Jump to content

Michael J

Members
  • Posts

    2
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Michael J's Achievements

Lepton

Lepton (1/13)

0

Reputation

  1. Hey there thanks for the question. What I'm suggesting here is that electron neutrinos can conditionally be made to have negative mass, albeit temporarily, thus temporarily becoming tachyons. From our perspective, the particle should cease to exist upon colliding with the magneton and should arrive at the detector before the message is sent, temporally speaking. It's not so much that it can't be done, it's just that there's no way to observe it when it's in the mass inverted state. Eventually, the mass would be restored and it would become observable again as a standard 'electron neutrino.' Catch is, it would be in the past instead of in the present. My reasoning is that since we already know that coordinated electron spin is what causes magnetism (thus, spin affects behavior) then solitons should also be able to have their own spin that affects their behavior and interaction with quarks and what not. I think thus far it's been hard to see what's going on because of how hard it is to get two particles that are so small to collide with each other.
  2. The concept combines the already-existing technologies of neutrino generators with skyrmion lattices, which thus far have been suggested as an information storage technology. I believe skyrmion lattices have an application in tachyon generation. It is my belief that if we can "skim" neutrinos just above a skyrmion lattice, this may generate spin in the neutrinos which supports the sustainment of a negative mass state in the particle subsequent to a magneton collision, an effect not as yet observed because non-spinning neutrinos do not resist mass restoration. The device would consist of a neutrino generation phase, a lattice skimming phase, and a magneton collision phase. During the skimming phase, preventing collisions would be critical, and during the collision phase, obviously, collisions would be desired. Lattice #2 would have to be a fraction of a nanometer higher in elevation than the first, and it would have to be shielded to prevent magnetons from colliding prematurely. The implications are enormous. I understand this is only a hypothesis, but I believe a simple experiment could confirm or disprove the findings and may be worth your while. Regards.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.