Speculations

Midwest Tornadoes Link to Solar System Record Week Of Twisters Hit America's Heartland NEW YORK, March 5 (Reuters) - When at least 80 tornadoes rampaged across the United States, from the Midwest to the Gulf of Mexico, last Friday, it was more than is typically observed during the entire month of March, tracking firm AccuWeather.com reported on Monday. According to some climate scientists, such earlier-than-normal outbreaks of tornadoes, which typically peak in the spring, will become the norm as the planet warms. A that times Planet Mars Aligned with Sun and Earth BANDA ACEH Earthquake Link to SOLARSYSTEM BANDA ACEH, Indonesia (A…

Revolutionary New Theory Suggests the Laws of Physics Evolved GRAND HAVEN, Mich. Mar 07, 2012 Mark Greer, astrophysics ponderer, suggests a revolutionary new theory that the laws of physics may have evolved over time. Assuming the earliest universe was completely dark and void of everything, and that mathematically represented a perfect zero, Greer asks, “how did we go from zero to where we are today?” Greer believes the reason there is something, instead of nothing, is because of imperfection. “This is not a new concept”, he says. “Fluctuations from 0 into +1 and -1 or any other set of balanced equations make it perfectly plausible for something to come from …

Spontaneous creation by accident is absurd. There must be processes in place that enable energy to organize into more complex forms over time. I have watched every documentary ever made and never saw anyone propose a theory that did not involve a theory that we started with the big bang. In fact, they all talk about it as if it were a settled fact. But recently I had a realization that our universe requires more of a cause and effect explanation. So this is my 3rd Topic post within 1 week suggesting the universe evolved in some way. I just discovered tonight that I am not the first person to suggest that the Universe Evolved. 33 top scientists signed an open letter to…

Copied over from "An indictment of scientific process" since it is OT for the Ethics board.

Less than a novice in cosmology, 97% of the time I wander aimlessly looking for something about a cyclic universe. My own answers come as thoughts that on occasion seem to have merit, at other times, so so and some; Nada at all! Then I go on Google and find this, "Junk". These men are supposed to be accompolished scientists, or at least someone thinks so in order to get them in print. Personally, I find this "Pronking Theory" scarier than the Big Bang. Actual Theory:http://www.physorg.com/news89399974.html In Reality:

Just wanted to share this,Please share the below very very important article with as many people as possible: A real gravity /magnetic engine is not a Perpectual motion machine!I am myself inventing a non -Perpectual gravity engine!People think falsely that gravity and magnetic engines are impossible but it is not true!They are mostly mislead by cheaters claiming to invent Perpectual machines or claiming to invent such engine that are Perpectual for us!These cheaters and non intelluctual conventional minded people have made our scientists life miserable.Very little people believe in us real scientists because of the psycological thinking that gravity / magnetic engines a…

questions 1.Z÷(10^n)=?,Z-integers 2.write in abbreviated form (if the function can be final and natural) 2+5=7 , 2+10=12 , 2+15=17, 2+20=22 , 2+25=27 , 2+30=32 , 2+35=37 , 2+38=40, 2+40=42, 2+41=43 , 2+44=46 , 2+45=47, 2+47=49 , 2+50=52 ,2+57=59 , 2+60=62 , 2+64=66, 2+70=72, 2+71=73 , 2+78=80 , 2+80=82 , 2+85=87 , 2+90=92 ,2+92=94 3.how to solve this current knowledge of mathematics: along a (20m) ,deleted between 10 m and 15 m (b=5m) , wet get c (image) Can mathematics explain the only two axiom that the rest are just evidence (experiments), if you think so join me show you Srdanova math, see you __________________________________________________ _…

G'day superball, I'm the new one here this time. This has been one of my favourite topics for well over a decade now and I have much to share about this once my regulatory number of posts has been met. A little different, my vote is for torque free 'illusionary' wobble of the tilt of the Earths axis. Apparently somewhere between 146–130 BC, Hipparchus started the investigation into all of this after he examined the changed positions of several bright stars previously recorded by Timocharis and Aristillus over a century before. He concluded the stars were moving in a grand precession. Much later, as you know, after the fighting died down and it was agreed …

Gravity is the resultant dynamic of entropic field interaction(s). Energetic systems are propagated through space and time along entropic potential geodesics, energetically attracted to and falling into states of favorable higher entropy. I have a field theory and everything.

The Big-Bang, Dark Energy, Einstein's Cosmological Constant, the Cosmological Principle, and the unnaturally young Age of The Universe are all man-made fabrications with no relation to reality. What's Real? Gravity. Now you may think of Gravity as a distortion of Space-Time, but for the purpose of this argument, I'm going to call it Gravity. The Expansion of the Observable Universe is Speeding Up. If we were going out, we'd be Slowing Down. As it is, we're Speeding Up, and that means we're going in. That's not me, that's the evidence. Modern Scientists say Gravity is the weakest force because the Big-Bang works better without Gravity. To Newton, on the other ha…

Pi, solved.. The reason pi is infinite is because people forgot what pi is actually describing - a lie. from 2d to circles to 3d spheres, nothing has a perfectly smooth or round surface. Just like in computer model space, a true circle or sphere cannot possibly be created, it's simply more and more sides to a polygon that only appears to be a circle or sphere. imagine if you were on a computer, drew a circle, then zoomed into that circle so much that you could see the single pixels, it would always be a collection of straight lines. If you take a measurement of something such as a round lid in the real world, no matter what measurement device you used such a…

While not a climatologist I do have a graduate degree in biology. And, there is no way around the fact that biology and climate are related. I also keep to date in readings. My nature of work involves a lot of traveling so I get to learn the views of many people. Now,the very groups of people that promote human caused climate change are among those who have indicated that such events as sun spot activity have earthly effects, that there has been a shifting of the poles,that geothermal activities cause dust particles to rise into the earth's atmosphere limiting solar radition..et al. Paleontologists have come to conclusions that Antarctica at one time was tropical due…

If the following things are true about black holes: A black hole is not a finitely (however enormously so) steep depression in the fabric of space-time, but in fact a hole that leads to another point in the space-time continuum. For the length of a black hole's existence all matter drawn into a black hole exits at the same point in space-time. IE: The black hole does not simply erupt matter continuously throughout its entire existence, from formation to eventual deterioration, at the same rate it sucks it in, but all matter for all of its existence erupts at the same point in space-time all at once (mini-big bang) All black holes everywhere lead to the same point in…

Hi, Was wondering if, through the ideas of quantum consciousness in terms of the way in which we are capable of having experience through the pre-conscious to conscious processing of values of qualia etc embedded at the planck scale. Would that mean it would be impossible for us to have, as sentient beings (here and now), spiritual experience etc or anything beyond our ordinary realm of experience - not excluding spiritual experience as normal experience though - if, as a thought experience, we found ourselves enclosed within a void of nothingness. As in a space where there is absolutely nothing else but us - not worrying about air or anything. Since, the informat…

The Twin Towers were marvels of structural engineering when constructed. Nowadays, it's well accepted that they were built in a highly redundant fashion using far more steel than necessary. The structures were built to withstand the impact of multiple large planes, and there is no evidence of faulty construction. The manner in which the towers collapsed, as proven through a huge amount of video evidence from a multitude of sources, is such that they simply could not have possibly have not been demolished but in a controlled manner through the release of a tremendous amount of energy during the collapse sequence. A self initiated collapse, even taking into account the …

Hi: Let's say I suddenly develop a hypothetical medical condition that causes the cells in my body that normally-synthesize sympathetic-stimulants [such as catecholamines] and pro-inflammatory chemicals [such as histamine and cytokines] to instead synthesize morphine. Second, this medical condition eliminates any/all bodily mechanisms that specifically cause any psychological or psychologically dependence of, addiction to, or tolerance of morphine. Third, this medical condition eliminates any/all bodily mechanisms specifically responsible for withdrawal of morphine. Finally, this medical condition causes the development of mechanisms that prevent there from being any …

this concept is always disturbing my brain ,as we go back before some 10000 years or so we were hardly able to start cultivation .this all realy started 600 yers or so but the modern science and its inventions realy started benifitting since 120 years or so from 0 to particle collidor is not possible without the help of some energy or life from outside the earth and deliver it in the form of intelect, machines and its uses know hows.

If you have 2 gravitons,the inverse square law says they will accelerate towards each other,if you can not travel faster than the speed of light,therefore when 2 gravitons that are attracted towards each other reach the speed of light,they must be touching.They must also be the minimum distance possible apart(1 graviton diameter) and have the minimum possible mass?

I have a question about something that I read way back in 1956 or 57 in the only chemistry class that I ever had. The best that can remember is that each and every element have a magnetic moment at a given temperature mostly in the low -200 F°. If so would this be possible , a Gold magnet. Please see the attachment.

I have read, read,(reread!) and (reread!),until at times I wish physics had been my prize. Likely I would have had a better shot at Russian, or 20 different dialects of Chinese. I realize that nothing is perfect, but formulation without absolute stipulation stuns me. How can a formula be true for one application of a situation and not, for another part of the same event; even though they concern the same thing? I'm referfing to gravitational and magnetic shielding in sub atomic findings. And how can anything be so absolute when nothing is at rest in the universe? This is just one of many. Is the guy just another crackpot, or on the level? It's just too deep for me to unde…

If antimatter has everything backwards why not gravity too? If it has negative gravity then it would repel itself into single particles spread rather uniformly in the space. You would say then why don't we detect small annihilations when traveling in space? Maybe all the massive objects in the solar system overpowered their negative gravity and annihilated them long ago, maybe there isn't much antimatter left inside the galaxies either. Is it possible to detect such properties of the antimatter inside a lab? Have anyone tried this yet?

Lets take the example of trigonometry of heights and distances. We usually come across something like: the height of a point is 100√2 and say angle of elevation used in the problem was a Now, √2 is irrational no. and so would be 100√2. This distance can only be approximated. So is it that a point can't be observed at an angle a but at any other angle closer to it or is it that a point can't be at 100√2 units from an observer. Sorry for my ignorance. Thanks

UNIVERSES CAN NOT BE CREATED ,THE UNIVERSES WERE ALWAYS THERE AND ALWAYS WILL BE ,BUT THEY MAY HAVE LIFE CYCLES LIKE BECOMING BLACK HOLES AND THEN AGAIN BIG BANG AND CREATION STARTS.

According to Einstein no objects in our known universe can travel faster than the speed of light, 299,792,458 meters per second. As an object approaches the speed of light its mass approaches infinity, thus said object would require an infinite force in order to accelerate past the speed of light. Theirs another side to this story though, European scientist claim to have logged a subatomic particle,referred to as an neutrino, traveling faster than the speed of light. This group performed their study a second time , confirming their original results. The theory of relativity has held strong through the years, recreated on a variable scale, thus , according to Ei…

These are my questions and theories: Could using a Collider in the near future help in space exploration? If we wanted to go close to the speed of light eventually or speed up gradually to the speed of light, could we use a collider with an engine similar to a jet propulsion engine with an expulsion area so that it would take the left over energy to propel your ship at high speeds? I know that NASA has already used ION drives for their satellites. So theoretically, could this be possible? Additional Details Now the issue with folding space... does matter exist in…