Speculations

1. Pack a pre-built copy of your X chromosome's DNA into a virus. It is a strand of DNA with 155 million base pairs that hopefully would fit through the nucleus pore. A chromosome cannot fit through the nucleus pore, so we send it in as a strand of DNA and have it built into an X chromosome inside the nucleus. 2. Make sure each cell in your body receive a copy of the virus package. I dunno how to get this to work, each cell only needs one copy of the X chromosome, having more than one would be troublesome. The epigenetic tags on the X chromosome might also need to be different for each cell, that I have not consider. The packaged DNA would enter the nucleus through t…

Well within GR paradigm GW's are nothing other than purely spacetime ripples. The better analogy then is one between sound waves and GW's. Both are distortions of a medium, and not something else propagating on top of or through the medium. Anyway there is a logical issue with GR's take on GW's as pure transverse spacetime distortions. Given GW's carry away energy and momentum, they should also self-gravitate like all other forms of energy-momentum-stress do within GR. But by definition, the vacuum gravitational field - both static and dynamic i.e. GW's, is NOT a source of further gravity in GR. Hence a self-consistency issue exists - there is an overall loss of gravi…

So I got an external brain piece. It looks like the real brain except it's linked "wirelessly" to my brain. Yes that is what wireless connection is about. This brain piece holds the information about how to drive a helicopter, kind of like Matrix. If I turn on this brain piece and link wirelessly to it, do I automatically knows how to drive a helicopter without learning? And if I turn that brain piece off, do I forget how to drive a helicopter, or does that memory stays? P.S. But be prepared to shutting down parts of the brain

I can explain pulsars. And any accretion disk (they're practically all variations of the same thing). And gravitational lensing. But not if we have relativity "correct". We are all traveling at subjective velocities through an objectively static particle field. This field is responsible for gravity, magnetism (I assume), and photonic wave propogation. Photons do not exist. I'd imagine the same particle controls gravity and photonic wave propogation. (And presumably magnetism but I just tack that on because I just think about things in all disciplines and I don't understand enough to attach that though it must be correct if the rest is.). The mor…

Something else, our atmosphere is filled with particles, which enable sound. When you move through that, then the gravit. field is altered depending on your speed. Your speed changes the concentration of particles(which alters gravit. attraction) around you, which shortens or lengthens sound waves. This is what people call the doppler effect.

Think about, when all things that are in moving, work only by rotation. When not all things rotate it would fly all in all directions! What was correct, how the gravity is working? The Sentence is unbreakable. Motors are rotating, stars rotate, galaxies rotate, the planets rotate, joints are rotating, the trees in the wind rotates about degrees, the walls of your heart are rotating at degrees too. And and and... It goes absolutely nothing without a rotation, all things would be fly away in the universe, and nothing would exist. What was the correct conclusion when all movement work only by a rotation, how will the gravity then work? Its …

I will simply state that in this post, without writing comments later. I will read the comments that other people can write. --------- The photon is nothing more than a series of waves moving outward from a vibrating electron. Planck's constant is the a measure of the energy in the passage of one wave. However, Planck's constant is not the most fundamental quantum. The actual fundamental quantum is half of Planck's constant which is found in the half-wave of light. Each complete vibration of an electron creates one complete wave. However, the sudden movement of a vortex (such as the electron) in one direction creates a half-wave. If there is no return…

Thanks to Charon that I've figured out liver does compensatory growth, not regeneration, but how does the liver knows what your liver mass is supposed to be? Question: If I donate 75% of my liver at age 5 the rest of 25% of the liver grows up to about 500g(100% liver mass) and it stops. Which I assume to be the normal mass for liver at age 5. If I donate 75% of my liver at age 30 the rest of 25% of the liver grows up to about 1kg(100% liver mass) and it stops. Which I assume to be the normal mass for liver at age 30. What am I trying to prove here? Oh yes, why doesn't the liver grow to 500g when I am at age 30 but instead become 1kg which is the full l…

THE THEORY ABOUT TIME theory about time.docx

light creats information we are made up . so we cant travel faster than source of our information. we will be able to travel faster than current speed of light for our spacetime, it light shed of its radiation a little become lighter and travel with higher speed. or we enter vaccume through black holes and warm holes.

according to my reading- why electricity is treated independently?- its part of electromagnetism. electrons are basically waves with perticular energy- there is only one electron wave and what observed as an individual electron is local stationary particle of the electron wave field . its like when we measure average tempature of room as X, its an average of many particles in room with different temperatures x1, x2,x3.... etc. gluons are the forces which hold all elementary particles togather. decay should involve chaos and thermodynamics . everything ultimately evaporates as a radiation. its suspected that g…

all the forces in the universe are basically centripetal and centrifugal forces creating radiations with diff quantas perceivable universe is just radiations intereacting (in higgs field)and now its suspected that they originates from vaccume pulsations simphony thats only way to combine classical and quantum physics

I had the unorthodox idea that inside a black hole C might be exceeded for in falling matter and pass into imaginary time. I base this on letting v exceed c in: 1/((1-(v^2/c^2))^(1/2)) If C can't be violated then colonizing the stars is next to hopeless. I don't personally believe that C is absolute. I know this would be a major inconvience for Physics in general. I would venture that at some point Einstein's may of thinking will be replaced just like Newton's was.

be treated seriously. Would you pass class if you completed 15 percent of the exam? Really, one fact that I know is that none of the universe is missing, it's all there just where it belongs. The thing is to comprehend that we do not comprehend what the universe is. So is the universe wrong, the math wrong, or is the math right and we just have no vision to apply the math because what we see is not what we think we see.

So to make stem cells into skin and convert it to shoes

1. Hey Charon, what are the currently available methods for signaling molecules or crispr cas9 delivery into the entire body? What percentage of the body is covered using this method?

How can a person use a computer to design a computer better than itself? Or does it need a person to provide creativity?

A subatomic molecule is a portal. Because there are similar subatomic moleules making all of them connected. One indistinguishable from the other. For instance if you got two identical cups on the table, you dunno which one is your cup, and which one is my cup. But you cannot go through a subatomic particle, because it is too small, and it has an electric field. So you can condense it into a matter wave like Bose Einstein condensate and drop something through it?

Alright, so based on idea of smuggling and inflating a chromosome into a nucleus. I will have to prove that transdifferentiation is possible. And I speculate that dedifferentiation is a form of transdifferentiation. The way that somatic cells becomes induced pluripotent stem cell is a form of cellular transdifferentiation, and therefore all method of transdifferentiation is possible. Let it be liver cell to neuronal cell or muscle cell. I speculate that it should be possible for direct conversion.

I was reading about muon-catalyzed cold fusion, and I thought if muons don't work in cold fusion maybe some other negative subatomic particles would. Muons decay after 2.2 x 10 -6 s, which is too short for cold fusion. Kaons (K-): Charge-parity violation, which generates the matter-antimatter asymmetry of the universe, was discovered in the kaon system in 1964. The lifetime of the kaon is 1.238 x 10 -8 s, too short for cold fusion. Tau lepton: Has a lifetime of 2.9 x 10 -13 s, too short to be considered for cold fusion. We have discovered 64 events of the form e+ + e- > e+- + muon-+ + at least 2 undetected particles for which we have no conv…

Alright, forget bout crispr, there is never going to be a time where crispr can modify every single parts of the body and at a precise location. That gives two methods which is currently science fiction based. 1. Modify DNA with optogenetics. Simple as that, we got the light tweezer, we target a cell, and we use light to "cut" and "piece" together DNA to the desire strands we want. We either use one laser to modify every single cells in a fast pace, or have multiple beams that modify all cells at once. In other words it won't drift too far apart from magnetic field control. 2. Modify DNA with nanomachines Well, talk about advancement in machinery in th…

The goal of this paper is to provide a pragmatic solution to every problem we experience on our planet today. The idea is very simple. Everything we do should be done from the premise of, "I genuinely want what is best for myself and the planet." This means doing everything within the power of the individual to genuinely strive towards manifesting their "higher self" into this world. Practically speaking, this would mean forgiving anybody who has wronged you; spending more time with your children; travelling to the coast; taking that new job; starting a new hobby; learning about a new subject; standing up to whoever makes you feel guilty; confronting whoever makes y…

Who do you imagine has the answers to these questions, and where do you imagine that they got these answers

So if you believe Hubble, and you accept that Einstein was wrong, why do you fight that Einstein was right? Make sense people, and bye the way Einstein DID CERTAINLY PREDICT THAT the gravitational attraction would cause all matter to collapse into a single point. https://www.space.com/31055-removing-cosmological-constant-was-the-blunder.html One of the early implications is that because all matter attracts all other matter, a static universe would not long remain static. The gravitational attraction would cause all matter to collapse into a single point. And even if one did not start with a static universe, the mass distribution of the universe should evol…

I am referring to the possibility that time dilation is the mechanism by which we see not only gravity but also inertia. A metaphoric experiment if you will that describes this mechanism. Suppose we had a kiddie train track 100 m long. We place a student school desk that has track wheels attached to it on the track. We attach a digital timer to the desk and of course a drive mechanism that can maintain a constant velocity. On the track we place two switches that are some distance apart. The first turns the digital timer on and the second turns it off. We put a student in the desk and tell him how far apart the switches are and the total mass of his system. We ask the …