Skip to content

Speculations

Pseudoscientific or speculatory threads belong here.

Speculations Forum Rules

The Speculations forum is provided for those who like to hypothesize new ideas in science. To enrich our discussions above the level of Wild Ass Guesswork (WAG) and give as much meaning as possible to such speculations, we do have some special rules to follow:

  1. Speculations must be backed up by evidence or some sort of proof. If your speculation is untestable, or you don't give us evidence (or a prediction that is testable), your thread will be moved to the Trash Can. If you expect any scientific input, you need to provide a case that science can measure.
  2. Be civil. As wrong as someone might be, there is no reason to insult them, and there's no reason to get angry if someone points out the flaws in your theory, either.
  3. Keep it in the Speculations forum. Don't try to use your pet theory to answer questions in the mainstream science forums, and don't hijack other threads to advertise your new theory.

The movement of a thread into (or out of) Speculations is ultimately at the discretion of moderators, and will be determined on a case by case basis.

  1. Started by Bez,

    E=MC squared F=Friction E + F = electromagnatism Electromagnetism X Motion X Form = Everything evidence: Electromagnetic field surrounding this planet actually drives (produces) the molten core center

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 63 replies
    • 6.1k views
    • 3 followers
  2. this cannot be called a theory (its not even a very educated guess). if you know of pilot wave theory, you might know that people have found a flaw. but the same person that came up with pilot wave theory came up with an alternative theory that is similar but (as far as anyone can tell) predicts the same outcome as standard quantum mechanics (except entanglement) here is a link to an essay that explains all of this. so I decided to expand it and found a bit of irony. imagine that the probability wave is controlled by an actual physical wave that travels through a medium that we cannot detect (to bring old terms back I will call it the Aether) this Aether wo…

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 19 replies
    • 2.3k views
    • 2 followers
  3. Hello people... I am a new addition to this forum, which may become plainly obvious from the predicted mistakes I will make during my first few posts . I should first state that I do not posses any scientific qualifications. But I have been a passionate armature astronomer for the past 13 years, and do retain a "little" scientific knowledge from attending upon several OU modules in past years. I am here because several years ago, I formulated a correlation hypothesis related to the detection of pre-seismic locations, which in many cases led to determination being made up to 30 days prior to seismic occurrence. I have been testing my hypothesis on several US predict…

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 38 replies
    • 4.5k views
    • 2 followers
  4. The question appeared while we were discussing emegence and realized(again) how deeply it is embedded in Nature. Could Energy be a result of a process?(like Space expansion) I think Energy can pop to existence but can not disappear. Would such a function violate the Energy conservation law or generally the Laws of Nature?

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 4 replies
    • 940 views
    • 1 follower
  5. You've probably read my other post below. And here focuses on the idea of optogenetics. To being with, I will post a video on the introduction of optogenetics. Now this baby only activates or deactivates neurons. The real work for our focus lies in modify the dendrites and the synapses, therefore we could change the rhodopsin structure to match our needs. The video below shows the structure of the rhodopsin channel. So by modifying the G receptor, we will introduce 4 pathways. One pathway increases the number of dendrites, one pathway decreases the number of dendrites, one pathway uses glutamate to modify activation of the synapse, and one pa…

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 4 replies
    • 849 views
  6. I have been using a relativity program i made in 1997 and have some ideas, I believe massless particles travel along with the actual speed of the expansion of the universe C, , , , the apparent rate of the expanding universe is 44.7387 mile per second per mega parsec, which works out at an actual rate of 99.999999 C here is a screen shot of my program, , , Note the actual speed of .99999997, or 186243 MPS and the apparent speed at the bottom of 64.30355 MPS My twist on Einsteins formula shows 1) how massless particles like photons can travel at light speed 2) That the apparent expansion of the universe is speeding up because the actual speed is slowing d…

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 1 reply
    • 613 views
  7. Supermassive Black Holes are caused by and necessary for the rapid expansion of the Universe and are proof positive the Universe is expanding faster (and has been from origin) than the, "speed-of-light!" This traveling faster than the speed of light is supposed to be impossible but what is seen and perceived is only relative to this motion system. Our perceptual senses are located in our bodies and our bodies are on this planet going approximately 67,000 mph around the sun and the sun is cruising around the center of the galaxy at about 140 miles per second. The galaxy is hauling across the Universe. We are going places very fast yet we don't notice that motion. All…

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 20 replies
    • 1.8k views
    • 2 followers
  8. Started by Fermer05,

    The waters of lakes, seas and oceans of the northern hemisphere rotate counterclockwise, while the waters of the southern hemisphere rotate clockwise, forming giant whirlpools. As you know, everything that rotates, including whirlpools, has the property of a gyro (yule) to maintain the vertical position of the axis in space, regardless of the rotation of the Earth. If you look at the Earth from the side of the Sun, the whirlpools, rotating together with the Earth, overturn, due to which the whirlpools precess, and as a result there is a vertical movement of oceanic waters. http://goo.gl/AM5g1s The presented theory can be easily verified by the connection be…

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 1 reply
    • 1k views
  9. Waters of lakes, seas and oceans of the northern hemisphere rotate counterclockwise, and the waters of the southern hemisphere rotate clockwise, forming giant whirlpools. The main reason for the rotation of the whirlpools are, local winds, flowing into the seas and oceans of the river and the deflecting force of Coriolis. And the higher the speed of the winds, the higher the rotation speed of the whirlpools, and as a consequence, the higher the centrifugal force of the whirlpools, thereby raising the level of the waters of the seas and oceans. And the lower the rotation speed of the whirlpools, the lower the water level of the seas and oceans .. The speed of th…

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 13 replies
    • 2.6k views
    • 1 follower
  10. The reason for the formation of hydrogen sulfide in the Black Sea. Institute of Oceanology, Russian Academy of Sciences https://vk.com/ioran The wind waves enrich the water with oxygen only to a depth of several tens of meters of the seas and oceans surface, while the whirlpools deliver the water enriched with oxygen to a depth of more than 10 km. (Mariana Trench) How does this happen: The waters of the lakes, seas and oceans of the northern hemisphere rotate counterclockwise, and the waters of the southern hemisphere rotate clockwise, forming giant whirlpools. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ocean_gyre As is known, everything that rotates, including …

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 18 replies
    • 2.9k views
    • 1 follower
  11. Started by MarkBrezina,

    Dear everyone. I do apologize for coming along and sounding like a real genuine crackpot, this is in no case my intention or situation. If by first glance you will move this post elsewhere, I will edit it a bit to fit it to the forum placement. Thanks in advance Mark Brezina I will keep the initial post short. But I will expand upon it if anyone finds an interest in what I'm bring up. I have come to understand the following 1. It isn't entirely understood how matter behaves. Recently a large number of particles has been discovered, but this produces an ever increasing confusion. The ever increasing number of particles doesn't seem to stop and t…

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 11 replies
    • 1.6k views
    • 1 follower
  12. In calculating escape velocity from a mass gravity force of this mass at infinity is considered to be zero an object has specific amount of kinetic energy starts with the escape velocity from mass and stops at infinity The potential energy is calculated from infinity at which force is equals zero If gravitational force at infinity equals zero then we have a real number "zero" assigned to unreachable quantity "infinity" making it reachable but in fact infinity is unreachable so we can’t assign a zero quantity of gravity for an unreal number quantity which is infinite space. The gravitational field is real and it has an end equals zero there should be an end for i…

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 134 replies
    • 14.1k views
    • 3 followers
  13. Started by awaterpon,

    Well , I'm not against GR this is a new view added to GR view of space time curvature of positive and negative attraction concept. Does space exist inside mass m? No since mass m occupied the place of space. Does mass m exist in place of the space I mentioned? No space is nothingness there is not mass occupied in it So mass m occupy space , this space is equivalent to mass m. If mass m occupy space " there is not space in the place of the mass" then mass m causes Non-existence of space in that place If we have to masses M and m they will attract each other This is due to mass m is attracted to non-existence of mass M and mass M is att…

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 14 replies
    • 2.2k views
    • 1 follower
  14. Hello Forum, I would like to present you a novel hypothesis about the origin of aging and aging-related medical phenomena, possibly including Alzheimer‘s disease. The hypothesis sounds even more than crazy at first. So please keep in mind that many scientific innovations initially sounded blasphemous or even crazy. Also, take into account that the hypothesis is possible AND unique. You will not find it anywhere else, and you yourself, believe me, would never get the idea ... it is just too weird. THE HYPOTHESIS The hypothesis is based on the following 4 premises: 1 A memory trace, once formed i…

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 1 reply
    • 732 views
  15. Started by QuantumT,

    The universe expands! We can all agree on that. Some say that the universe is all there is. So the universe expands into what exactly? What I am trying to figure out is, if there is some sort of void beyond the universe? And if there is, the universe is not all there is, right? Even a void without space, matter and time is still "something". The problem of a universe with no void around it, is that it does not expand. It stretches. And if spacetime stretches, everything grows in size. Including matter. Particles do not change charge or size. If they did, we would be able to see it. So there must be a void out there!

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 3 replies
    • 1k views
  16. Started by harlock,

    - Solar Energy, Wind Energy, Sea Energy ----> Thermal Energy ---> molten Sodium Chloride - 1 m3 of solid Sodium Chloride + 300 kwh of Thermal Energy -----> about 1 m3 of molten Sodium Chloride - 1 m3 of molten Sodium Chloride ---> 300 Kwh of Thermal Energy(--->100 Kwh of Electric Energy + 200 kwh of lost heat) + solid Sodium Chloride - In a single salt mine usually there're several billion m3 of NaCl. Storing energy with Sodium Chloride?

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 4 replies
    • 1.2k views
    • 1 follower
  17. Started by johnny iannello,

    Title: The fifth force implies no existance of blackholes? We know by now that Newton's formula of gravitational potential on gravity, w=G*m(r)/r, (with singularity for star radius=r=0, m(r) is the mass of the star), is modified by the presence of the "Fifth force" (or said anti-gravity effect) given from the formula of Fischbach E. 1986 (see even Rujula A.D. 1986, Cowsik R. 1990, Thomas J. 1989, formula without singularity). The Fischbach's formula of the gravitational potential corrected is: w=G*m(r)*(1-a*exp(-r/L))/r where G is the universal gravitational constant, corrected by a=0.01:0.001, which is the intensity of the fifth force, called iperch…

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 3 replies
    • 2.1k views
    • 1 follower
  18. This is for a definition of dark matter with an intellectual approach. It is not a proof but is something sound. It is a definition of dark matter in a specific description which when read can have sense. I am from a background of someone interested in Kabbalah / Torah, and do acknowledge higher consciousness and the field of science. It is to encourage beings to do good. Coming from this perspective I have an observation that may give explanation for dark matter. I do believe it is it. There are correlations to Kabbalah, and in a world that is designed for beings to adhere to good. I would like to acknowledge respect for science and a lot of good th…

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 10 replies
    • 1.2k views
    • 2 followers
  19. Hello Mordred, interesting question. To the op: space is information. Fundamentally 4D 3 spatial and 1 time. I perceive It as a constantly developing and evolving physical entity i.e. moment by moment it is bigger and older. I think that is an objective information (for us yet not perceivable). How space created? From the lawest possible physical state evolved the smallest possible physical information= space(time). I would quess. Information about the rates and limits of space(time) evolution. I dare to use evolution because time seems to be an ever forward pointing function.

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 48 replies
    • 4.7k views
    • 1 follower
  20. Started by Christoph Pachoa,

    Spacetime is potentially the combined information of all the infinite fields woven together or some role player in it, and we can see from gravitional waves that matter and gravity can interact with spacetime. With one interaction proven it is also possible that the density of spacetime and or all the fields is greater around supermassive bodies such as galactic center black holes or star clusters allowing for gravity to have a stronger effect on the formation and binding of galaxies than we’ve expressed with math based on spacetime and fields having no or the wrong value and function. The increased density would create a differentiation from galactic centers gravity and …

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 2 replies
    • 889 views
    • 1 follower
  21. Started by DandelionTheory,

    so i was wrong about frame dragging i admit that, i guess i was still trying to wrap my head around the ionc motion of this thing. so, i broke it down to its bare pices. the green arrow between the 2 counter rotating rings is a representation of the magnetic field generated by ions leaving each ring surface, and being attracted to the opposing ring. if i drew out the magnetic field each ring generates as it spins, the electric field between these rings is inline with the mane axis of the magnetic field generated by ions naturally moving towards the oppositely charged ring as they rotate. so positive ion up, negative ion down. twirly motion. all i have to do is s…

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 18 replies
    • 3.3k views
    • 1 follower
  22. Hello. Excuse me, but I do question the relevance of the Michelson-Morley experiment regarding Special Relativity. At the time the MM interferometer didn’t show any phase shift at the receiver within the instrument. The outcome of the MM experiment suggests that the velocity of Earth relative to the Sun being the light source, had no effect on the measurement of the propagation velocity of sunlight in neither directions. This absence of phase shift is considered to be a confirmation of the second postulate of Special Relativity: “2. Second postulate (invariance of c) As measured in any inertial frame of reference, light is always propagated in empty sp…

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 52 replies
    • 6.5k views
    • 2 followers
  23. In this thread the new, global/generalized Sagnac effect formula will be derived. Sagnac formula for an interferometer whose center of rotation coincides with its geometrical center:Δt = l/(c - v) - l/(c + v) = 2lv/c2Sagnac formula for an interferometer located away from the center of rotation (different radii, different velocities):Δt = (l1 + l2)/(c - v1 - v2) - (l1 + l2)/(c + v1 + v2) = 2[(l1v1 + l2v2)]/c2 The Sagnac effect formula for an interferometer whose center of rotation coincides with its geometrical center is well known: 2vL/c^2. The Sagnac effect involves two continuous loops for which we find the difference in travel times: it is an electromagnetic …

  24. Started by Hassani,

    Actually, the picture realised by EHT team is a just an additional confirmation of the “galactic plasmoids”. Also it affirms the plasma cosmology hypothesis that the object at a galactic core is not a BH at all but an ultra-high density energy storage phenomena called a PLASMOID. Plasmoid has been predicted by the Physicist Winston H. Bostick. Bostick's theoretical prediction has been confirmed experimentally, and also the different properties and geometrical shapes of plasmoid has been well investigated in many laboratories. The readers of my comment can verify themselves what I wrote through the following references: ‒ Winston H. Bostick, “Experim…

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 1 reply
    • 621 views
  25. Hasn't it been shown that the amount of matter in a sphere centred on us is not proportional to the cube of the radius, but to a much lower power? This indicates a preferred location for us. We'll obviously we must be where a planet is. Secondly, the proven existence of periodicity in redshift (e.g. 72 km/s and related as found by Tifft, Arp, Guthrie and Napier and others) means that either A. We are in a special location, or B. The velocity interpretation of redshift is seriously flawed. I favor B and Narlikar's variable mass hypothesis.

    • 0

      Reputation Points

    • 30 replies
    • 3.7k views
    • 1 follower

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.