Speculations

I thought some might be interested in this. A UFO has landed and took off from a backyard in Vegas! A cop caught it on his body cam and the people who saw it said the aliens were 8 feet tall!

Hi, I believe that I have found proof that the universe is a mathematical construct generated using waves of Time. It's easier if you read my free online Google document outlining this discovery: Is the universe a Matrix? Please read with an open mind and please excuse me if I have posted this under the wrong section. I believe that I have found the mathematical blueprint for a Quark particle, and that this knowledge will unlock all the secrets to the universe. Here is the image for the Quark (see attached) Please read with an open mind. Thank you for your Time.

A theory of everything (TOE[1] or TOE/ToE), final theory, ultimate theory, unified field theory or master theory is a hypothetical, singular, all-encompassing, coherent theoretical framework of physics that fully explains and links together all aspects of the universe.[2]: 6  Finding a theory of everything is one of the major unsolved problems in physics.[3] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory_of_everything Does this forum have a member/members that feel competent to assess such theory? As, it can challenge some currently accepted and deeply rooted assumptions about reality. Do those members have access to high rank science so…

Introducing graviton, which decay at to less than Planck's time to gravitation waves which becomes template upon which spacetime curvature forms, merging Einstein field equations parameters and interpreting that using Schrodinger equation, can this leads to quantification of gravity? have a look at the following diagrams. The diagrams have been used for illustration purposes to outline the concept-from the diagram graviton wave function illustrated envelopes elementary particles in this case case-down quark. Once Higgs field is saturated a standing wave is formed that forms graviton that immediately decay to gravitation waves. As elementary particles aggre…

The root of your problem is that you first believed that Special Relativity was a rational Theory. A correct theory. This false belief leads to all manner of weirdness. Common excuses to overcome questions like yours are: Shut up and Calculate (don't ask questions) , Its "Unintuitive" (meaning irrational) , and my favourite, "Some people just can't grasp the concepts". (said by superior intellects that can understand it but just can't seem to find suitable words to explain it )

there is online discussion of scalar emf waves that do not have a frequency, but offer a voltage. Not only does this supposed wave have a voltage that can be applied remotely, but travels faster than light to a specific point, moving in the time dimension, not normal 3d space time. This seems highly unlikely, even to the extent of the naming of it as a scalar "wave" when the proponents say it has no frequency. thanks

Hi, This is my speculative idea on how a universe like structures could come into existence. Let's start with dark matter candidates, Axioms , Wimps. Sterile neutrinos. "A Ryton is a subatomic particle that has a weak mass and a weak positive charge associated with it, giving rise to a weak electric field. Making them somewhat different to the other dark matter candidates. These particles form a volume of space with a uniformed mass and energy density. each Ryton is separated from one another by its weak positive electric field, forming a Ryton Cluster. To the best of my knowledge 3 of the forces including the strong nuclear force, the electromagnetic force…

I saw the 'UFO' in news thread in news and looked up whether Oumuamua had been mentioned in context. Only there, as far as I can tell. When I first heard the initial details it struck me immediately as the most likely route to having any contact with extraterrestrial civilisation in our history. Of course it might be nothing at all to do with that, more likely than not, but if it were and we missed the chance to launch a mission to visit it, what a lost opportunity. If intelligent civilisations tend to destroy themselves (possibly the explanation for why we don't see any?) a short time after they invent nuclear power and space travel, the next thing would be to …

as a thought experiment, what if one of an entangled pair of particles were to fall into a black hole and it's partner is in a remote lab and is measured. Would the black hole residing particle respond to it's partner as in the case of being separated by only distance, and not affect by the event horizon? IOW, is non locality blocked if one particle is behind the horizon, forming a sort of informational diode to even this quantum effect?

The big bang did not start with the explosion of a single ATOM of matter alone. THE ENERGY CREATED would be negligible in viewing our end result.. Before there was matter, there where two opposing harmonising, stable, forces that (became vibrations , sound , light) they existed as a whole ,a negative and a positive, a north and south, a push and a pull with equal force issuing stability in perfection.. something upset this causing rhythm, then causing these otherwise stable intertwined equal opposing forces to lose stability ,which in turn caused them to abrase and in this collision that double atom of matter came to life instantaneously being born into a pure energy envi…

In our many discussions about UFOs or UAPs I'm not sure we have ever discussed Bracewell Probes in any real detail and "if" the UAP/UFO phenomena turns out to be not of this earth I think the idea of a Bracewell Probe might be a viable explanation of not only where these objects originate but the concept might even explain some of their behaviors. A Bracewell Probe might have technological capabilities not predicted by Ronald N. Bracewell the originator of the concept in 1960. Not only could such a probe be combined with the concept of a Von Neumann probe the probe could build smaller drone type vehicles to explore and more closely observe the planets it was sent to…

The "Light Clock" has nothing to do with Physics. Because such a device is a physical impossibility. So you have an imaginary device that can't possibly function in reality, then you expect to be able to do Math calculations on its performance? That's equivalent to calculating how many tooth fairies would be required to lift a block of Moon Cheese.

https://www.newsweek.com/device-that-turns-carbon-dioxide-oxygen-could-help-colonize-mars-1739040 Imagine modifying this machine to turn CO2 into C & O2

Elon Musk once said 'We can use Nukes to Warm Mars up' If we extrapolate from that, we can also use Nukes to cool Earth down. Neutron bombs were intended to detonate at ground level to destroy all humans nearby whilst keeping Buildings mostly unscathed. The difference here is that we could detonate them in the sky instead. The fiery blast radius would be a few hundred metres. The high energy Neutron radius would be 1000-2000 metres. High energy Neutron collisions with Carbondioxide would make radioactive Carbondioxide. This newly radioactive compound would Betadecay into single Atoms Earth's Atmosphere 78.08% Nitrogen 20.95% Oxygen …

I placed this here right away as speculation on others but this is my theory and my belief. Please disprove it and debunk it. I am serious because I need to know. The debunk is not this amateur post but my book as a whole. Not telling to buy the book but click on "see book" on amazon and debunk the first 8 pages or substack stuff but it should be the book. If not, I will place myself; Newton = Gravity (Principia) Einstein = Gravity (General Relativity) Delamotte = Gravity (Prime Mechanics) Only three people got it right. March 14, 2023 I published Prime Mechanics. "Prime Mechanics is based on a science that…

The procedural position of an autonomous photon in a particle with quantum entanglement of the nucleus, adjusted for light error, will be approximated by dividing space into atomic intervals, and then compiling a procedural matrix of photon positions, which is a matrix with mixed elements. Each photon has the opportunity to act in different positions of the process, forming some sequences and patterns, while the quantification process occurs according to the rule: the more positions a photon occupies, the more likely it is to be in a certain position. Thus, the procedural position of an autonomous photon in a particle with a quantum entanglement of the nucleus, adjusted f…

How to increase your IQ level ? How to improve your IQ ? The level of intelligence ranges from 70 to 200 IQ points, and very rarely exceeds 200 points (in the case of normal, not impaired intelligence). Below 70 points, Intellectual disability begins. Well, it turns out that the level of your intelligence can be raised by 20, 50, 100, 200 and even several hundred points. To do this, you need to tune in and set yourself up to raise the level of intelligence. The mind shifts to a higher level of intelligence with the right effort. In my method, the mind is moved to the target level of intelligence, e.g. 180 IQ points, or 400 points. I initially increased my IQ by 20 po…

I hope this thread has a good conversation on the topics I will post about because I don't want the thread prematurely shut down again. This is serious business as forwarding human understanding for everyone on earth is at stake. I do not have a degree in physics but I think that may have been an advantage as I was able to ponder the problems I wanted to without the pressure of conforming to academia, funding and prizes. For example, many physicists may believe a theory of everything is the unification of relativity and quantum mechanics, but that may not be what the theory of everything is. I know the emphasis is on me to explain this framework however, it answers q…

In relativity, the space and time of the observer moving at the speed of light are different with the space and time of the observer at rest. At near the speed of light length contract and time dilate. Even motion is relative to the frame of reference used. An observer in accelerated frame view motion different from observer at rest. If we think deeper, even me and you are not in the same space. What I view in my space is different from what you view in your space. At least you can view me in your space while I cannot view myself in my space. Also, I can view you in my space while you cannot view yourself in your space. Is relative space not the union of absolute spaces? …

I thought I had a pretty good grip on why FTL was impossible. I was knowledgeable enough to at least think I understood why FTL was impossible even in the face of things like warp drive and worm holes. I was pretty confident that the time travel aspects would prohibit FTL even if the infinite energy requirements didn't. Now I see one of my most respected scientific sources seemingly asserting that all I've been taught was solid as a rock is in fact on shaky ground at best, Sabine Hossenfelder has blown my mind by suggesting all I know might not be as solid as I was led to believe. Is anyone willing to watch this video and assure me that Sabine has slipped a cog so I …

The only thing that can save us from completely destroying the atmosphere is to overcome earth's gravity beyond rockets, wings and wheels. Pyramid Vortex Generator Gravity Machine: This experiment will show how nothing becomes something and it will demonstrate how gravity is the beginning of matter and is the glue that holds matter together. It will also create a containment vessel for a fusion reaction. Start with a steel pyramid of some scaled down dimensions of the great pyramid of Giza with an electro magnet at its peak. Then mount it on a hollow shaft and spin it. Now shoot a jet of air at the spinning pyramid. The faces of the pyramid, as they pass…

I've noticed that when I'm cooking and I decide to hum while I'm stirring the food. The food gains whatever energy that is released from humming. The more I hum, the more energy the food gains. I've giving food to people without informing them of this energy transfer and some comment how it tastes strange while one person said it gave them so much energy like they've never felt before. I also tested this a year ago when I had to feed a cat. I mashed their wet food while humming, the cat ate the food and not even a couple minutes later... The cat threw up the food as if it couldn't handle whatever energy I transferred into it by humming. The cat never throwed up when …

Greetings All, How about some healthy speculation? The idea that something—meaning our universe—can arise from nothing is ludicrous, unprovable and, by no stretch of science, math, or imagination will I ever be convinced otherwise. That is because within a true vacuum—devoid of all energy or energetic interference—nothing can or will be created regardless of how advanced our science may eventually become. I know this is a rehash of a subject we’ve had in this forum many times before and maybe there’s nothing new in anything I have said or will say. However, with your continued indulgence, consider what would be required to test the idea that the whole of a un…

LIGHT--- THAT TWO DIMENSIONAL 3D ARTIST and or LIFE FORM Light travels at 670,616,629.384 miles per hour,. so in theory, if we build a wall in a circle with a radius of that distance or indeed scaled down by a factor of 60 to bring this distance down to distance travelled in one minute and then 60 again to give us 19615.7304 this would equate to miles per second. Then, in theory if we could run around this wall in one second we would be travelling at the speed of light , correct? but if we then reduce the wall by a factor of 1000 it leave us with a circumference of 19.6157, meaning we would then have to travel the wall at a speed of 1000 revolutions per second to bal…

THE CONCEPT OF ONE THE IDEA THAT THE WORD ONE IS A NUMBER AND HAS NUMERICAL VALUE IS WRONG ONE DID NOT, NOR NEVER EXIST ONE IS AN IMPOSSIBLE OBJECT ONE IS A MAN MADE CONCEPT THAT PERTAINS TO ANOUNCE THE EXISTENCE OF A THING ONE HAS NEVER BEEN NOR CAN BE. IF A MAN LEFT ON PLANET EARTH ALONE WAS TO ANNOUNCE HIS EXISTANCE TO AN ALIEN LIFE FORM HE WOULD ANNOUNCE HIMSELF AS ALL OF HUMANITY . NOT AS ONE WHEN THERE IS THE CONCEPTUAL USE OF ONE ON A SINGULAR OBJECT THEN THAT OBJECT IS NOT ONE BUT IS ALL OF THAT ITEM THAT EXISTS, ONE IS NEVER ONE , BUT IS ALL. LIKE EVERYTHING IN LIFE THERE IS ALWAYS AN OPPOSITE AND EQUAL, YIN AND YANG, GOOD BAD, YOU GET THE DRIFT. IN THE FIRST INS…