Speculations

Split reference: When we find a particle with the Schrodinger equation, is it either stationary (fixed position), or in motion with a given velocity with the uncertainty principle?

The concept combines the already-existing technologies of neutrino generators with skyrmion lattices, which thus far have been suggested as an information storage technology. I believe skyrmion lattices have an application in tachyon generation. It is my belief that if we can "skim" neutrinos just above a skyrmion lattice, this may generate spin in the neutrinos which supports the sustainment of a negative mass state in the particle subsequent to a magneton collision, an effect not as yet observed because non-spinning neutrinos do not resist mass restoration. The device would consist of a neutrino generation phase, a lattice skimming phase, and a magneton coll…

Hello. Is there an equation or an approach in view of a unification between the wave function (amplitude of probability of presence, and volume density of probability of presence of the particle (represented by the square of its norm)), and the electromagnetic field?

Hello all, I didn't know where to fit the subject so I put it here. Sorry for my very poor English, I am French speaking. I'm wondering about the D antigen (ABO system & Rhesus system). I first consulted Wikipedia (not the most reliable, but the fastest), and then other French-speaking scientific communities, which are turning a deaf ear, without really getting an answer... I didn't understand absolutely nothing, not being a scientist... in fact, I passed tests concerning immortality ; and by "chance" or "without doing it on purpose", scientists found large amounts of D antigen in my body. This allows me to heal from severe wounds, and even death. …

So what are thoughts on time travel?

They aren't made up, an object that uses fusion would be a good source, a v shaped object. However, there's only ever been one incident, anything prior "Kenneth Arnold" et al just a test to see what people believe and if the videos are legit of balls instead of a v-shaped object it was just an after effect of retrocausal grafting of the Illinois Missouri v-shaped craft. Phoenix lights and Lubbock lights also made up They put the Illinois footage in this video to trick people

The question of extraterrestrial lifeforms ability to exsit rests on probability....the probabilty of been the first instance of a natural process not only of happening twice but producing the same phenomena twice ....why would biology happen again if Abiogenesis is required to happen again first?....Nothing in nature is observered to happen again or twice ...have a look yourselves! The indistinguishable particle from the field of quantum physics only remains so to you humans as of yet .... other lesser complex mechanical/chemical reactions are yet to be observed to produce anything twice or the same again ...Is extraterrestrial biology destined to be the first rathe…

We all know it is possible to generate plasma in mid air like lightning, but is it possible to isolate out the electrons from the gas and group them together with just the electrons?

STOP! Under Construction Please wait! g=2*h/(t^2)-2*vi/t. It looks (to me) like that term -2*vi/t has been missing for a long time. Surely you ((should) already) know it; but do you use it? For (fallen) height h time(_difference) t initial_speed vi. The free_fall acceleration g~-(Pi^2) [m/(s^2)]+ac g=~-9.8 [m/(s^2)] is (instantaneous,) linear, & negative; & (please bear with me) (the bothersome details:) (=but it) (is) slightly) reduced by the (Earth's daily_rotational) centrifugal_acceleration ac=(vc^2)/r having the (squared) Earth's (surface) circumferential_…

t=time s=space e=energy m=mass Strangely the concept of nothing came to me when I started to account with physics, which had been pointing to (if it can be true), that the Universe started at s0t0. If (s) and (t) is zero than (e) and (m) must be zero as well since the laws of nature must apply on every entity in the system. Or expressing it differently: energy and matter can not exist without space and time. So the starting state of the Universe supposed to be (s0t0e0m0) even we can not directly examine that space time moment. In one hypothesis: “The null hypothesis is that nothing, zero is a physical reality based math…

I have already found an error in the GRT equation for about six months, but I still did not dare to share this idea here. If you look at the equation of Newton's law of universal gravitation and Einstein's equation of general relativity, you can see that they both include the gravitational constant G. But this constant is dimensional, and its SI dimension is m^3/kg*s^2. In Newton's theory, space and time are absolute, i.e. the scales along the axes of spatial coordinates and time are unchanged, so it is logical that in Newton's theory G is a constant. But in GRT, when approaching a massive body, time slows down, i.e. the value of the second increases, therefore the numeri…

This is not my idea, but one of my friend thought of it, and it sounds like it would work. The idea is you have some massive metal tube stretching from the sea floor. A metal pole would be inside the tube, and the pole would be strapped to a buoyant object. As the tide rises/lowers, it would move the pole like a piston. The friend didn’t suggest how exactly the energy would be created, and I’m too dim witted to figure that out... but yeah.

However, since I claim the uniqueness of the electron (even if there are several), it is logical that when there are several electrons therefore in an atom, to find a distribution which attenuates according to the distance from the nucleus. (because it is necessary to represent all the electrons with only one) and the more there is, the less its density presence becomes weak.

If you were to have a circular magnet(s) facing south inwards, and in the middle have a spindel with a bar that has perches with a magnet facing south on each side toward the other magnets, would that generate a spin? I am (probably obviously) not very knowledgeable with the forces, and don’t know much what I am talking about hence the lack of evidence, but my theory is the energy would come from the bar holding the magnets together. This however, would suggest some theoretical energy from material just existing. Another glaring issue is the whole forces not being energy problem, but it’s just speculation, and speculation is no more than that. Once again, I…

It just seems to make sense since black holes suck in light energy and stuff whereas stars give off light energy.

Einstein written in terms of tau (2π) makes a beautiful equation visible and helps to understand GR: https://vixra.org/abs/1805.0304. I hope someone enjoys. From the abstract: I propose to rewrite the volume equation for the non-euclidian spherical Universe in terms of tau (2π) instead of π. Written this new way, a truly elegant equation and deeper structure becomes visible. Further, I postulate that the Universe is the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, i.e. that the 3-dimensional Universe we live in is the derivative-surface of its 4-dimensional hypersphere volume. 1805.0304v2.pdf

The duration of an eclipse is directly proportional to the size of the object, all other things being equal (distance and speed). The duration of the total phase of a solar eclipse is 7.5 minutes (the Moon completely covers the Sun for 7.5 minutes). The duration of the total phase of the lunar eclipse is 108 minutes (the Earth completely covers the Sun for 108 minutes). With the same distance between the Moon and the Earth. At the same speed of the Moon (the orbit of the Moon moves with the speed of the Earth). The diameter of the Earth is 12,742 km. Therefore, the diameter of the Moon can be calculated using the following formula: 12 742 * (7.5 / 108) = 885 km. The offic…

The duration of the total phase of a solar eclipse is 7.5 minutes. The duration of the total phase of the lunar eclipse is 108 minutes. The diameter of the Earth is 12,742 km. Therefore, the diameter of the Moon is 12 742 * (7.5 / 108) = 885 km. Additional evidence. The Unsolved Mystery of the Earth Blobs The coincidence of the angular sizes of the Sun and the Moon indicates that their sizes are proportional to the distances relative to the Earth. In addition, the Sun and the Moon have the same axial rotation periods - 27 days. In the earth's mantle there are two huge diametrically opposite formations (one is larger, the other is …

So first thing first, I took a look at the hyperspectral imaging page from Wikipedia(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyperspectral_imaging) and as most of you know it is s system that utilizes Raman laser(laser reflection) and spectrometer. Now what is interesting is this time I found an application call thermal imaging in the same page in the Wikipedia page produced by a Specim LWIR hyperspectral imager. Now thermal imaging is quite common that utilizes the infrared light. Now the question is I am unsure on is how the hyperspectral image is produced because technically the infrared light goes through objects, so if I want to see through a person or a car I would…

So I was looking at this video about Tesla turbine and I came up with a new idea. What if we use a magnetic field, like a motor, and increase its speed inside a vacuum with 0 gravity acting on its friction so it just keeps spinning faster and faster? Well I think one of two things would happen, either the material would not hold(breaks apart), or a whole hole be created in space time, leading to a previous, next block of the universe. Let me know what you think.

Suppose I have a rest mass m0 of 10 kg, part of this mass 1 kg converts to energy, E=mc² , E=e joules. In this case I will have a new rest mass m0 which is 10-1 kg or 9 kg . pushed by the 1 kg energy This system of rest mass 9 kg will move by the 1 kg energy with speed v1 in which the relativistic mass for the system will be : m=m0/√(1-v²/c²) or m=9 / √(1-v1²/c²) Because no energy comes from out side, then m will be 10 kg and this for speed v1 and rest mass 9 kg * Now let's calculate the kinetic energy of the system : The relativistic kinetic energy of the system is energy of the rest mass or m0c^2 plus energy due to motion: K.E= m0c²/√(1-v1²/c²) +…

I am a general topologist. I have my own theory of preserving information by black holes. (I have formulated my modified math model of general relativity and it is likely in my opinion that in this model information is preserved, but I didn't do calculations whether the model really preserves information yet, because my research topic was general topology, not physics.) The consequences? If we have an alternative explanation, the Hawkings's theory may be wrong. Isn't it so? I hope that both my theory and Hawkings's theory are correct (in the sense that they to be combined in one unified theory.) But if it happens (we don't know) that my …

So I took a look at this video(posted below) regarding magnetic field and I think if I create an em wave similar to the coil(4:33), I should get a current in return? Thing is no one have generated a coil like em wave before, sort of like a tidal wave, somewhere in the microwave to infrared spectrum. P.S. To control the current's direction, coil the magnetic field inward or outward.

So I found this microwave antenna unit on Alibaba. I want to turn it into an MRI machine to image the brain. How should I go about working on it? Following this chart based on my speculation: 1. Apply microwave on the brain to fix the atoms(water molecules) on a correct position since the microwave contains a magnetic field. 2. Apply a separate microwave pulse to turn the unmatched atoms and receive the reflected microwave. 3. Construct the image based on the microwave signal. The microwave antenna Unit + Price: https://www.alibaba.com/product-detail/Factory-Price-15G-0-3m-UHP_62029178930.html?spm=a2700.7724857.normal_offer…

Hi everybody! I would like to share three experiments I conducted some 11 years ago as also I may share all the technical details in case there is interest to make some calculations: url deleted per rule 2.7 I am searching for an answer in the following questions: a) Since there are no external forces pushing the ferromagnetic ring in any direction in all three videos then, how does it move? b) if (a) is correct then, what Newton's 3rd law has to say about it?