Speculations

The way the universe works in Savo terms. Recycling is the A and O of everything Everything basically consists of one and the same thing. What it all basically consists of is in itself a pushing force. There is no separate substance and four separate forces separately. The atomic model and worldview will be revolutionized in the near future. A direct observation of how galaxies are born from the middle / inside out proves the current theories to be incorrect. That’s to be discovered at the latest with the new space telescope James Webb. Ok, and now for that matter. The birth of a visible universe expanding in space. First, the …

The world is completely connected. Everything fits. The planets cycle the sun the sun revolves around the center of the galaxy, the galaxy spins in relation to the great attractor. Every molecule, every atom has a history and a present state and a likely future condition. No part of the whole can be removed from its current state and inserted in a different time, because the past has already happened in total and the future has not yet happened. The whole universe fits together seamlessly. No way to exist in another time without taking the whole universe with you. If you take the whole universe with you you are effectively where you began. No time travel is po…

What do you think? Fundamental Cosmology and Physics Beyond the Standard Model4.pdf

I believe that evolution is highly unscientific since the statistical possibility of any level of sophisticated integrated life developing randomly unguided through random geentic mutation and natural selection based on said traits expressed via said genetic mutation is (or seems to me) so highly unlikely as to be impossible rationally - even given full 5 billion years - i would galdly discuss this with someone who is able to rationally counter this by having regard inter alia to statistical probability -

Especially in superconductors/superfluids there are observed so called macroscopic quantum phenomena ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Macroscopic_quantum_phenomena ) - stable constructs like fluxon/Abrikosov vortex quantizing magnetic field due to topological constraints (phase change along loop has to be multiplicity of 2pi). There is observed e.g. interference ( https://journals.aps.org/prb/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevB.85.094503 ), tunneling ( https://journals.aps.org/prb/pdf/10.1103/PhysRevB.56.14677 ), Aharonov-Bohm ( https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0375960197003356 ) effects for these particle-like objects. It brings question if this similarity …

(This is an extract from a piece I wrote elsewhere. I only intended to write an improvised paragraph but more ideas kept coming to me. I didn’t research anything. Could someone tell if anything I said makes genetic sense or if it’s wrong!?) As I said before nonphysical doesn’t mean nonlogical. If something was spiritually created that doesn’t translate to “anything goes”. It doesn’t mean that it was created by a particular God at a specific time for this stated prophetic reason. Nonphysical doesn’t mean nonobjective and subjective either. Much like the existence of eternal hell for nonbelievers can still be defeated solely on logical grounds of disproportionality …

Hello it is again a function of Hubble time tH =1/H as here : https://www.scienceforums.net/topic/125960-why-this-egality-is-exact-please/ you will not have the referential immediately, so don't contest with dimensional analysis please. here his equation, you will adapt the dimensions: [math]\rho_{\text{Vacuum at }t_H}= \frac{1}{ \vartheta} \frac{ G \text{ }m_{Pl}^2}{ (t_H\text{ }c)^2} [/math] with : [math] \vartheta=2 [/math] if tH>tPl (1) and [math] \vartheta=1 [/math] if tH=tPl (2) can you please confirm that : (2) give the exact numerical value ? and that (1) is a good approximation of the me…

Hello everyone,i came here to get some help about the topic i will write about now. Sorry for my English in advance. The topic Has allready been Here for 10 years : Anyways in the end nobody did really get to a proper answer. The thing Is that since i was a boy,i discovered that i could induce some kind of a feeling in to my body literaly instantly,and i can hold it up for a few seconds max before i eventually and sometimes twitch and stop doing it. I can hold that feeling for longer if i dont induce it with maximum pressure or whatever(i cant explain it better,hope u understand) The feeling starts vibrating from my chest to every pa…

hello what do you think of this interpretation please ? It is sufficient to calculate the dark energy density parameter ΩΛ at Planck time, origin of our universe : ΩΛ= Λ c2 / ( 3 H2 ). Source : Page 4 ΩΛ,tp = 1/3 Λ c2 tp2 with tH = 1/H, where tH is Hubble time and H is Hubble constant The vacuum catastrophe = Λ / lp-2 = Λ lp2 as lp = c tp lp2 = c2 tp2 The vacuum catastrophe = Λ c2 tp2 The vacuum catastrophe = 3 ΩΛ,tp Conclusion The vacuum catastrophe would be the energy density parameter of cosmological constant at Planck time in the ΛCDM model with a factor of 3 (and…

So, every action in the universe is like a water-ring that's interacting with eachother... Exept, every ring is not equal in reaction like physical water, every small ring can be or become the most powerfull one going through the others and being the most powerfull one for a while, I don't know why the most powerfull force of vibration matters... But it is the best way to describe my worst dream, I would call it a nightmare, coz it's also the worst nightmare, even tho i usually get tortured in the most interesting ways (Like being trapped in eternity n stuff in that ball league Black mirror stuff, like my fav. astral form was Nightcrawler for a long time when I figure…

Hi. Received a short conspiratory video from friends in relation to the sunken ship Titanic; where explains that it was not, but its twin "Olympic" after a name swap due to insurance manipulations after the Olympic had a costly accident. Other suspicious actions from owners of the ships also 'exposed' Like the hull was not ripped by an iceberg but a explosion by the stern instead, shown by pictures at the bottom of sea. (?). Do you know of more details or a oscure report to read somewhere ?

A crazy question. This is the idea: Nature complexifies itself through time, and at an accelerating rate. This complexification is the fundamental evolution of reality. This evolution also ascends into higher dimensions of experience/expression as time rolls on, meaning: First, it expresses itself as the evolution of space and cosmic matter: stars, galaxies, planets. Next, through biology: the self-evolution of a physical body, and a higher dimension of experience. This Complexifier is always going faster. Its evolution is toward the form or dimension in which it can change the fastest: from space, into biology, and now through intelligence and imagin…

Perception As far as I’m aware, many people who were definitely more educated and arguably more intelligent than I am, have struggled to describe the nature of perception since at least 500 BC. Oddly, it appears that they kind of missed the point. It’s actually not very complicated and there’s a good chance that you are at least partially aware of much of it already. This next bit is interactive: a thrilling ride into the world of A.R. (actual reality), so strap in and hang on tight. Here we go. Hold an object in your hand. Look at it; really look at it for a few seconds. Seriously, this only works if you actually do it – it’s interactive, remember? Stop rea…

Let's do a thought experiment. A tree grows on planet X, an apple falls from it from a height H. There is an observer next to the tree, and in his frame of reference, the apple will fall in time Let another observer from outer space also observe the fall of an apple through a telescope. Due to the fact that the second observer is < br /> in a weaker gravity, in its frame of reference, the time of the apple's fall will be slowed down by a factor of k, and the height of H will also be increased by a factor of k. From this it can be seen that in the reference frame of a remote observer, the acceleration of gravity on the surface…

Has anyone either tried to trace the point in space we’re all matter I.e planets asteroids etc came from.because I’m sure with are technology we could re trace the trajectory of all matter in space and find out the location the so called Big Bang happened.

Imagine you are a time traveler and you can do time travel at any place .And imagine you are standing at a point and then start moving towards north and walk 3 steps from the origin point taking one second per point then travel to your 3 sec in your past. You will find your self standing at that origin point .And you will change the direction of yourself (the past one) 60° towards north west direction, and return back to your original present position. You will find another you in the same space time(your present point) in 60° west to you. As you and that image of your self is same from brain and mind he will also do the same thing and create another copy of himself so in…

Глава заключительная. " Код Создателя!" Начало обсуждения находится здесь. The discussion starts here. : https://forum.belastro.net/viewtopic.php?t=2844&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=0 English version of "Proof of the Hypothesis of Large Dirac Numbers or How to Weight the Universe?": https://www.academia.edu/36630302/Proof_of_the_Hypothesis_of_Large_Dirac_Numbers_or_How_to_Weight_the_Universe Русская версия "Доказательство гипотезы Больших Чисел ДИРАКА: https://www.academia.edu/50355159/Доказательство_гипотезы_Больших_Чисел_Дирака_или_как_взвесить_Вселенную English version of "Mercury anomaly and Milgrom's constant.": https://www.acad…

First of all, I do want to be careful to point out that I'm not trying to propose a new scientific theory or dismiss any of the major established theories. Instead I just want to present a very crude model building on a new world system and a new fundamental principle and a few supporting principles. I believe this model if found reliable could help us get a better understanding of many existing theories. I have tried to find any earlier attempts by anyone else in this direction, but hasn't found any. It has surprised me as even if it's built on quite drastic change of view of the universe, it also seems quite simple, at least to me. If anyone can point to similar id…

Hawking wrote in his book "A Brief History of Time" (or in "M-Theory" ) that it is a big mystery that the universe expands where there is no gravity. That the expansion of the universe cannot be explained by a simple change in the scale of distances. After all, if all the sizes and distances, from the size of atoms, the radius of the Earth, the distance from the Earth to the Sun, the diameter of the galaxy and further to the distances to distant galaxies, would change in the same number of times, then we would simply not notice it. This is indeed the case. Thus, the distance standard changes more strongly in intergalactic space than in galaxies where there is gravity…

Because sound waves have anti gravity properties is it possible to vibrate a object at a frequency to give it anti gravity properties

Hi, looking for a way around the liar and logic contradictions I changed logic (a little bit?) by introducing a new logical dimension: Statements are not absolutely true or false anymore but true or false related to a viewing angel or kind of logical layer or meta-level. With this new dimension, problems become solvable that are unsolvable with classical logic. Most contradictions are not contradicional anymore, as the truth values belong to different layers. The good news (in my theory): The liar´s paradox, Cantor´s diagonal argument, Russell´s set and Goedel´s incompletene…

There is an inherent error in the engine system. Bypass it and you can double the output.

Two object, yellow and red, is traveling close to the speed of light 3*10^8m/s, and the black circle is the space time that they perceive around them. 1st question. Are the two space time perceive by yellow and red two distinct space times? 2nd question. If they pass through each other(as the arrow shown), does the space time maintain their original identity after they pass through each other?

Following on from Swansont's comment "There is nothing we can interact with outside of the universe. It is inaccessible to us" https://www.scienceforums.net/topic/125641-two-objects-going-near-the-speed-at-lightrelativity/?do=findComment&comment=1184766 Is it possible (within the realms of possibility) to construct a "sub universe" whose inhabitants (not necessarily living inhabitants) cannot perceive anything outside their construction and where there exists a speed limit analogous to our own? We,as the creators of this universe would be able to see in but the "inhabitants " would be prevented by their speed limit from s…

Good afternoon. My name is Vic Mеier and I want to offer you my book on theoretical chemistry and astrophysics. My book contains many new scientific discoveries in the field of chemistry and astrophysics that will change modern theoretical chemistry. I wrote this book in 1 year, publication date 2021. This book is better and more ingenious than the work of Stephen Hawking, scientific discoveries surpass Einstein's achievements. This is the most useful book written in recent years, it can change the life of person who read it. You can throw in the trash modern textbooks on theoretical chemistry, because there are only mistakes and delusions of scientists. The book c…