Speculations

So apparently Hawking radiation happens when pairs of virtual particles are created on an event horizon and one of the pair falls into the event horizon while the other flies away, somehow taking mass with it. If there were a way to create more such virtual particles at the event horizon, would the black hole then evaporate faster? Are there any other vaguely realistic ways of destroying black holes?

Gödel’s 1st theorem is meaningless as Godel cant tell us what makes a maths statement true SPMA LINK DELETED Gödel’s 1st theorem states a) “Any effectively generated theory capable of expressing elementary arithmetic cannot be both consistent and complete. In particular, for any consistent, effectively generated formal theory that proves certain basic arithmetic truths, there is an arithmetical statement that is true,[1] but not provable in the theory (Kleene 1967, p. 250) note "... there is an arithmetical statement that is true..." In other words there are true mathematical statements which cant be proven But the fact is Godel cant tell us what mak…

Godel's 2nd theorem ends in paradox Godel's 2nd theorem is about SPAM LINK DELETED "If an axiomatic system can be proven to be consistent and complete from within itself, then it is inconsistent.” But we have a paradox Gödel is using a mathematical system his theorem says a system cant be proven consistent THUS A PARADOX Godel must prove that a system cannot be proven to be consistent based upon the premise that the logic he uses must be consistent . If the logic he uses is not consistent then he cannot make a proof that is consistent. So he must assume that his logic is consistent so he can make a proof of the impossibility of proving a system t…

Godels theorem is invalid as his G statement is banned by an axiom of the system he uses to prove his theorem SPAM LINK DELETED a flaw in theorem Godels sentence G is outlawed by the very axiom he uses to prove his theorem ie the axiom of reducibiilty AR -thus his proof is invalid http://www.enotes.com/topic/Axiom_of_reducibility russells axiom of reducibility was formed such that impredicative statements were banned but godels uses this AR axiom in his incompleteness proof ie axiom 1v and formular 40 and as godel states he is useing the logic of PM ie AR "P is essentially the system obtained by superimposing on the Peano axioms the logic of PM[ …

what if we are looking at this all wrong, what if time is not a fragment broken into pieces. Time is not absolute and we all know that, but the real question is how it changes and why. imagine two identical balls with different masses but of the same shape and size. one is having a mass of 5kg and the other with 20kg, they are rolled on the ground to reach a distance of 5 meters using the same force, note that they all may reach the distance but not at the same time which changes their velocities becaus…

So, first off, full disclosure. I'm a Flat Earther. I am well-aware of all the preconceptions that comes with, I can only promise that I am not the stereotype and hope my actions live up to that. (Honestly I'm compelled to mention that most of the time the stereotypical closed-mindedness is simply a reaction to being met with bad arguments; to take one cliche there are some that believe the Earth is a disc accelerating upwards at 9.8m/s2 as an explanation for gravity, not a belief I hold, and the most common response to that is that we should have reached the speed of light by now, even though relativistic velocity addition does not work that way. It is too common for dis…

I had a read of most of the comments & am disappointed, i havent learnt much. The main topic seems to be whether GWs need a medium to propagate -- the answer is in the question -- it cant propagate without a medium. And swansont's comment that em radiation doesnt need a medium is a worry -- it reminds me that standard science continually confuses photons with em radiation -- hencely bringing in em radiation can only confuse rather than clarify. The main side issue seems to be whether GW's & gravity add to the gravity field. I thort that Einstein said yes. In which case the addition must introduce a kind of almost never ending process of addition that sooner o…

In short, the reason expansion was fast early on is due to the high amount of matter to energy wave conversion. Space is energy waves. Then when the universe cooled and went dark, expansion slowed. When stars began glowing, the additional energy released by the galaxies filled with stars continued to expand the distance between heavenly bodies. The following video explains this within the first minute better than what was just typed. LINK REMOVED

(Disclaimer: I really want to hear the opinion of quantum scientists, if this is too off topic, I apologise) I had this question under Quantum Theory; if all matter/anti matter was living, the reason for the question, is kind of based on this theory. Maybe all living, is to consume(or try) untill there is nothing left. Maybe it is a battle, like imagine, life / (non life)matter being the Yin / Yang, actually fighting and consuming eachother for control/dominance Or life is an entity made to transfer matter into spiritual energy, or anti-matter.. reason for evolution is that (non life) matter is actually alive(in another sense), and fighting back, like…

I had this question under Quantum Theory; if all matter/anti matter was living, the reason for the question, is kind of based on this theory. Maybe all living, is to consume(or try) untill there is nothing left. Maybe it is a battle, like imagine, life / (non life)matter being the Yin / Yang, actually fighting and consuming eachother for control/dominance Or life is an entity made to transfer matter into spiritual energy, or anti-matter.. Reason for evolution is that (non life) matter is actually alive(in another sense), and fighting back, like antibiotics fight bacteria and vise versa, I imagine it abit like Yin / Yang, where One is to consume the othe…

Higher Dimensions and the Formation of Space-Time Through Strings By Christopher Rodriguez Abstract Albert Einstein's Theory of general Relativity and the well established string theory have played major roles throughout the field of physics. Yet, as well as they work independently, when combined, they just don’t work out. Well, this paper aims towards solving that and discovering the true beginning of the universe. These findings show that general relativity and string theory can work together and maybe, just maybe, it could help solve the beginning of the universe. ____________________________________________________________________________ …

Hi, I have not been on the forum for a while but I am back after some thought and writing a fresh post. Some of it is science, some of it is about the attitudes to science, especially on this forum. I have a number of questions I will ask as I go through, I will summarise them at the end. I am an amatuer phycist but I plan to go to university in the years ahead to work on this further. In my twenties, I am now 42, I had what I believed to be a profound insight about the universe. This insight matured over the years and I am convinced I have a framework for a theory of everything or final theory. It’s not strictly a theory of everything as it doesn’t explain ev…

Hi everybody, I am working on a model that uses the solution to a 2nd order DE, Ψ(e,ε), e=elementary charge, ε=electric constant, as probability amplitude for the electromagnetic field, EΨ. Applying this to a point charge gives: - quantized values for particle energy - as function of a partial product of powers over the fine-structure constant α, see table below for spherical + 1st angular symmetry term; - a numerical approximation of the fine-structure constant 1/α ≈ 4π Γ(1/3)|Γ(-1/3)| ( Γ=Gamma function); - magnetic moments, calculated from electromagnetic fields; agreement with experiment within factor of 2; and on a speculative level - a …

Perhaps time can be expressed as $$ t=\frac{Gh}{c^4} \int \frac{dS}{r} $$ Where S is the entropy of entanglement of an arbitrary closed surface. r is the radius to the surface point. Integration over a closed surface. This is very similar to the analogy. Time behaves as a potential, and entropy as a charge. From this formula there are several possible consequences. Bekenstein Hawking entropy for the event horizon. Light cone case $$ ct=r $$ $$ S=\frac{c^3r^2}{Gh} $$ Gravitational time dilation. The case if matter inside a closed surface processes information at the quantum level according to …

First question. I will lay this out in a series of questions, so please try to follow this thread as it evolves. 0 applied to the universe represents a state of the universe that is absent of both space and time. This is a naturally absolute value, which we can also be identified as a finite state. Although theoretically impossible in our universe, it could also be considered theoretically possible, giving it potential. Given the impossible nature of this state, however, it's potential would be infinite over time from our perspective. Mathematically, it can be represented as x=x, where x=0, because it is only equal to itself in comparison. Nothing…

I think so. Every time I take one, I feel my consciousness slipping away. I was once told by an Egyptian gentleman, if you're on them 23 years since 17 you won't live long past 40. I think the NHS have got to cut us mental patients some slack, and find other ways to treat us rather than feeding us pills. Your input is valued, please contribute, thank you.

The boys recommed change this topic here Specluations Trust, this is wrong topic this subject, but maybe moderators does not accept the rest. I am did study ancient solar eclipeses, how they fit together with ancient chronologies. I is not can tell very large, so not to be interpreted as advertising. I want to make this thesis known, not to advertise something. But i can part my study so a liitle bit. Solar ecplise 13 October 1504 BC. > This was queen Hatshepsutin's 15th regnal year. Solar eclipse 12 May 1384 BC > This was pharao Akhenaten's 4th regnal year. Solar eclipse 15 July 1360 BC > This was Mursili II, king of …

Hello, I have made an experiment based on mathematical model of EMF generated in segment of wire moving in constant velocity in uniform magnetic field: Here is the link to the mathematical model: http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/magnetic/genwir3.html#c1 My problem is that I am not getting any voltage out of wire at any speed up to 100 m/s. The field is 0.5 T and the wire length L is 0.02m... Please advice...

Let’s we imagine a particle that is in a box and it hits the walls of the box with a certain frequency. Let's say that the energy of the box comes from the frequency with which the particle hits the walls. If we start to shrink, the box frequency will become bigger and the energy of the box will rise. But the smaller the box, the better we will know where the particle is, from where it follows that the uncertainty in momentum is going to get bigger. On the other hand, if we have a test object close enough to the box, this object will experience a greater gravitational pull from the box. I made a derivation using the Newtonian laws of gravity and I got this formula. …

This I believe is possibly a simple “conceptual breakthrough” in the effort to explain the origins of everything from nothing using simple mathematical logic. “Occam's razor is the problem-solving principle that essentially states that simpler solutions are more likely to be correct than complex ones” Wikipedia. The theory outlined hereunder is informed and motivated by this “problem-solving principle”. Theory: In Mathematics, the number zero (0) is unique and represents the absence of “anything” that can be measured, seen, touched, etc. Therefore, this is the logical starting point for the theory. Nothing = zer…

A thought occurred if spiders where huge and eat people when would they realize that if they left the victim alive they could produce blood again and be harvested again. I guess I’m asking when would they start to learn agriculture

That was actually good stuff that I just got the chance to read. I am more then happy to change from the tube to a chamber. I know it was crap for the first setup. how much would you spend? Im not using math for this. Einstein already solved that part. I'm showing functionality. Just because you can say what the horsepower is does not explain how to make it. I am merely trying to find an outside source to compare for proving or disproving. Shutting me down doesn't disprove anything. So can I proceed? Im sorry I didnt prove it immediately after other responses or are you controlling information? Can I continue because it doesn't effect your life at all? Because it is ef…

so had a dream last night about the universe an then in my dream I had an idea. (* Please note that under no circumstance should this idea be considered real science. Dreams do not compete in the slightest with real science works. It is only an idea from putting puzzle pieces together thank you*) what if gravity is impossible to observe because it tunes itself to the observer. Like a string on a guitar which is being played by the observed. The more you observe something the more in tune it becomes. And vise verse. So say you have a piece of mass you want to try an observe right? well, you can do that at larger scales, but at smaller scales, it become…

Watch the video on this site and tell me thats not what I have been posting about here on this site. This is exactly what I have been trying to point out gravity. Notice the rotation. Thats weird how thats what I have been saying about gravity! Just because I cant make sense of it doesn't mean I'm wrong. The waves are density differential. The lower density allows higher density to move to and same goes as higher density pushes into lower. The surrounding matter including gases change gravities effects because of density. The faster its moving the stronger the attraction. Slower rotating planets have much less gas surrounding them. It even says on the site "The strongest …

This is not a paper but just a silly idea from a secondary school student. Looking forward to hearing your comments. Thank you so much! Twin universes.docx