Speculations

The STEM approach has been extended and re-tweaked to eliminate some mis-statements (but there are probably many still lurking). A summary of the STEM approach is: STEM proposes a tentative model for the structure of up and down quarks in terms of concentrated energy tori (referred to as CESs or preons), which may or may not need to be modified or replaced further down the track. However, in its current form, this quark structure has led to a structured atomic nucleus that is reflected by the characteristics of element types, and to new consistent explanations for a wide range of topics such as atomic bonding, electromagnetic fields, electricity, light and even Gravi…

Origins of Natural Order A Strong Bond Between Geometry, Mathematics, and Physic S. Solomon Assertion: An omission occurred during the early development of our formal geometric knowledge, it was a notable Problem that lacked a satisfactory Solution, which was eventually set aside and nearly forgotten about over time. Since then, the many advances in geometry, mathematics, and physics now constitute the rigor, logic & laws of today’s natural science. Nevertheless, that ancient geometric omission r…

I want to present my hypothesis for your consideration ehveng.htm

SEPERATING SPACE FROM GRAVITY TO TRAVEL FASTER THEN LIGHT AND TRAVEL IN TIME!!! I hypothesize that space is a set size and is not expanding. The notion that it is expanding is a misunderstanding of the effect of gravity on space, time, and light. When we speak about gravity and the bending of light on the plain it is said to curve with the gravitational waves. When we are measuring photons in our calculation of the size of the universe, we leave this part out but it is a fundamental issue in determining distance that is not easily calculated. In the drawing above you can that time, light, and objects or matter move relative to each ot…

Hubbe_derivation2.pdfHubbe_derivation2.pdf You can read it here too : https://www.scirp.org/journal/paperinformation.aspx?paperid=91689 Hi ! A few years ago I developed a theory that explained the accelerated receding of galaxies and its rapid movement of rotation of them without the need to postulate the existence of "Dark Energy" and "Dark Matter" respectively. ( The theory link: https://www.scirp.org/journal/paperinformation.aspx?paperid=91689 ) I thought my idea was a good one as I used fewer hypotheses than these two "dark" entities. However, I knew that it could be one of dozens (or hundreds) of theories that try to explain these "…

So, if we take the set of square roots of prime numbers, each number in that set can match the set of "Natural" numbers by extending the decimal points. As the "Natural" numbers get large a further decimal 0-9 matches each n, n+1, ...; 1:1. The ordinality of i' is the same as the ordinality of "infinity", and there is a degree of aleph=2 to the subset i' before it reaches anything including all the "Reals". So, between the sets "infinity", i', various Real sets, and the Natural set, there are at least two degrees, hence the aleph=2, hence Cantor's conjecture is towards the negative. Does that make sense? P.s. yada, yada, cardinality.

Whether Time is linear or cyclical or something else, is the speed of time constant? What basis do we have to extrapolate time back to t=0 (or very close to 0) and assume it's speed is the same as it today? I read descriptions of the early universe describing things like "A few millionths of a second (after the big bang), quarks aggregated to produce protons and neutrons" https://home.cern/science/physics/early-universe How would an observer in the early universe measure time when there are only quarks, protons and neutrons? Is it possible the speed of time is variable? Could 1 millionth of a second in the early universe be equivalent to a few mi…

This model was created by emphasizing that the universe is filled with Ether (Ether) as Nikola Tesla said. If we can step outside of the universe and look, we can see that the vibrations in the video below are in an order as they have created. If you want to solve the secrets of the universe, as Nikola Tesla said, think of energy as frequency and vibration. Also, it says that if you knew the grandeur of the numbers 3, 6 and 9, you would solve the mystery of the universe, and we know in the Qur'an that the universe was created in 6 periods. 369, 396, 639, 693, 936, 963 ..... The universe had a diameter of more than 93 billion light-years. There was no matter, that is,…

All the most known theories of gravity are built on the principle of long-range action. When approximately "point" body or mass density (also electromagnetic energy) distributed in space creates gravitational potential. This article attempts to substantiate gravitational phenomena on the principle of proximity (locality). The cause of interactions is some spatial state of fundamental fields, the consequence is change of these fields over time (first derivative in time at local point of continuum). Presumably, following fundamental gravitational fields exist: (SI units in parentheses are m-metre, s-second, k-kilogram, A-Ampere) scalar potential g (m2/s2) vector …

I have something to share to all of you. As the title says, i will talk about earth's gravity growing with a proof. Don't worry, the proof I will provide can be tested in a lab just like you usually do, a very simple lab test. // I have asked admin to repost the topic. I hope this is ok.

If gravitational waves are considered as a repulsive force emanating from a collision of heavy objects and dark energy is similarly considered as a repulsive force, is there a link between those two phenomena as viewed from this common repulsive behavior? If dark energy is the leftovers of the annialations (collisions) of the vitrual particles of space, giving the small forces that are everywhere, inflating the cosmos in a smooth, continuous fashion, thus leaving dark energy as an aggregate of these smallest possible gravity waves, with ultra heavy objects detected by LIGO as tending toward the largest?

This is a serious scientific question and I expect serious answers! It's very important, I have a grow gun that I want to test out and I need to know by Friday Thanks very much

Abstract Introduce a geometric model in which there is a maximum speed, which may help us understand why the speed of light c is the maximum speed in the universe, why parameter c is a constant and the geometric mechanism that causes time dilation and length contraction. Finally, this paper will introduce a new coordinate transformation and general velocity addition formula based on this model. The new coordinate transformation and general velocity addition formula not only correspond to time dilation/length contraction effect, but also correspond to the Sagnac effect. Keywords: Lorentz transformation, special relativity, one way speed of light, Sagnac effect …

I don't think it exists , I think what we call darkness is just simply when objects are not illuminated .

Math :

I have provided a special clock that measures time !

Hi, how big is the Universe ?

The nuerological reference frame , NRF for short , is a more advanced way of explaining the mind. The NRF is entangled with the universe when your eyes are open and is your conscious reference frame , making note of all we sense , storing information we gain .

My point of view about time The human observer invented the concept of time and clock because it was difficult for him to measure change and speed of change (rapidity of change or slowness of change) which along with: space, matter, energy, forces, fields, .... are fundamental constituents and properties of the universe. Time is nothing but the relationship between change and the speed of change. Time only makes sense for what is changing at a certain speed, so it is a function of these two. Time is relative depending on the nature of the change: life time, half-life for radioactive substances, reaction time, astronomical time ....

Hello , I have an experiment that may demonstrate the existence of an Aether . In theory the experiment should work but the potential results of the experiment could be highly dangerous with several possible outcomes. The physics of the experiment seems viable physics and there is a great chance for success ! The problem I have , how do I explain the experiment here when there is potential dangers ? I wouldn't want the results to end up in the ''wrong hands'' . This isn't the sort of experiment I can do at home ! One of the possible good outcomes of the experiment , is that we invent a way to ''siphon'' spatial energy .

Hi. I hade one speculation/discussion here, but it got locked. Do anyone know of any forum where I can speculate and discuss wildly, about space/time and quantum physics without being locked out and where there is people who know about gravitational waves, general relativity and quantum physics who can help me get any of my thought experiments discussed, if they can be anything of interest ? Regards MagI --------------------------------

----------------------------------------------------- In the movie Interstellar(2014) they live on planet Gargantua near a black hole and time is moving much slower. One hour on the planet would be 7 years on earth. Lets say time moved much slower on the planet. They would see the planets and stars moving like white stripes in the night sky. The planets would seem to be as a cloud around the sun in its solar system. They would see time and the speed of light in space moving much much faster than on the planet. Now lets say it is like that in micro-cosmos. Time is moving much faster in particle physics. Our time is much slower than …

Origins of Natural Order A Strong Bond Between Geometry, Mathematics, and Physics S. Solomon © 2022 Abstract: An omission occurred during the early development of our formal geometric knowledge, it was a notable Problem that lacked a satisfactory Solution, which was eventually set aside and nearly forgotten about over time. Since then, the many advances in geometry, mathematics, and physics now constitute the rigor, logic &amp…

My Quantitative theory coincides with Einstein's, is its continuation; without using space, speed, acceleration, energy, and so on and so forth: Postulate I: In this volume there is only this exact number of minimal elements. This postulate is ergodic, in the spirit of Poincare recurrence theorem. Einstein: Postulate 1 (Einstein's principle of relativity). The laws of nature are the same in all coordinate systems moving rectilinearly and uniformly relative to each other. Monotheism in both theories. Postulate II: The inclusion time of the minimum element in any set is the minimum possible. Einstein the same: Postulate 2 (the princip…

1. STM Let us accept an existence of homogenous formation space-time-matter, shortly STM. STM = S + TM = T + SM = M + ST [spacetimematter = space + timematter = time + spacematter = matter + spacetime] M + ST is concerning macroscopic conditions. If - M, + ST matter loses then spacetime profit, it is distance - perspective, objects decrease with distance - ordinary contraction. If + M, - ST matter profit then spacetime loses, it is bringing closer - perspective, objects increase in progress of bringing closer - ordinary dilatation. S + TM is concerning microscopic conditions. If - TM, + S timematter loses then space profit, it leads to…