Speculations

Could the speed of light be said to be equivalent to the processor speed?

Dopamine and serotonin are essential monoaminergic neurotransmitters implicated in the neuromodulation of the subconscious system. The pharmacological regulation of dopamine and serotonin via cannabinoids (THC) administration may enhance synaptic hypercomputation (SH), a novel neurocomputational mecanism to access the subconscious system on-demand. Accessing the subconscious system through synaptic hypercomputation is probably relevant to monoaminergic connectivity and schizophrenia. Furthermore, dopamine disconnectivity has been implicated in the pathology of schizophrenia. However, the relationship between schizophrenia and synaptic connectivity is poorly un…

After observing numerous time lapses of the stars, sun, and moon it's obvious the universe is in the shape of a square, and earth is flat with a glass like dome. If earth were a round ball spinning on a wobble the time lapse would show stars going across the sky from left to right. But the time lapse shows the stars are only above us and they make perfect complete circles, which would be impossible if earth were round and spinning on a wobble. The time lapse of the sun shows if you take a pic the same time every day will show a figure eight. This shows the sun starts out on the outer ring and works it's way to the center and back again. If I could post images it would be …

Firstly I want to write a note here. Note:I'm Azerbaijani. If a have any wrong about grammar,dont care about it. So... I made this theory 2 month ago. First I think it is crazy idea, but I think that I need to write my theory here and I want to know what does people think about it. I called it Infinitum and first I want to start with the collision force. This force is become after collisions. Formula of collision force is like this. Fc=(m(1)×v(1) + m(2)v(2))/√1-v^2/c^2. The formulas of my theroies are much but I dont have enough time for write. But if you want I can write much.

I'm willing to explain things further if anyone is interested. Existence Properties https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Dg4rX67TIMuI_wzpJjrGetWtUO4bgwzpNA8aM-qEvwg/edit?usp=sharing Mass Effects https://docs.google.com/document/d/10Xvw3Cwwbej9FI0fvQHSAyilcZbN9oloBLhFxfj-v2Q/edit?usp=sharing Basic Existence Understanding https://docs.google.com/document/d/1LepQHo7BuNATGHNPLqQuRjMC3Wfy8kIPe3wD6SAWzlA/edit?usp=sharing

Perhaps if the y or z axis was shifted by 90°? Then your photon becomes somewhat of a screw.

Good morning. I had an interesting thought while reading one of my old posts. This sounds a lot like a law but I just wanted to post this here to see if there any flaws in my statement. The universe is finite so long as no one particle or object passes the furthest former borders of the universe as defined by the two farthest outlying particles or objects from that particle or object, these three particles or objects describing a plane, with these three particles or objects being points describing this plane. In this fashion the size of the universe is relative to and described by it's own matter and energy, also in this fashion the universe is infinite, but only in …

Hello I would like to know if the relations below are known? T Hawking the radius of CMB t1 / T Hawking the radius of CMB t0 = (M = total mass of dark energy included) unruh acceleration with T Hawking with the radius of the CMB t1 / unruh acceleration with T Hawking with the radius of the CMB t0 = for simplicity: M t1 * (CMB radius t0) ^ 2 * G / (M t0 * (CMB radius t1) ^ 2 * G ) (1) = Omega lambda t0 * radius of the CMB t1 / (Omega lambda t1 * radius t0 of the CMB) (2) equalities (1) and (2) are thus simplify: Omega lambda t0 * (CMB radius t1 ) * M ^ 3 t0 / (omega lambda t1 * (CMB radius t0) ^ 3 * M t1) = 1 that it simplifies Omega lambda t0 * H0 ^ 2 / (Omeg…

All matter atoms consist of protons (with charge) and neutrons (without charge) in their nucleus. Each nucleus is depicted as being surrounded by as many electrons as there are protons. Hydrogen is the simplest, lightest atom, with just a single proton in its nucleus. All the other elements are made up by adding protons and neutrons to the nucleus. The force that binds the particles together in the nucleus is the strong force. It acts on a very local level, but, as its name would imply, it is very powerful. It attracts protons to protons, neutrons to neutrons and protons to neutrons. So, what is the strong force, exactly? Well, if we have two charged particles, two prot…

Reactionless drive url deleted

So does the body age because *Insert biological reason- DNA deterioration, etc"... Or does the body age because of the 'space-time' of the physical universe?

http://www.scienceforums.net/topic/102124-why-do-elements-want-to-achieve-a-stable-state/ I was just reading above thread, wanted to ask a question. @swansont I understand that lead & iron are classed as stable elements, but will eventually decay to Hydrogen/Helium. but will take trillions of years? I believe Hydrogen is a stable element that would never decay? So when all the stars/planets burn out, would their cold cores eventually decay to hydrogen/helium over trillions upon trillions of years? If the above all do decay to Hydrogen/helium, would these now very dispersed hydrogen atoms, eventually have the gravity to create a singularity &amp…

If the man in the rocket suffer no more acceleration, then, it's the same as if he was the one resting and the other moving from him. Twins... that maintain both of them into the same space-time dimension. But in this case, when the movement stops, they should have the same age... to this we must notice that one his actually moving. Giving a direction... as universe is expanding at various speeds, the maximum being light speed, the one moving at light speed would actually slow down his time to 0 when light speed max is reached. Common mistake about light speed is to consider a max for it. Max if Inifinity. We can only observe a range of speed I would call mate…

I would like to hear ideas on anybody's take on bioelectric magnetism. The reason for this is my personal interest in ways of achieving artificial gravity without the use of constant acceleration, centrifugal force, or an almost impossibly dense object as the source of a gravity field. My true question is: is it possible to charge or ionize a human body on a cellular or smaller level that will allow it to attract to a medium electromagnetic field built into a deck or walkway to simulate gravity to an extent?

Energy is a dimension just as much as Time. In this dimension everything travels as energy in waveform. The entire EM Spectrum is a subset to this dimension (until it is measured). All quantum weirdness events takes place in this dimension (superposition). The double slit experiment finally makes sense. The particle is an energy wave until it is measured and becomes mass. Dimensions of Mass = xyz ​Dimension of Energy = quantum waves Dimension of Time = t This revelation will be closed down by the mods, but will soon become the most viewed threads in the history of the site.

This post is an extension of an earlier post meant to focus specifically on a photons "self energy" and how it moves through space. Specifically consider Landau & Lifshitz Vol. II. On page 108, the wave equation section talks about electromagnetic waves “in which the field depends only on one coordinate, say x (and on the time). Such waves are said to be plane”. Electromagnetic waves are ever changing “plane waves moving in the positive direction along the X axis”. In volume IV, page 5, Landau & Lifshitz continue, talking about Quantization of the Free Electromagnetic Field and on page 11, introducing photons: These formulae enable us to introduce the concep…

Hi, I present below an alternative version (not a questioning) to the theory of general relativity in order to integrate the accelerating expansion of the universe, the dark matter and to solve the problem of quantum time. To do this, quantifying space-time is essential. It’s not an easy concept to explain. To do so, I will describe my approach below and have written an article for those who will be interested. There is a strong similarity (which is not obvious) between the energy of an elementary particle and the energy of a fluid in motion (describes the Bernoulli’s principle): For a moving particle, the energy comes from two sources: having speed and ha…

I originally assumed gravity had something to do with the cutoff ..but now this seams like a good answer?

i suppose i could define it from the equation s=vt taking v as the velocity of an object under no external forces so next would be define whats space a space is defined as the distance between two objects but lets imagine there are just two objects alone in the whole universe distance is relative to ones size and how can i define distance if i dont define size for example if i slowly double the size of both objects APPARENT distance will be half than before i hope you see where im going how can i define the distance dimention if i dont define the size dimention? we are just assuming as theres no RELATIVE change in size theres no change in size at a…

Please, I hope you will be open-minded. If you must, please, in the very least read the following as a form of entertainment, but I am telling you the following is correct. I've been given a noticeable part of the New Physics. In another thread I've already provided a detailed radio wave sub-photon experiment that if replicated by notable physicists and engineers would cause shock waves through mainstream. Additionally I've built gravity devices that demonstrate the nature of gravity. Such gravity devices can detect motion through space without using accelerometers or known methods. In short, such devices cannot be explained with the standard model. There are two gravity …

Why are we so certain EM packets travel physically as waves when not being measured? What if there is an invisible 3d lattice throughout the universe that an EM packet has to traverse when not being observed? When a measurement is made, the lattice disappears or morphs out of the way. If this turned out to be true, it would suggest a bubble of space-time, engulfing the experiment, is what would be changing dependent on a detector being used. I would be curious of multiple double slit experiments being conducted next to each other to see if overlapping bubbles cause anything weird in the results.

It's the uv. The moon is near the horizon more red, less ultra violet/blue. This is because particles in our atmosphere absorbe (a bit of the) ligth. It's due to the path of the ligth. It also has to travel a longer distance in our atmosphere so it is being absorbed more. So is it with the sun. Easy to understand this. It affects a lot. I have not thinked so mutch about climate change because I do'nt care anymore. They spend billions of dollars but didn't understood/know this and more. I will keep the rest for myself. But one I can explaim. Good to know. Flora knows that autumn has come from the more red less uv/blue and the shorter dayligths. I takes/needs/ab…

I can explain but then all whould know/understand this. They explain it with balls on youtube on on childsplayground or with a plane but they theirselfes doesn't know/understand it. So any one who can explain this? If i explain it now, this topic would be moved I think. I will explain afterwards and I promisse even the average mind will understand the balls. Let's make it more interesting. In part one I will explain the balls and the coriolis effect. In part 2 on another topic I will explain the coriolis force and the gravity of earth. The upwards push low presure and towards pull (of the atmosphere) high presure.

Speed is how fast an object move in this physical reality. An object can move because there is space around it. We know base on the teaching of G.R. that no object can travel faster than the speed of light or even the speed of light itself because it is the top speed which our reality limits. We also know base on G.R. that an object that moves actually slows the time base on the perspective of observer and it changes it's shape as well as it increase it's mass. Now the intriguing part of it is that base on my speculation, if an object happens to travel faster than the speed of light it actually disappear on the view of an observer.Another profound speculation is that the…

Philosophical: time is an measurmentstool of us to set the past, live the moment and to organize the future. I know Einsteins aimings and what he did to prove his theory. He sended an atom clock with an plane and aimed that time on the surface will slow to opposite to the atom clock that is in an plane with HIGH SPEED. Back in 2014 I was a bit hyper. And had the thougth of all. The planets etc etc and was brainstorming about speed etc. I know more about time because I experienced a lot. When we brainstorm so mutch and fast time seems not to pass as usual. It seems slower. This is my theory and I know I'm rigth because I discovered mutch more with this: Tim…