Speculations

The only thing that makes motion is Force: F. Newtons explanation for the quantity of motion was F = ma Acceleration is velocity over time: so, F = mv/t Multiplying both side by t we get Ft = mv; Newton's explanation of motion was Ft or mv; Now the professors of the world of physics say that mv can't be used to evaluate motion. That is identical to saying motion can't be used to evaluate motion. Instead the inappropriate use of two other formulas have taken momentum's place. In an absolute sense Newtonian Physics has been thrown out. If the motion of a balanced flywheel is caused by 20 newtons applied for 20 seconds; then that is the quantity o…

Speculation: the expanding universe is creating energy and black holes are squeezing energy out of existence. Question: has this line of reasoning ever been pursued on this forum? If so can someone point me to that thread. Thank you.

I believe after reading a few different articles on Laniakea the milky way is in a Galactic Super-cluster in a Super-cluster of its own and in each "Super" Super-cluster there a different perspectives in such a way that there is different laws of physics. Another point I have to make is the universe is not expanding its the same size as it start billions of years of go, we just are going towards the center just like solar systems and a black hole.

in the other thread we are discussing what collapses the wave function in the double slit experiment ive been told that its collapsed by the measure instrument i agree with this but a measure instrument has an implicit observation of the measurement results how could you know the wave function has been collapsed if you dont observe the results, maybe it hasnt and you dont know you can not know for sure so if we take its the observer ultimately whom collapses the wave function seems to have been a choice of left or right slit but this is a problem to explain common reality, what if there are two observers and one collapses wave function so the photon go…

So I've been thinking a bit lately. After the very helpful posts by people like Delta212 and Strange to name a few on my Universe is infinite only in the theoretical sense? thread, I'd like to ask a new question. Does the universe exist on the surface of a black hole? Crazy? Yes. Stupid and completely false? Probably. But let's pursue this matter anyways using some rickety but still somewhat logical points I've come up with. Hypothesis: The universe exists as the surface of a black hole 1. Question: The speed of light is the absolute limit of speed for particles with mass, Why is this? Answer: This could be the rate of the expansion of the universe, as if yo…

Could the speed of light be said to be equivalent to the processor speed?

Dopamine and serotonin are essential monoaminergic neurotransmitters implicated in the neuromodulation of the subconscious system. The pharmacological regulation of dopamine and serotonin via cannabinoids (THC) administration may enhance synaptic hypercomputation (SH), a novel neurocomputational mecanism to access the subconscious system on-demand. Accessing the subconscious system through synaptic hypercomputation is probably relevant to monoaminergic connectivity and schizophrenia. Furthermore, dopamine disconnectivity has been implicated in the pathology of schizophrenia. However, the relationship between schizophrenia and synaptic connectivity is poorly un…

After observing numerous time lapses of the stars, sun, and moon it's obvious the universe is in the shape of a square, and earth is flat with a glass like dome. If earth were a round ball spinning on a wobble the time lapse would show stars going across the sky from left to right. But the time lapse shows the stars are only above us and they make perfect complete circles, which would be impossible if earth were round and spinning on a wobble. The time lapse of the sun shows if you take a pic the same time every day will show a figure eight. This shows the sun starts out on the outer ring and works it's way to the center and back again. If I could post images it would be …

Firstly I want to write a note here. Note:I'm Azerbaijani. If a have any wrong about grammar,dont care about it. So... I made this theory 2 month ago. First I think it is crazy idea, but I think that I need to write my theory here and I want to know what does people think about it. I called it Infinitum and first I want to start with the collision force. This force is become after collisions. Formula of collision force is like this. Fc=(m(1)×v(1) + m(2)v(2))/√1-v^2/c^2. The formulas of my theroies are much but I dont have enough time for write. But if you want I can write much.

I'm willing to explain things further if anyone is interested. Existence Properties https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Dg4rX67TIMuI_wzpJjrGetWtUO4bgwzpNA8aM-qEvwg/edit?usp=sharing Mass Effects https://docs.google.com/document/d/10Xvw3Cwwbej9FI0fvQHSAyilcZbN9oloBLhFxfj-v2Q/edit?usp=sharing Basic Existence Understanding https://docs.google.com/document/d/1LepQHo7BuNATGHNPLqQuRjMC3Wfy8kIPe3wD6SAWzlA/edit?usp=sharing

Perhaps if the y or z axis was shifted by 90°? Then your photon becomes somewhat of a screw.

Good morning. I had an interesting thought while reading one of my old posts. This sounds a lot like a law but I just wanted to post this here to see if there any flaws in my statement. The universe is finite so long as no one particle or object passes the furthest former borders of the universe as defined by the two farthest outlying particles or objects from that particle or object, these three particles or objects describing a plane, with these three particles or objects being points describing this plane. In this fashion the size of the universe is relative to and described by it's own matter and energy, also in this fashion the universe is infinite, but only in …

Hello I would like to know if the relations below are known? T Hawking the radius of CMB t1 / T Hawking the radius of CMB t0 = (M = total mass of dark energy included) unruh acceleration with T Hawking with the radius of the CMB t1 / unruh acceleration with T Hawking with the radius of the CMB t0 = for simplicity: M t1 * (CMB radius t0) ^ 2 * G / (M t0 * (CMB radius t1) ^ 2 * G ) (1) = Omega lambda t0 * radius of the CMB t1 / (Omega lambda t1 * radius t0 of the CMB) (2) equalities (1) and (2) are thus simplify: Omega lambda t0 * (CMB radius t1 ) * M ^ 3 t0 / (omega lambda t1 * (CMB radius t0) ^ 3 * M t1) = 1 that it simplifies Omega lambda t0 * H0 ^ 2 / (Omeg…

All matter atoms consist of protons (with charge) and neutrons (without charge) in their nucleus. Each nucleus is depicted as being surrounded by as many electrons as there are protons. Hydrogen is the simplest, lightest atom, with just a single proton in its nucleus. All the other elements are made up by adding protons and neutrons to the nucleus. The force that binds the particles together in the nucleus is the strong force. It acts on a very local level, but, as its name would imply, it is very powerful. It attracts protons to protons, neutrons to neutrons and protons to neutrons. So, what is the strong force, exactly? Well, if we have two charged particles, two prot…

Reactionless drive url deleted

So does the body age because *Insert biological reason- DNA deterioration, etc"... Or does the body age because of the 'space-time' of the physical universe?

http://www.scienceforums.net/topic/102124-why-do-elements-want-to-achieve-a-stable-state/ I was just reading above thread, wanted to ask a question. @swansont I understand that lead & iron are classed as stable elements, but will eventually decay to Hydrogen/Helium. but will take trillions of years? I believe Hydrogen is a stable element that would never decay? So when all the stars/planets burn out, would their cold cores eventually decay to hydrogen/helium over trillions upon trillions of years? If the above all do decay to Hydrogen/helium, would these now very dispersed hydrogen atoms, eventually have the gravity to create a singularity &amp…

If the man in the rocket suffer no more acceleration, then, it's the same as if he was the one resting and the other moving from him. Twins... that maintain both of them into the same space-time dimension. But in this case, when the movement stops, they should have the same age... to this we must notice that one his actually moving. Giving a direction... as universe is expanding at various speeds, the maximum being light speed, the one moving at light speed would actually slow down his time to 0 when light speed max is reached. Common mistake about light speed is to consider a max for it. Max if Inifinity. We can only observe a range of speed I would call mate…

I would like to hear ideas on anybody's take on bioelectric magnetism. The reason for this is my personal interest in ways of achieving artificial gravity without the use of constant acceleration, centrifugal force, or an almost impossibly dense object as the source of a gravity field. My true question is: is it possible to charge or ionize a human body on a cellular or smaller level that will allow it to attract to a medium electromagnetic field built into a deck or walkway to simulate gravity to an extent?

Energy is a dimension just as much as Time. In this dimension everything travels as energy in waveform. The entire EM Spectrum is a subset to this dimension (until it is measured). All quantum weirdness events takes place in this dimension (superposition). The double slit experiment finally makes sense. The particle is an energy wave until it is measured and becomes mass. Dimensions of Mass = xyz ​Dimension of Energy = quantum waves Dimension of Time = t This revelation will be closed down by the mods, but will soon become the most viewed threads in the history of the site.

This post is an extension of an earlier post meant to focus specifically on a photons "self energy" and how it moves through space. Specifically consider Landau & Lifshitz Vol. II. On page 108, the wave equation section talks about electromagnetic waves “in which the field depends only on one coordinate, say x (and on the time). Such waves are said to be plane”. Electromagnetic waves are ever changing “plane waves moving in the positive direction along the X axis”. In volume IV, page 5, Landau & Lifshitz continue, talking about Quantization of the Free Electromagnetic Field and on page 11, introducing photons: These formulae enable us to introduce the concep…

Hi, I present below an alternative version (not a questioning) to the theory of general relativity in order to integrate the accelerating expansion of the universe, the dark matter and to solve the problem of quantum time. To do this, quantifying space-time is essential. It’s not an easy concept to explain. To do so, I will describe my approach below and have written an article for those who will be interested. There is a strong similarity (which is not obvious) between the energy of an elementary particle and the energy of a fluid in motion (describes the Bernoulli’s principle): For a moving particle, the energy comes from two sources: having speed and ha…

I originally assumed gravity had something to do with the cutoff ..but now this seams like a good answer?

i suppose i could define it from the equation s=vt taking v as the velocity of an object under no external forces so next would be define whats space a space is defined as the distance between two objects but lets imagine there are just two objects alone in the whole universe distance is relative to ones size and how can i define distance if i dont define size for example if i slowly double the size of both objects APPARENT distance will be half than before i hope you see where im going how can i define the distance dimention if i dont define the size dimention? we are just assuming as theres no RELATIVE change in size theres no change in size at a…

Please, I hope you will be open-minded. If you must, please, in the very least read the following as a form of entertainment, but I am telling you the following is correct. I've been given a noticeable part of the New Physics. In another thread I've already provided a detailed radio wave sub-photon experiment that if replicated by notable physicists and engineers would cause shock waves through mainstream. Additionally I've built gravity devices that demonstrate the nature of gravity. Such gravity devices can detect motion through space without using accelerometers or known methods. In short, such devices cannot be explained with the standard model. There are two gravity …