Skip to content

Speculations

Pseudoscientific or speculatory threads belong here.

Speculations Forum Rules

The Speculations forum is provided for those who like to hypothesize new ideas in science. To enrich our discussions above the level of Wild Ass Guesswork (WAG) and give as much meaning as possible to such speculations, we do have some special rules to follow:

  1. Speculations must be backed up by evidence or some sort of proof. If your speculation is untestable, or you don't give us evidence (or a prediction that is testable), your thread will be moved to the Trash Can. If you expect any scientific input, you need to provide a case that science can measure.
  2. Be civil. As wrong as someone might be, there is no reason to insult them, and there's no reason to get angry if someone points out the flaws in your theory, either.
  3. Keep it in the Speculations forum. Don't try to use your pet theory to answer questions in the mainstream science forums, and don't hijack other threads to advertise your new theory.

The movement of a thread into (or out of) Speculations is ultimately at the discretion of moderators, and will be determined on a case by case basis.

  1. Started by maruikia,

    This is an idea I had quite recently. I know it needs work, and I would've liked to have diagrams of what I mean exactly when I say a certain thing. But here is my first draft. Jan. 2, 2012 This theory was developed with these laws in mind: 1. At the beginning and end of all things, there must be nothing. 2. In order to compare something to isolate its true nature, something that has no prior characteristic must be used. 3. These characteristics are relationships the object in question has with something else. 4. If something has no relationship to any other, it does not exist and is nothing. The universe is only as big as there is another landmar…

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 6 replies
    • 1.9k views
    • 1 follower
  2. Guest Maciej Marosz
    Started by Guest Maciej Marosz,

    Below typical Example conversation Train go or Station move an movies about my discover ( Sorry for my English) Professor– OK lets speak about velocity Matthias – actual for me not exist precision Velocity definition why ,what You mean not exist everything is relative I'm sitting but I moving the velocity definition is very easy just before You say velocity You must give another objects that You use as a Zero Definition , Not exists absolutely speed in universe. Sir I invent dynamic method to show absolutely universal velocity any objects You can't be smarter than millions people before, You make basic mistake like all inv…

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 0 replies
    • 1.1k views
  3. Started by swansont,

    I've added this to one of the locked sticky threads, but have reproduced it here for discussion. ——————— It's human nature to categorize people, and if you're introducing a new subject for discussion — some new, possibly untested idea that is not part of the standard curriculum of science — you don't want to be classified as a crackpot. Here is some the behavior you must avoid. 1. Vocabulary Crackpots misuse terminology, especially terms like theory, or dogma. You don't want to be the one who proclaims "it's only a theory" or "you're being dogmatic" and make it clear you don't know the definitions of the words. Unless your posts actually get redacted,…

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 48 replies
    • 6.4k views
    • 2 followers
  4. Started by dimreepr,

    Powley's principle seems 2 suggest, for me at least, that all the atoms and all the energy was created or established at the moment of the big bounce or if you will the big inflation. It suggests that all the atoms in the universe was created at this point. What if the atom is accreted around quarks, the energy condenses space/time by means of standing waves, because space/time is in a very weak but generally positive ground state*, thus stretching space/time and creating gravity. *For me space/time is in a generally positive ground state but look microscopicaly and it's a seething mass of changing states going from positive to negative. Allowing Durac's equat…

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 17 replies
    • 2.5k views
  5. I have something that I have found but would like to get more feed back on this pertaining to the Hubble constant and the proton mass. It appears that these two elements have a relation to the h constant, gravity, and pi ratio squared, here is what I have found thus far and would like to understand more on this….. In my first find y is undefined, so I had nothing to work with, but this inverted gave me a defined value which I then could work with. I would like to know, if you find this interesting, as I am trying to get some information on this here, if there is something of interest you find, then I would like to share more information… I need to be clear t…

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 0 replies
    • 920 views
  6. Hello, I am trying to find out something about Earth and Uranus, it appears that they may be in phase some how in relation to precession. I have been experimenting with figures and differential calculus in relation to the dates of 1776 2012 and 2029, now these dates were given by an online year converter, I used a birth date to get these figures and was trying to use winter solstice as a starting period only... I am seeing this precession here with the year 2012. This year of 2012 is also used as the denominator or delta x, and yes I am trying to find a relation to the Maya End Date Calender here. Please note what I am also trying to do is get the derivative fo…

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 11 replies
    • 2.8k views
    • 1 follower
  7. How will this finding effect the standard model? http://www.popsci.com/science/article/2011-09/baffling-cern-results-show-neutrinos-moving-faster-speed-light

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 6 replies
    • 1.8k views
  8. Hello I am not an expert in chemestry, but someone told me about this weird substance called monatomic gold. Or white powder gold that apparentkly has amazing abilities. So I typed it up on google and got a lot of weird results. I will start of with this example Advertising Link Removed By Moderator, which seems to be a typical snake oil salesman site that is just after money for selling something that does not work. But then I clicked on a couple of more hits and came across stuff that made me starting to doubt. Advertising Link Removed By Moderator The above websites go on about something called ORMUS and how its actually had scientific researched conducted.…

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 3 replies
    • 7.6k views
  9. Started by Andeh,

    This is really speculative. So speculative that it's probably going to piss people off even though it's in the Speculation section. Likewise, I have no idea how to test it, so it's not scientific. But whatever... First, some backgorund info. In pair production, two photons (chargeless) can create an electron (negative charge) and a positron (positive charge), so the charges cancel out, and the whole system is neutral. Likewise, if there is extra energy (more energy than the rest mass of the particles) it becomes kinetic energy after pair production, and the electron and positron move in opposite directions--therefor the motion also cancels out. I had the i…

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 1 reply
    • 1.2k views
    • 1 follower
  10. Started by I think out of the box,

    Hello, I was wondering something that I have pondered on for some time now it is here: Pi Ratio Simply Squared As G 3.14^2 = 9.8596 9.8596 degree = 0.172082483 radian 9.8596 degree = 0.027387778 revolution Could pi ratio squared really be confused as gravity?? Could this be what that Higgs Fields is all about, in relation to pi ratio empty space and the Higgs Bosson?? And mostly, can this explain the constant of proportionality in relation to Issac Newtons' F= G*m1 m1/r squared? I never really did understand why pi ratio is used in some of the most rigorousness of equations used in this study, and maybe this can bring some light on m…

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 23 replies
    • 16.6k views
    • 2 followers
  11. "Time dilation" and "space contraction" are the important deductions from Einstein's special relativity(SR), based on "the principle of constant speed of light in vacuum" and the observation of moving objects in his thought experiment. Actually, Einstein's thought experiment is one kind of observation of length for a moving object with an invariable velocity, and there are many methods for us to be selected to measure the length of a moving object. for an experimental measurement, the errors caused by the method and equipment must be considered and be applied to correct the results. Lorentz's transformation from SR, which is only satisfied …

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 68 replies
    • 13k views
    • 1 follower
  12. Started by pantheory,

    Strange New "Species" of Ultra-Red Galaxy Discovered http://www.scienceda...11201125358.htm I was thinking about putting this article in the science news section here but realized that the comments that I wished to make are not mainstream, so they would be considered speculative so I posted the article here. As long as they have been using the Hubble and VLBA/ VLBI (long baseline radio telescopes) they have been seeing at the farthest distances very old appearing galaxies like we can find in our local galactic neighborhood. I expect when the James Webb goes up they will also see the same thing. It has always seemed likely to me that a number of the furthest of…

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 15 replies
    • 2.8k views
  13. Started by Sandra1,

    Somebody just published a theory of life that looks meritorious. I'd love to hear what everyone here has to say about this: Link removed by Moderator

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 7 replies
    • 1.9k views
    • 1 follower
  14. Started by dimreepr,

    The one thing I have learned on this forum is, you have to get the question right. My first attempt at this was, I'm afraid a disaster.This was due to my lack of eloquence and naivety (on this forum). So having a weeks experience, here goes. I think matter is, fundamentaly made up of an energy/spacetime interaction*. For me this goes along way to explaining our universe. E=MC^2, matter anihilation when the energy is released, the reason gravity is so weak compared to the other forces and gravity itself*. Now this I'm not clever enough to be sure but it seems to comply with durac's equation. I'm clearly no einstien, consequently I have no math to back up this hypothe…

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 6 replies
    • 1.9k views
  15. Started by minimoman,

    If tiny quiantum particles constantly blip in and out of space, do you think that possibl your universe is a blip of space? Like the big bang was the blip into space and eventually we are just goignto blip out?

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 7 replies
    • 1.9k views
  16. There is a proof of the singular nature of black holes, but it is being ignored. This proof was mentioned in an old paper by Michael Rowan Robinson. It can be found in ArXiv from after 1998. I ran across it by accident and I do not remember the title or year of publicatiion. I e-mailed him to ask if he could remember the paper where he made the comment. In his comment, he said that it has been suggested that black holes, precisely and only because they are relativistic singularities, must possess an hyperbolic gravitational field. A singularity, as a single point mass with infinite density, must have a gravitational field that also tends to infinity as one approaches …

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 11 replies
    • 2.5k views
  17. Hello I’m sorry. I can’t English well. My native language is not English. Important Report on the Dark Energy and Gravitational Potential Energy [Abstract] Gravity is the force conquering the structure of the universe. By recognizing the components of the universe, we are estimating the quantity of components composing the universe through size of gravity and gravitational potential energy (GPE). In this paper, it is being shown that the universe can be created and expanded through pair creation of positive energy (mass) and negative energy (mass) from zero energy condition. Also, GPE is composed by 3 units of [math]U_{++}[/math], [math]U_{-…

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 2 replies
    • 2k views
    • 1 follower
  18. I know I can't describe this mathematically but I'll try to do it with mere words. Black holes have or do in some theories a singularity at the center, I have given this some thought and what if this singularity is connected with the singularity of the beginning of the universe and all matter that falls into a black hole is shuffled back to the big bang as it happened. So the universe is indeed a steady state as matter is drawn into a black hole it is immediately shuffled back to the instant of the big bang. This would make black holes recyclers of the universe. The reason I thought of this is due to time having no meaning (so I've read) beyond the event horizon and…

  19. Started by Steve Christopher,

    Hi, I'm new here but I wanted to show you people how the true nature of the universe is actually a tiny, inverted one. Cyrus Teed's foundational premise that the Earth's surface is concave and all the planets, sun, moon and stars are actually very small in relation to it and fit inside a hollow, inverted Earth has never been debunked. In addition to his theory I want to point out the optical illusory effects of the glass ceiling about 70 miles high that plays tricks on the eye and causes one to perceive the sun and moon as spherical but are actually not. Her are some videos from m y webpage I made concerning the subject at hand. Here's my webpage that consol…

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 49 replies
    • 14.6k views
    • 1 follower
  20. Started by bbouch111,

    What does everyone think? http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/sideshow/mysterious-planet-sized-object-spotted-near-mercury-154443870.html

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 27 replies
    • 4.3k views
    • 1 follower
  21. Started by jimmydasaint,

    At the end of October 2011, I had a very vivid dream. I was driving along a motorway in my car when, all of a sudden, there was thick black smoke all across the motorway. I had to make a quick decision what to do and I decided to speed up to get clear of the smoke. I could not see anything at all in front of me. Suddenly, I saw a car in front of me and I could not stop in time. As the collision occurred I woke up. About a week and a half later this happened: M5 Motorway Crash Which field of science could answer the reasons behind this occurence? Is it simple coincidence? Because if it is, then my wife and one of my children dreamed about the death of m…

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 1 reply
    • 1.2k views
  22. Started by The time Traveller,

    Not my post

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 5 replies
    • 2.6k views
    • 1 follower
  23. Started by kitkat,

    There was an article on the internet that indicated that science was get close to reversing and stopping the aging process. We could possibly live to be a 1000 years old. While this idea might be intriguing to envision living that long of a lifetime, I would imagine that it would produce many undesirable consequences in our society. First this probably would only be available to the very rich and powerful government individuals while the masses would never get the opportunity to live that long. It would turn our society in the worst possible corruption scenario never before seen in our species. Mass execution of the population would occur leaving only a large en…

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 19 replies
    • 2.4k views
  24. Started by heavensdemon,

    So the main gripe with the big bang theory is how did something come out of nothing? Im gonna try and explain it in easy terms. Obviously this is a theory but see what you think and please try and debunk this theory somehow. Firstly imagine nothing. Infinite nothingness, pretty easy to comprehend right? Now take infinite energy and put that energy into the nothingness. You might think its not possible but it definitely is and ill explain how. Imagine something small, and now imagine something smaller. If you keep going there will be nothing relative to whatevers watching. Now imagine blowing up a balloon, thats gonna pop if theres to much pressure inside, thats pr…

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 2 replies
    • 1.5k views
  25. Started by superball,

    Greetings folks, this is an opportunity for you to include your observations, and possible outcomes for the near future. Predictions should follow the geologic, and climate change effects. Earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, whatever. If you predict an earth quake include the magnitude it should be at least a 6.0 or better. Location will be difficult to predict. If you predict a volcanic eruption, give the name of the volcano. this is not easy to do, you may say a major eruption will occur, and give a date or estimate. Serious predictions is best, not Michel Jackson ghost will come back and haunt the globe theater, Pull a rabbit out of your hat for science. …

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 19 replies
    • 4.3k views

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.