Speculations

Well, energy is defined as change is space2 per Change in Time2 for a unit of mass which velocity increases mass via relativistic mass at increased rate of travel through space, So it is safe to say that Mass is compressed energy and the increase in velocity somehow increases the amount of energy able to be stored in the mass field due to Time Dilation or Length Contraction probably by increasing the time experience by the particle, so that would mean that Mass is a reaction to time increasing as Space Decreases and since Mass increases as time does we can say that Mass allows time to move more quickly and is somehow more stable with increased time rate and has decreased …

I've been googling this to death and I can't find any info on this so it might be possible it's a new concept. But here goes! What if the status of the cosmos at T=0 was an all encompassing now. Time was just another spatial dimension and time did not pass. At the moment of the Big Bang time symmetry was broken resulting in the release of energy bound up in that static time dimension. This break in symmetry resulted in time as we know it and time's arrow. But, and yeah this is pure speculation, if the expansion of the big bang resulted in two universes expanding in two opposite time dimensional directions? Matter goes in one time direction and antimatt…

Has any research been done, experiment or attempts of any sort to transfer the knowledge and experiences from the brain of a sixties lucid person to a twentiesh year old ? It is usually called teaching, but in a more technological and quick way. Short of implanting a USB socket under the hair... Would such be happening in 100 years from now ? Implications would certainly be impacting.

Bees are probably using a simple algorithm to solve the travelling salesman problem. We know that when bees get back to the hive after discovering a new group of flowers, they do a little dance. The length of the dance represents the distance to the group of flowers, and the direction they are pointing indicates the direction to the group of flowers. The bees could be using a spiral pattern to find the flowers. They would start at the middle group of flowers, and work their way outwards in a spiral pattern. That's just a guess. They could be using some other algorithm.

Gravitons are the theoretical particles of gravity that work by exchanging themselves with other masses thereof creating an attraction between masses but lets look deeper on how they could work. 1)gravitons could technically be aligned in a formation we call a field and this field when in contact with a mass exchange and cause the pull basically fussing the idea of a field and a particle 2)if gravitons do exist it could be possible to isolate a mass form the formation of gravitons of earth or other celestial objects, then therefore causing new space tech and conventional labour tech 3)maybe gravitons are connections of energy between matter therefore making…

I'll let you know I understand energy. If I take relativity seriously, then they are both the same thing, but in what way do we mean this, really? What does [math]E = Mc^2[/math] actually mean, in this context? Or as you ask, what exactly is energy: 1) energy is nothing but a diffused form of matter 2) matter is the physics of condensed energy From this, many have concluded, matter is just a trapped form of energy, quite possibly light since most particles can and will reduce back to photon energy in matter-antimatter collisions. This may be a non-trivial relationship of light to matter. A group of Glaswegian scientists show…

We all are familiar with the theories of the universe being higher dimensional I assume. There has never been any proof of this, bit I'm going to go ahead and add another probability level to them being true by explaining them with simple logic. But first, I'm gonna 'prove' something else which leads to this point. Let's start with the 3 dimensions we know of. Width, height and depth. We are able to see all of these dimensions, and that has led people to assume that this world is 3-dimensional, and we living here also are 3-dimensional. And this is a valid assumption... except that it logically doesn't make sense. Why? Well let me explain. …

I know what your thinking "uhhh, another crackpot theory" but if you understand 'velocitas' like this you will begin to understand this concept, but hold on this isn't evidence its merely in easier way to understand it, now lets begin... Velocities is like a battery, you can charge it (to gain more potential energy form external forces like gravity) and it will hold the energy until it is used for charging a Xbox controller or tv remote(kinetic energy, chemical energy etc). Now with this basic concept I wish for people to comment on this and give me ideas and maybe even math or evidence for my idea but remember this is only a theory and I will keep n posting new par…

Einstein stated that gravity and acceleration must be the same force, I can only see one way this is possible... Everything is expanding, this seems ridiculous at first, however I have been giving it a lot of thought for many years and I am ready to answer questions.

So, I've heard this many times: "Those who believe in the multiverse theory either come from a non scientific background and are usually crackpots." But I want to say this: I don't believe in anything. So yes, the multiverse theory has no where near as many points of evidence with it as against it, but I'd like you to look at a few points I think are relevant to the theory. Steven Hawking has theorized if not nearly proven that the universe once existed as a black hole, this raises many questions on how this black hole came to be, namely where did it get all that mass from? Matter doesn't simply pop into existence and for as much matter as we have in our…

do u want a hover board then learn how to here cool stuff within just like post ideas for cool like sci fi inventions

sorry if this isn't the right area to post this I wasn't sure where it should go. (I didn't want to post in math or something which might have content which the community might think of as more respectable so I put it here so it can be moved somewhere nicer if the admins think it is worthy.) so recently I've been thinking about the gamblers fallacy. the gamblers fallacy is the idea that things become more or less likely based on previous results which to most people seems obvious. you can't flip a coin and keep coming up tails forever. at one point I thought I discovered why the gamblers fallacy is a fallacy that is that any particular combination of 100 coin flips…

So, I deduced this neutral system over a 3 year period. When you pair a larger and smaller Field coil, charged particles are trapped around the smaller field coil in a toroidal vortex when DC current is applied. I think this is what Harold White was stumbling upon with the Warp Drive research he has been doing. I think Normal matter and Dark matter are coupled by gravity, and collecting Dark Matter into one spot with a toroidal vortex is brilliant. That way you can control the localized gravity shift made. I'm not a science major, just a normal Joe with a knack for pattern recognition. I'm open to questions, because if it is an ACTUAL unifying theory of gravity it woul…

The Apollo 11 lander did not land on the moon. In the descent of the Apollo 11 lunar lander, the lander begins to descent onto the surface of the moon and achieves a velocity of 550 mph at which point the lander's rocket engine is activated and produces a thrust of 10,000 lb until the lander nears the moon's surface at which time the thrust is reduced to 3,000 lb. At the moon surface, the lander's rocket engine's thrust would result in a blast zone and the accumulation of rocket smoke at the moon's surface caused by the push back of the rocket smoke from the moon's surface yet the lunar descent film does not depict rocket smoke. The lack of the moon's atmosphere is used …

I have been turning over some ideas for a while and have come up with the following which could be useful ontologically. It have gone to effort to make it simpler than my previous attempt, and to correct any obvious errors I came upon. We know the universe is expanding at an accelerating rate and the acceleration is ubiquitous throughout the universe. We know matter doesn't seem to undergo this same spreading. Such a uniform acceleration of expansion brings is typical of the forces a wave would exert as its wavelength increased. Fig 1. In a sine wave both the trough and the crest undergo expansive geometric forces, causing a shift in wavelength as they propagate…

There is no dark matter. One only has to apply General Relativity correctly to have the galactic orbital velocities we see. Flattened spiral galaxies and spherical stellar systems have different shapes and different shaped time dilation gradients. Within a stellar system, all events appear to accelerate increasingly as they approach the center of the dilation "pit", where the dilation gradient only equalizes in an infinitesimal point within the star. At his point, where ∆D = the difference in the rate of time between frames (designated proper and coordinate times) the math is determined by the following: as ∆D→0, ∆Y, ∆X and ∆Z→0 This impedance to the …

My theory is that the asymmetry could be best explained as TWO infinite points instead of one. Like binary stars spinning around each other getting ever closer until they collide. The two points would collide and explode. Such an explosion would be massive enough to annihilate anything. My theory is that in the explosion, there was more anti-matter destroyed than matter creating the asymmetry and causing matter to be more abundant and creating the universe. This would also allow for the singularity as the Big Bang would still appear to have come from a single point.

Schumann, the composer, died and left a violin concerto behind. During a Ouija board session, he apparently asked for his missing concerto to be found and played. This took place but many decades after it was "lost" and then put into storage. Is the story fake? Or is it coincidence? Full Story

I've posted two topics this one and one on Dark Matter on a few forums and everyone seems to go quiet. They don't do it with my other ideas and I can't figure out if it is because it is rubbish or because I have something. I'm guessing you guys are the experts, so please indulge me and tell me why these two posts just can't be right. Post 1 · Dark Energy The previous post spoke about the inwardly curving gravitational space. It is not unreasonable to assume that if space can curve inwardly into high density regions, it also curves outwardly into low density regions (an inward curve and an outward curve). In fact, in true wave fashion, they both mu…

The CHSH Inequality is valid. The logic of the experiment is correct. The alignment of the physical experiment is wrong. The alignment of the 2 polarizers is from a angle of zero from vertical. The incoming photons must be aligned with the vertically polarized photons at zero degrees and the horizontally polarized photons at 90 degrees. That is NOT the way the experiment IS ACTUALLY DONE. There is a ton of information about the alignment of the 2 polarizers but there are really 4 alignments. The 2 polarizers can be rotated to set the alignment. The BBO crystals can be rotated to set their alignment. The Quartz Wave Plate can be rotated to …

I have drawn 2 molecules of triple DNA Bases... Each Base is a DOUBLE-Base... The 6 DOUBLE-Bases connects together in one and only one possible way to make 2 triplets!!!... The 2 triplet Bases could be part of the core of a "TRIPLE Helix DNA" ...

Well, for those of you that don't know what the "Great Filter" is it suggests that the reason why there are fewer aliens out there than Drake's Equation suggests is do to self destruction of Intelligent Species via war before becoming an advanced species. https://en.wikipedia...ki/Great_Filter Today, I have a interesting video to share that may prove the "Great Filter" about a distress call that could have been a hoax about a alien civilization in another galaxy very near to here that self annihilated about 2.53 million years ago, which I would not doubt given humanity's struggle with the Atomic Bomb, during the cold war, the U.S. and Soviet Unio…

i had a in depth study 13OO pages, theoretics, am curious where's to start a interested comment, am instead going to seize these opportune moment to say hi guys, welcome industrial workers, ''i come in peace slobs, perhaps what if; i either hindrance is it possible, am asking how? i worked a fusion generator a fission fused critical mass exclusion ratio am curious not in my learned capabilities and the ideal of an idealogically presence and the cybernetic orga nism or symPLEX brain i am am STUDIED THE COMPLEXITIES, MY MORAL ABILITIES, QrM$nxqaMroot.funC/Val$-}{^arm{G/plas/Eg.iBplaSrad.boiS- Spoiler , fissionably (C).pdf i am a primal c…

This article have just passed Peer Review ... http://www.scirp.org/Journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=76756 Notice the prediction in the paper.. The solar eclipse in USA, - August this year, - is just excellent to confirm this very significant and important new aspect of science.. ABSTRACT An Anisotropic Dark Flow Acceleration can solve the cause of the Allais Effect. This claim is based on a kinematic analysis of 21 Allais Effect measurements. All measurements (without exception) substantiate that the Allais Effect is consistent with anisotropic acceleration and that the acceleration is directed in the same direction as Dark Flow. So far, Allais Effect m…

1. What’s the difference between the convergent counter-spatial centripetal charge of dielectricity and the divergent spatial polarization and centrifugal discharge of magnetic radiation, and how does that inter-correlate with dielectric voidance and dielectric counter-voidance; AKA magnetic vectorization? 2. Moreover, in regards to this how does one define a ‘Field’ necessarily? And by that i mean, can you give me the absolute scientific denotation of the quantification of a field in principle? 3. Furthermore, can you explain what a Bloch wall is without merely describing it’s attributes, and tell me why it has no locus and thus there is no spatial flux at the …