Jump to content

Speculations

Pseudoscientific or speculatory threads belong here.

Speculations Forum Rules

The Speculations forum is provided for those who like to hypothesize new ideas in science. To enrich our discussions above the level of Wild Ass Guesswork (WAG) and give as much meaning as possible to such speculations, we do have some special rules to follow:

  1. Speculations must be backed up by evidence or some sort of proof. If your speculation is untestable, or you don't give us evidence (or a prediction that is testable), your thread will be moved to the Trash Can. If you expect any scientific input, you need to provide a case that science can measure.
  2. Be civil. As wrong as someone might be, there is no reason to insult them, and there's no reason to get angry if someone points out the flaws in your theory, either.
  3. Keep it in the Speculations forum. Don't try to use your pet theory to answer questions in the mainstream science forums, and don't hijack other threads to advertise your new theory.

The movement of a thread into (or out of) Speculations is ultimately at the discretion of moderators, and will be determined on a case by case basis.

  1. My machine solve several stage clockwork by avoiding connecting gears directly , however by discharging the energy in steps. And the clockwork has very high ratios in this picture 5 gears with spiral springs fixed to them gear #1 with no spring instead weight is used , gear #2 has the strongest spring , spring in gear #3 is weaker spring #4 is the weakest and that according to gear ratio gear #5 has no spring it is fixed to a generator How the machine works: group number 6 consisted of gear #2 and gear #4 , it moves from side to side continuously to transfer energy between the gears.When the group No (6) moves from right to left rod #8 will release gear…

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 8 replies
    • 1k views
    • 1 follower
  2. “Singularity universes” my first and most well versed theory of everything, Our universe completely vast and well defined yet not understood may be a in or around a singularity inside a black hole. The laws of physics are said to break but that could include the plank length meaning atoms and other particles may get condensed and pushed into smaller states as matter is also gravitationally smashed into a type of state that is not yet completely known or the falling matter and information from the fields which are the woven fabric of space time and through but falling into the singularity as well as the matter yet act fundamentally the same in regards to our understanding …

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 12 replies
    • 1.5k views
    • 2 followers
  3. Started by ja7tdo,

    hi, There is a potential difference of 300,000 volts between the surface and the 30 km ionosphere above. The atmosphere is ionized by cosmic rays.There is a potential difference of 100 V per meter near the ground surface, but the potential difference gradually decreases as it goes up, and it becomes 0 V at 30 km. Atmospheric pressure is generated because the ionized atmosphere is drawn against the surface minus. Read more about it here URL removed (rule 2.7)

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 5 replies
    • 976 views
    • 1 follower
  4. hi, There are two mistakes in Newton's universal gravity. The gravity of the universe and the earth is different. Mass does not produce gravity. If you need further consideration, let's do it later.And let's explain how mass is born. Substances are made of atoms. Neutrons decay into protons and electrons in 15 minutes. Thus, an atom consists of protons and electrons.When a force is applied to the proton, a magnetic field is generated behind. The magnetic field is a resistance that tries to pull the protons.This is an electromagnetic mass.The electromagnetic mass is the mass itself. Earth's gravity causes an electric field on one side when Sc…

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 14 replies
    • 1.8k views
    • 2 followers
  5. Started by Phantom5,

    Ok, when you take a sphere and put in the middle maybe natrium. Then you make in the inner sphere reflectiv for a radiation that reflects at a special element for nearbe 100%. The natrium must be compressed more and more it gives no other way and the radiation you put in the sphere, it reflects more and more and press maybe natrium. Look in the german wikipedia at the picture from edmond halley and the hollow earth. That is the absolutely perfect fusion reactor it doesnt go more naturally. What you think about it? Greetings phantom5

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 12 replies
    • 1.6k views
    • 2 followers
  6. And what will it be? The answer is nothing. Here to the explanation ... A saying of mine was that if gravity is an "element" that consists of all the elements, then it must be something that is made of everything. For the most part, atoms are nothing. For the most part, the universe is nothing. So empty vacuum. This may not suit some because of the dark matter but here is another explanation ... Everything that is in motion can only be put into that state by turning. Joints, motors, wheels, turbines, planets, suns, galaxies, pumps, as well as the lungs and heart have a few degrees of rotation in the walls. Well gravitation is also a force that moves things, such as Withou…

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 15 replies
    • 1.6k views
    • 2 followers
  7. Started by LittleBoPeep,

    Short of it I have used different languages to decipher information from the first 15 decimals of Pi Here: The languages are Romain Numerals numbers and the Romanian word for 10. I did not create a special language Just used existing languages. I proposed back in 2014-2016 I proposed that if I were a time traveler I would leave a message using pi but change everything around it to make the message and that is what I present. Below is another message found in pi and 2pi or Tau insisting an Ai is watching over us. Looking at the facts everything is out of order unless it was created into this reality. Speed of light in m…

  8. I have a pending patent on this concept of "reactionless devices", like gyroscopes etc etc, but bringing to the table a new idea, that mixes up the laws of Newton and the principle of Pascal to obtain a thrust. Excuse my english btw. So I have created several animations, with some animation errors, but very easy to understand and visualize, and very short to not to bore you Lol. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vz8R1et6BRA - Linear device https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aIZN5zDDXEo - The descriptions are in spanish but the animation begins in second 37 The first two animations that have more chances to work in my humble opinion, are one linear and a…

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 132 replies
    • 14.9k views
    • 3 followers
  9. Started by EdwardWeise,

    Hi Guys, I am new here and was looking for some advice and help. Pretend "IF" I was able to create a time travel device and I could travel backwards in time. Only backwards and only 2 minutes (Closed time curve of 112.3 seconds). What could I do? I can't get the the shops to buy a lottery ticket obviously... Also why would I be limited to such a short curve?

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 7 replies
    • 1.9k views
  10. Good day. I have a project on power industry. I receive the electric power on the basis of a renewable energy resource. It will be possible to receive the electric power 24 hours a day, 365 days in a year, generation of the electric power will happen at one level all the time, that is, no stores of the electric power will be necessary and the electric power can be given directly to a electrical grid of the country. It will be possible to construct power plant of any power for electricity supply of the whole city or any country. Because the power plant works at a renewable energy resource it is not necessary to transport any energy carriers on power plant, that is, the ele…

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 15 replies
    • 1.9k views
    • 2 followers
  11. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Covalent_bond When you think about that atoms send out waves. You can see it here... Then you think about waves that erase by itself and leave a vacuum or at the othe way a pressure. The h2o molecule, maybe, sorry the picture is in gernan, but on the other side of the two atoms is maybe a vacuum that stabilize the molecule.

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 1 reply
    • 667 views
    • 1 follower
  12. Think about it, when you know about wave breakers at the coast. Maybe the wave that we call electrons are so sensible that gives only a point and explodes like a soap bulb, when this was correct then its nothing other as a wave. You can test it very easily, you must take a chamber or a same thing with a slit and then you dont put the detector in the direction of the slit where you can look. You must set the detector next to the slit behind the wall, then you can check if an electron is a wave or a particle. And important is that the walls of the chamber dont reflects the electrons then the experiment gone wrong. The detector was the wave breaker a…

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 2 replies
    • 737 views
    • 1 follower
  13. Regarding the alleged plenty of scientific evidence and experiments confirming the special and general relativity, the summary list of which is presented in the article "What is the experimental basis of Special Relativity?", available on the link: http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/SR/experiments.html , it is not possible to treat this list of experiments as confirmation of the truth of the SR. A significant part of the experiments quoted there concerns the null results of the Michelson-Morley experiment and many other similar experiments. In any case, these experiments can not be a confirmation of the truth of Special Relativity, because in fact…

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 10 replies
    • 1.8k views
    • 2 followers
  14. Awhile back I posted an engine design of just the cylinder where the piston goes up and down, and it wasn't complete. It had a row of X's that encircle the interior of the cylinder a bit below half way down just below the gas vapor entry points (the vapor entry points are facing each other from opposite sides of the cylinder). The point is that I'm trying to make it suck the piston down. The row of X's are metallic ribbons that poke up along the perimeter in repeated side-by-side X's. But you need two holes, and you shape them so it's difficult for air to blow out upon explosion, and easier to blow in from outside (I drew it so it curves in the drawing in the side dr…

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 4 replies
    • 1k views
    • 1 follower
  15. Started by EzequielLayag,

    Bio-weapons better than nuclear weapons?

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 6 replies
    • 1.5k views
  16. Started by Itoero,

    Related to global warming there will be many crises….how do you think the 'world' will react? Peaceful or WO3?

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 11 replies
    • 2.2k views
  17. this is my last one I post here. life > nature > rationality Self conscious,irrationality and analogy, induction 1: Rational thinking and the self of rational thinking If and only if we know the definition of self in human thinking, can we know the structure of human thinking. I will start by discussing the basis of rational thinking-formal logic and use logical paradox as testing. There are three basic laws of formal logic. 1: The law of identity 2: The law of non-contradiction 3: The law of excluded middle The law of identity states that something i…

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 1 reply
    • 701 views
  18. Chain fusion then chain fission repeat 1 Hydrogen > Uranium 2 Uranium > Hydrogen 3 repeat simplest formula of cyclical chain nuclear fusion/fission reaction This is the element modifying formula This will change the world Theoretical will become practical with radioactive protection that will be developed sooner, or later, or never, and this will make humans create, modify or destroy elements (material) as they feel like. Element creating/modifying vending machines or for homes use to create periodic table elements (discovered and undiscovered) there are possibly 1000s of undiscovered periodic elements that is human made so incom…

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 16 replies
    • 1.9k views
    • 2 followers
  19. Simultaneity: special relativity, matter wave, uncertainty principle and QM By Xuefeng Frank Yuan 1: Relational value and its correlational value: symmetry of relational values For any two associated physical quantities present, such as space and time or a pair of conjugate variables, the relational value reflecting the changes of two associated physical quantities, such as the speed or the product of conjugate variables changes, corresponds to a correlational value. This correlational value also reflects the changes of the associated physical quantities. The relational value and its correlational value satisfy two…

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 2 replies
    • 923 views
  20. Non-real relational values and simultaneity: the relationship between special relativity, matter wave and uncertainty principle 1: For any two associated physical quantities present in physics, such as time and space or a pair of conjugate variables, the relational value reflecting the two associated physical quantities changes, such as the velocity or the product of conjugate variables, is the real relational value. It corresponds to a non-real relational value. The non-real relational value also reflects the changes of the associated physical quantities. The real relational value is defined by the relevant physical quantities, so it cannot alone prove the c…

  21. there is no wave, just act like wave. I have one article to prove superposition is equal to the law of middle or included the middle. another one is tell how a thing satisfy the law of middle exist. Superposition principle and irrationality.docx Non-real relational values and simultaneity.docx

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 59 replies
    • 5.6k views
    • 2 followers
  22. Started by Poemander,

    It is quite possible to construct a theory based on a false hypothesis and continue to create further ad hoc hypotheses to cover an entourage of anomalies as long as they keep on coming forth. This situation is true for both Big Bang Theory (Dark Matter, Dark Energy, Asymmetric Matter-Antimatter Reactions, Decomposing Dark Matter) and Quantum Theory (first created as a massless speed of light particle with negligible interaction with matter, explaining the range of beta emissions, and becoming a magic entity [non-conservational] like BigBangium] making it a panacaea of ad hoc covers across both extreme disciplines, from sub-PARTICLE physics [let’s face it] to cosmology!!…

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 2 replies
    • 892 views
    • 1 follower
  23. Started by Poemander,

    I propose that Rutherfords hypothesis of neutrons in the nucleus is incorrect, and that this hypothesis stands in the way of an understanding of gravity akin to that of magnetism. Magnetism has been shown to be a Special Relativistic effect of opposite charges in different inertial frames. Gravity may be understood as a General Relativistic effect of opposite charges in different non-inertial frames in similar manner. If correct, we have a basis for an expanding universe due to a gravitational dipole resulting from the opposite charges on the antiparticles of the electron and the proton. Fred Hoyle's Steady State Universe would then be possibility.

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 43 replies
    • 6.4k views
    • 2 followers
  24. Imagine a spherical volume of space and time representing a photon as 60 iterations that reduce, via sphere eversion, by one planck length at a time: x^2+y^2+z^2-n=4/3pix^3 x/((2(3^59))=1.616229e-35 x=1.616229e-35*((2(3^59))) x=4.56758796e-7 x^2+y^2+z^2+n=(4/3*pi*4.56758796e-7)^3 x+y+z=square root(7.0036847e-18-n) x+y+z=7.0036847e-18^(1/2)-n^(1/2) n^(1/2)=7.0036847e-18^(1/2)-(3(4.56758796e-7)) n=7.0036847e-18^(1/2)-(3(4.56758796e-7))^2 8x-6y-4z-7=2.6445699e-9 8x-6y-4z=2.6445699e-9+7 4x-3y-2z=(2.6445699e-9+7)/2 4x-3y-2z=3.50000000132 S(0)=x^2+y^2+z^2+4x-3y-2z-3.50000000132=0 S(60)=x^2+y^2+z^2+4x-3y-…

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 6 replies
    • 1.8k views
  25. Started by EzequielLayag,

    Immortality in jellyfish?

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 5 replies
    • 1.1k views

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.