Speculations

Could mass be grounded by mass ? All mass contains a positive and a negative electrical charge and in research I've discovered that electrical energy is grounded .

About a month ago, I posted my idea of the possibility that if light has a mass, it is the best candidate to replace dark matter, because it is transparent, well distributed in the entire universe, does not combine with other particles to form "visible" matter and (most important) it is the only type of particles/energy/mass we know for sure is present everywhere in space. Please don´t forget that we are searching for particles present everywhere (like water) instead of searching for some rare elements (like diamonds), because "dark matter" should be responsible for about 80% (40% - 99% according to the author) of the entire mass of the universe. For those who think …

it does seem that there is a faster than light signalling with quantum entanglement issues, but that it cannot transfer any signal other than the basics used to determine a static outcome. Is this because no information can be "added on" to the basic mathematics that determines what is only allowed to happen in normal nature? Could it be possible to artificially "add on" signalling by building unique entangled structures that have a greater bandwidth?

Is lightning a substance relative to permitivity and permeability ?

In the distant past our Sun was much dimmer than it is today, the science on this is pretty much confirmed, Faint sun paradox , during this time the Earth is thought to have had a large amounts of CO2 and Methane in its atmosphere to allow the Earth to have liquid water on its surface. On the other hand Mars is considered by many as too small to have had such an extensive atmosphere. I am proposing that Mars was an ice world similar to Jupiter's Moon Callisto but much larger. Being an ice encased world would allow for liquid water at the surface covered by a world wide ice sheet with a very thin atmosphere. As the magnetic field of Mars was lost the Solar Wind w…

I request to initiate a thread on what I only know as the Lagrangian equation. The original published scientific paper derivation proof is unknown to me. [math]\;[/math] Lagrangian equation: [math]\mathcal{L} = \underbrace{\mathbb{R}}_{GR} - \overbrace{\underbrace{\frac{1}{4} F_{\mu \nu} F^{\mu \nu}}_{Yang-Mills}}^{Maxwell} + \underbrace{i \overline{\psi} \gamma^\mu D_\mu \psi}_{Dirac} + \underbrace{|D_\mu h|^2-V\left(|h| \right)}_{Higgs} + \underbrace{h \overline{\psi} \psi}_{Yukawa} = 0[/math] [math]\;[/math] This Lagrangian equation appears to represent a massless field tensor fundamental field interaction Lagrangian combination zero summation action in natural u…

as I understand it, space is composed of two virtual particles appearing, then annialating, as borrowed energy, but do these pairs originate from the same source? If they were omitted at that same point, why would they have been differentiated in the first place? Wouldn't they have "pre annialated"? Were they cancelling each other out until physical separation allowed their respective properties to materialize?

This is probably wrong but I'll ask just to clear up anyone else's misguided thoughts. Could the dead pathogens of the Covid virus vaccine be contagious? If so could those who weren't vaccinated develop residual herd immunity from dealing not only with former patients but also from interacting with vaccinated friends?

Oygenation? CO2 splitting? High frequency terra to exo hz. The signal fore exo Hz. Is internally modulated by B ch. Only A ch need to be transmit. Fore 10 m band. A ch 29.620 MHz Fore instance a repeater frequency. Of 29.620 MHz. B ch 29.619 999 999 912/917 MHz. Both squares or same wave and volt. If you set it to A 27 MHz or 29 MHz . The setting B will be 26.999 999 999 912/917. Or 28.999 999 999 912/915 MHz. Range effects not tested. Oxygenation through observed combustion enhancing oxygen. Easaly seen. CO2? Question if it releases oxygen or just makes it more active by vibration. My feeling is relatively low range and splitting capability. Maybe o…

I have a new model for particles. The model predicts correctly that a particle that absorbed (a) photon(s) (i.e. was accelerated), gets heavier. The Model suggests particles are Riemann Spheres/Anti-Riemann Spheres, with circles in them identified and the properties are carried on these circles (encoded by numbers of superimposed space points). An Anti-Riemann Sphere is a Riemann Sphere made out of left out points of space. The Riemann Spheres are constructed from all of a 2-dimensional slice of space copied and compactified. The particles are made from Riemann Spheres superimposed on Anti-Riemann Spheres. We see that we don't get the most beautiful theory. Part…

Hi all, I am a Polish individual, a pianist, radio amateur and electronics hobbyist, please see my website for more information about me. I currently look for someone good at math and radio astronomy (ideally), who will be able to help me with calculations related to the Wow! signal received by the Big Ear radio telescope in 1977 in Ohio. To this very day it has not been known which horn of the Big Ear radio telescope received the Wow! signal. I think I can shed some fresh light on this problem. More details on my websites. Regards, Jakub Commercial link removed by moderator

During the last decades, scientists have been searching for all kind of particles to explain the “dark matter” effect. But these particles are either too heavy, too rare, not transparent, or they combine to form more complex structures that would become visible. But a couple of years ago, I discovered a much simpler solution to this problem, and I am offering it in my new book (still only in German) “Eine Lösung für das Geheimnis der dunklen Materie” (Author: Thilo Müller). If light is manipulated by mass (see the Einstein rings) and our sun loses 4 million tons of mass per second, I think that light should have its own mass and that this mass is responsible for…

A new time-line that combines facts about Human Evolution | Geological map | Physics | Chemistry | Cosmos | Geology | Paleontology | Archaeology | Anthropology | History & Science. The name of the Theory is Astrogeomanity. Astrogeomanity theory of human evolution in space, is to be used by practitioners for study and research purposes. The theory it's a model of framework that Astrogeomanity generates that can be used for correct predictions. Use manual: The Astrogeomanity Table Integrating: Physics fundamental forces | Chemistry fundamentals | Matter | Minerals | Rocks | Astronomy - Nebula to Nebula theory stars life cycles | Goldilocks condit…

a human has tiny cells in his skin or where ever all over the whole human is made of cells so today i thought about the earth came to conclusion that earth is a cell a long time ago when the earth was in fire millions to billion years ago the earth cell was cancer then later the earth turned into a healthy cell because it had glaciers and cleaner air so the earth cell became a healthy cell just like a cell in the human body its tiny so the earth must be a tiny cell to a larger bigger being

At earlier time I was reading the following website with an article titled, "Aether Definition in Alchemy and Science": link - https://www.thoughtco.com/aether-in-alchemy-and-science-604750 Negative findings: "The negative results were published in the same year and followed up with experiments of increased sensitivity." *from the link above* Case closed. Right? Yet, the law of causality remains. Causality Law I still have a reasoning or notion of that; the space-time continuum with causality law "ensures" things to happen in "correct" manner regardless. For ensuring to happen, that would surely require a connection or medium of between …

If an Alien in a far distant galaxy does not move relative to Bob on Earth, he sees Bob in his present. But when the alien gets on his bike and cycles away from Bob, he sees not Bob but the past of Earth as it was hundreds of years ago. This does not make sense since the present doesn't change into the past.

Diagram I have developed a simple diagram about an envision of future travel technologies, although these are fiction for now. The purpose of this thread and diagram is for fun viewing and discussion about now to future travel technologies. See attached image to this post. Impulse Engine: Interplanetary travel in Star Trek films and television shows. Speed up to before Warp level. I imagine experience would be like driving ordinary vehicles. Warp Drive: Faster than light travel. I imagine it to be best for fun rush experience, imo. FTL Jump: Faster than light travel or jump from a to b. Woah, I imagine it to be fast but potential boring and disori…

For example the idea that a field is numbers assigned to space points. How these numbers are written into space points is left up to magic. What some don't realize is that there must be a field for each property of a particle. How these fields are unified into the field of a particle is left up to magic. Since a particle has many properties just one number at a space point won't specify the particle completely. In addition if a space point can only accommodate one number then a particle cannot be specified to be located at a point and how is the space distribution of the particle then going to be defined. There needs to be a grouping together of space points fun…

The WOW message reads: "6EQUJ5". We can take EQU to mean "=". Then "J" can be taken as the symbol for "successor of" (aliens would have a different symbol than ours). Then the message reads: "6 = S5", so it makes sense!

The Aether is a medium of heat, not conventional EMR heat, but heat like that at the center of the Earth, heat I call nucleus heat. The heat originates at the nucleus and puts a density/ temperature on the Aether. Perhaps the background temperature of the universe is from a nucleus to the universe and all atom's and universe's are the same. The squeezing force of the nucleus inner heat creates a field of density on the Aether and makes its gravity field. When two gravity fields touch the density in the Aether at the point where the fields touch pulls the two object's together. Energy like matter is also made of the background Aether heat medium. Energy is just heat o…

I have an exciting new experiment to test for the Aether wind. It is similar to the famous Michelson and Morley experiment. The experiment utilizes a Femto camera. A Femto camera takes a trillion frames per second and is capable of capturing light in slow motion as it leaves its source. The link below is a video of just that. By pausing the video where light has expanded into s sphere, one can then measure for the Aether 'moving past' just as they did in the M&M experiment. If the Aether is in fact the medium for light one would expect to be able to measure for the slight difference in speed along different directions in a paused image of the Femto camera. When …

I just had this thought quite some time ago. I made a drawing that deliberately looks like it could be an "popular science" illustration from 17th century. If someone makes a cannon, that can shoot repeatedly cannonballs into space and the cannonballs can be connected with a chain (or not), Would it be possible someone to walk slowly along the chain into space - that way that the walker steals some of the linear momentum of the cannonballs - and end up into orbiting earth? I named this hypothetical setup as " Free fall chain ". In the place where the cannonballs fall back to earths surface, there could be some kind of device that can gather the kinetic…

if alice determines an up and that delivers a down measurement for bob, what if they determine their respective particles at the same instant in time, should that somehow be made to happen, and would that matter to the outcome?

Is it possible we are living in a pressurized system where what we see as matter is actually space and what we see as space is actually matter? We accept that matter can pull on matter even if we don't know how it works and it appears impossible. It’s action a distance. We see it all the time - in magnets, gravity, and the way common objects are held together (atoms do not touch). It's easy to accept what we see as fact. But how can matter affect matter from a distance? Can you imagine a way? I can’t. However, if we are in a pressurized system, matter can push matter over a distance to cause and create everything we have in the universe without the unimaginabl…