graybear13

I understand your need for mathematical proof. With all due respect, I believe you already have the math you need to understand the initial vortexes of my hypothesis. It is Einstein's math that, by the way, is the same math you reversed in time to come up with the big bang concept. Instead of an explosion creating atomic matter, Einstein's direction in time would have created collapsing and condensing of clouds of energy particles being forced toward atomic, star, spiral galaxy, and quasar ignitions. (mesotron solves the unified field theory puzzle). Sadly, I cannot mathematically prove mesotron ,but I can visualize it because I see it everywhere in NASA and other images of the universe i.e. spiral galaxies and quasars. You can see the hour glass structure everywhere you look. All that being said, The vortexes that feed the core of mesotron are mathematically provable by Einstein's math. Also I have performed an experiment that clearly demonstrates the airfoil affect created by a spinning pyramid. I have attempted to create the affect, thermodynamically, with air, but I could not generate nearly enough heat up through and out of the pyramid or near enough cold projected toward the airfoils to collapse the hot air into vortexes. Mesotron's force, mass and power is what creates and holds everything together. The Higgs field math you have created is a glimpse of masotron. When we harness the power of mesotron, guess what, no more need for fossil fuel. I realize I am in the land of giants, but I am not here to steal the goose that lays the golden eggs. I am here to give you Fort Knox. I am an old man not moving as fast as I used to. My wife and I had doctors appointments yesterday that took all day. Got home and saw that you all had responded and I gave pzgfw a quick lighthearted response to say that I do understand and completely agree with big bang beginning @ star ignition and moving forward in time. Got something to eat, took care of my home dialysis, came back to my computer and....locked out . That was a pretty quick reaction. Seems extremely defensive. Maybe my hypothesis is a threat to your way of thinking. After all, I am going with Einstein's original instinct. Before he was swayed by politics. I am sorry that I cannot give you mesotron mathematically. All I can do is point you in the right direction and hope someone with power and influence will eventually see the truth in what Einstein was trying to say. "We cannot solve our problems using the same thinking we used when we created them." Einstein regards gray

I agree with the big bang theory except for the big bang part. And the magic gravity that some how collapses a cloud of gas into star ignition. I know B.S. when I see it.

Is anyone ready to give up on the nonsensical big bang B.S, yet (bad science , that is) ???? If not now, when? It's obvious, or it should be, that this theory's notion of some primeval atom from which everything (billions of galaxies) sprang forth in a split second is completely illogical and most of us on the outside of science looking in are getting a little tired of this big bang B.S. It's time to move on, salvage what you can and move on. Find something to replace primeval atom as the beginning. I entered my hypothesis here and was told in no uncertain terms no one here wants to hear it; that your theory might be wrong at it's core. We will never know until the big bang B.S. fever breaks. Come on people. We need results that can save the planet. Stop spinning your wheels building bigger and bigger colliders spending billions and billions of dollars trying to create temperatures that can break down atomic matter. You have done that and there is nothing left to see. At least consider the possibility that the beginning was not an instant flash of heat but rather an accumulation of heat over billions of years that led to the stars lighting up the heavens, and galaxy formation.

I am an old retired land surveyor in middle America. I am not a scientist or an engineer. I cannot provide any scientific evidence or proof that this machine will be able to produce a vortex with over 1,000 mph wind speed. That is what the experiment is for. I have presented a logical speculation of a unified theory. Logic and a little common sense is all that is needed to understand the concept. I don't hear anyone disputing the logic. All that is left to do is gather up some money and perform the experiment. Yes I have been raked over the coals through the years for daring to challenge the 'hairbrained theory" big bang. I don't disagree with big bang from the time the stars lit up until now, it is just the question of what caused those clouds of hydrogen cloud to collapse and condense into star ignition. I think it is important to understand how that happened; what was the process. I am sorry that pyramids and vortexes are key to understanding this last puzzle piece. It does make it harder for folks to take me seriously because of myths and legends about pyramid power, and tornados destructive power; how can a destructive power lead to a creative power?

I am not insane, mad or foolish if that is what you mean to say. I am clear eyed about what I know the reaction will be as I try to reveal this unknow force. I have been insulted and chastised for years, but I keep trying. I think you should give this idea a deep ponder before you just blow it off. You are right. I just should have left your question for another time.

There is plenty of independent evidence of collapsing clouds of gas, true vortexes. There is no evidence of this whole structure that I know of. There are hints or it in the cosmos. The problem is that we cannot see the vortexes because they are composed of dark matter. All we can see are the accretion disks and the nuclei. This is a yet to be discovered atomic force. I have played around with this machine over the years and the only thing I know for sure is that the air foils will create the small vortexes. Have not been able to put it all together to create the large vortex; beyond my ability as an engineer, not to mention way beyond my funding for a hobby. I am not a mathematician, but the prediction of Einstein's mathematics, which was that gravity would make huge amounts of matter collapse inward into an increasingly smaller and denser point, which he called a singularity, would be a good place to start. Sorry. I just meant to brush the question aside because I was hoping to discuss the gravity machine.

The wheel makes it easier to move heavy objects around on the surface of the earth because it has an affect on earth's gravity. Perhaps it's like surfing a wave.

create a large vortex above the pyramid spinning at the speed of the pyramid. A pyramid sized to create a 10ft. diameter vortex spinning at 6,000rpm will produce wind speeds of around 2,000 mph. For this to work thermodynamically the pyramid must be hot and being hit by cold air. Ionized gas is injected into the system up through the hollow axel and out two opposite walls of the pyramid. The ionized gas will help form the large vortex as it is influence by the spinning magnetic field at the peak of the pyramid. Then create a second Pyramid Vortex Generator with opposite spin. Aim the two vortexes at each other. They will join together and continue to collapse forming an accretion disk, all collapsing into a larger and larger mass. The result will be more and more gravity, pressure and heat potentially resulting in a fusion reaction. A growing gravity bubble will form in earth's gravity field surrounding the system. Everything inside of the bubble will be weightless and experience zero G-force while moving around in earth's atmosphere.

The only thing that can save us from completely destroying the atmosphere is to overcome earth's gravity beyond rockets, wings and wheels. Pyramid Vortex Generator Gravity Machine: This experiment will show how nothing becomes something and it will demonstrate how gravity is the beginning of matter and is the glue that holds matter together. It will also create a containment vessel for a fusion reaction. Start with a steel pyramid of some scaled down dimensions of the great pyramid of Giza with an electro magnet at its peak. Then mount it on a hollow shaft and spin it. Now shoot a jet of air at the spinning pyramid. The faces of the pyramid, as they pass the jet of air, will act as air foils creating a vortex; the same as the air foil on top of a wing in forward motion creates a vortex. If you surround the spinning pyramid with jets of air aimed at it, you will produce vortexes collapsing toward the peak of the pyramid. When allof the vortexes come together they will cre

My initial assumptions are correct and my logic is sound. With all due respect, dependence on mathematics as the only way to move forward is a big part of the problem with physics. A little bit of common sense is what is needed. It's as if we have given up the ability to visualize a way forward. Math has led us into a blind ally with nothing ahead but a dead end. I don't have the ability to speak the language of mathematics, but I can see how math was used to create a primeval atom that Einstein went along with, reversing his math in time to eventually send us chasing wild geese up a blind ally. Big bang is BS (bad science). So there will be no math. I can prove what I say to be true by experiment, but there is no interest (yet) in funding experiments that could prove big bang to be BS. I know I am in the land of giants who believe that I have come to steal the goose that lays golden eggs (big bang). Not so. I have come to show you how to access unlimited clean energy, but it will take a major rewire of the current thinking about a few things. Thank you for the insult. It means a lot coming from someone who thinks that if you jump out of an airplane you become weightless. If that were the case you wouldn't need a parachute to keep earth's gravity from smashing you like a bug when you hit the ground. Linear gravity is the movement of neutrinos through your body pushing you down if you are in the air, on the ground or in a cavern under the ground. The charged protons and uncharged neutrons of the nucleus of an atom are held together by the reciprocating force of the Mesotron. If Mesotron is destroyed this will facilitate all sorts of atomic breakup and material disintegration

I will start with a few axioms that will justify my logic First and foremost is a quote from Albert Einstein " We cannot solve our problems with the same thinking that we used when we created them." Second, there is no evidence of a gravitational attraction between masses. Third, dark matter is not matter at all. It is a field of pre-atomic emergent energy particles (neutrinos). Finally there was no big bang that started atomic creation. Atomic creation started with zero point energy (neutrinos) organizing themselves, through gravitational collapse and electronic organization into atoms. Heat is a byproduct of atomic activity built up over billions of years. The cosmos is much older than we think. At this point in time science sees no connection between neutrinos and atoms. I posit that there is the ultimate connection in that atoms are electronically organized neutrinos. Why else would neutrinos be given off when atoms break down for one reason or another? The process of organizing neutrinos into atoms is the missing piece of the puzzle. How does a flow of neutrinos collapse and condense to the point at which an active nucleus is created? And once an active nucleus begins to project a positive charge, how is that contained and supported by the flow of neutrinos? Every atom of a mass exerts a pull on the field of neutrinos to feed its atomic activity. We know that neutrinos have no direct influence on the atoms of a mass as they pass through, but there is an indirect push or nudge on the atoms of, for example, my body because they pull in neutrinos that are moving toward earth in order to feed and support their active nuclei. If the flow of neutrinos stops, the nucleus will die. The experiment to measure the nudge on my atoms is the easiest experiment in the world, just hop on a scale. The result of a 100 trillion (or so) tiny nudges per second is your weight. If we can find a way to feed the atoms of our bodies from a source of neutrinos that are not moving toward earth there would be no nudge toward earth on each of my atoms therefore I would weightless in relation to earths gravitational field. How to create a warp in the flow of dark matter that can redirect the flow of neutrinos toward the center of the warp is a problem that can be solved with this 'new way of thinking' about gravity. In my view the missing neutrinos coming from the sun is equal to the number of neutrinos that are absorbed by the planet and the life on it. All of which must be fed energy in order to continue to exist. Neutrinos are raining down on earth from outer space ( dark matter), riding in on light beams from the sun and cycling through atoms; negative charge pulling them in and positive pushing them out. The flow of neutrinos being incessantly pulled in by a mass is linear gravity.

I do not think you should assume anything about me. Whether or not I understand the math is not relevant. I understand, from what I have read, that Einstein said "it is ridiculous to suggest a moment of creation from a primeval atom", but the Catholic church's priest Lamaitre, with the help of Edwin Hubble, convinced Einstein to change his way of thinking. This led directly to BBT and now you say that BBT has nothing to do with the creation of the universe. I guess you have to deny the primeval atom/singularity in the end, but that leaves BBT without meaning. Something from nothing doesn't really work. Einstein was on the right track until his way of thinking was changed by Hubble and Lamaitre. I do not have to be able to do the math to see the difference between exploding from nothing into creation and PEE slowing down and collapsing and then exploding into creation. The universe is a lot older than is predicted by BBT. For all we know our local universe may expand and contract over hundreds of billions of years It probably depends on how the PEE is moving. The atomic universe is drifting and moving within the PEE.

Yes. I saw the connection in the 1982 form of the experiment. I was shinning lights at a spinning mirror pyramid and I saw the spinning effect that was caused by the light reflecting off of the passing pyramid walls. Later I had some success with making the transition to a thermodynamic spinning effect in atmosphere. If the experiment were to move forward, any suggestions on how best to create the vortex thermodynamically should certainly be considered. I do not have a strong vortex in my hand because I have not been able to control the variables; temperatures, air pressures and rate of spin. Not to mention electromagnetism and ionized gasses. regards, gray When I have a vortex that I can control, then I can have two vortexes that I can control. When I force them to join at their tips, If the spheres form, that is the framework of the genesis particle. The spinning pyramid is the cause of the vortexes. I never said that I doubted the value of mathematics in physics. I did say that I dismiss the mathematics behind the big bang theory of creation because it is backwards and wrong headed. That is what my threat is about, creation. When I attack the big bang b.s. I am not attacking the standard model unless the big bang is part of the standard model. regards, gray

Thank you for your questions Ghideon. Yes, it is the same gravity as measured by mainstream science. No conflict, just a new understanding. a new way of thinking. The disturbance in space-time that has been accepted by mainstream science needs to be defined and then connected to all of these measurements. I am sure they will interface nicely. All of the standard model derives from the transfer of energy from PEE field into the electronic organization of matter. The Genesis particle is the conductor/conduit of PEE. If this experiment creates strong gravity, that would be some new stuff. I believe that the creation will seem to be anti gravity, but it is really just gravity creating it's own reality (disturbance) in space-time. If the Genesis particle manifests and continues compressing the air, the enhanced gravity could become strong enough to ignite a fusion reaction and contain it. That would be some new stuff. When an atom performs radioactively it degrades its own genesis particle giving up PEE particles. This explains why, when atoms perform radioactively, they emit far more energy than would be expected. This excess of radiation comes from the breaking up of the Genesis particle. regards, gray

The shape of a pyramid is the only shape that will create a dip in the air flow across it's face when spinning against an opposing air mass. The shape and tilt of the pyramid wall will determine the shape and tilt of the vortex created. The dimensions of the great pyramid of Cheops, it seems to me, are best suited to create a spiral vortex. I don't know. It seemed like a good place to start. I think that the pyramid should be the magnet. I don't know that spheres will manifest, but that is one of the objectives of the experiment; what will happen when two vortexes push against each other's push to continue collapsing and condensing? Again, I don't know, but I would like to find out if a new structure will appear. One that will increase the gravity of the two vortexes. All good questions. Thank you for your interest. regards, gray Thank you for your interest. I played with a spinning pyramid for a long time as a hobby while I pursued my career as a professional land surveyor. I injected the pyramid with cold air into hot air outside of the spinning pyramid. When I realized that I needed to inject the pyramid with hot air into cold air outside, that is when I ran out of money. My shade tree engineering failed and I stopped experimenting with the machine I built. From the time I first saw the vortexes form on the spinning pyramid in 1982 until now, 36 years. It will take some good engineering and science, neither of which I can provide, to make it happen. How long will it be until someone is willing to fund this project? I don't know. After that pretty quick I think. regards, gray