Speculations
Pseudoscientific or speculatory threads belong here.
The Speculations forum is provided for those who like to hypothesize new ideas in science. To enrich our discussions above the level of Wild Ass Guesswork (WAG) and give as much meaning as possible to such speculations, we do have some special rules to follow:
- Speculations must be backed up by evidence or some sort of proof. If your speculation is untestable, or you don't give us evidence (or a prediction that is testable), your thread will be moved to the Trash Can. If you expect any scientific input, you need to provide a case that science can measure.
- Be civil. As wrong as someone might be, there is no reason to insult them, and there's no reason to get angry if someone points out the flaws in your theory, either.
- Keep it in the Speculations forum. Don't try to use your pet theory to answer questions in the mainstream science forums, and don't hijack other threads to advertise your new theory.
The movement of a thread into (or out of) Speculations is ultimately at the discretion of moderators, and will be determined on a case by case basis.
6789 topics in this forum
-
Hello, I was wondering something that I have pondered on for some time now it is here: Pi Ratio Simply Squared As G 3.14^2 = 9.8596 9.8596 degree = 0.172082483 radian 9.8596 degree = 0.027387778 revolution Could pi ratio squared really be confused as gravity?? Could this be what that Higgs Fields is all about, in relation to pi ratio empty space and the Higgs Bosson?? And mostly, can this explain the constant of proportionality in relation to Issac Newtons' F= G*m1 m1/r squared? I never really did understand why pi ratio is used in some of the most rigorousness of equations used in this study, and maybe this can bring some light on m…
-
0
Reputation Points
- 23 replies
- 16.4k views
- 2 followers
-
-
"Time dilation" and "space contraction" are the important deductions from Einstein's special relativity(SR), based on "the principle of constant speed of light in vacuum" and the observation of moving objects in his thought experiment. Actually, Einstein's thought experiment is one kind of observation of length for a moving object with an invariable velocity, and there are many methods for us to be selected to measure the length of a moving object. for an experimental measurement, the errors caused by the method and equipment must be considered and be applied to correct the results. Lorentz's transformation from SR, which is only satisfied …
-
0
Reputation Points
- 68 replies
- 12.9k views
- 1 follower
-
-
Strange New "Species" of Ultra-Red Galaxy Discovered http://www.scienceda...11201125358.htm I was thinking about putting this article in the science news section here but realized that the comments that I wished to make are not mainstream, so they would be considered speculative so I posted the article here. As long as they have been using the Hubble and VLBA/ VLBI (long baseline radio telescopes) they have been seeing at the farthest distances very old appearing galaxies like we can find in our local galactic neighborhood. I expect when the James Webb goes up they will also see the same thing. It has always seemed likely to me that a number of the furthest of…
-
0
Reputation Points
- 15 replies
- 2.8k views
-
-
Somebody just published a theory of life that looks meritorious. I'd love to hear what everyone here has to say about this: Link removed by Moderator
-
0
Reputation Points
- 7 replies
- 1.9k views
- 1 follower
-
-
The one thing I have learned on this forum is, you have to get the question right. My first attempt at this was, I'm afraid a disaster.This was due to my lack of eloquence and naivety (on this forum). So having a weeks experience, here goes. I think matter is, fundamentaly made up of an energy/spacetime interaction*. For me this goes along way to explaining our universe. E=MC^2, matter anihilation when the energy is released, the reason gravity is so weak compared to the other forces and gravity itself*. Now this I'm not clever enough to be sure but it seems to comply with durac's equation. I'm clearly no einstien, consequently I have no math to back up this hypothe…
-
0
Reputation Points
- 6 replies
- 1.9k views
-
-
If tiny quiantum particles constantly blip in and out of space, do you think that possibl your universe is a blip of space? Like the big bang was the blip into space and eventually we are just goignto blip out?
-
0
Reputation Points
- 7 replies
- 1.9k views
-
-
There is a proof of the singular nature of black holes, but it is being ignored. This proof was mentioned in an old paper by Michael Rowan Robinson. It can be found in ArXiv from after 1998. I ran across it by accident and I do not remember the title or year of publicatiion. I e-mailed him to ask if he could remember the paper where he made the comment. In his comment, he said that it has been suggested that black holes, precisely and only because they are relativistic singularities, must possess an hyperbolic gravitational field. A singularity, as a single point mass with infinite density, must have a gravitational field that also tends to infinity as one approaches …
-
0
Reputation Points
- 11 replies
- 2.4k views
-
-
Hello I’m sorry. I can’t English well. My native language is not English. Important Report on the Dark Energy and Gravitational Potential Energy [Abstract] Gravity is the force conquering the structure of the universe. By recognizing the components of the universe, we are estimating the quantity of components composing the universe through size of gravity and gravitational potential energy (GPE). In this paper, it is being shown that the universe can be created and expanded through pair creation of positive energy (mass) and negative energy (mass) from zero energy condition. Also, GPE is composed by 3 units of [math]U_{++}[/math], [math]U_{-…
-
0
Reputation Points
- 2 replies
- 2k views
- 1 follower
-
-
I know I can't describe this mathematically but I'll try to do it with mere words. Black holes have or do in some theories a singularity at the center, I have given this some thought and what if this singularity is connected with the singularity of the beginning of the universe and all matter that falls into a black hole is shuffled back to the big bang as it happened. So the universe is indeed a steady state as matter is drawn into a black hole it is immediately shuffled back to the instant of the big bang. This would make black holes recyclers of the universe. The reason I thought of this is due to time having no meaning (so I've read) beyond the event horizon and…
-
0
Reputation Points
- 1 reply
- 1.2k views
- 2 followers
-
-
Hi, I'm new here but I wanted to show you people how the true nature of the universe is actually a tiny, inverted one. Cyrus Teed's foundational premise that the Earth's surface is concave and all the planets, sun, moon and stars are actually very small in relation to it and fit inside a hollow, inverted Earth has never been debunked. In addition to his theory I want to point out the optical illusory effects of the glass ceiling about 70 miles high that plays tricks on the eye and causes one to perceive the sun and moon as spherical but are actually not. Her are some videos from m y webpage I made concerning the subject at hand. Here's my webpage that consol…
-
0
Reputation Points
- 49 replies
- 14.4k views
- 1 follower
-
-
What does everyone think? http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/sideshow/mysterious-planet-sized-object-spotted-near-mercury-154443870.html
-
0
Reputation Points
- 27 replies
- 4.2k views
- 1 follower
-
-
At the end of October 2011, I had a very vivid dream. I was driving along a motorway in my car when, all of a sudden, there was thick black smoke all across the motorway. I had to make a quick decision what to do and I decided to speed up to get clear of the smoke. I could not see anything at all in front of me. Suddenly, I saw a car in front of me and I could not stop in time. As the collision occurred I woke up. About a week and a half later this happened: M5 Motorway Crash Which field of science could answer the reasons behind this occurence? Is it simple coincidence? Because if it is, then my wife and one of my children dreamed about the death of m…
-
0
Reputation Points
- 1 reply
- 1.2k views
-
-
Not my post
-
0
Reputation Points
- 5 replies
- 2.5k views
- 1 follower
-
-
There was an article on the internet that indicated that science was get close to reversing and stopping the aging process. We could possibly live to be a 1000 years old. While this idea might be intriguing to envision living that long of a lifetime, I would imagine that it would produce many undesirable consequences in our society. First this probably would only be available to the very rich and powerful government individuals while the masses would never get the opportunity to live that long. It would turn our society in the worst possible corruption scenario never before seen in our species. Mass execution of the population would occur leaving only a large en…
-
0
Reputation Points
- 19 replies
- 2.4k views
-
-
So the main gripe with the big bang theory is how did something come out of nothing? Im gonna try and explain it in easy terms. Obviously this is a theory but see what you think and please try and debunk this theory somehow. Firstly imagine nothing. Infinite nothingness, pretty easy to comprehend right? Now take infinite energy and put that energy into the nothingness. You might think its not possible but it definitely is and ill explain how. Imagine something small, and now imagine something smaller. If you keep going there will be nothing relative to whatevers watching. Now imagine blowing up a balloon, thats gonna pop if theres to much pressure inside, thats pr…
-
0
Reputation Points
- 2 replies
- 1.4k views
-
-
Greetings folks, this is an opportunity for you to include your observations, and possible outcomes for the near future. Predictions should follow the geologic, and climate change effects. Earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, whatever. If you predict an earth quake include the magnitude it should be at least a 6.0 or better. Location will be difficult to predict. If you predict a volcanic eruption, give the name of the volcano. this is not easy to do, you may say a major eruption will occur, and give a date or estimate. Serious predictions is best, not Michel Jackson ghost will come back and haunt the globe theater, Pull a rabbit out of your hat for science. …
-
0
Reputation Points
- 19 replies
- 4.3k views
-
-
'Dark Matter' & 'Dark Energy' are real, and entirely normal [DRAFT] 'Dark Matter' (DM) & 'Dark Energy' (DE) are known to have different properties, i.e. "behave differently". DM is spatially associated with stars in galaxies, which stars "trace" the presence of DM; and, DM possesses properties similar to stars, i.e. slow-moving, massive, gravitating point-particles. Prima facie, DM is dim stars, e.g. brown dwarves; and, dim stellar remnants, e.g. white dwarves, neutron stars, black holes. By contrast, DE is a uniformly distributed, diffuse, matter-and-energy density, logically linked to the vast inter-galactic 'Voids', which encompass most (~3/4ths) of the …
-
0
Reputation Points
- 8 replies
- 2.9k views
-
-
Just to reiterate - this is pure speculation. Pi has always annoyed me, 3.14159265358979323846264338327950288419716939937510 is not sensible to my mind. Surely Pi should be 3? A nice rational number. Which made me wonder, with the expansion of the universe essentially stretching the fabric of space/time, could Pi be moving? What I maen is: in the early universe could Pi have been closer to my ideal 3? Any comments welcome as always...
-
0
Reputation Points
- 18 replies
- 2.6k views
- 2 followers
-
-
Okay, so this is just a theory, very rough and doesn't have much evidence to back it up due to very limited resources. Now this is based on the ability to go back in time. So if you were to go back in time (unplanned), then would you be able to get out of a constant time loop, where you are traveling along from A to B. So say you are going through normal time and then something happened to divert you away from the normal flow from A to B which ended up with you going back in time. After that would you be able to change the past by going A to B by jumping over the event that caused you to go back in time and carry on to B or would it just not be possible as you are …
-
0
Reputation Points
- 13 replies
- 2.7k views
- 1 follower
-
-
Is this time??? Past (low entropy) -----X (the present)------ All possible futures (high entropy) Where time is a wave and the present (point of observation) is where the wave (superposition of all possible futures) collapses. So in effect the universe is created NOW and flows into the past because the future only exists as a superposition (observing it in the present causes it to collapse into a single state) the present is a static point which time flows through pouring into the past. Also, when observing any superposition, you are effectively looking into the future (all possible future…
-
0
Reputation Points
- 7 replies
- 1.8k views
-
-
By a process of elimination, the premise can be established or negated. Re. Evoution. This does not work if this is an on-going process. Namely, an on-going process is not effected by time, which says we must see evolution occuring at all times. If one species changes to another, then we must be able to witness this every second - a billion years ago, and a billion years plus one second, and now. Of note, ToE depends on time as its proof. Secondly, evolution does not work without the 'seed' factor; namely an output of essence from the host parents, which acts as a chip with a directive program [dna; genes]. This was correctly given in Genesis, from w…
-
0
Reputation Points
- 22 replies
- 3.7k views
- 1 follower
-
-
No sir - it does not. Same spot has no real meaning, other than whatever some agenda based sci-fi artists wants to make of it. The said imprint can be commonplace to all life yet not align with your conclusion; the commonality can be imited to life per se. Call me when you show why no half way chimp-human living transits appear; why did the on-going process cease. There was yet no centre; yet no point. It is scientifically impossible for the universe to be initiated with one singular entity! Every stated discovery made by ToE advocates, including alledged fossil findings, have been proven wrong, false and corrupt.
-
0
Reputation Points
- 2 replies
- 1.5k views
-
-
Years ago, I had an idea for a "genetic" germ, an organism that has some of the characteristics of a virus, but still constitutes a bacteria. Sort of a combination of the two. I used this germ as a means to explain how a species of trees on their own hypothetical planet could synthesize consciousness; that is to say, sentient plants. The germs are hyperactive. They are constantly tampering with and re-coding segments of DNA within certain cells of the tree, so that information can be stored via the relative coding of groups of large organizations of cells as a whole. In short, the germ and the plant cells simulate an electrical-impulsive brain system, in a micros…
-
0
Reputation Points
- 0 replies
- 1.2k views
-
-
I can prove God and life after death biology way even evolutionairy way, i do that on my website. I programmed that myself and i put some paintings in of mine, look my website: link removed by moderator
-
0
Reputation Points
- 2 replies
- 1.5k views
-
-
In nature there are three levels of particles: primary, secondary, and tertiary. And each level is composed of two particles; one of which is semi complete in character while the other is complete in all three respects. And there are also two incomplete particles as well. Primary level is composed of; photons and gravitons. Secondary level is composed of; electrons and dielectrons. Tertiary level is composed of; neutrons and protons. The semi complete particles are; photons and electrons. The complete particles are; gravitons and dielectrons. The incomplete particles are; neutrons and protons. Moreover there are three particles with a charge, and three wit…
-
0
Reputation Points
- 15 replies
- 2.5k views
-