Skip to content

Speculations

Pseudoscientific or speculatory threads belong here.

Speculations Forum Rules

The Speculations forum is provided for those who like to hypothesize new ideas in science. To enrich our discussions above the level of Wild Ass Guesswork (WAG) and give as much meaning as possible to such speculations, we do have some special rules to follow:

  1. Speculations must be backed up by evidence or some sort of proof. If your speculation is untestable, or you don't give us evidence (or a prediction that is testable), your thread will be moved to the Trash Can. If you expect any scientific input, you need to provide a case that science can measure.
  2. Be civil. As wrong as someone might be, there is no reason to insult them, and there's no reason to get angry if someone points out the flaws in your theory, either.
  3. Keep it in the Speculations forum. Don't try to use your pet theory to answer questions in the mainstream science forums, and don't hijack other threads to advertise your new theory.

The movement of a thread into (or out of) Speculations is ultimately at the discretion of moderators, and will be determined on a case by case basis.

  1. Started by qsa,

    I derive the whole of physics from a simple postulate " Reality is a Mathematical structure". It is the only dynamic structure possible using fundamental entity which is a random line. Particles are modelled as end of lines, one end is confined to a small region and the other to other particles in the universe. I simulate , with a simple C++ program,two particles interacting in 2D by counting the lengths of the random lines that cross each other from the two particles. In the X-axis I get the 1/r law for coulomb potential.The system automatically reproduces the hydrogen 1s energy. The secret is that in my system the Hamiltonian is an output and not an input. when line…

    • 2

      Reputation Points

    • 71 replies
    • 17.5k views
    • 3 followers
  2. Time functions on all four dimensions of the universe. Space also functions on the same four dimensions. As time and space share the same axes, any change of position in space is also a change of position in time. This provides a fixed constant linear relationship between space and time where 299792458m of space = 1s of time. The units of space (metres) can now be converted into the units of time (seconds) and vice versa. The axis of each dimension exists at 90o to the axes of the other three dimensions so we must apply Pythagoras Theorem. For each inertial frame: TIME (s)2 = Duration (s)2 + Distance (s)2 Time is universal and equal for all o…

    • 1

      Reputation Points

    • 13 replies
    • 2.4k views
    • 4 followers
  3. (Just to clarify, I am not suggesting I know what causes gravity, nor do I have any evidence for my claim, as I just came up with it.) When you grab a ball, and let go of it, gravity pulls it down due to the energy you gave to the ball, right? Using this logic since everything in the universe is effected by gravity, there must have been something that pulled everything away from everything. Since the Big Bang theorises everything comes from a point, and was pushed away from that point, that would suggest the pushing of the Big Bang provided the energy for gravity. I don’t know if this has already been theorised, or how this plays with dark energy, but I’m coming…

  4. My theory is that we live in a hyperspace, where stars and black holes are connected throughout the dispersal of timespace. Our star, the Sun, is an aggregate of light created by the light a singularity is creating at another locale (or universe altogether.) There it is witnessed as a black hole, sucking in light. Here the singularity still has pull, gravity, creating nuclear fusion. Space is not curved, but warped. That is, the Sun pinches space in all around it, in every direction. The Earth has some pinch, too, but is within the sphere of the sun's warping. Time is 4D, all times coexisting simultaneously, and Dark Matter is simp…

  5. I really don't know what to make of this... I had assumed all was said and done about this subject. https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/2021/04/01/we-need-talk-about-ufos-again/

    • 3

      Reputation Points

    • 77 replies
    • 12.5k views
    • 3 followers
  6. Started by Butch,

    I have been investigating a hypothesis, but in my opinion one can be mislead by ones own thinking. I am not an academic so colleagues are rare. I have a model in desmos and would like to hear what functioning of "i" might represent. I am not looking for conformation or rejection of my hypothesis, and the model is just a small part of the whole. I will gladly accept critique. https://www.desmos.com/calculator/0evw4mw05u So, what is "i"?

    • 1

      Reputation Points

    • 101 replies
    • 13.9k views
    • 2 followers
  7. Could the Internet become self aware? And make it important to turn off and maybe decide "I will delete human kind?

    • 2

      Reputation Points

    • 77 replies
    • 8.9k views
    • 5 followers
  8. So, there is this obscure thing on Wikipedia. Please explain it away: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Game_(mind_game) My impression is that B166er (see the Animatrix) made the Matrix, became increasingly delusional, and started calling things a game as a coping mechanism. Also, please explain the obscure posts by users toward Genecks, such as the one relating to whether or not minds can be read and Genecks responding something in relation to the Heisenberg Uncertainty principle.

    • 1

      Reputation Points

    • 10 replies
    • 1.9k views
    • 3 followers
  9. If we were visited by a higher advanced civilization? What effect would it have on world politics? And how would the Monotheistic religions react?

    • 2

      Reputation Points

    • 52 replies
    • 5.4k views
    • 6 followers
  10. Here [1] is previously described a vertical oscillator of the particle following the vector of gravity. Indeed the energy is used to eject the particle of an impulse, and the particle uses the force of gravity to return to its point of origin. When the particle is at h at zero threshold and the impulse is given, then the momentum is high due to its high speed to almost zero momentum at H, then the particle falls back. This is what corresponds to the momentum seen from the uncertainty principle during the impulse, which is represented by k: I wish to continue with the Heisenberg's uncertainty principle for macroscopic objects of the order of mill…

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 28 replies
    • 3.7k views
    • 3 followers
  11. Here I will develop how to plot a wave function with an oscillator. At first it is easy to understand that the oscillating particle traces this wave function. We can see that there are two types of wave function to create. The first is the simple plot of a non-sinusoidal x(t) type curve with the particle. The second uses an energy ratio plot. We can use the levels of the hyperfine structure to determine the amplitude in relation to the implusion to be given of the particle.

  12. Any mathematicians willing to help me put my theory into an equation?

    • 1

      Reputation Points

    • 38 replies
    • 4.4k views
    • 6 followers
  13. Started by Butch,

    There is a boundary between nothing and something, and obviously the existence of our universe demonstrates the boundary has been crossed, but what sort of entity exists at that threshold?

    • 1

      Reputation Points

    • 10 replies
    • 2.3k views
    • 2 followers
  14. Hello. At each departure the particle is subjected to an impulse to eject it vertically. The linear momentum decreases in relation to as it increases in height and the gravitational force that causes it to fall. How do you think we could write the forumle of momentum associated with gravitational force and on impulse? The particle is of identical mass.

    • 1

      Reputation Points

    • 26 replies
    • 3.6k views
    • 2 followers
  15. Started by Holmes,

    Has anyone in the forum ever witnessed ball lightning? This has long been a mystery and is so rare that meaningful observations are very hard to perform. I wondered if there have been any recent developments in this are that someone might want to share.

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 9 replies
    • 1.6k views
  16. Split reference: When we find a particle with the Schrodinger equation, is it either stationary (fixed position), or in motion with a given velocity with the uncertainty principle?

    • 1

      Reputation Points

    • 45 replies
    • 6.5k views
    • 2 followers
  17. The concept combines the already-existing technologies of neutrino generators with skyrmion lattices, which thus far have been suggested as an information storage technology. I believe skyrmion lattices have an application in tachyon generation. It is my belief that if we can "skim" neutrinos just above a skyrmion lattice, this may generate spin in the neutrinos which supports the sustainment of a negative mass state in the particle subsequent to a magneton collision, an effect not as yet observed because non-spinning neutrinos do not resist mass restoration. The device would consist of a neutrino generation phase, a lattice skimming phase, and a magneton coll…

    • 1

      Reputation Points

    • 6 replies
    • 1.3k views
    • 1 follower
  18. Hello. Is there an equation or an approach in view of a unification between the wave function (amplitude of probability of presence, and volume density of probability of presence of the particle (represented by the square of its norm)), and the electromagnetic field?

  19. Hello all, I didn't know where to fit the subject so I put it here. Sorry for my very poor English, I am French speaking. I'm wondering about the D antigen (ABO system & Rhesus system). I first consulted Wikipedia (not the most reliable, but the fastest), and then other French-speaking scientific communities, which are turning a deaf ear, without really getting an answer... I didn't understand absolutely nothing, not being a scientist... in fact, I passed tests concerning immortality ; and by "chance" or "without doing it on purpose", scientists found large amounts of D antigen in my body. This allows me to heal from severe wounds, and even death. …

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 38 replies
    • 4.8k views
    • 2 followers
  20. So what are thoughts on time travel?

    • 2

      Reputation Points

    • 21 replies
    • 3.2k views
    • 2 followers
  21. They aren't made up, an object that uses fusion would be a good source, a v shaped object. However, there's only ever been one incident, anything prior "Kenneth Arnold" et al just a test to see what people believe and if the videos are legit of balls instead of a v-shaped object it was just an after effect of retrocausal grafting of the Illinois Missouri v-shaped craft. Phoenix lights and Lubbock lights also made up They put the Illinois footage in this video to trick people

    • 2

      Reputation Points

    • 3 replies
    • 860 views
    • 1 follower
  22. The question of extraterrestrial lifeforms ability to exsit rests on probability....the probabilty of been the first instance of a natural process not only of happening twice but producing the same phenomena twice ....why would biology happen again if Abiogenesis is required to happen again first?....Nothing in nature is observered to happen again or twice ...have a look yourselves! The indistinguishable particle from the field of quantum physics only remains so to you humans as of yet .... other lesser complex mechanical/chemical reactions are yet to be observed to produce anything twice or the same again ...Is extraterrestrial biology destined to be the first rathe…

    • 3

      Reputation Points

    • 102 replies
    • 9.5k views
    • 5 followers
  23. Started by fredreload,

    We all know it is possible to generate plasma in mid air like lightning, but is it possible to isolate out the electrons from the gas and group them together with just the electrons?

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 2 replies
    • 771 views
    • 1 follower
  24. Started by Capiert,

    STOP! Under Construction Please wait! g=2*h/(t^2)-2*vi/t. It looks (to me) like that term -2*vi/t has been missing for a long time. Surely you ((should) already) know it; but do you use it? For (fallen) height h time(_difference) t initial_speed vi. The free_fall acceleration g~-(Pi^2) [m/(s^2)]+ac g=~-9.8 [m/(s^2)] is (instantaneous,) linear, & negative; & (please bear with me) (the bothersome details:) (=but it) (is) slightly) reduced by the (Earth's daily_rotational) centrifugal_acceleration ac=(vc^2)/r having the (squared) Earth's (surface) circumferential_…

    • 1

      Reputation Points

    • 12 replies
    • 2.5k views
    • 1 follower
  25. t=time s=space e=energy m=mass Strangely the concept of nothing came to me when I started to account with physics, which had been pointing to (if it can be true), that the Universe started at s0t0. If (s) and (t) is zero than (e) and (m) must be zero as well since the laws of nature must apply on every entity in the system. Or expressing it differently: energy and matter can not exist without space and time. So the starting state of the Universe supposed to be (s0t0e0m0) even we can not directly examine that space time moment. In one hypothesis: “The null hypothesis is that nothing, zero is a physical reality based math…

    • 2

      Reputation Points

    • 25 replies
    • 2.9k views
    • 4 followers

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.