Rajiv Naik

Senior Members
  • Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

-6 Poor

About Rajiv Naik

  • Rank
  1. nobody is talking about Quantum entanglement. its not true that information Travels with speed of light only- its only in our spacetimes. otherwise all information is singularly present in quantum state, outside the spacetime and hence in valcume which is radiation free state. no time is required - as time is property of speed of light in space. entanglement clearly indicate that time doesnt exist beyond space.
  2. Where are the laws of the universe exactly?

    you mean vaccume energy plays role in space time and is part of entire scheme ? do you mean vaccume energy intereacts with standard particle fields ? is it not that higgs field facilitate standard model particle fields to intereact. ? same quations can be asked about dark matter. how one knows that differential Calculus is sufficient to study vast not understood force like vaccume radiations? you mean vaccame responsible for inflation of universe is different entity from vaccume in atoms, between planets and galaxiesin space etc.? how vaccume energy can be compared to building of potential in even superconducting capacitor?
  3. Where are the laws of the universe exactly?

    I dont understand what you are saying. may be you are better than Nasa. but for me your comments are as strange as vaccume by what I have understood most of the space is vaccume. The problems in understanding the true nature of the "vacuum" of space were discussed by a theoretical physicist CERN. From the point of view of cosmology, the vacuum appears to have an energy density, which is sometimes called "dark energy" or the "cosmological constant", responsible for the observed accelerated expansion of the universe. From a particle physics viewpoint, the vacuum is permeated by a "Higgs Field" - named after physicist Peter Higgs.
  4. l think spacetime is creation of quantum singularity. its completely virtual.all dimensions we notice are sust convinientconcepts - This is what I have read recently: The Nature of Space and Time A pair of researchers have uncovered a potential bridge between general relativity and quantum mechanics — the two preeminent physics theories — and it could force physicists to rethink the very nature of space and time. Albert Einstein’s theory of general relativity describes gravity as a geometric property of space and time. The more massive an object, the greater its distortion of spacetime, and that distortion is felt as gravity. In the 1970s, physicists Stephen Hawking and Jacob Bekenstein noted a link between the surface area of black holes and their microscopic quantum structure, which determines their entropy. This marked the first realization that a connection existed between Einstein’s theory of general relativity and quantum mechanics. Less than three decades later, theoretical physicist Juan Maldacena observed another link between between gravity and the quantum world. That connection led to the creation of a model that proposes that spacetime can be created or destroyed by changing the amount of entanglement between different surface regions of an object. In other words, this implies that spacetime itself, at least as it is defined in models, is a product of the entanglement between objects. ITo further explore this line of thinking, ChunJun Cao and Sean Carroll of the California Institute of Technology (CalTech) set out to see if they could actually derive the dynamical properties of gravity (as familiar from general relativity) using the framework in which spacetime arises out of quantum entanglement. Their research was recently published in arXiv. Using an abstract mathematical concept called Hilbert space, Cao and Carroll were able to find similarities between the equations that govern quantum entanglement and Einstein’s equations of general relativity. This supports the idea that spacetime and gravity do emerge from entanglement. the next step in the research is to determine the accuracy of the assumptions they made for this study. “One of the most obvious ones is to check whether the symmetries of relativity are recovered in this framework, in particular, the idea that the laws of physics don’t depend on how fast you are moving through space
  5. Where are the laws of the universe exactly?

    ha ha. what was that? s://science.nasa.gov/astrophysics/focus-areas/what-is-dark-energy What Is Dark Energy? More is unknown than is known. We know how much dark energy there is because we know how it affects the universe's expansion. Other than that, it is a complete mystery. But it is an important mystery. It turns out that roughly 68%of the universe is dark energy. Dark matter makes up about 27%. The rest - everything on Earth, everything ever observed with all of our instruments, all normal matter - adds up to less than 5% of the universe
  6. Where are the laws of the universe exactly?

    how we can. say that they are only two things or few things without knowing what it is.? who said that. I suppose I said very little- by saying ultimate particle I meant most massive particle - misunderstanding ? I think it was hypothesis till cern claims. nobody is really sure its the ultimate particle . may be they will find some more massive one- experiment is not yet over. a bold statement it would be to say that ,"we know". recently cern has discovered new bumps of massive masses thin higgs particle it will take ore more year to complete investigation. , I suppose its know or one can check
  7. Where are the laws of the universe exactly?

    I think it was hypothesis till cern claims. nobody is really sure its the ultimate particle . may be they will find some more massive one- experiment is not yet over. a bold statement it would be to say that ,"we know". this not a court argument I suppose, in law we call it hypertechnical argument. we both know what we meant.
  8. Where are the laws of the universe exactly?

    how are you sure that they are only two things when we know nothing. about it today. ?
  9. Where are the laws of the universe exactly?

    I know about God particle research, but do anyone truely know how higgs field give mass to particles?
  10. Where are the laws of the universe exactly?

    I am talking about physics not biology or chemistry or other things etc. dark malter and dark energy combined is whooping 96 % of our universe We are ignorant about today its not "few things"
  11. I think equivalence principle says that gravity is acceleration. . I think obviously pendulem fundamentally works on this principle. three dimensional universe is distortion of two dimentional spacetime. so everything is basically can be explained by two dimentional geometry of triage or circle. its ultimately that place where answers could be found.
  12. Where are the laws of the universe exactly?

    so do we know more ? what is it? you are not answering my quations. we didnt know till recently that standard model particles form hardly 2 or 3% of our universe. we didnt know much about higgs field either do you know? do you know why existance of universe is remote chance? and I am an athiest. so do not take it as a phylosophy. one day we probably will know-but not tody.
  13. Where are the laws of the universe exactly?

    so you know for sure what dark energy is? What dark mater is? where antimatter has gone ? and what happened to symmetry ? I never said human learning is pointless - I said what we know till date is very little. and do you know exactly how higgs field give mass to standard particles?
  14. Where are the laws of the universe exactly?

    Law of universe is mathematical equations governing the possibilities in universe. we humans know little may be not even .ooooo1 of it. (96% is dark energy and dark matter) 2% is antimatter, and we know very little about remaining 2%. this Laws are not created by humans they exist we try to discover them with our tiny brain. We ignorants are not eligible to comment anything about it. We thought that we knew about four fundamental forces then we discovered about dark energy. We are confused about even higgs field and totally new science is emmerging- many miles to go. only a fool will comment confidently about its knowledge.
  15. I think I am misunderstood? or not understood- I m using it (π)to define rate .- not a constant. but a constant rate of aaccelleration. I think the basic principle remains the same and and can be transerred to other motions also.