scifimath

Senior Members
  • Content Count

    50
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

-18 Bad

About scifimath

  • Rank
    Meson

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. a picture of what was around it. get real
  2. Black holes, Dark Matter, and Dark Energy are in the same family. They are not on our team if the only way you can tell they are there are indirect means.
  3. It's unobservable like a black hole is unobservable.
  4. "Dark" implies something is unobservable. So that's what Dark Matter/Energy are. Dark Energy is the unobservable quantum field. Quantum objects don't use spacetime, but spacetime's gravity can bend the fabric of the quantum field. Dark Matter is matter that normally would convert over to spacetime naturally but doesn't. It's found in abundance as halos around galaxies. Which leads me to believe it's a substance that held together galaxies before spacetime was turned on.
  5. You have a double slit with opposite linear polarizers at each slit. You get an observed clump. You then add a 45 degree polarizer and the fringes come back. It's not because the which way information is getting erased. It's because the particle starts a new life when passing through multiple filters. The state of a particle is predetermined based on the path it will fly through. But something interesting happens with you place multiple detectors. The particles state is reassessed while passing through a polarizer. If it sees another polarizer in its path it's going to cycle back to being a wave. Atoms normally shake around with thermal energy ..but not as much as quantum uncertainty makes them appear to be doing. The Uncertainty Principle is a side effect from repeated requests to make the QM object real/physical. It's a delay/smear from the system not being able to process quick enough. Swapping from wave to particle is apparently taxing, especially if it has to do it to each observed event (frame/timeline), for momentum tests. A simple double slit example shows us that a particle can be requested to decohere and remain decohered until it hits the final screen. An Uncertainty Principle test requires several requests of decoherence to get the momentum. What's newly discovered is that each request is causing the particle to cycle from wave to particle, setting fuzziness because it wasn't fast enough to do the swap.
  6. Is this an argument against something I said or are you just being a jerk?
  7. so you didn't read my clarification then? Maybe try attacking my actual theory.
  8. If I had experimental results going against what I'm saying ..I wouldn't be saying them.
  9. That's not what I asked for you don't have experimental results What you have, is what was drilled into your head to never question.
  10. I want this if you have it "guesses that contradict known experimental results"