# yuanxue60616

Senior Members

42

0 Neutral

• Rank
Quark

## Profile Information

• Location
Chicago
• Interests
Philosophy, artificial intelligence, physics
• College Major/Degree
BS in EE, MS in CS.
• Favorite Area of Science
artificial intelligence, physics
• Occupation
software engineer

## Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

1. ## In special relativity, what if relativity of simultaneity is discontinues?

Is it already in relativistic QM or quantum field theory? or QM is already relativistic, but SR is not quantized?
2. ## In special relativity, what if relativity of simultaneity is discontinues?

I mean simultaneity is a time period, not a time.

4. ## Irrationality: analogy and induction

Andrew Moore, VP of AI for Google Cloud, speaks at a Google AI event. "AI is currently very, very stupid," said Andrew Moore, a Google vice president. "It is really good at doing certain things which our brains can't handle, but it's not something we could press to do general-purpose reasoning involving things like analogies or creative thinking or jumping outside the box." different analogy? or still in developing? if it is reasoning, it is still rational as I think.
5. ## Irrationality: analogy and induction

Do we have any research about it? right now AI could not do analogy and induction. I think it is related with Irrationality.

8. ## A classic double-slit experiment

I do not think it is a question of philosophy, still a question of physics. just do not have a physics explanation now. superposition principal is equal to include the middle, means it do not need two waves to cause Interference
9. ## A classic double-slit experiment

if there is no wave, then no collapse of the wave. but need explain the interference and why observe cause it disappear.
10. ## "Law of middle" (split from De Broglie relation)

QM is different than the logic that falls out of classical mechanics, yes, like superposition. so nature has something not follow the formal logic. as I said the law of excluded the middle. special relativity and QM are all correct and not violate the logic. so these things must be in current theory. if they really exist in nature but not in special relativity and QM, then current theories should be wrong. nothing wrong with current theories I try, then found the third speed in special relativity is same value as matter wave phase speed. sorry, my English is not good enough, cause a lot of misunderstanding. one more thing, nature obey the law of non-contradiction. human could use contradiction, it is the reason why human has consciousness. in my article Conversion 1: When the law of contradiction exists, applying the law of non-contradiction (cannot be both true), Any of A and -A is denied, it will result in the law of middle. Because A = -A. Denying A will also deny -A, denying -A will also deny A. Conversion 2: When the law of middle exists, applying the law of excluded middle (cannot be both false), Any of A or -A is affirmed, it will result in the law of contradiction. Because the law of middle logically requires that "A is affirmed" will result in "-A is affirmed", "-A is affirmed" will result in "A is affirmed". contradiction and include middle could convert to each other.
11. ## "Law of middle" (split from De Broglie relation)

I think it is basic knowledge of physics if anyone want to talk about QM.
12. ## "Law of middle" (split from De Broglie relation)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matter_wave
13. ## "Law of middle" (split from De Broglie relation)

I know what you mean, we only use c and v in special relativity. in step 2 I said. 2)real relational value, the non-real relational value and their extreme value satisfy a certain mathematical relationship. so non-real relational value could express by real relational value and extreme value. you know matter wave phase speed u = c^2/v, right? You could see the speed u = c^2/v in special relativity too. so there is direct relationship between special relativity and matter wave. is phase speed real? how to you measure it?
14. ## "Law of middle" (split from De Broglie relation)

because it is a length of time. space, time, speed.﻿ you need use two of them to calculate the third one.
15. ## "Law of middle" (split from De Broglie relation)

how do you calculate the relativity of simultaneity? it is a time difference between two points. right? then you need a speed. it is not v, is not c. space, time, speed. you need use two of them to calculate the third one.