Speculations

I already posted this idea before but I want to share it in this speculation forrum to find it's flaws if there is any or in other words accept critics so that I am able to further develop this idea. So now the idea behind this is that, what we experience as time is actually the change of matter in this space-time reality. What we commonly notice about time is actually the changes that matter had undergone.Time is my idea is merely a measurement of that change in matter in this space-time reality which we are part of. To summarize this idea, here is the formula: Time= change of matter Time here represents the measure of how much change the matter had undergon…

Haywire (Extra Activity/Active Badness) To access white’s potential to haywire, use orange and blue work intersection to realize the white’s work potential to energy through a work access recombination. The orange driving white against the blue with the existence looping back to drive another white against the same point in the blue starts to cause the haywire effect at the point in the blue the orange is driving the white against by stacking up white effect into extra onness in the same spot. Feeding this effect through other colors will activate a felt badness effect. This is because it acts like overactive energy at this point. The overactive energy fed into se…

When I calculate neutron decay, into proton & electron using momentum & starting (both e & p) with light speed c instead of (the neutron's) 0 m/s, then I get a mass deficit of 2 electron masses instead 3/2=1.5 electrons, e.g. what you call an anti_neutrino. Please show me a neutrino "particle" that you claim to have discovered, I've never seen 1.

Every complex natural system has a self-checking mechanism. The solar system is in balance because of gravity, the earth has trees, a water cycle and an atmosphere, living creatures all have regulatory systems. What if life started forming to create balance on turbulent earth and living creatures developed consciousness and the ability to think to keep their instincts in balance? It could be argued that in order to have a complex system, there needs to be some sort of balancing agent and so through random chance complex systems form and survive because the conditions were right but it does not explain the need for increasing complexity. What if imbalance followed by the r…

According to my latest thought experiments the electron should always be a particle. How can it be anything else in an expanding universe? But the double split and countless other experiments prove that it is also a wave. The wave observation might be explained by a principle, whereby the cloud of possibility itself is spinning. Seems to me that this would explain the wave like properties we observe, if for some reason, it stops spinning when we observe it. Is it possible that the detector somehow changes the spin to be perpendicular to the target or perhaps stop the spin altogether somehow? I wonder what might happen if we turn the detector film at a 45 degre…

If our theory of Quantum Entanglement is accurate, could that be a means to other dimensions? Or even more so, since we are all made up of pieces of old stars, planets, and matter, could we ourselves be entangled with other particles in other parts of the universe? Perhaps, visions we see, certain feelings, etc could us be interacting with these entanglements. I like to go down these kinds of rabbit holes, feel free to endulge lol. The questions unasked can never be answered.

I once flipped a coin & it finally landed on edge. I was just wondering how you would calculate the probability of that (happening, because it never happened again). That (edge_stand) would be the (undecided) maybe answer, between yes & no. Assuming we know the diameter D thickness T density (rho) & leaving you free to choose your own flipping method (calculation, e.g. height h, twist rate, etc what(ever) you need, for the normal way people flip coins & coin contour): is there a way to calculate that probability (for edge standing)? E.g. (100%=) 1=H+E+T heads, edge, tails (H=1-T-E, E=1-H-T, T=-H…

I want to start with Schrödinger personally. We have reason to believe that on the subatomic level, in the absence of a conscious observer, all possibilities occur with the actual one being what is aligned when the situation is observed. Quantum entanglement I think? But in metallurgy , there's info on subatomically removing the lattice bonds In Certain metals, to induce a liquid state at room temp. I can try to find it again if need, but with that idea, couldn't we knock around the "lattice bonds" of unobserved confined events?

If I knew what I'm talking about, I would enlighten the world in a declarative Thread. This is just an old man asking what nobody has explained to me in several generations. [The following are all questions, even tho I didn't put question marks after them.] Speculation A: Some DNA or RNA fell in a meteor and was not incinerated. (But that just moves the question back a kazillion years to another world.) Speculation B: The world is large. The oceans are wide. Rainwater dissolves just about everything and flows on down to the sea. Atoms and molecules of just about everything bang …

1. What is the kg of the gravitationally effective mass of the Sun's photons blocked by the Moon at eclipse ??. Wikileaks says that an average of 1426 watts of the Sun's radiation hits the Moon per square m (ie 1426 joules/sm/sec). And that 89,875,517,873,681,764 joules (of radiation energy??) are equivalent to 1 kg of mass (i guess that this is based on E=mcc). The Moon's radius is 1,737,100 m. Distance tween Moon & Earth is 380,000,000 m. Speed of light is 300,000,000 m/sec. I calculate that this equates to 6.842 kg of the Sun's photons (blocked by the Moon) in each metre tween Moon & Earth. And the total mass of photons along the 380,000,000 m is 1.3…

Swansont wisely told me not to hijack someone else's Thread. After I did. Swansont told me to start a new Thread. So here it is. A modern-day Alchemist suggested (speculated!) in these Speculations that we could turn lead into gold by putting a lead atom next to a hydrogen atom (that shouldn't be too hard) and then synchronizing their vibrations until they merge. No. It was even more technical than that. Line up their axes of spin. And their temperature. And . . . No. I'm getting this all wrong. The solar furnaces make heavy atoms out of light ones all day and all night. That might have something to do with their kazillion-degree…

Mass m vs speed_difference v "trade_off" is very important for conservation of momentum (com). Unfortunately conservation of energy (coe) doesn't see (=conceptualize) things the same way, & instead (some sort of) a speed_squared vs (single) mass relevance exists (or should it?)! E.g. How can both laws be valid, when they seem to contradict? Does (kinetic) energy really have a mass vs speed_squared trade off? E.g. in collisions. If NOT, then why do we use it (=(the) energy_construct)? That's 4 questions. Thanks in advance.

Speculation I opened a storage box yesterday and found a book my wife bought for 10 years ago by Stephen Hawking, I had not read it. I was accused of not reading it so I started reading. I think Hawking is mistaken in some of his claims, he bases most of his ideas on. The ideas below in no way contradicts quantum theory, particle physics, string theory, dipole theory, monopole theory etc as I understand them. It does however lead to a slightly different idea of gravity and how the universe works, ie space and questions the conclusions of Einsteins little time slowing experiment. I do not view science as a religion, to be believed no matter what! Let the Sp…

I speculate that my physics professor was correct sixty years ago about the variable speed of light. The evidence he showed us was a simple nine-dollar magnifying glass. He said light goes slower in glass than in air, and that's why its path is bent in the lens. I don't have any mathematics on that, nor any other evidence. It just makes sense. Maybe he had some more to show us on that, but he didn't. Maybe he had some math on the subject, but he didn't show it to us. But I speculate he was right. And if he wasn't, nobody ever showed up to tell us any different. And here's a further speculation: WestStar is going over half the speed of lig…

If the Mans descend from the ''race'' of Monkeys Why ? are there still Monkeys.

speculation ˌspɛkjʊˈleɪʃn/ noun 1. the forming of a theory or conjecture without firm evidence. After my recent speculation being closed I am some what confused , you seemingly do not understand what speculation means. Is this forums native language English?

Although experiment proves c to be invariant, relativity also proves c to be variant at the same time. An observer in motion with a slower frequency of time relative to an observer at relative rest in an inertia frame will measure different speeds of light due to the very fact of γ/dx=c

Its my first participation in this lovely forum as I joined today and I would like to share with you one of innovative idea. Few days ago, the 5th scientific episode of "Sea Level Rise (SLR)" series has been launched. "Deep Water Technique (DWT) for Producing Hydrogen, Purified Water and Unique Electricity" * How to increase the efficiency of electrolysis of water to produce hydrogen? * How to generate electricity by utilizing from the upward motion of Hydrogen bubbles in the deep water? All these questions is answered in the new scientific post: https://scientistmohamed.wordpress.com/2017/04/24/deep-water-technique-dwt-for-producing-hydrogen-purified-water-a-u…

This is basically taken from my religious thread, which was closed, but I have now censored the religious bashing and focused on time-paradox alone. Say you are sitting to yourself and you say...how do I know I am not timelooping this day over and over gain?? Well you just know...why? Spiritual memory...gut instinct. you know to a certainty that you are not timelooping. but you dont have the clarity to explain it, or the clarity to predict the future.

Time is the relative flow of least resistance within the electromagnetic universe. What do you think?

What if the vortex laser tunnelled through a condensate and created long vortices to the center. The condensate may have vortices in them if the tunnels that the laser create by spinning about the axis of the central vortex in the laser. If many beams are directed at a spherical collection of condensate and the condensate were magnetic with containment, the space between beams might bulge along the length of parallel vortices, due to repulsive effects of a magnetic condensate. Then the bulge would form tori in the vortices, and an array of tori may form. They create vortices in the lab by stirring the condensate in circular paths with a regular laser. The vortex l…

I. More on Gravity If gravity is bent space rather than being a force (as everybody seems to agree), then it ought not to be thought of as a force (except in newtonian realms). With gravity as a force an ever increasing mass would seem to logically reach a point of singularity as a result. But as the bending of space, which is caused by that very matter, it is not at all clear how such should be the result. In a physical discrete space the basic unit would be the limiting factor, preventing things from going divergent. A space could only "be" within the limits of its design. It would have, perhaps knowable, maximum whatevers regarding what it could "do". Here …

I figured out how to make a computer exactly the same as a black hole. On the surface of a hollow sphere will be point sources of magnetic force. Inside the sphere is a dye that phosphoresces in light similar to the recent experiment that condensed light at room temperature inside that dye. The dye here will be magnetic in charge, and it's a gaseous atom. The force will be directed inwards except at several points to create something similar to the hyperbolic octahedron, with pointy tubes where the magnetic force wasn't directed. Then with the other points originally still on, apply force towards those pointy tubes. They will descend towards the contained sphere, bu…

hi I have a theory that a light particle is a magnet square or rectangular and nearly 2d this would explain how light moves in a wave and is a particle the oscillation of the magnets side by side would cause them to constantly shift back and forth on their axis meaning they would move towards and away from each other while tilting at the same time, this would also explain how light can be bent by a magnet.

I discovered the following spacetime superposition chart. I need help with developing a temporal distributor to fully access a magnetic field. My blog goes into detail here: url deleted Attached is the chart that I made. Please reply.