko Ilmari Laukkanen This hypothesis provides a simple elegant mechanical solution to the central mystery of Quantum Mechanics - that of wave-particle duality - and thereby helps resolve the other mysteries of QM as well. The Simplest Answer is Usually Correct - Occam's Razor HYPOTHESIS Photons are particles which; contain energy, have mass, and therefore have electromagnetic properties and actions, including each an electromagnetic field that interacts with the electromagnetic fields of other photons and matter around them. The simple self-organizing behaviour and actions of e…

Hello, I would like to propose the idea of using the HTML function to transfer power. We can already transfer data, images, & video throughout different points in cyberspace. I would not think it would be such a difficult accomplishment to transfer power this way. It would involve sending either small or large amounts of electrical current a few inches or to the other side of the earth. By using hypertext transfer protocol, power could be moved instantaneously with little or no power loss. So if any one has an idea of how this could be done a reply will be appreciated. Also please allow this message to be posted because I have done my best to comply …

Hello I noticed that the Planck Force is central for the vacuum catastrophe in quantum theory [latex]\text{volume density of quantum vacuum energy} = \frac{F_p}{l_p^2}= 4.63*10^{113} \text{ Joules / }m^3 [/latex] and in cosmology : [latex]\text{volume Density of vacuum Energy} = F_p*\Lambda / 8 / \pi = 5.35*10^{-10} \text{ Joules }/m^3 [/latex] [latex]F_p \text{ : Planck force = 1.21*10^44 kg m s^-2 , } l_p \text{ : Planck length = 1.61*}[/latex]10^-35 m [latex], \Lambda \text{ : cosmological constant } = 1.11*10^{-52} m^{-2} [/latex] so I think it could be interesting to try to define a "cosmological Force" to ending …

I hope you realize that time is a form of energy. Matter is a form of energy. Momentum is a form of energy. Temperature is a form of energy. In fact everything you can ever think off besides space is just another form of energy.

I would argue that the evidence that "photons" interfere with each-other, or themselves, is extremely week. In all experimental cases the CAUSE of "the pattern" is not proven, or made obvious beyond reasonable doubt. The only truth established by evidence, or prediction, is the EFFECT and its probabilistic certainty. Case #1: Radio interference: conditions: 2 antennas a small distance apart are engineered to transmit a same in-phase frequency carrying an audio signal. A much grater distance away a receiving antenna is moved parallel to the alignment of the transmitting antennas. Observed effect: The receiving antenna detects no audio signal in locati…

Period versus 1/(vc), frequency versus vc ? I find it very confusing that rotation_speed vc=2*Pi*r/t looks (very similar, &) proportional to frequency f (cycles per second; or (1) cycle (e.g. circle) per time (in units of seconds, or less than a second)); & inverted_rotation_speed 1/(vc)=t/(2*Pi*r) (the time "per" cycle_or_circle_(circumference)) looks proportional to Period T=1/f which is inverted_frequency! (Thus units are suppose to be inverted.) So (confusing) that I must start with what we know. In fact I am so confused, that I know nothing except the rotation_sp…

Hello forum, I am having a slow day at work today and as I was reading the below article, my mind began to wonder. It would really help the conversation if you could go through the short paper copied below but also linked just under. I didn't want to add just a few quotes as it would be confusing. I was trying to find a ridiculous way to measure if lets say indeed c would change it's value. Let's wander a bit and take the assumption that starting tomorrow c will immediately change it's value. I mean what confuses me is that I could think of many barbaric ways to prove to you that c indeed changed or not given the above assumption. An example is given in th…

So the radiation is high enough. I have a tip for the reactor. Take balls that are soft enough with a core that are strong enough that the balls go down. Test it with a bucket. Nobody must use it and i have no problems. I have lost all. An important thing is that you know about the holes and you need much water that the balls go in the holes. And then smaller and smaller balls. The humans do much bad things with me. First of all its bad enough for all people on the world. New game, new cards.

I hope anyone in the world understand me. Sorry for this idea, when i should go you must say it to me. Here is my idea... Here is a machine that can form plasma... Here are things from it in german, you can say its my daybook... http://www.kompetenznetz-schizophrenie.info/forum/index.php?action=vthread&forum=1&topic=25442

I know this can't be real but how do they get this to self start and speed up with no energy input?