Speculations

Electron-Positron Dipole (EPD) model of dark matter was set up initially, and force amongst EPDs, force amongst EPDs and visible matters, and EPDs’ space distribution law are given. Electric field, magnetic field, electromagnetic field and gravitational field can be explained reasonably with EPDs’ regular polarization, directional deflection, induced oscillation and density gradient. 4 kinds of field substance and physical substance can be unified reasonably. Substance of dark matter had been verified with vacuum friction, EPDs’ thermal motion, electron-positron pair creation and annihilation. It is the essential reasons of dark matter invisible that EPDs can transmit but…

It seems to be absurd to me that you locked me out that way (easily), without letting me present my supporting evidences to the previous title, 'Everything in the universe are expanding three dimensional'. Any way I'm back. First, I have to accept that I have to correct my self, in the strict rule of the scientific world, a 'theory' is a a very ' holy word' to present as to the level of theologians, thus, it a sacred word, so, I stand corrected. Mine is simply a a 'hypothesis Somehow, to connect to my previous claim, there are on-going studies in geology that favoring that the earth, as to the data and analysis gathered, showing, that indeed, the earth is is expa…

! Moderator Note As per the rules no advertisement to external blogs, the discussion should be facilitated here. The linked article examines the fundamental assumption of the evolution theory by which, just because each new organism has subtly different genome than its parents, this will eventually lead to genomes with information for previously nonexistent, functional and niche occupying structures, such as organs. For that purpose, first it compares two libraries. One library contains ‘realized genomes’ — i.e. all genomes that could have been formed during the entire history of life on Earth. Another library contains ‘unrealize…

I was a believer in the theory that 'gravity' does not exist as a natural force but rather due to the Earth expanding from it's center in a three dimensional way. I just learned recently the debate between the a 'Flat Earth' advocates contending that the Earth is not round. Believers in Flat Earth keeps on claiming that everywhere you look, even the horizon is perfectly horizontal and even showing the proof that Kansas is perfectly flat. It also makes no sense to me regarding the basics of Euclidean Geometry that no two straight lines can be vertically parallel from each lines if they were drawn from the center of a circle. However, to make a flat ground on the surfac…

Our solar system contains the planets: Mercury, Venus, Earth, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, Neptune. And with our technology we have seen that there is no trace of intelligent and evolved life in any of them. What if there was life in all of them? From Mercury to Neptune? Each life unfolds in a different dimension on each planet, each with its different biology and evolution in each of the planets of our solar system! Incommunicable, separated by dimensions ... And this law extends to all the planets of the universe, as for a better use of space and less unnecessary interference from one system of life to the other. Then that's it! Thank you!

According to Einstein’s theory of general relativity, mass/gravity bends the fabric of space-time. The greater the mass/gravitational pull of an object, the more it curves space-time. This causes time to pass slower in areas of space that have stronger gravitational fields. For example, if you synchronize two atomic clocks on the surface of earth, then put one of the clocks in orbit and left the other on the surface of earth, then the clock in orbit would run slightly faster. So the relationship is as you approach a center of mass, time runs slower. In other words, as gravity increases the passage of time decreases (relative to outside observer). The objects in the univer…

In my very thorough research on the gravity constant I made a connection between known constants ( G , c ; NA ) After a solid year of research on the gravitation constant , that I now say is 7.46209031*10-11 Nm2/kg2 , I have to question its real nature . It seem to be a mere modulus (multiplier) when modifying the qualities of kg*kg and mass .Here some short notes picked from my work to this topic. I'm very sorry for my still poor writing , and the shortness almost looses the ideas . On FB< Essence of gravitation > , hear from you.

This theory begins with an understanding of puissant emergent energy (PEE) that fills the content of space. It is an ocean of neutrinos in their natural state (no heat, no charge and beyond the speed of light) before they slow down and cycle through an atomic creation. When ejected from an atomic organization through some kind of atomic decay or disintegration, the neutrinos speed up and move back to their natural state. When the PEE slows and whirls into the electronic organization of matter, the incessant pull of gravity is created. Gravity is a pull on the PEE field by an electromagnetic atomic system. Neutrinos being pulled in and condensed into a nucleus is the …

Could quantum mechanics lead into relativity through string theories holographic field theory by assuming that all systems in the universe, systems being objects that are observable, are themselves independent universes that are mirrored off of itself into separate dimensions? If you were to have a universe created which mimics the effects of an electron then that universe is mirrored in some way, shape or form causing all assumed electrons simply be mirrors of the same electron universe?

I have a question about ancestry. Will it be possible and allowed to edit ancestry in the future? Lets say that a person is 95% Asian and 5% White, can a person then edit ancestry so that the person is 100% Asian and 0% White?

I am giving away my book about 23 proofs of a flat earth. You can read it here on kindle SPAM LINK REMOVED I want to start a discussion on why you think the earth is round? I am 100% sure that the earth is flat and I have written my thoughts in this book.

Mr. Kent Hovind alway says Question 1: How to test evolution? Question 2: How to test creationism? Question 3: How to disprove evolution? Question 4: How to disprove creationism?

The author of these articles claim they have proof to disprove evolution. My question is reverse, how to disprove the authors claims in the articles? 1. 22 Falsifications of Evolution! 2. 11 Major Arguments against Evolution 3. Language is proof of God

In physics we have consensus theories or proven rules of physics that are the same rules no matter where you are in the universe. Sometimes a consensus theory looks perfectly correct as Aristotle postulated but then Copernicus proved that the opposite is true. I will now prove this in relation to time in space as there is no 4th dimension. The big bang is a consensus theory opposed by creation of the universe by a god i will leave that decision totally to you and your beliefs I will endeavor to simply explain from the big bang theory. The universe is basically made of matter and ene…

I assume not unless big magnet is in TESLA range and able to remagnetize the little magnet in opposite direction. Here is an example of 2.5T field magnetizing small non-magnetized neodymium. video removed

I know this is sounding like science fiction but this is a hypothetical scenario. Would someone be a blessing to be Immortal of he used time traveling technology to reverse the state of organs? I know this may sound stupid but I'm seriously wondering about it.

There is speculation that the next new particle discovered will be called the ALB particle. It's properties are best described in terms of colors. Predictions are already abound for the existence of an anti-ALB particle called the ALBino. It is colorless.

The Theory of Gravity Aloysius Sebastian aloysi.aloys@gmail.com Abstract Here I am about to create a new theory of gravity. In this theory I am trying to explain the range of gravity and the gravitational field. With this theory, one can calculate the range of gravitational field of an independent object. Here gravity is not depending upon the mass of a second object. Here gravity is related to the energy of the object. I am not going to replace any previous theories of gravity. Sir Isaac Newton and Albert Einstein were made wonderful theories. I am also working with those theories. Inside these theories I have been found a road to explain gravi…

On Learning Difficulties: I bring to attention what I believe is a lesser understood facet of the largely speaking, Learning Disabilities. Some problems that people with learning difficulties may face (these symptoms belong to me): difficulty playing instruments difficulty learning languages mimic signature learn dance steps may not have a uniform handwriting style posture problems May learn the hold the squash/tennis the wrong way find it difficult to imitate the rhythm of a song find it difficult to imitate gym exercises speaking style may vary, especially when learning a new language. Cannot Learn a batting or bowling style Followin…

In the program VETER v. 3.0 for verification the theory of relativity, available on the link: LINK DELETED are presented calculations regarding the observation of ticks rate of light clocks in motion. The calculations shown (numerically and graphically) in the "Frequency" and "Time" sheets, clearly prove that is not true the claim of relativity theory, that every two clocks maintaining a constant velocity with respect to each other, will both see (measure) the other as running slow. (To open this program you do not need to log in to Dropbox, but select: Download> Download directly and after opening the program in Excel, select Enable editing.)

We are all aware of the four fundamental interactions of physics. They are called strong nuclear force, weak nuclear force, electromagnetism, and gravity. However there is a fifth force that many have speculated about. The following explanation demonstrates the possibility of the proof of a fifth interaction. The fifth interaction is proven by the precession of the equinox. The precession is a cycle that not many people understand. If you do not know what it is here is a link that describes this cycle: https://www.britannica.com/science/precession-of-the-equinoxes As a result of the precession the seasons begin to occur while the sun is in a different constellat…

This is a new theory describing the states of matter There are states of matter beyond that of plasma -One of these states has yet to be named and is directly a state higher than that of plasma. For now we will call it "Energetic Material." -Energetic Material includes a number of substances. An example of this material includes kinetic energy. Kinetic energy can indeed be labeled as a substance. Like how water is an example of a liquid, kinetic energy is an example of Energetic Material. -Kinetic energy can be held within processes like chemical reactions. It has a quantity and is measured by joules. The state above Energetic Material is "Light."…

Is it possible to create a "superbrain" using modern or near future technology? Something that at least 10 times larger than human brain? Can we create a new race of conscious creatures in this way? Would they be thankful us for their creation? How can we make them good and morally perfect?

THE TIME-FLOW FALLACY Time is described in physics as “what clocks read”; if you asked a scientist to describe what water is in physics and the answer was “what boats float in” you would think s/he was joking, asking the reader to distinguish what a clock reads is actually appealing to his/her everyday use of the word and puts it in that context when as a description in physics it should unmistakably be in a physical or mechanical context. It is this play on words that creates the bias that time flows in the mind of the reader but in doing so makes each reader responsible for the assumption instead of the definition which is a pretty good trick; at first you may thi…

New Invention about Bridge Hands Distribution ! In the Card Game of Bridge 13 cards out of 52 are dealt to a Player. They contain Suits Spades, Hearts, Diamonds or Clubs and each suit may have 0 – 13 cards with all Suits adding to 13 cards in the hand ! We tried to evaluate the total number of Combinations possible and found that the number is 560 ! Varying the numbers from 0 – 13 as the left most number of the Combination [say Spades holding] we got following : I give here the summary : number of combinations with the first spot [Spades] having 0,1,2,...,12,13 & the Cumulative total in the last Column ! 0 …