# yuanxue60616

Senior Members

55

1. ## In special relativity, what if relativity of simultaneity is discontinues?

is the matter wave phase speed(c^2/v) and the speed to calculate the relativity of simultaneity in SR(t-x/(c^2/v) ) same one? if not, stop here. if yes, then we could talk about the frequency of matter wave.
2. ## In special relativity, what if relativity of simultaneity is discontinues?

my assertion: Et' = h/2π here t' is time period of relativity of simultaneity. this is the only assertion I made. 1)according to matter wave theory. E = hω/2π, so 1/t' is angular frequency of matter wave ω. 1/t' = ω 2)according to SR, the speed to calculate the relativity of simultaneity is c^2/v, t-x/(c^2/v) 3)calculate the simultaneity space for t' , s = t'c^2/v = c^2h/2πEv = c^2h/2πmc^2v = h/2πmv= h/2πp, this space length is angular matter wavelength, so if my assertion is right, t' is time period of relativity of simultaneity, then matter wave frequency formula could deduce the matter wave wavelength formula. they are not independent.
3. ## In special relativity, what if relativity of simultaneity is discontinues?

according to my assertion, matter wave wavelength formula and frequency formula are not independent, is it prediction?
4. ## In special relativity, what if relativity of simultaneity is discontinues?

superposition principle is really talking about simultaneity.
5. ## In special relativity, what if relativity of simultaneity is discontinues?

that's my point. single-particle interference is caused by simultaneity, not wave. if simultaneity exists, the single particle will logical pass two slits, not actual. so we never see it.
6. ## In special relativity, what if relativity of simultaneity is discontinues?

the relativity of simultaneity and matter wave have same speed c^2/v, it is hard to believe there is no relation between them.
7. ## In special relativity, what if relativity of simultaneity is discontinues?

how do you know Matter waves exist independent of simultaneity?
8. ## In special relativity, what if relativity of simultaneity is discontinues?

not this logic, if time of relativity of simultaneity is quantized, because its speed is c^2/v, so space is quantized for moving particle. it is matter wave length.
9. ## In special relativity, what if relativity of simultaneity is discontinues?

time is not quantized, the time of relativity of Simultaneity is quantized. according SR, relativity of Simultaneity is coming with moving particles. in SR, relativity of Simultaneity is only related with event, you are right. so I ask this question, what if it is not discontinues? if yes, it is related with energy of different particles. then we get the frequency of matter wave.
10. ## In special relativity, what if relativity of simultaneity is discontinues?

Et' = h/2π t' = h/(2π E) Assume t' is the time of relativity of simultaneity, use speed of relativity of simultaneity to calculate the space. t'c^2/v = hc^2/(2πEv) = hc^2/(2πmc^2v = h/mv2π = h/p2π
11. ## In special relativity, what if relativity of simultaneity is discontinues?

t' is different by E. so wave length is t'*c^2/v, different for two particles if their E are different. pia = 3.1415926... I do not know how to input it here.
12. ## In special relativity, what if relativity of simultaneity is discontinues?

take noncommutability of energy and time. [E, t] = Et-tE = i h/2pia it could have Et' = h/2pia. here t' is a time. but not part of t because of i. so t' could only be a time period of relativity of simultaneity in SR. there is no other time in SR. 1/t' is the frequency of matter wave. in SR, relativity of simultaneity = x/(c^2/v) then we could use c^2/v calculate the matter wave length directly. if you are sensitive, you know I am right somewhere.
13. ## In special relativity, what if relativity of simultaneity is discontinues?

if relativity of simultaneity is quantized, we will get the matter wave. They have same speed c^2/v, if speed is 0, no matter wave and no relativity of simultaneity.
14. ## In special relativity, what if relativity of simultaneity is discontinues?

Is it already in relativistic QM or quantum field theory? or QM is already relativistic, but SR is not quantized?
15. ## In special relativity, what if relativity of simultaneity is discontinues?

I mean simultaneity is a time period, not a time.

17. ## Irrationality: analogy and induction

Andrew Moore, VP of AI for Google Cloud, speaks at a Google AI event. "AI is currently very, very stupid," said Andrew Moore, a Google vice president. "It is really good at doing certain things which our brains can't handle, but it's not something we could press to do general-purpose reasoning involving things like analogies or creative thinking or jumping outside the box." different analogy? or still in developing? if it is reasoning, it is still rational as I think.
18. ## Irrationality: analogy and induction

Do we have any research about it? right now AI could not do analogy and induction. I think it is related with Irrationality.

21. ## A classic double-slit experiment

I do not think it is a question of philosophy, still a question of physics. just do not have a physics explanation now. superposition principal is equal to include the middle, means it do not need two waves to cause Interference
22. ## A classic double-slit experiment

if there is no wave, then no collapse of the wave. but need explain the interference and why observe cause it disappear.
23. ## "Law of middle" (split from De Broglie relation)

QM is different than the logic that falls out of classical mechanics, yes, like superposition. so nature has something not follow the formal logic. as I said the law of excluded the middle. special relativity and QM are all correct and not violate the logic. so these things must be in current theory. if they really exist in nature but not in special relativity and QM, then current theories should be wrong. nothing wrong with current theories I try, then found the third speed in special relativity is same value as matter wave phase speed. sorry, my English is not good enough, cause a lot of misunderstanding. one more thing, nature obey the law of non-contradiction. human could use contradiction, it is the reason why human has consciousness. in my article Conversion 1: When the law of contradiction exists, applying the law of non-contradiction (cannot be both true), Any of A and -A is denied, it will result in the law of middle. Because A = -A. Denying A will also deny -A, denying -A will also deny A. Conversion 2: When the law of middle exists, applying the law of excluded middle (cannot be both false), Any of A or -A is affirmed, it will result in the law of contradiction. Because the law of middle logically requires that "A is affirmed" will result in "-A is affirmed", "-A is affirmed" will result in "A is affirmed". contradiction and include middle could convert to each other.
24. ## "Law of middle" (split from De Broglie relation)

I think it is basic knowledge of physics if anyone want to talk about QM.
25. ## "Law of middle" (split from De Broglie relation)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matter_wave
×