Speculations

I've developed a TOE and would like feedback on it. I'd particularly like comments on a proposed a modified Bohr atomic model. In the new model an electron in a hydrogen atom collapses to a particle at the n=1 quantum state. In higher quantum states the electron is a wave and has no mass. In the ground state the electron has mass and gravity keeps the electron in orbit around the proton. The other major change is electric charge is proposed to be emergent rather than constant. The changes account for all verified atomic observations and explain the stability at the n=1 ground state and the emission of energy (photons) below the 0 energy state. This TOE challenges se…

An ironic advantage of spirituality is that to promote relevance to astronomical transcendence or unconsciousness means that you know you’re absolutely not relevant to a specific quantum system. By contrast those promoting materialism might accidentally imply there was a sarcastic risk of themselves being slightly relevant by stating they weren’t relevant in a way that could backfire for atomic nanometers! So when we think of obsessions about semantics in philosophy it might turn out relevant in clarifying the double slit experiment. For example when we observe a classical object like a chair there’s a surplus of photons whereas when we think of the double slit experiment…

I have been playing the role of Cassandra for over 40 years watching you people floundering around acting like you know. You are trying to understand something I saw in 1982. I'm sure you will finally get there, but you better hurry up every chance you get. Here is one last turd from the sandbox. When I see tornado forming in the clouds and growing bigger and bigger, reaching down toward earth I see something coming into existence that wasn't there before. The air molecules are being organized in such a way that allows and actually forces more and more air to be pulled into the new matrix (the pull of gravity). The first time I saw an EF5 tornado touch down, b…

The cells in your soul, that make up your soul, deterioates over time. Stress, manual labour etc. makes them age faster, if it goes beyond normal use. And, if you change them all, it wouldn`t be you anymore ether. You`re kinda stuck with the same cells all life. The more complex you are in intelligence and makeup, the longer you live. So, if you born with 70 IQ for example, you usually live to around 60, while 120 and above, maybe 110 years old. This is because the higher intelligence, the more cells in the soul. So where is the soul? It`s not actually in the brain, it`s below it, in the brain-stem. It`s more like a muscle, while the brain is more like an organ of …

The Theory of Everything in my mind is the formation of all matter and all energy whenever that took place.

We all see light or so we think. I will attempt to convince you that what we experience and what is real are two very different things. I shall start with an example or two before I move on to the humble photon. Have you ever heard the expression, if a tree falls in the forest and there is no one to hear it fall does it still make a noise? If you burn your skin but you have no brain will you feel the pain? So now let us look at light or should I say the photon, when we cast our eyes on an object that emits protons we see the object and determine that it is indeed illuminated, but is it? Well, I can tell you that what we see is all in our mind, we live …

The energy associated with the Higgs field’s VEV, about 246 GeV, contributes to the overall vacuum energy of the universe. However, the contribution of the Higgs field to the vacuum energy is expected to be much larger than the observed value of the cosmological constant/ vacuum energy, leading to a significant discrepancy known as the cosmological constant problem. Why? (The cosmological constant is here in this issue treated same as the vacuum energy.) (Thus, the cosmological constant is the overall vacuum density. And the vacuum energy is seen as the fluctuations in various volumes of universe. Where the mean value is detected to about 3 GeV/m^3) T…

I propose that dark matter isn't a new particle, but an emergent phenomenon arising from the collective behaviour of electron waves on cosmological scales. Key Points: Electron Wave Coherence: Vast, "quiet" regions of space, with minimal matter, energy, and gravitational disturbances, allow electron waves to maintain coherence over vast distances. Particles entering these regions are predisposed to join existing large-scale electron waves, contributing to their growth and stability. Emergent Gravity and Galaxy Formation: These enormous, coherent electron waves interact with spacetime, generating an emergent gravitational field…

I'm seeing more and more posts online now of people who have clinically died and claim to have not seen anything. Some have said it was like going into a deep sleep and remember nothing else. One guy even said he became atheist because he saw no white light,tunnel, guides...nothing. Just a sensation of "deep sleep". So what's up with that? Stories like this makes me wonder sometimes at the validity of most NDES and makes me wonder if they truly are real or just coming from a dying brain. When I read posts like this doubt creeps in and makes me question if NDEs,OBES etc are even real?

Your mathematics of big bang runs into a singularity before it can get there, so you result to collider boondoggles to prove first cause and all you can come up with is some mysterious Higgs boson. Pretty weak! There is the presence of something that explains an atomic riddle. It seems that certain radioactive atoms emit far more energy than would be expected. This excess of radiation is derived from the breaking up of a yet to be discovered energy carrier that moves basic units of materialized energy into atomic mass (hydrogen atoms) creating an active nucleus and giving rise to the electronic organization of matter and electric charge. This is first cause. Y…

Thanks to all the posts on this forum to my posts. This is where I am up to so far.... The pretence is that there was time before the Big Bang. The question is what might this time look like? My proposal is that some of the time might look similar to what we see in the world today. So let's propose that there were earth worlds in the past. What is the model? Well, they would have had their own Big Bang. For the sake of argument let's argue that they there existed a "smaller" time than ours. So a smaller earth world and a smaller universe. Over time an earth world develops. Oceans form and plant life comes on to the planet. Then …

What if I told you the same quantum phenomenon responsible for quantum entanglement can manifest as dark energy and black hole evaporation (Hawking radiation)? And even cause dark matter? the sun explodes but it also collapsed from less dense gas. As the earth formed formed from debris. Gravity forms and it decays.

Emfo 0 Started conversation: Monday at 01:42 PM Guide for Reviewing Atom Structure Proof (GRASP) Welcome to the true Periodic Atom Crystal Table (PACT) and the Microsoft EXCEL program which can provide a one trillion to one scale model of any atom from 1 (hydrogen) to 96 (cerium). I am an 88 year old researcher who, for over 50 years, has listened to elected representatives at all levels, news reporters at all levels, environmental experts at all levels, and college professors at all levels proclaim that carbon dioxide will degrad…

Chapter 1: The standard model of the mind The standard model of the mind starts with the factors of the standard model of physics, which are mass and energy. So what is the mass and energy of the mind? Mass is the talent, which is to say talent to read people or talent to read and comprehend written material. Energy is the personality factor in question. The personality factors in question could be the bad factors, the neutral factors, and the good factors. The bad factors are the dark tetrad of personality, namely greed, violence, manipulation, and apathy. The neutral factors are extroversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, emotional stability, and openness to exper…

I have a theory which explains the Gravity as dynamical force which appears only between moving particles. Actually electric and strong (aka nuclear) forces also appears only between particles, but as static ones. This theory has few conclusions. One of them that the infinitly continued relative movement of all bodies in the space remains by means of dynamical force of gravity. Thus, 1. Stars in any galaxy move with weak acceleration. By time they their orbit and speed increase. When they reach the galaxy's periferia their velocity increased greatly. This is explanation for dark matter phenomena. 2. Cosmic rays get their high speed and energy during …

There is work on Euclidean relativity. Here are some results I have established using Gemini 1.5 Pro https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Formulations_of_special_relativity#Euclidean_relativity url deleted Suppose that an object moving in the ether undergoes the following transformation: `t' = t/γ - βx` `x' = x/γ + βt` Preservation of round-trip speed of light: To calculate the speed of light in each frame of reference, we must divide the distance traveled by the round-trip time. 1. Distance in S': The distance traveled by light in the frame of reference `S'` is not the same as in `S`. Indeed, the mirror, which is stationary in `S`, is moving i…

______________________________________________________________4D Edit: (as) the inside out of 3D Where are the fields in Physics? On the outside. Gravitational field. Electromagnetic field. There are no Knots in 4D, why? Isn't an inside out Knot the same as an untied Knot?

Einstein has taken us down a wrong path, and 100 years later, physics has not recovered from the consequences. We need to look at the clear evidence and go back to working on real physics instead of science fiction! Theory and experiments show Special Relativity and General Relativity are optical illusions. Space and time are absolute as denoted by Galilean Relativity. Hi my name is Dr William Walker and I am a PhD physicist and have been investigating this topic for 30 years. It has been known since the late 1700's by Simone Laplace that nearfield Gravity is instantaneous by analyzing the stability of the orbits of the planets about the sun. This is actually pred…

Would they die? Exactly how would they die? Obviously it would not be a "hanging". What geometrical death?

What is the point of reference?

Former CEO and Computer Technician of IN-AP Systems The Big Bang explained once and for all !! - By Mick Bartram - As my doctors certified me a Genius, it is so obvious to me !! Here is my conjecture, , ,was the big bang probably caused by a division by zero, a mathematical oddity where 1 \ 0 = infinity, a dividend of 1, with a divisor of zero equals a quotient of infinity, the dividend of 1 is an infinitesimally small fundimental particle, and ok maybe not a divisor of zero, but an extreamly small unimaginable value of say 10 to the minus googol, .1 with 100 zero's before the 1, thats a whopping 100 \ 70 = 1.428 x all the atoms in the universe ( if the dividend…

Abstract: This theory proposes that the universe is structured in a layered, hierarchical manner, originating from a foundational event we term the "Grand Bang." The model suggests a cyclical process of creation, extending beyond our observable dimensions and incorporating a higher-order dimension, the "dimension of dimensions," or the fifth dimension. Key Concepts: Space: The foundational zero point, the canvas upon which all existence is painted. I (Introduction of Input): The initial spark or input, potentially akin to the concept of light, introducing energy and information into the system. Variance: The differentiation over…

Unacceptable to me what just occurred! A voice that was contributing to defending the other side of the story has been nullified. The first part only of my post was taken, not the second which stated clearly that I was setting things up for science. An arbitrary-unilateral decision. Just waiting for the shoe to drop, then pounce. It was unconventional, but not-not science. I presented evidence like no one does on this forum. It was biased, but for reasons that I indicated. How many were not in agreement with my position, but turned up regularly anyways. some to scorn me, but others, maybe, to understand the position that I was defen…

Thank you MigL, Is it possible that dark matter, dark energy and zero point energy are all the same thing, just neutrinos arranged in different ways and moving in different ways?

recently a dialogue about webb telescope findings has been going on speculating that the age of the universe is twice previous estimate of 13.7 b years. The discrepancy seems indicated by early star and galaxy formations appearing much older than standard bb model. Since light is affected by gravity, could not the mass of the early universe cause an additional red shift factor adding to the well measured expansion of space? Would not such a far away and immense combined mass function as to simulate a dispersed black hole effect acting upon light beams observed here?