Speculations

A GIANT CROSS HAS APPEARED ON THE SURFACE OF THE SUN This has scientists baffled because is formed by giant super flares and is permanent since may 13 2013, violating all that is known about the sun. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e96VT2mBMRw See real time images from NASA here: http://www.helioviewer.org/ There is a group making claims about the cross on the sun http://third-secret.pro-forum.co.uk/h49-cross-appears-on-the-sun-during-miracle-of-the-sun Im sure soon there will be more

time to ditch big bang inflation theory, for a new one. I call it the Blackhole inflation theory, both are relative same basics. only few key structures are remade first this bigbang have troubles with *what become with* i watch a lot of documentary's they all point out to 3 possible futures. now a blackhole inflation theory, don't have trouble with what was first. example, blackhole do not need matter to create a massive gravity well and can be foundation on gravity problems what exist in today's theory's. second, It can explain why higgs can be unstable without ever being enable to explode whole Universe. third, what become, is not a issue we exist …

I'm trying to extract the oxygen from water and get solidified hydrogen. How can I go about doing this?

swansont, on 25 Apr 2013 - 23:32, said: Yes. Well I have devised several types of trajectories. I have built some experiments to demonstrate the principles of the proposed phenomenon, I have done some of the maths And as I mentioned a few posts ago , that I would try to put it together. Which I will, provided I do not get run over by a bus, or end up in concrete wellington boots.. First Experiment:- The purpose of this experiment conducted in 1970's and put to patent agent was devised to see if it were possible to arrange, and see if , centrifugal force could be ' rectified' [ as in the case of a.c. voltage waves being rectified to produce unsmo…

Unless of course, you believe that principles present, and laid down in the very early cosmos, get reflected on and built on , and show up through the whole thing. Say like symmetry or opposites or balanced systems or whatever works in paired systems ? There is too much of [ + - ] [matter antimatter ] [ left handed righthanded ] [male female ] [ right brain left brain ] [ up down ] etc etc for it not to be fairly fundamental to the universe .I think to separate the microscopic from the macro too much , might be ' missing a trick' . However as you will see I went on to build models more reflective of actual atom structure.

Or NOT ? Oh I forgot. Here is a Picture of NOW I painted earlier today, having discussed it quite a bit with like minded colleagues. There is a yellow bit that represents the NOW . There is a Dark Green Bit ............................... There are a series of Light Green Bits ............

News out today of Slight Detail change to age of Universe ( 13.81 Billion years ) , confirmation of many ideas around the big bang, and inflation. But some new evidence for new ideas.

I'd like some opinions about a paper titled the schwarzschild proton by Nassim Haramein. In short, he gets rid of the strong and weak forces and accounts for the missing mass using the classical mechanics of gravity at the atomic level making all protons "mini black holes." The math is accurate if the proton's mass is not renormalized as it is in quantium theory. This also eliminates the need for dark matter and dark energy as all mass through vacuum fluctuation is accounted for.

I have thought of something that has become somewhat of a puzzle game for me. How I got to this thought is not that important, but involved some frustration with the fact that the square root of 2 is what it is. It was somewhat disconcerting that the answer is not 1, when the thought I was following needed an answer of 1. Then I saw a triangle that represented the Pythagorean Theorem. Then something that Michel 123456 wrote in a thread some time ago came to mind; “The diagonal is the distance”. I looked the thread up to see what he was talking about, and it does seem to me that his diagram applies to the thought I was having; well somewhat. Not quite... Maybe... …

How do I set up an interface for my program, it is necessary.

Center of Milky Way a recyclable mill of mater. (A controversial hypothesis by a lay -- man) With sixth grade math calculations results that in the center of Milky Way must be a super gigantic cosmic body with a super-mass of 1.69283*10^44 gr. and a radius of 1.250062*10^16 cm. For modern cosmologists this is a “black hole”, an infamous merchandise misnomer. In my lay—man imagination this is a colossal cyclotron with a tremendous gravity. This cosmic body attract from nearby mater ( mass and mass--les common bodies) and run them in a circle movement with a velocity that reach limit velocity C, but cannot over come it, as pretends cosmologists, because i…

I HAVE ALWAYS BELIEVED OUR UNIVERSE TO BE EXPANDING INTO LOWER DIMENSIONAL SPACE, THIS EXPLAINNED EVERYTHING FROM DARK MATTER TO BLACK HOLES AND THE FORMATION OF ALL WE SEE AND DO NOT YET SEE. THIS STILL LEFT ME PUZZLEING OVER WHAT THIS LOWER DIMENSIONAL SPACE WAS, I REALISED THE ANSWER MUST SOME HOW LAY WITHIN THE ELEMENTS/NOBLE GASES, SO I SET ABOUT EXTENDING THE PERIODIC TABLE AND EVERYTHING BECAME CLEAR TO ME. LINK TO TABLES .http://alphaomegadot...panded11111.xls I NOW BELIEVE OUR UNIVERSE IS AN ELECTRON EXPANDING OUT TOWARDS THE NEXT SHELL, YOU WILL SEE I HAVE EXTENDED THE TABLE TO 172 ELEMENTS/ 12 NOBLE GASES, but i can extend the table to fractal inf…

Just curious, if you were to take the Nervous system from every different species of animal, or mammals and connected them, how large a system would you have/??

I'm going to throw out a theory for you guys. A bubble might emerge which would become a new planet

You should shoot by muons and photons in different directions.You should recieve photons reflected by the muons.You should fix arrival time of reflected photons,energy of the photons and energy of the muons.Then calculations can define a direction where a muon can live longer.

has anyone seen this show Ancient Aliens? the show is about the idea that aliens have visited earth and assisted in construction of ancient buildings etc. and they provide enough evidence to make it sound like a sincere hypothesis but still sounds a lot like nonsense what do you all think?

The concept of one Big Bang is a pure fantasy!!! Just one example of Colliding Galaxies which contradicts the concept of the Big Bang that all the mass of the universe had been generated in one point in space. Andromeda is about 2.2 million light-years distant from Milky Way. As it is moving directly to the Milky Way, it is clear that in the past the distant was much longer. Therefore, 13.75 Billion years ago the distant was about 15 Million Light years. So how come that those two Galaxies were so far aware at the moment of the Big bang? Is it possible that there were two or more Big Bangs??? This is only one example for two galaxies which are in colliding d…

Physics is all about why. Why do electric currents flow? Because electrons and protons attract their like, and repel their unlike. Maxwell may have done some handy maths, but he still could not have answered that basic question, because electrons and protons had not been discovered in his time. But surely the biggest question in physics today is: why have physicists stop trying to make sense of the universe, and instead started to believe it is all mystical and mysterious, and can only be understood through maths, and invented more imaginary beings than anybody since the Ancient Greek mythologers

So I was thinking; that if not to be drowned into the scientific “insanity” of universal theory, what else? The more I have been trying to get rid of it, the more I have been trapped into the “crazy” idea! The central idea of this theory postulates that; “With relative frames, all things are; but just different reference frames of the same thing. And with absolute frame, the framework of every thing is oppositely symmetrical and complementary. These opposites are smoothly and recursively circulated through conflicting patterns that are directly proportional to the regulation of the relative frames of the concerned absolute framework and inversely proportional to the coo…

It is one of the properties of waves that they can interpenetrate without loss of identity. That is two (or more) waves can occupy the same space at the same time. Massive objects (matter and particles) are not supposed to possess this property. The consequences of viewing massive objects as waves has interesting implications which are worth discussing.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nothing wikipedia definition of nothing for the linguistically impaired I have been thinking (yes, I know its not a good idea) and I came up with this 1. currently there is a universe 2. it started at the big bang (or something along the lines) 3. it had to start from something 4. that something had to come from something 5. that something had to come from something 6. that something had to come from something 7. that something had to come from something 8. (infinite regression) 9. that something had to come from nothing so the million dollar question is what is nothing *I just thought this was a valid thing to po…

This happen a couple months back when it was raining here in seattle. I was driving home from the store and I notice this huge rainbow in the distance behind me from the mirror of my car. But then I also notice that the rainbow from far distance starts from right behind my car and ends at the far distance. I thought of this when I got home and I find it wierd that even though the rainbow that is faraway is able to connect to the rainbow that was created by the splash of my rear tires. How can those 2 rainbow be connected as 1 when they are so far apart from eachother?

The Scientist is looking for higgs boson.This partical can not exist because we can make conclusion what is small than this partical.The smallest partical is wave.We can make supposition that partrical is two waves positive and negative.They attract each other and form the mass.Is our Universe without end?Over our universe there is field.This field make positive and negative waves exist and to form mass. Is our Universe endless.No it is surrounded by field .This is the only explanation ,in contrary the Universe shall always be expanding.If we think what is beyond the space if the answer is space what is beyond that space if it is substance what is beyond that…

To Deconstruct Atoms: An atom, a collection of positive, nuetral, and negatively charged subatomic particles, each of which, in certain arrangements, give certain properties of structure to certain elements. These are the building blocks of the universe. To break, or split one, causes a massive release of potential energy in a massive exothermic reaction as the energy contained in the atom is released. To deconstruct one is a dangerous task. The hypothesis i propose is simple, yet keep in mind, I'm only in honors chem 1, so much of what I say could be completely wrong. An atoms acts, according to the hypothesis, like the majority of its subatomic …

I recently noticed a mathematical ressemblance between special relativity and bayesian probability: If A and B are events such that P(A) = 1 - P(A') = (1+v1/c)/2 P(B|A) = P(B'|A') = 1 - P(B'|A') = 1 - P(B|A') = (1+v2/c)/2 where v1 and v2 are relativistic one dimentional velocities then according to Bayes formula P(A|B) = (1+v3/c)/2 where v3 = (v1 + v2)/(1 + v1 v2/c^2) witch is the relativistic velocity addition formula. So the math suggest that the quantity 0 < (1+v/c)/2 < 1 is a probability since it behave like probability. This might indicate a fundamental connection between probability theory, special relativity and hyperbolic geometry. …