Speculations

Simultaneity: special relativity, matter wave, uncertainty principle and QM By Xuefeng Frank Yuan 1: Relational value and its correlational value: symmetry of relational values For any two associated physical quantities present, such as space and time or a pair of conjugate variables, the relational value reflecting the changes of two associated physical quantities, such as the speed or the product of conjugate variables changes, corresponds to a correlational value. This correlational value also reflects the changes of the associated physical quantities. The relational value and its correlational value satisfy two…

Non-real relational values and simultaneity: the relationship between special relativity, matter wave and uncertainty principle 1: For any two associated physical quantities present in physics, such as time and space or a pair of conjugate variables, the relational value reflecting the two associated physical quantities changes, such as the velocity or the product of conjugate variables, is the real relational value. It corresponds to a non-real relational value. The non-real relational value also reflects the changes of the associated physical quantities. The real relational value is defined by the relevant physical quantities, so it cannot alone prove the c…

there is no wave, just act like wave. I have one article to prove superposition is equal to the law of middle or included the middle. another one is tell how a thing satisfy the law of middle exist. Superposition principle and irrationality.docx Non-real relational values and simultaneity.docx

It is quite possible to construct a theory based on a false hypothesis and continue to create further ad hoc hypotheses to cover an entourage of anomalies as long as they keep on coming forth. This situation is true for both Big Bang Theory (Dark Matter, Dark Energy, Asymmetric Matter-Antimatter Reactions, Decomposing Dark Matter) and Quantum Theory (first created as a massless speed of light particle with negligible interaction with matter, explaining the range of beta emissions, and becoming a magic entity [non-conservational] like BigBangium] making it a panacaea of ad hoc covers across both extreme disciplines, from sub-PARTICLE physics [let’s face it] to cosmology!!…

I propose that Rutherfords hypothesis of neutrons in the nucleus is incorrect, and that this hypothesis stands in the way of an understanding of gravity akin to that of magnetism. Magnetism has been shown to be a Special Relativistic effect of opposite charges in different inertial frames. Gravity may be understood as a General Relativistic effect of opposite charges in different non-inertial frames in similar manner. If correct, we have a basis for an expanding universe due to a gravitational dipole resulting from the opposite charges on the antiparticles of the electron and the proton. Fred Hoyle's Steady State Universe would then be possibility.

Imagine a spherical volume of space and time representing a photon as 60 iterations that reduce, via sphere eversion, by one planck length at a time: x^2+y^2+z^2-n=4/3pix^3 x/((2(3^59))=1.616229e-35 x=1.616229e-35*((2(3^59))) x=4.56758796e-7 x^2+y^2+z^2+n=(4/3*pi*4.56758796e-7)^3 x+y+z=square root(7.0036847e-18-n) x+y+z=7.0036847e-18^(1/2)-n^(1/2) n^(1/2)=7.0036847e-18^(1/2)-(3(4.56758796e-7)) n=7.0036847e-18^(1/2)-(3(4.56758796e-7))^2 8x-6y-4z-7=2.6445699e-9 8x-6y-4z=2.6445699e-9+7 4x-3y-2z=(2.6445699e-9+7)/2 4x-3y-2z=3.50000000132 S(0)=x^2+y^2+z^2+4x-3y-2z-3.50000000132=0 S(60)=x^2+y^2+z^2+4x-3y-…

Immortality in jellyfish?

Hi Everyone I would firstly like to start by saying that I fully understand why us humans are not able to use quantum entanglement for FTL communication. It is because we can't force an outcome without breaking the entanglement and we can't detect as soon as a measurement has been made at the other end. My question is this: Does quantum entanglement mean that the Universe itself has privileged access to a means of FTL communication for its own administrative purposes? (I can't see how quantum entanglement would work otherwise.) Thank you very much Kind regards Tim

I think no other war in history had so many potential alternative scenarios which could have easily change the course of entire history as WWII. It includes: 1) Why Japan chose to attack US in Dec. 1941 instead attacking USSR together with Germany and Italy in Jun. 1941? Wouldn't it have a much better chances of success? And what would happen if Japan would attack USSR instead of US? 2) Why Germany proclaimed war on US in Dec. 1941 right after US proclaimed war on Japan? If Japan failed Hitler and proclaimed neutrality in war in Europe, why Hitler decided to remember an ally obligations in Dec. 1941? Wouldn't it be much clever decision for Germany to abstain fro…

Irrationality and logical paradox 1: Rational thinking and the self of rational thinking If and only if we know the definition of self in human thinking, can we know the structure of human thinking. I will start by discussing the basis of rational thinking-formal logic and use logical paradox as testing. There are three basic laws of formal logic. 1: The law of identity 2: The law of non-contradiction 3: The law of excluded middle The law of identity states that something is what it is. Expressed as symbols: A = A. The law of non-contradiction says that a …

We are sensitive to music. What about matter? Is there a song that impresses protons, neutrons, or electrons? A song that can have testable physical or biological effects? The colors of the spectrum of light remind us of a chord of seven consecutive notes (built with musical intervals of seconds). Could chords on the radio spectrum be new lights to determine relevant scientific advances? For example one: 4243 Hz 4495 5045 5345 6000 6735 7560 equivalent to F# G A Bb C D E (frequency relation G: F # = 1.0594631) or a 7000 Hz 7857 8819 9899 11112 11773 13214 equivalent to F# G# A# B# C## D# E# Could chords like these at the right frequency …

Hi,is there a technique to slow down an asteroid with the help of other asteriodes or the gravity of jupiter?an asteriode with a speed of 10km / h to the pole would it be a risk for the earth?

Do you think the gates of heaven are at the center of black holes (speculation)?

At the risk of being completely idiot here below something I wonder: Step1: the positive & negative on the number line. This above is a representation of the number line, the Real numbers going from zero to positives on the right & negative to the left. Step 2: When it comes to multiplication, we can show the sign rule in the following diagram. Where we have the product of 2 positives is positive. The product of a positive with a negative is a negative, the product of 2 negatives is a positive. Step 3: From the diagram above it comes out that the square of a Real number, positive or negative, is always positive. As shown below, t…

What are the pros & cons? I have my own thoughts but do not want to limit the direction of the conversation by including them in the OP.

All matter is dark matter. If gravity warps space (seems to have been proven back in 1917) then logically all matter is indeed dark matter (yes, even you) depending only on your position in space. This can be revealed by watching numerous videos where they show weights being laid on spandex and throwing marbles around to show how gravity warps space. It is watch the pretty marbles go until you put names on the objects. If there are two weights name one of them Andromeda and the other Milky Way, with a little electron on the back we will call earth. The little marbles call them: photons, x-rays, gamma rays, or any other electromagnetic wave. One can see that the vast…

Electron-Positron Dipole (EPD) model of dark matter was set up initially, and force amongst EPDs, force amongst EPDs and visible matters, and EPDs’ space distribution law are given. Electric field, magnetic field, electromagnetic field and gravitational field can be explained reasonably with EPDs’ regular polarization, directional deflection, induced oscillation and density gradient. 4 kinds of field substance and physical substance can be unified reasonably. Substance of dark matter had been verified with vacuum friction, EPDs’ thermal motion, electron-positron pair creation and annihilation. It is the essential reasons of dark matter invisible that EPDs can transmit but…

It seems to be absurd to me that you locked me out that way (easily), without letting me present my supporting evidences to the previous title, 'Everything in the universe are expanding three dimensional'. Any way I'm back. First, I have to accept that I have to correct my self, in the strict rule of the scientific world, a 'theory' is a a very ' holy word' to present as to the level of theologians, thus, it a sacred word, so, I stand corrected. Mine is simply a a 'hypothesis Somehow, to connect to my previous claim, there are on-going studies in geology that favoring that the earth, as to the data and analysis gathered, showing, that indeed, the earth is is expa…

! Moderator Note As per the rules no advertisement to external blogs, the discussion should be facilitated here. The linked article examines the fundamental assumption of the evolution theory by which, just because each new organism has subtly different genome than its parents, this will eventually lead to genomes with information for previously nonexistent, functional and niche occupying structures, such as organs. For that purpose, first it compares two libraries. One library contains ‘realized genomes’ — i.e. all genomes that could have been formed during the entire history of life on Earth. Another library contains ‘unrealize…

I was a believer in the theory that 'gravity' does not exist as a natural force but rather due to the Earth expanding from it's center in a three dimensional way. I just learned recently the debate between the a 'Flat Earth' advocates contending that the Earth is not round. Believers in Flat Earth keeps on claiming that everywhere you look, even the horizon is perfectly horizontal and even showing the proof that Kansas is perfectly flat. It also makes no sense to me regarding the basics of Euclidean Geometry that no two straight lines can be vertically parallel from each lines if they were drawn from the center of a circle. However, to make a flat ground on the surfac…

Our solar system contains the planets: Mercury, Venus, Earth, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, Neptune. And with our technology we have seen that there is no trace of intelligent and evolved life in any of them. What if there was life in all of them? From Mercury to Neptune? Each life unfolds in a different dimension on each planet, each with its different biology and evolution in each of the planets of our solar system! Incommunicable, separated by dimensions ... And this law extends to all the planets of the universe, as for a better use of space and less unnecessary interference from one system of life to the other. Then that's it! Thank you!

According to Einstein’s theory of general relativity, mass/gravity bends the fabric of space-time. The greater the mass/gravitational pull of an object, the more it curves space-time. This causes time to pass slower in areas of space that have stronger gravitational fields. For example, if you synchronize two atomic clocks on the surface of earth, then put one of the clocks in orbit and left the other on the surface of earth, then the clock in orbit would run slightly faster. So the relationship is as you approach a center of mass, time runs slower. In other words, as gravity increases the passage of time decreases (relative to outside observer). The objects in the univer…

In my very thorough research on the gravity constant I made a connection between known constants ( G , c ; NA ) After a solid year of research on the gravitation constant , that I now say is 7.46209031*10-11 Nm2/kg2 , I have to question its real nature . It seem to be a mere modulus (multiplier) when modifying the qualities of kg*kg and mass .Here some short notes picked from my work to this topic. I'm very sorry for my still poor writing , and the shortness almost looses the ideas . On FB< Essence of gravitation > , hear from you.

This theory begins with an understanding of puissant emergent energy (PEE) that fills the content of space. It is an ocean of neutrinos in their natural state (no heat, no charge and beyond the speed of light) before they slow down and cycle through an atomic creation. When ejected from an atomic organization through some kind of atomic decay or disintegration, the neutrinos speed up and move back to their natural state. When the PEE slows and whirls into the electronic organization of matter, the incessant pull of gravity is created. Gravity is a pull on the PEE field by an electromagnetic atomic system. Neutrinos being pulled in and condensed into a nucleus is the …

Could quantum mechanics lead into relativity through string theories holographic field theory by assuming that all systems in the universe, systems being objects that are observable, are themselves independent universes that are mirrored off of itself into separate dimensions? If you were to have a universe created which mimics the effects of an electron then that universe is mirrored in some way, shape or form causing all assumed electrons simply be mirrors of the same electron universe?