Speculations

How to increase your IQ level ? How to improve your IQ ? The level of intelligence ranges from 70 to 200 IQ points, and very rarely exceeds 200 points (in the case of normal, not impaired intelligence). Below 70 points, Intellectual disability begins. Well, it turns out that the level of your intelligence can be raised by 20, 50, 100, 200 and even several hundred points. To do this, you need to tune in and set yourself up to raise the level of intelligence. The mind shifts to a higher level of intelligence with the right effort. In my method, the mind is moved to the target level of intelligence, e.g. 180 IQ points, or 400 points. I initially increased my IQ by 20 po…

I hope this thread has a good conversation on the topics I will post about because I don't want the thread prematurely shut down again. This is serious business as forwarding human understanding for everyone on earth is at stake. I do not have a degree in physics but I think that may have been an advantage as I was able to ponder the problems I wanted to without the pressure of conforming to academia, funding and prizes. For example, many physicists may believe a theory of everything is the unification of relativity and quantum mechanics, but that may not be what the theory of everything is. I know the emphasis is on me to explain this framework however, it answers q…

In relativity, the space and time of the observer moving at the speed of light are different with the space and time of the observer at rest. At near the speed of light length contract and time dilate. Even motion is relative to the frame of reference used. An observer in accelerated frame view motion different from observer at rest. If we think deeper, even me and you are not in the same space. What I view in my space is different from what you view in your space. At least you can view me in your space while I cannot view myself in my space. Also, I can view you in my space while you cannot view yourself in your space. Is relative space not the union of absolute spaces? …

I thought I had a pretty good grip on why FTL was impossible. I was knowledgeable enough to at least think I understood why FTL was impossible even in the face of things like warp drive and worm holes. I was pretty confident that the time travel aspects would prohibit FTL even if the infinite energy requirements didn't. Now I see one of my most respected scientific sources seemingly asserting that all I've been taught was solid as a rock is in fact on shaky ground at best, Sabine Hossenfelder has blown my mind by suggesting all I know might not be as solid as I was led to believe. Is anyone willing to watch this video and assure me that Sabine has slipped a cog so I …

The only thing that can save us from completely destroying the atmosphere is to overcome earth's gravity beyond rockets, wings and wheels. Pyramid Vortex Generator Gravity Machine: This experiment will show how nothing becomes something and it will demonstrate how gravity is the beginning of matter and is the glue that holds matter together. It will also create a containment vessel for a fusion reaction. Start with a steel pyramid of some scaled down dimensions of the great pyramid of Giza with an electro magnet at its peak. Then mount it on a hollow shaft and spin it. Now shoot a jet of air at the spinning pyramid. The faces of the pyramid, as they pass…

I've noticed that when I'm cooking and I decide to hum while I'm stirring the food. The food gains whatever energy that is released from humming. The more I hum, the more energy the food gains. I've giving food to people without informing them of this energy transfer and some comment how it tastes strange while one person said it gave them so much energy like they've never felt before. I also tested this a year ago when I had to feed a cat. I mashed their wet food while humming, the cat ate the food and not even a couple minutes later... The cat threw up the food as if it couldn't handle whatever energy I transferred into it by humming. The cat never throwed up when …

Greetings All, How about some healthy speculation? The idea that something—meaning our universe—can arise from nothing is ludicrous, unprovable and, by no stretch of science, math, or imagination will I ever be convinced otherwise. That is because within a true vacuum—devoid of all energy or energetic interference—nothing can or will be created regardless of how advanced our science may eventually become. I know this is a rehash of a subject we’ve had in this forum many times before and maybe there’s nothing new in anything I have said or will say. However, with your continued indulgence, consider what would be required to test the idea that the whole of a un…

LIGHT--- THAT TWO DIMENSIONAL 3D ARTIST and or LIFE FORM Light travels at 670,616,629.384 miles per hour,. so in theory, if we build a wall in a circle with a radius of that distance or indeed scaled down by a factor of 60 to bring this distance down to distance travelled in one minute and then 60 again to give us 19615.7304 this would equate to miles per second. Then, in theory if we could run around this wall in one second we would be travelling at the speed of light , correct? but if we then reduce the wall by a factor of 1000 it leave us with a circumference of 19.6157, meaning we would then have to travel the wall at a speed of 1000 revolutions per second to bal…

THE CONCEPT OF ONE THE IDEA THAT THE WORD ONE IS A NUMBER AND HAS NUMERICAL VALUE IS WRONG ONE DID NOT, NOR NEVER EXIST ONE IS AN IMPOSSIBLE OBJECT ONE IS A MAN MADE CONCEPT THAT PERTAINS TO ANOUNCE THE EXISTENCE OF A THING ONE HAS NEVER BEEN NOR CAN BE. IF A MAN LEFT ON PLANET EARTH ALONE WAS TO ANNOUNCE HIS EXISTANCE TO AN ALIEN LIFE FORM HE WOULD ANNOUNCE HIMSELF AS ALL OF HUMANITY . NOT AS ONE WHEN THERE IS THE CONCEPTUAL USE OF ONE ON A SINGULAR OBJECT THEN THAT OBJECT IS NOT ONE BUT IS ALL OF THAT ITEM THAT EXISTS, ONE IS NEVER ONE , BUT IS ALL. LIKE EVERYTHING IN LIFE THERE IS ALWAYS AN OPPOSITE AND EQUAL, YIN AND YANG, GOOD BAD, YOU GET THE DRIFT. IN THE FIRST INS…

X

What properties would a material need to be able to efficiently convert energy from a fission reaction into electricity? Let's say we had a device that used thin round plates of fissile material. The fissile material is well below critical mass, but you can stack them to achieve critical mass. Now imagine we have something called... idunno, a "Magischeibe" which is a flat disk that's stacked alternating with the fissile material like a voltaic pile. The Magischeibe can allow enough energy to pass through for the critical mass reaction, but is able to absorb a portion of the energy to convert to electricity. there's a couple potential ways to control the power ou…

Ok, so I've been pondering all the above for a while now. I've been considering, human evolution, development, advancements, consequences, purpose... I find it all very fascinating but also confusing, chaotic, sometimes troubling sometimes exciting, always wonderous. Like many people interested in science in general, I have considered all the questions, philosophy mainstream science, data and observations surrounding humanity, our place in the universe, our purpose (if there is one) and our future. I often wander from on idea to another from one belief (for want of a better word) to another swapping camps so to speak depending on the latest trend or data set or idea.…

Say you had a 1kg lead sphere that, by using a hypothetical form of antigravity, can be changed from a mass of 1g to 1t without affecting any other physical properties. if you pushed it so it was moving at say 1m/s then changed it's mass up or down; would the speed stay the same but the kinetic force changes, or would the kinetic force stay the same and the speed would change?

In my research of history, I have discovered that there have been cataclysms in the past so massive that they could not have been caused by terrestrial forces alone. Wanting to explain their cause, I became interested in the cosmos and discovered that the greatest cataclysms on Earth are caused by the magnetic influence of the planets. This discovery enables us to predict the date of earthquakes based on space weather. I'm new to astrophysics, so I'm ready to take all your remarks into consideration. Introduction This animation created by NASA shows the forecast of space weather in the solar system. At the top you can see the date and time of the forec…

This thread intend to get input about the connection between the three issues outlined in the topic...mainstream argument is highly welcomed and wild suggestions is appreciated. My take is this,you have two events in space-time with common origin such that t=t'=0 they are freefalling in the same space axis then you lorentz trasforms one event(t') towards to past the null line of the other(t)...the worldline of event(t') will be becoming closer to the null line from the upper part(increasing angle from time axis) while the space axis of event (t') will becoming closer to the null line from lower part(increasing angle from space axis),as the world line approaches the…

Please read the following sentences: "Gravity can only be explained by taking into account that there is a spacetime curvature." "The only proof of a spacetime curvature is gravity." "Because there is a god, we build a lot of churches." "If we build a lot of churches, there will be a god." "If the sun is shining today, I will ride my bike." "If I ride my bike, the sun will be shining." If you are interested in a new logical way to explain gravity, please send me a message, before this topic is being removed by the Einstein fanatics.

below paragraph is from the text New horizons in physics: Antigravitons or antiparticles of gravitons can be used in the construction of an antigravity drive because they probably generate antigravity. The propulsion of the antigravity vehicle will be a miniature anti black hole with an anti singularity inside, built from antiparticles to particles at the level of gravitons. Another possibility is a drive built with an anti singularity. So, visions of flying cars from science fiction movies can be put into practice. Gregory Podgorniak, Poland, year 2023 Sorry for the mistake but not year 2023 but year 2021 Sorry for the…

In a nutshell, women can basically get sex more or less when they wish. There's other considerations but it's common knowledge that men ask, women choose. Hypothesize there's a means to introduce balance into that situation however. i.e. a situation where men can essentially exude sex appeal to the point that spontaneous sexual attraction that historically happens only for women, now happens for men. So it's possible that by example, men could start practicing as heterosexual prostitutes. That's pretty out there but this is somewhat philosophical, but with a strong scientific component which I will elaborate on. Any initial thoughts on the ab…

is called "frequency" f=(theta/t)*(1 [cycle]/360°) =1/T for the angle theta in (units) [degree(s)]=[°]; t is an amount of time (duration, e.g. difference in time) in (units) [second(s)]; & period T is the (amount of) time (duration), per cycle. There are several ways to express angle & (thus, also) angle_speed. But I prefer to express angles in cycles(' fractions, &/or multiples), e.g. as fractions, &/or multiples of a cycle. 1=100%. E.g. 1 [cycle]=360°. That is(=means), a degree 1°=[cycle]*(1/360) is 1/360th part of a(=1, complete=whole, single) cycle. E.g. 90°=0.25*[cycle]=[c…

Summary: Idea of deriving down to i''' from infinity, potentially establishing number theory from set of sq.rt. of primes, i'. Then, (*highly speculative*) i'' as Kinetic Energy, i'" as Potential Energy from electrostatics for new Hamiltonian in quantum mechanics? In need of critique on mathematics/calculus, in particular. Derivations done with respect to Field "shape", encompassing decreasing dimensions with each derivative for conceptualization, see discussion. Hello, Although this hinges on mathematics I will make this only just a discussion with cursory equations. I would encourage criticism, as I suspect my math is completely off-base. That said, I t…

Greetings All, I’ve placed this discussion here under Speculations because most of us are not interested in speculation and I sincerely do not want this topic given serious attention. However, an aspect of this topic compels my wish to express my thoughts on this subject in an open forum. What I want to discuss has a basis in science that cannot be disproven or dismissed, as you may soon agree. I want to begin with this declaration: There will always be world instability and humanity will never overcome racism. Rather than beginning with racism, I begin here with instability because racism is a child of instability. I declared there will always be world …

I think each parallel universe has at it's lowest level the string. And each one is "competing" with the others to see how quickly "they" can "get there". But they, themselves have rules to follow But what is "above" the string is my question

It explains everything (The diagram). Swansont, Joigus, Genady.....let me hide..hhhh.. hope am not on madness steroids. Hope I won't vanish in the blackhole, where mental breakdown will swallow me, incase I vanish remember to associate that diagram with me.

The same kind of magic wand you physicists wave with the word "geometry". So spacetime has a geometry. So what? Lots of things have geometry. Geometry is just a mathematical description. It doesn't mean fields and gravity waves happen by magic or unicorns or leprechauns. It doesn't mean spacetime isn't implemented by something that an amateur might call a "fabric" or "ether". From Einstein's 1920 address in Leiden: This is only the summary in the last paragraph. There's a fuller discussion earlier in the talk.

Nestor has 6 continents/4 do or don't touch its equator/4 LARGE land areas. 64% of its surface is liquid or frozen water. Its LARGE moon has 4 primary phases of 6.4 days each thus 6-day weeks & 4 weeks in a 'moonth'. Lunar year of 306 days + 6 day week + 4 days = 316 day solar year. Their ancients observed 6 moving objects in their heavens/4 can be seen during the day/4 cast shadows on Nestor. Their Venus is at .6 AU & their Mercury .4 AU. Besides Nestor, their solar system has 6 planets/4 are or are not gas/ice giants. Etc. I've been sharing this with NASA and others for 20 years. I presented All 'True64 Earthlike Plan-its' Are Built64 on 7_4 (like Eart…