Skip to content

Speculations

Pseudoscientific or speculatory threads belong here.

Speculations Forum Rules

The Speculations forum is provided for those who like to hypothesize new ideas in science. To enrich our discussions above the level of Wild Ass Guesswork (WAG) and give as much meaning as possible to such speculations, we do have some special rules to follow:

  1. Speculations must be backed up by evidence or some sort of proof. If your speculation is untestable, or you don't give us evidence (or a prediction that is testable), your thread will be moved to the Trash Can. If you expect any scientific input, you need to provide a case that science can measure.
  2. Be civil. As wrong as someone might be, there is no reason to insult them, and there's no reason to get angry if someone points out the flaws in your theory, either.
  3. Keep it in the Speculations forum. Don't try to use your pet theory to answer questions in the mainstream science forums, and don't hijack other threads to advertise your new theory.

The movement of a thread into (or out of) Speculations is ultimately at the discretion of moderators, and will be determined on a case by case basis.

  1. The orbital electron is possibly simply an unfortunate historical aberration stemming from the 1913 Bohr model of a positively charged nucleus holding negatively charged electrons in orbit. The comforting features of the Bohr model, particularly in the early 1900’s, were its simplicity and similarity to our own planetary system, with a Sun being the equivalent of a nucleus and the orbiting planets the electrons. The main difference, apart from size and scale, is that the planets are held in orbits by gravitational pull whereas electrons are allegedly by opposite electric charge attraction; and there is the slight problem that the mutual repulsion between protons within th…

  2. Can scientist please explain why they are using incorrect foundational data for their studies. Scientist claim that the 2 off magnetic forces in nature are the same. They are not, so why do they claim that they are and base all their studies on this false claim? The present scientific model is based upon this false foundational assumption.

    • 1

      Reputation Points

    • 51 replies
    • 5.2k views
    • 4 followers
  3. After reading @Moontanmans post about the alien documentary "The Phenomenon" which I believe was from another thread it got me thinking. If a complex alien life did exist, why would they not interact with us? What reasoning would they have to not say "hey, here we are. We exist." And I believe that a potential idea is that of for scientific analysis and discovery. When humans who have more advanced understandings of things discover and interact with humans who, in many cases, have less formalized structures they tend to do so from a distance. Not directly interacting in order to obtain more knowledge from a non-interactive stance which could influence the behaviors …

    • 3

      Reputation Points

    • 72 replies
    • 8.7k views
    • 4 followers
  4. Started by Externet,

    They should have pretty good access to equipment for tracking ufos, right ? Hope they release more videos from the ISS and past missions. Together with the military and their sophisticated tracking and imaging satellites by radar and optics... If an UFO shows up at a certain location, can it be followed until reaches its destination with all that equipment hanging in orbits ? Would it make sense if they ever say "we lost its position" ? 🤥 Unsure if links did not stick or is it against rules to add video links here. Retrying : www.youtube.com/watch?v=QMsgjP7EyNw www.youtube.com/watch?v=CP1ByO1wzzc www.youtube.com/watch?v=hPadIH5JmmM Plese…

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 1 reply
    • 664 views
    • 1 follower
  5. Started by lidal,

    It is a basic requirement of special relativity theory (SRT) that all relatively moving inertial observers agree on an observable (interference fringe shift, for example). It is shown that SRT trivially leads to a disagreement on the observables ( interference fringe shift) in two relatively moving inertial reference frames. Suppose that the interference fringe shift of a light speed experiment predicted in frame S is N, and the fringe shift predicted in frame S’ for the same experiment is N’. It is a requirement of relativity theory that there should be an agreement on the observable (the fringe shift) in both frames, i.e. N = N’. Let us see if this is actually t…

    • 1

      Reputation Points

    • 15 replies
    • 2.5k views
    • 1 follower
  6. Yes, he has a good point. At the time that Darwin discovered those finches, they thought that a cell was just an empty space that made up a body, not the complex mechanism we know it is today. May I also add that the beaks had differences of less than a centimeter, only about 18.92 millimeters. Earnst Haekel's embryo evolution was a fraud. He just drew the pictures without evidence, and they're not even accurate. They don't show real pictures, that's because there are no pictures, it can't be proven, but still it's shown in science textbooks. They even know they're wrong, but they still do. Then there's Nebraska man. A whole in-between species made up because…

    • 2

      Reputation Points

    • 33 replies
    • 3.2k views
    • 1 follower
  7. Earth is said to be a sphere with a circumference of 25,000 miles, or 40,000 km, therefore it has to have a curvature of about 8 inches per mile squared. Can we observe or verify this? We are taught about the ancient observations like a sailing boat going over the horizon and the measurements of Eratosthenes. They are all falsified by our current observations and better understanding of the optical effects of the atmosphere. But how can we really measure the curvature of Earth in the 21st century? FECORE has established the Terrestrial Laser Targeting method, or “TLT method” for short, to measure the geopotential surface of the Earth. Geopotential means the…

    • 3

      Reputation Points

    • 40 replies
    • 16.2k views
    • 9 followers
  8. From the second Friedmann equation or acceleration equation, [math] \frac{1}{R}(\frac{{{d^2}R}}{{d{t^2}}}) = - (\frac{{4\pi G}}{3})(\rho + 3P)[/math] Since ρ is the mass density in the acceleration equation, the pressure term P has a dimension of energy density (c=1). Current acceleration equation inevitably require negative mass density. Without negative (gravitational) mass density, it is impossible to create acceleration expansion. The mainstream produces acceleration expansion by setting the pressure of the cosmological constant or vacuum energy to P=−ρ . Currently, dark energy is described as a being that exerts a negative pressure while having a posi…

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 5 replies
    • 2.7k views
    • 1 follower
  9. Started by NTuft,

    "There is a connection between physics and complex calculus, provided by harmonic functions in two-dimensional problems." Can you explain that: harmonic functions, a la on the unit sphere, with real clear triangles? @joigus, Hello, good day, What if the Riemann zeta function has primes distributed with (1/2) real part because of the way i is being used as a 'spanner' in the works? As a placeholder it's made complex numbers a sort of math that can hold with limiting the nature of the imaginary component; or is it a component inseperable from an extra dimension like time, and so splits from the real number line for its expression? If complex math us…

    • 1

      Reputation Points

    • 9 replies
    • 2.7k views
  10. The LINE Scenario: A Thought Experiment; Earth is gone. Complements of some natural occurrence, you name it. Perhaps a primordial black hole or giant rogue planet that happens to be passing through this solar system which sends the Earth into direct collision with Jupiter. Or perhaps there is an immense solar flare that perturbs Earths' orbit, sending our magnificent crucible for life careening into the sun. Result? All that you, and I, and your pet otter were, every cell and every DNA molecule, every atom that was on, or in the Earth, is now ionized nuclear fuel within the sun. The Darwinian evolved chemistry and biology that many fall back upon to describe life…

    • 1

      Reputation Points

    • 21 replies
    • 3.1k views
    • 3 followers
  11. His name is George E Hammond: His Credentials: GEORGE E. HAMMOND B.S. Physics 1964, Worcester Polytechnic Institute Worcester MA, USAM.S. Physics 1967, Northeastern University, Boston MA, USAPh.D. Candidate and Teaching Fellow in Physics, 1967-68 Northeastern Univ.Boston MA. Note: Studied Relativity under Prof. Richard Arnowitt at N.U. and later Distinguished Professor of Physics at TAMUPeer reviewed publications: Hammond G.E (1994) The Cartesian Theory, in NewIdeas In Psychology, Vol 12(2) 153-167 Elsevier Scientific Ltd.. Online copy ofpublished paper is posted at....... Elsevier Scientific Ltd. 1994 also a full length free research only copy is located…

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 4 replies
    • 1.7k views
    • 1 follower
  12. Started by MrOrlock,

    I've been keeping my work as short and sweet as possible, so sorry if my work seems to gloss over at times. I begin with a relationship I noticed that would hold in theory: $G\cdot\rho = \Box^2 \phi$ The proceedings idea is very simple, we replace the appropriate terms in the Friedmann equation for Cosmic Evolution $(\frac{\dot{R}}{R})^2\ \psi = \frac{8\pi G}{3} \rho\ \psi$ $\frac{8\pi}{3} \Box^2\ \psi= \mathbf{k}(\frac{\partial \psi}{\partial t} - \frac{\partial \psi}{\partial x} + \frac{\partial \psi}{\partial y} + \frac{\partial \psi}{\partial z})$ With c=1 in natural units with metric signature of (-,+,+,+). The other issue…

    • 1

      Reputation Points

    • 1 reply
    • 870 views
    • 1 follower
  13. The source of dark energy is gravitational self-energy. 1. The need for negative energy density 1) Negative energy (mass) density in standard cosmology From the second Friedmann equation or acceleration equation, In standard cosmology, it is explained by introducing an entity that has a positive mass density but exerts a negative pressure. ρΛ + 3PΛ = ρΛ+3(-ρΛ) =- 2ρΛ However, If we rearrange the dark energy term, the final result is a negative mass density of - 2ρΛ . There are too many people who have an aversion to negative energy (mass). However, in the standard cosmology, accelerated expansion is impossible without negative mass density. It …

    • 1

      Reputation Points

    • 20 replies
    • 4.1k views
    • 1 follower
  14. Hi looking for some advice on some concepts I have started to develop, I would like your opinions on anything wrong you can see with the concepts. Or any advice you could share on crediting or discrediting my work as I can understand basic concepts, but I am only classically trained in electrical engineering. I believe the problem is a multi field problem and I'm only one man. Weak Acting Magnetic Field.mp4

  15. So, I'm not saying that I have some miracle working thing that will bring you up five cup sizes, but I have had a female friend test this for me over the course of one month and grew a whole cup size. With that being said, what on God's green earth is going on here? Is it prolactin? Is it the fascia tissue being expanded? I cannot figure it out, but what I do know for certain is that it in fact works. Help me out here please.

  16. Started by olencki,

    The existence of three-dimensional space is obvious. Accepting more dimensions of space requires justification. In three-dimensional space, the length does not need to be justified. All other physical quantities need to be defined. In the language of mathematics, general relativity describes the gravitational interaction as the curvature of space-time caused by the presence of matter. Since physical quantities other than length have not been defined, further analysis concerns the curvature of space, not space-time. The physical interpretation of the curvature of space is the bending of one, two, or all three axes of space. The curvature of the space implies the springines…

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 7 replies
    • 1.4k views
    • 1 follower
  17. Do you know what the greatest hoax in the history of science is? In my view, it is this picture: It is taken from the Pink Floyd’s album “The dark side of the moon”. The members of one of the greatest bands of all times have also fallen for this hoax, taking this drawing as an idol of worship on their legendary album. The same drawing can be found in billions of textbooks throughout the world. Why is this drawing a hoax? Because it has nothing, absolutely NOTHING to do with the truth. The phenomenon doesn’t look like that at all. Johann Wolfgang von Goethe has already given the right picture two hundred years ago: There are numerous fl…

    • 2

      Reputation Points

    • 6 replies
    • 1.8k views
    • 1 follower
  18. ADC experiment - advanced-death-checker In order to understand what death is, we must ask ourselves two fundamental questions: what is death? Is it really the moment when life would cease to exist, the end of everything? What happens to consciousness when our organism stops its vital functions? Weeks, days, minutes would remain to listen us while we face the questions with extreme rationality, doing so we could even guess many aspects characterizing the life itself. For the science, according to the current knowledge on the merits, the definition of death indicates the permanent cessation - moreover scientifically irreversible - of all vital functions that allow to i…

    • 2

      Reputation Points

    • 108 replies
    • 11.8k views
    • 2 followers
  19. I thought I'd share work I have been doing on what is known as Bessler's Wheel. His original book at the Rare Book Library at Utrecht University in Utrecht, Netherlands. If you click on the yellow go to digital version button, the digitized version of his book. https://www.uu.nl/en/utrecht-university-library-special-collections/collections/early-printed-books/scientific-works/das-triumphirende-perpetuum-mobile-orffyreanum-by-johann-bessler Why perpetual motion is impossible from Dr. Baird; https://www.wtamu.edu/~cbaird/sq/2014/01/08/since-gravity-is-unlimited-can-we-use-it-as-an-infinite-energy-source/ Where I am at on my buil…

    • 2

      Reputation Points

    • 37 replies
    • 7.6k views
    • 2 followers
  20. Started by jameskennymatheson,

    Ok so its come to my attention there will be another ice age if we don't figure out how to make salt from air or some other substance the sun heats up to make heat The reason we have heat is the sun is using salt water as fuel I hope we solve this Very serious questions For very serious people

  21. Speculation is FUN because it requires no evidence..:) For example I like to speculate that the woman in the grocers fancies me..

    • 1

      Reputation Points

    • 11 replies
    • 2.1k views
    • 1 follower
  22. What would happen to space if passage of time was accelerating? Equality principle and its consequences. Similarity of empty space. A Shrinking matter theory that might actually work. ---This is quite long representation. There may be some mistakes. Contents: Part I Two important principles: Equality principle and similarity of empty space Deriving equations of change for kinematic, dynamic properties and EM and gravitational properties starting from equality principle and demanding certain laws of nature to hold Transfo…

  23. The expansion of spacetime is an assumption… not an observation. Perhaps, the universe has always been the enormous size that we see today while all the material within has been uniformly shrinking in size. With either scenario the observations are identical. They are just the same scenario viewed from different perspectives. Russel Ryerson described the two views as one being the simple mathematical inverse of the other. He called one view “expansion” and the other “inverse-expansion.” Arthur Eddington said of his “shrinking atom” theory that a universe of contracting matter is the conceptual and mathematical equivalent of an expanding universe. We don’t have a…

    • 1

      Reputation Points

    • 17 replies
    • 3.8k views
  24. These are the three types of infinite motion in the universe of an object where this object travels infinite distance in infinite time. 1) An object moves in straight line this object will travel infinite distance in infinite time if we suppose that the object will not find some obstacle and the universe is infinite. 2) An object moves endlessly in a circle, the object will travel infinite distance which is a portion of the circumference, if the object completed two cycles the distance is the double the circumference. 3) An object starts from zero meters and moves for instance toward 6 meters , if the deceleration increases in…

    • 1

      Reputation Points

    • 4 replies
    • 1.5k views
    • 1 follower
  25. e=mc2 mass=gravity/weight therefore c=√e/(gravity/weight) in outer space, there is no gravity, therefore; c=c=√e/(0/weight) = c=√e/0 c=infinity So in outer space, where there is no gravity, the speed of light is infinity. Isn't that the definition of dark matter? That would also prove that dark matter and antimatter are the same thing. Matter, is what makes up planets and stars etc. Dark matter is what lies all around us in outer space. The realms of the universe where the speed of light rises like a phoenix....to infinity.

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.