Speculations

1) About the fermi paradox I am not sure if this question is relevant after all these UFO activities going on, witnessed by individuals but also by governments who have released reports of such occasions to public. So rather than asking if they are “out there” -after all these interactivities i think it is safe to say they are “here”- maybe we should be asking why we couldnt establish the total enclosure, the first global contact. I think the answer is simple. We can not detect the extraterrestrial life with our inadequate technology. So the first contact is only possible with us showing good will and them accepting our invitation. If more than half of the people livi…

In this experiment we will demonstrate the source of handedness. Handedness is a fundamental property of charge. Did you know that? When they listed properties and taught you about particle physics, did they explain the source of handedness? Handedness is also what causes the asymmetry of charge. (the mass and energy difference between electrons and protons) Let's see.....a particle has an electric field, positive or negative...and magnetic field with a N and S pole, It has spin, mass and quantum states of momentum/energy. It also has a very distinct set of frequencies of rotation, it wobbles, and it has handedness. It also has a structure. All functional…

1 kg has a weight force ~9.8 Newton. What is the power relation (to balance force)? E.g. a helicopter doesn't stay up in the air for nothing, but (instead) burns chemical energy at a specific rate. I'm NOT thinking (=talking) about Zeppelins (e.g. buoyancy: force vs force balance).

So far the Big Bang theory is the most solid explanation for the birth of our universe, but i always found the idea of a singularity instantly spewing out a massive quantity of matter was uncanny. So i pondered upon it for a while, and came up with a theory that would explain events prior to that of the Big Bang, based on what we know about physics so far. In this theory, the Big Bang isn't t=0, but just an event in space. Just a quick warning first: I am no physicist, i am just an amateur that daydreams a lot and think about stuff a lot. Also english is not my native language, so i apologize for any mistakes. I also invite anyone and everyone to poke holes, dec…

The twin paradox, a theory of relativity must cross experiment, let us begin to analyse it correctly. The Derivation of Relativity Theory from Twins Paradox.pdf

When I went out for a walk on the road I felt that IF I HAD AN EYE ON THE BACK OF MY HEAD it would be so wonderful to view what's happening behind me without having to turn around my front Cameras [Eyes] When I thought further about this I wondered why God or Nature or Our Evolution has not found it neessary to improve upon this. Of Course there is a Security Risk & Safely of the Eye if situated at the back. Also the processing and display of front & back eyes in a cogent way. Human Beings have designed many Products with Front & back Cameras & have handled all the necessary Processings in Machines ! If Evolution does take care of this …

As atomic biology post inspired me. I was wondering if you can 3d print atoms. Alright, I was into 3D print a body, an identical one at that in DNA and structure. Since the gene expression of the cells would not match, I thought, maybe we need to print from an atomic scale instead of a cellular scale with cells. And you got an inkjet with all the chemical elements and begin printing as the chemical bonds take place. Alright, sorry, this is speaking from an elementary school level. You got all the elements like hydrogen and oxygen, do you 3d print them with the chemical reactions to make water? If you 3d print meat, does it spoil? Things like that. Surely an atom…

However i don't believe at rumors and metapyshical things, Telepathy seems different then others to me. Lots of people evaluate it like part of paranormal activities, so they generally include things like "chakra, soul etc.". Like Eastern Medicine, but there is also scientific side as i researched from books and web. But when we look scientifically to the telepathy. It has really logical sides. There is a sender and receiver like basic communication. And as defended by theory, we are doing this all the time without consciousness. But it is more hard doing it with will and controlled. Brain waves can make way up to ~10.000kms. Also, only thing what can p…

A larger interferometer gives better resolution tan a smaller one. The technology developed for the Breakthrough Starshot (i.e. light sails pushed by lasers) enables making a vast phased-array interferometer to be launched into space, with probes radiating out away from Earth's orbit. Each vehicle would have a light sail and interferometer antenna, which means its weight might be twice that of Breakthrough Starshot vehicles. Many antennas for the interferometer can be launched toward the Ort Cloud, for example, scheduled once per month for decades, centuries or millennia. This array of antennas will spread across the solar system and eventually grow larger. This proj…

http://www.josephnewman.com/ So VERY funny

(The longest most insane scientific theory you'll ever read. I'm almost sorry about it.) Inside singularity energy was unified as one field/force. Following the big bang, first gravity manifested, then the strong force, the weak force, and finally the electromagnetic force. These all seem to me to define as spatial forces which can calculated using time-symmetric formulas. But as the universe expands, and the rate per square unit energy lever lowers further, logically couldn't a new force manifest? While a 5th spatial force would likely destroy the physical nature of our universe, why should there not be a time-like manifestion of force? Maybe even sev…

T'=T - r/c T' is simultaneous time of motionless remote object T is time of observer r is distance between observer and remote object c is speed of light Moving object to observer creates additional rate of time. Object motion from observer creates additional slowing of time by factor of motion. t=gamma * t'+ dr/(c*gamma)

Is the 2016 election the same as a chair in 1433 AD?

Hi I'm no scientist, just a natural philosopher who has had a nose around Wikipedia's entry on the Copenhage Interpretation and thinks he's come up with a solution to the quantum theory problem that wave functions collapse when observed. What I'd like to propose is that wave functions do not collapse when observed, but that it is the event of their collapse (or change of state) (through interacting with a photon (or whatever)) makes the collapsed state observable. After all this is what happens in the 'real' world. We don't really see things, we see things after they have been excited by photons and changed their state. We observe the release of energy. Tur…

This is just a short one minute video I made of a theory on how gravity works. Lets here your feedback if you got any.

Are there any low energy options for translation of electrical current into virtual particle pairs? I have seen references to orthorotation within zero sum vector coils. plasma and UV light, but can find no detail on the methodology used. Any insight on this, or the process in general, would be most appreciated.

Calculations suggest that physical information(like mass) could permanently disappear in a black hole. (Black hole information paradox)

So hear me out, this has a rather scientific background. I am posting it here again hoping to get some responses. 1. So you got a clone body without consciousness, you upload the short term memory and transfer your consciousness over. Pros: It's a human body. You should be well suited. Cons: Could you grow a human body without consciousness? You won't have your long term memory. 2. You got an android body that is most likely powered by batteries, you recreate your short and longer term memory and transfer your consciousness over. Pros: Easy to fabricate. Comes with short and long term memory Cons: It's not a human body. Mostly prosthetics. 3. You …

Expansion could be the result of GWs from beyond the known universe meaning dark matter & dark energy as well as particle charge would have their own respective superluminal velocities. A GW will propagate faster if it is broader, so because GWs propagate at the speed of light (demonstrated by LIGO in 2017) there could be superluminal GWs if adjacent cosmoses are in a later state of expansion than ours is, just as the current speed of light is faster than it was 13.8 billion years ago. Meaning that, & this is important, the fastest GWs have traveled the farthest to get here and have lost the most strength because they've journeyed the farthest. Dark matter & …

So I had an interesting thought, what if instead of the universe expanding due to an unknown cause it is expanding due to something right under our noses? What if the universe is one constant size but the things beyond it's 'boundary' are invisible to us because their light has not reached us yet? There could be a way to account for redshift in ways other than straight expansion due to an unknown cause,. This sounds absolutely preposterous and most likely is, but what if photons produced a warping effect on space? Tiny wakes for each photon, this could explain why Dark energy causes 'expansion' and how such an amazing amount of energy exists at all, because imagine that e…

Assume that a particle of energy is like a universe of matter, with a relatively equivalent amount of mass in adjusted scale. Fall anywhere in space, no matter how seemingly void, and you will land on matter if you're small enough. The Microverse: A microverse is the same principle as a level 1 multiverse, matter can only arrange itself in so many different ways eventually everything takes on the same order again, especially where c covers a unit of distance in less than 1 planck time. Even in quantum theory c does propagate under such extremely short distances in the form of gravity waves: some people claim that a 'Poisson sprinkling' of space-time po…

A blackhole is formed when a very massive star after converting all of its hydrogen to higher elements , collapses under its own weight.The sphere(star) becomes smaller and smaller until it reaches its schwarzschildradius(the minimum radius of a given mass to form a black hole.The small sphere collapses further . It becomes so dense and its gravity is so huge that it breaks the fabric of spacetime such that the laws of physics no longer apply there.The blackhole is formed around it because light cannot escape from its surface as the gravitational pull is simply enormous.There is an apparent surface from which light cannot escape.This is the event horizon. What laws o…

My rational understanding regarding dark matter is it is a continues force that still happening after the "big bang". It is in other words the aftermath of the big bang. According to modern science, physical space itself formed in the big bang. So base on this, dark matter is actually a formation of space that is why our universe expands. The space until now continue to form, pushing previously created space. Now question may arise," Where thus this force creating the space came from?" This question is connected to the big bang and the origin of the universe itself. They have the same answer.

G = Newtonian constant of gravitation D = Descartesian gravitation density UMR Formulae frequency=[(G*D)^1/2] force=[(G*D)^1/2]momentum energy=[(G*D)^1/2]hbar power=[(G*D)^1/2]energy current=[(G*D)^1/2]charge G*power=c^5 G*force=c^4 power/force=c Dark Energy energy=[(G*D)^1/2]hbar energy=[(G*D)^1/2]e^2*z0 energy=[(G*D)^1/2]e^2/e0*c energy=[(G*D)^1/2]e^2*u0*c energy=[(G*D)^1/2]h*2alpha G=c^5/power G=c^4/force force=power/c Dark Matter mass=[(G*D)^1/2]hbar/c^2 mass=[(G*D)^1/2]e^2*z0/c^2 mass=[(G*D)^1/2]e^2/e0*c^3 mass=[(G*D)^1/2]e^2*u0/c mass=[(G*D)^1/2]h*2alpha/c^2 power=c^5/G force=c^4/G power=force*c …

According to science, there's absolutely no correlaton between the size of an object and the gravitational field, which it produces. Science tells, that changing the size of Sun wouldn't have no effect on the planets in Solar System. I don't agree with this. I think, that density of an object has significant importance for the properties of g. field, which it produces. What makes me thinks this way? Well, I've noticed, that celestial objects, which have low density, like a nebula, don't attract other objects with the same force, as planets or stars. If density of objects has no influence on gravity, then try this: - take a beach ball and a golf ball with similar…