Jump to content

Speculations

Pseudoscientific or speculatory threads belong here.

Speculations Forum Rules

The Speculations forum is provided for those who like to hypothesize new ideas in science. To enrich our discussions above the level of Wild Ass Guesswork (WAG) and give as much meaning as possible to such speculations, we do have some special rules to follow:

  1. Speculations must be backed up by evidence or some sort of proof. If your speculation is untestable, or you don't give us evidence (or a prediction that is testable), your thread will be moved to the Trash Can. If you expect any scientific input, you need to provide a case that science can measure.
  2. Be civil. As wrong as someone might be, there is no reason to insult them, and there's no reason to get angry if someone points out the flaws in your theory, either.
  3. Keep it in the Speculations forum. Don't try to use your pet theory to answer questions in the mainstream science forums, and don't hijack other threads to advertise your new theory.

The movement of a thread into (or out of) Speculations is ultimately at the discretion of moderators, and will be determined on a case by case basis.

  1. In Einstein's theory of general relativity, the exterior metric or exterior fluid solution, is an exact solution to the Einstein field equations and Einstein-Maxwell equations that describes the gravitational field and the space-time geometry in the exterior of a non-rotating or rotating neutral or charged spherically symmetric body of mass M, which consists of an incompressible fluid and constant density throughout the body and has zero pressure at the surface and that the electric charge and angular momentum of the mass may be zero or non-zero, and the universal cosmological constant is zero. For a non-zero charged mass, the metric takes into account the Einstein-Maxwel…

  2. Hi all. Life is short, and i have another interesting idea regarding special relativity. I want to write this thread independently from the other thread i have written earlier that is about pulsating dots. Don't bring that up here in this thread. There may not be any connection between these ideas. the reason is that whatever kind of dots there may be, they may be extremely small. I have found interesting articles that are written by E.Bakhoum starting from the year 2001 where he suggest different total energy for the particle. I want to bring it up here as i think it is an interesting idea. I don't know if it its true. I don't agree with everything and i…

    • 1

      Reputation Points

    • 10 replies
    • 1.3k views
    • 1 follower
  3. There are three radii associated with the electron: The Bohr radius, Compton radius and Classical radius. These radii have never been associated with any physical electron geometry. They can actually be fit to a toroidal geometry, in a way not presented in other speculative toroidal electron models. When all values are expressed in base units, half the outer toroidal surface area equals the Boltzmann constant. Things are never that simple of course, leading to a paper that is 5 pages, PDF format. The paper is publicly available at Zenodo and has not been published or peer reviewed. Some currently unrecognized numerical findings about electrons are presented. …

    • 1

      Reputation Points

    • 65 replies
    • 5.5k views
    • 2 followers
  4. If anybody can travel backward in time, please tell me how cause they DIDN’T tell me either & I want to know. Time is a scalar (amount) in which the direction is determined ONLY by its amount. Thus, time is NOT bidirectional like a dimension is. Time ONLY goes forward. We can ONLY measure time going forward; NOT in reverse. Instead, time is a parameter (= something other than a dimension, thus) NOT a dimension. Disclaimer: Sometimes I have to say some of the simplest most obvious things (against ridiculous mainstream, NONSENSE opinions).

    • 1

      Reputation Points

    • 12 replies
    • 1.7k views
    • 2 followers
  5. Started by Gian,

    There seems to be a drift at the moment towards ai and machines taking over people's jobs. I'm sure no robot would be stupid enough to want to be president or prime minister, but suppose for the sake of argument, ALL paid employment became automated, so no more paid employment for any human beings whatsoever. I suppose all money in the economy would eventually flow to the owners of the means of production that is the human proprietors of the robots and ai. So the proletariat would be left with nothing. The robot-owning aristocracy could buy and sell from each other, and the proles being penniless would have to go back to medieval self-sufficiency working th…

  6. _______________________________________________________________________4th Spatial dimension interpretation Look at this 4D Tesseract, What do you see? Lots of 3D Cubic shapes Now; What do you see when you observe Two 3D Spherical Photons Or Electrons An interference wave pattern of 2D Circles on the Screen behind the Slits Before it was observed they were two regular bands of bombarded verticle lines SO Why do the Spheres turn into Circles over time? What I'm about to type here is the basis of the idea; ___________________________________As the Observer changes what they see from verticle lines in…

    • 3

      Reputation Points

    • 30 replies
    • 3.1k views
    • 2 followers
  7. Started by sum1konundrum,

    project HyperForge So... This is a completely theoretical concept that I am attempting to verify with this website in the pursuit of establishing a feasibility ratio. I'll be honest my established amount of physics education is vague at best. But i will say it is a really cool idea that may pave the way to eliminating our needs as it pertains to raw materials acquisitions. I simply ask that you finish reading this entire summary before dismissing it as ludicrous and outlandish. While in space and from multiple points, using refractive optics (magnifying lenses). You essentially create a thick sun beam. Along the beams path perpendicular t…

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 1 reply
    • 505 views
    • 1 follower
  8. Hi all. I came up with this idea that could explain the theory of special relativity and more over the Lorentz covariance and Lorenz transformation. This reminds of one commonly known special relativity "problem" or thought experiment that is about mirrors. A. Lets assume that some physical entity does not consist of rigid constituents, but dynamic sub entities what i call "pulsating dots" or in other words, expanding and contracting spheres. B. Lets assume also that they pulsate between single point and some sphere such a way that the velocity of the frontier is always light velocity c. It may be possible that assumption A and B can be more general and th…

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 3 replies
    • 926 views
    • 1 follower
  9. Utilizing modern discoveries in physics I would like to reintroduce modern science to the framework that we have recently completely avoided and that being Quantum Field Theory. Although rather than identifying these objects as field, rather identifying them as a higher dimensional state. An example of the concept is the stability of a neutron and proton inside of the nucleus of an atom. Without somehow being independent of time the neutron and proton should experience entropy. This is due to the second law of thermodynamics referring to all objects in a system will go towards disorder. But time would need to interact for them to go towards disorder so the stability …

    • 1

      Reputation Points

    • 13 replies
    • 2.1k views
    • 1 follower
  10. Global Warming (technology [cars etc.]) disrupted a well-synchronized ecosystem. The ecosystem includes atmosphere and ocean. This slowed down the earth's core, thus weakening the magnetic field & cutting apart the magnetosphere. The ozone layer isn't healing, but rather is collecting in pressure gradients across the globe (maybe?) Not gravity (pressure). such as teh beach. A distinctively different atmosphere can't focus out so many cosmic rays: weakened magnetic field & global warming. Therefore, (also because there's much less refraction than there would be) harsher wavelengths or radiation is hitting the ground (us). This would explain why it feel…

    • 3

      Reputation Points

    • 13 replies
    • 1.5k views
    • 2 followers
  11. Derivation of neutrino mass from neutrino scattering: [math]\theta[/math] - scattered neutrino angle [math]\phi[/math] - electron recoil angle [math]p_{i}[/math] - initial neutrino momentum [math]p_{f}[/math] - final neutrino momentum [math]p_{e}[/math] - electron momentum [math]p_{e} \sin \phi = p_{f} \sin \theta \tag{1}[/math] [math]p_{e} \cos \phi + p_{f} \cos \theta = p_{i} \tag{2}[/math] Isolate [math]p_{e} \cos \phi[/math] from equation [math](2)[/math]: [math]p_{e} \cos \phi = p_{i} - p_{f} \cos \theta \tag{3}[/math] Divide equation [math](1)[/math] by equation [math](3)[/math] for an expression for [math]\tan \phi[…

    • 1

      Reputation Points

    • 13 replies
    • 2.7k views
    • 2 followers
  12. Started by Dmi3007,

    In contrast to the approach of nuclei under thermal conditions, the interacting nuclei are maximally immobilised and are held near the equilibrium position not by a magnetic field, but electrostatically, while thin Coulomb barriers are overcome during quantum vibrations of the nuclei. The approach of nuclei to the minimum distances to (10^(-13) m) becomes possible due to the using of recent discoveries in the field of composite dielectric materials (SDM, super dielectric materials). Description of the proposed processes The essence of proposed method is the creating of conditions for maximum approaching of nuclei and hold it approached as long as possible. The m…

    • 2

      Reputation Points

    • 34 replies
    • 2.8k views
    • 1 follower
  13. Started by grayson,

    This is completely different than the Rumpelstiltskin theory! It started as that but it evolved into this. I would like to make a clear point that it has evolved. Here is the equation: A=±(O*C) A is the spectrum, or the value, which can be positive or negative ± is whether the equation is positive or negative. C is the Campbell Change Variable. It is determined by the number of particles (an atom counts as one) in 100 picometers from the isotope/atom. It also adds an invisible t at the end O is the original A value. See, with the invisible t the C, the equation repeats itself over and over again. The O is the A from the last cycle. Now that y…

    • 2

      Reputation Points

    • 20 replies
    • 1.9k views
    • 2 followers
  14. Hello My name is Matthew, for the last 20 years I have been pondering on the areas of science and mathematics and about 2-3 years ago I was pondering on the fundamentals of the mathematical system for the number base's specifically the representation of the decimal or the null factor it represents because in a lot of mathematics I see it representing things that are clearly observable but are represented with a null number similar to 0 in base 10 mathematics also, so for a few days I pondered on this for a while and I kept thinking that 0 cant exist because its a null number representing infinity pretty much but to be able to write the number 1 next to it it has to h…

  15. Hello, my name is Grayson. Anyone coming from the Rumpelstiltskin theory should read this. I have created a lot of chaos with my Rumpelstiltskin theory. Which is why I renamed it to the atomic adaptation theory. The theory states that atoms tend to adapt to their environment. That is literally it. The whole thing started in a topic called "What draws the line at life?" That didn't go so well. The second was the Rumpelstiltskin theory where I explained how atoms are sort of "Alive" Well this theoy has the same methematical formula as the rumpelstiltskin theory, but it is just a new name. Here is the formula you have been waiting for: A(t)=A(o)*c t A(t) or a of t …

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 1 reply
    • 661 views
    • 1 follower
  16. Started by Photon Guy,

    Sometimes in science fiction they have planets that have very strong gravity and as a result the people from such planets are really strong. For instance, people from a planet that has twice the earth's gravity would be able to perform tremendous feats of strength while on Earth or while on any planet or environment that has gravity around the same level as earth's gravity, able to bend steel bars and lift cars and so forth. Im wondering though just how realistic that would be in real science. Let's say Earth did have twice the gravity, would we all evolve to be super strong? Or is that just in science fiction and not in real science?

  17. This hypothesis is based on personal experience and reflection. The hypothesis is thus: Bipolar disorder is caused by an overdeveloped affect of interest-excitement. This leads to habits which others find annoying / odd (stuttering, interruptions, etc.), which in turn leads to social rejection and depression. The individual learns to cope, developing a more reserved, euthymic presentation. The cycle repeats as the individual gains self-esteem and attempts to express themselves again. The individual will also be more prone to depression than other individuals due to low self-esteem. For discussion: are there any logical flaws that you can note in this hypothesis?…

    • 2

      Reputation Points

    • 35 replies
    • 2.5k views
    • 2 followers
  18. Started by KrallSpace29,

    Hey Everyone, I'm new to the forum but am looking forward to engaging with people who are also interested in brainstorming for solutions. And another thing I've been having a hard time with, what happens when you actually come across a potentially world fixing/changing solution but don't have the funds or resources to make it happen? This has been a problem for me recently. Anyways, I have had an idea that could potentially have a dramatically beneficial cooling impact on the Climate, It would be an atmosphere lamp; located on either pole. I've tried this before a few times on a small scale and it has already prevented multiple apocalyptic warm…

    • 2

      Reputation Points

    • 20 replies
    • 2.2k views
    • 4 followers
  19. All matter gravitate towards the Rest of the Matter in the Universe and moves towards the Gravitational Force Center of the Universe. At this Center the Mass of the matter becomes zero as it comes to a dead stop but gets pulled apart gravitationally by the Rest of the Matter and gets decimated. This is similar to the Big Bang Process most Scientists are familiar with but a Continuous Bang Process which goes on decimating every matter reaching there. At an interval of One Universal Time Unit [Average] every matter will be at the Center and it is Equality of Matter. You, me and every Particle within us and every bit of matter on Earth, Space, Sun, Moon and e…

    • 2

      Reputation Points

    • 31 replies
    • 5.4k views
    • 3 followers
  20. Started by ZipperPockets,

    During this dream I was in a science college like class room and the professor was explaining how to create a frequency that emits a shape in its self side by side . The way to form this number is to find 2 sets of numbers the factor of the shapes side and cross section values and the height and length of the 2 frequancys being edited at the same time. He said take the highest common denominator and the lowest common numerator for both them average them togeather to get the proper frequancy to to side by side shape frquancy.

  21. In the Double Slit experiment, there is an interesting approach known as the Onnon Theory, which suggests considering the photon or electron as stationary while treating the entire system as moving. According to this philosophical theory, the universe is composed of infinite dimensions, and everything in the universe can be understood as the motion of a single particle. The Onnon Theory is based on three fundamental assumptions: Assumption: The universe has infinite dimensions, and each dimension consists of the surfaces of objects in higher dimensions and the spaces between these objects. For instance, the surface of four-dimensional objects is three-dimensiona…

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 1 reply
    • 515 views
    • 1 follower
  22. Hierarchical Structure of the Cosmos: Black Holes as Portals to Subquantum Dimensions Abstract: This piece delves into a theory proposing that our universe experiences cycles of growth, galaxy development, and eventual contraction via black holes. This process births subquantum universes. These interconnected universes, often labeled as "parallel," are nested within one another. Each primary universe can spawn numerous smaller, slower-paced sub-universes. Introduction: Throughout epochs, humanity has been captivated by the vastness of the universe and its countless galaxies. Observations of these celestial bodies reveal patterns, suggesting a repetitive and profou…

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 3 replies
    • 721 views
    • 1 follower
  23. We use the Tide somehow. Each H2,O gets more Gravitons given to them by the Moon temporarily I require assistance

    • 1

      Reputation Points

    • 9 replies
    • 1.3k views
    • 1 follower
  24. Hello , The present theory explores the behavior of the expression of relative mass M(v) with respect to the speed of light (v=c)\ and suggests that dark matter or dark energy could be composed of ordinary particles with mass that have reached the speed of light. The theory delves into a mathematical analysis of the series representing the relative mass function, M(v), and discusses its divergence at v=c, drawing parallels with the regularization of the Casimir effect using the Riemann zeta function, which gives M(c)=-M(0) at v=c. It proposes the existence of a natural phenomenon that accelerates ordinary matter with mass to the speed of light and transforms it…

    • 1

      Reputation Points

    • 5 replies
    • 764 views
    • 1 follower
  25. Is it permissible to use infinity(infinity mass or infinity energy), which is not defined in physics, to assume the impossibility of traveling at the speed of light? Here is an example of using regularization via the $ zeta$ function in the Casimir effect: Mathematical calculations lead to the famous divergent series $1+2+3+\ldots=+\infty$. However, the physical results do not correspond to infinite values for the energy of the moving plates. To resolve this issue, we applied regularization through the Riemann zeta function. Eventually, we obtain a finite value of $-1/2$ for the divergent series $1+2+3+…$, and this result provides a good explana…

    • 3

      Reputation Points

    • 145 replies
    • 10.5k views
    • 3 followers

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.