Speculations

Hello All, I've posted here because, if you choose to engage, our discuss will primarily encompass my personal perspective of the research and metadata I've privately studied and amassed over several decades. My goal has been a personal understanding of the extraordinary capabilities of our unconscious mind relative to our consciousness. My hope is that this discussion will be accessible to all as I consider myself merely a layman on the subject and material. Before we begin in earnest, if you're still with me, we should probably agree on use and understanding of terms, which is no doubt a separate discussion in itself. Nevertheless: Mind- The environmen…

Modern general theory of relativity considers gravity as the curvature of space-time. The theory is based on the principle of equivalence. All bodies fall with the same acceleration in the gravitational field, which is equivalent to locally accelerated reference systems. In this article, we will affirm the concept of gravity as the curvature of the relative wave function of the Universe. That is, a change in the phase of the universal wave function of the Universe near a massive body leads to a change in all other wave functions of bodies. The main task is to find the form of the relative wave function of the Universe, as well as a new equation of gravity for connecting t…

Does anyone agree that we should convert our understanding of spacetime into mechanisms of quantum mechanics? Something that explains time, distance, energy, mass into a more intuitive system?

[disclaimer] don't ask for math, I can't do math! With observer effect there's a reference in time and space, thus time is calculable and will dilate in known measures. Without observer effect, there are no set reference in time and space, so time will dilate by say 100^10000000000 (random figure) and length contract. - this will explain quantum entanglement "spooky action from a distance" - this will also explain quantum tunneling since everything by trillion of years will be destroyed, so the photon can unhindered pass the destroyed space A beginning is defined by a set time with a reference in time and space, without a set time and reference in time a…

This is an extract of "Appendix A" in my manuscript on a new theory which can be accessed through the link in my profile if someone would be interested. The real Equation of Force is F = ma Today's Physics is stating that the Equation of Force is F = dp/dt. We will analyze the equation of motion of rockets to see that the real Equation of Force is: F = ma A rocket has variable mass in its trajectory and it's important to see its motion equation. Let m be its variable mass at any instant in its movement composed by the mass of the rocket plus the mass of its contained fuel. I have made a search in the internet about rocket motion equatio…

An amendment to the introduction/abstract of my paper of the Unified Field Theory explaining resistance is what leads to time and mass. The more resistance the more time and weight...in 3 dimensions. The field described here provides a foundation which makes for clear simple logical explanations of gravity, electromagnetism, quantum entanglement, light, matter, teleportation, radio waves, radiation with the underlying principle being that everything we perceive is essentially vibrations/energy passing through the field. The field is a flexible fabric made up of quantum balls/particles connected by quantum string which are invisible at rest becoming visible when exci…

This is my equation for the observable Universe mass, based upon the Cosmic Energy Inventory (CEI) parameters and the Hubble Space Telescope (HST) parameters in (SI) units. Universe observable parameters: Universe total observable radius: [math]R_u = 4.408 \cdot 10^{26} \; \text{m} \; \; \; (46.6 \cdot 10^{9} \; \text{ly})[/math] CEI stellar Baryon density: [math]\Omega_s = 0.00205[/math] HST observable stellar number: [math]N_s = 10^{22}[/math] Solar mass: [math]M_{\odot} = 1.989 \cdot 10^{30} \; \text{kg}[/math] Observable Universe mass: [math]\boxed{M_u = \frac{N_s M_{\odot}}{\Omega_s}}[/math] [math]\boxed{M_u = 9.705 \cdot 10^{54} \; \text{kg}}[/math] Any disc…

This topic is about the gravitational effects of the singularity. Get ready for shocking news ! "I dont understand why we the theory of quantum gravity would apply at a singularity of a black hole . Quantum gravity would describe the gravitational interactions between subatomic particles . On the other hand the mass of the black is too big for any quantum effects . But on the other hand we have a singularity which is dimensionless so it can be considered a quantum system . I think all the confusion begins from there : if we need to study the singularity as a quantum system or without quantum effects . " What does this mean? …

Well this topic is about a crazy idea I came up about space-time . I was wondering how everything came from nothing . I mean we have positive mass and energy but in the beginning we should have an absolute 0 . Ok so what if space-time is a substance and is made of subatomic particles as well ? Earth bends space-time . And every object with big enough mass-energy bends it . But this bending doesn't it look like the space-time is "repulsed" from the object? I know it is very crazy but it explains how everything came to be . Before big bang there wasn't anything . And suddenly quantum fluctuations started happening and created positive and negative mass ( negative mass be…

Well we know that most cores of atoms are said to be stable or unstable by doing experiments . But I think I have found a way to predict if a core is stable or not without the known proton/neutron ratios : There are 3 interactions which contribute to the stability of a core . 1) Electrostatic repulsive forces 2) Pauli repulsion 3) Mass of the neutron being bigger than the mass of the proton When a core is unstable we say it has a big weak interaction potential energy . The weak interaction potential energy is mass . This is how it works : Let's take Hydrogen-2 and Helium-2 : There can be only 1 stable core with a certa…

I have been trying to get a response to some ideas I have regarding time, in particular time driven entropic gravity, I propose that Einstein's concept of spacetime warping by mass is in fact a simple warping of time. This has some remarkable consequences and I try to outline my ideas in this rather long spiel....if anyone can spare some time (lol!) I would be very happy to hear your thoughts.....good or bad.

A NEW KIND OF PROPULSION SYSTEM The three links below reveal ABSOLUTELY FREE the secret of the principle of operation of a new kind of propulsion system, which is cheap, safe, reliable and with strongly reduced (or even zero) pollution. (AND VERY IMPORTANT -- THE NEW TECHNOLOGY BELOW MUST BE EVALUATED ONLY BY HIGHLY QUALIFIED EXPERTS IN THEORETICAL AND APPLIED MECHANICS!) And here are the three links. 1) 2) 3) The first link contains the text, and the second link contains the related Figs.1-6. The two links form one united whole. The third link is a very important addition to the first link and to the second link. Besides WITH THE O…

Let's consider acceleration of two spaceships wich are rigidly connected on distance. In frame S backward spaceship is earlier accelerating. In S' frame backward spaceship is later stoping, therefore backward spaceship is attracting forward spaceship . Also backward spaceship is more traveling in S and in S' therefore it is younger . By the analogy a center of the Earth is backward spaceship and a surface is forward spaceship in frame of BB, in frame of center and in frame of surface. Escape velocity is caused by the non-simultaneity.

Time dimensions are key to understanding quantum entanglement. When we seem to force the particle to align with the direction of the measurement we are not actually affecting the spin what we are doing is focusing on one time dimension. So while the energy passing through the fabric is causing it to spin in multiple directions I imagine similar to like ball bearings in a wheel because the two particles are entwined whatever way they spin will be relational to each other exactly opposite in every way at every instant. When we observe this it will always be an observation in the same time dimension no matter how far apart they are so their behaviour will always reflect exac…

Obviously I have no evidence to back the following suggestions up, but neither does other more or less accepted hypothesis, like the 'inside black hole' one, or the 'multiverse' of M-theory. Suggestion 1: Could a new big bang have occurred 5 billion years ago, inside our universe, causing our universal expansion to accelerate? Like a balloon inside a balloon? Suggestion 2: This one should be easier to dismiss. Could the big bang have happened in two stages? Stage one releasing only dark matter, and later the version we know, with both matter and dark matter? In that way our universe would be surrounded by a huge gravitational field, that is only getting st…

DOI: 10.18483/ijSci.2115 W.D. Abstract This article is about a constant growth of objects and systems in the Universe, based on: the forces of matter attraction (gravity), rotation and its speed with their effects, too, the creation of whirls and cyclones as a result of the rotation of objects, systems and the Universe. The creation of light is related to the effects and force of waves (radiation) in their collision with visible matter. It is proven here that a redshift is directly related to the weakening intensity of waves to the distant objects. Instead of being over-intellectual, this text, as a form of evidence, also introduces images, created by the di…

Hello, My Name is Sascha Kozacenko, I'm from Germany and I think I found some interesting stuff I want to share with you. I'm watching often "Ancient Aliens" it's a really interesting show, with interesting opinions, I'm not with everything they talking about, but it's anyway interesting. I simply think, it's time to overthink the Science at all, we don't know by far not everything and we should be open for all. I've found some interesting Stuff... in this show they always talking about the Star People or Humans from stars which taught many ancient cultures like Mayans, Sumerians.... My Zodiac is Aries and together with a Taurus girl, happens interes…

Quantum four-dimensional geometry has taken 10 years to develop mathematically and to apply to atomic physics. It is based upon data such as the Rydberg quantum formula for the light spectrum of hydrogen, which became the model for the shell/subshell system of orbitales used in the Periodic Table of Elements. Quantum-Dimensional Mathematics have also provided a much more precise model of the nucleus, one which is likely to be rejected out of hand because it is so foreign to current thoughts. However, the nuclear model should be considered because it identifies a bonding function for neutrons which is completely lacking in current confused understandings. The model propose…

At first there were nothing, nothing is the same as a vacuum in a vacuum due to the dept of time, or nothing is the same as electricity. The edge of the two vacuums sparks an electron, a proton follows, now we got Hydrogen, due to the vacuums and the non-physical entity of Hydrogen, Oxygen comes after, and the universe is created. The universe is a node of water in nothing, later on the universe creates acid, because the water got an arbitrary surface and this creates a current that generates mRNA inside the water. The universe is made of water. The living beings came from the acid releases underneath the ocean.

String theory is a mathematical model . It hasn't been proven and I guess it will never be . Also it tries to combine general relativity with quantum mechanics which is wrong , due to the nature of quantum mechanics (Quantum mechanics describes the possible outcome of our universe and general relativity describes something which is already a part of our universe) . Well I guess QFT is wrong as well for the same reason but physicists stubbornly dont listen to me .

That which isn't possible unless you are smaller than space time. What would happen?

Well I think I have solved the matter-antimatter asymmetry.But this includes that the universe is not expanding , it is just being stretched . I will explain everything : In the beginning space-time was so curved that it existed in the size of a sugar cube.All the energy of the universe was stored inside that cube of sugar.Then dark energy took over and started to stretch the universe.Space-time started becoming more flat , and it "seemed" to be expanding , but in reality it was just stretched.During the era of the first particle - antiparticle pairs the universe was still very curved at some points of space-time. This acted like an event horizon …

Let's assume I clone a lizard so there are two identical lizards in genetics, one older, one younger. Experiment: I cut off the arm of both the young and old lizard and stitch the old lizard's arm on the young lizard's arm place where it's cut. Question: Would the young lizard attempt to transform the old lizard's arm into a young arm using regeneration, or would it simply shed off the old arm and grow a new one in its place? Analysis: I am always fascinated by the idea of regeneration and I know there has to be a communication mechanism among the cells during regeneration, but I am not sure if the mechanism seeks to reprogram a cell or push it aside and g…

Instead of using Cantor's (bogus) counting methods you could just count the rationals more directly. density.pdf

My first thread about this topic: F=GmM/r²This equation is not valid and wrong.What is wrong with this equation?Mathematics equations are a away to measure quantities related to other quantities .Equations works for finite values, I measure r = 4 meters and find out F to be x NewtonsEquations won't work for infinite values , that is equations themselves works finitely but not infinitely .Let say F decreases without bound while r increases without bound, then the equation itself as a functional tool will approach infinity and the equation limit as r approaches ∞ is ∞, the equation is undefined and wrong.If the equation definition is the tool that finds values of F f…