Speculations

How do I set up an interface for my program, it is necessary.

Center of Milky Way a recyclable mill of mater. (A controversial hypothesis by a lay -- man) With sixth grade math calculations results that in the center of Milky Way must be a super gigantic cosmic body with a super-mass of 1.69283*10^44 gr. and a radius of 1.250062*10^16 cm. For modern cosmologists this is a “black hole”, an infamous merchandise misnomer. In my lay—man imagination this is a colossal cyclotron with a tremendous gravity. This cosmic body attract from nearby mater ( mass and mass--les common bodies) and run them in a circle movement with a velocity that reach limit velocity C, but cannot over come it, as pretends cosmologists, because i…

I HAVE ALWAYS BELIEVED OUR UNIVERSE TO BE EXPANDING INTO LOWER DIMENSIONAL SPACE, THIS EXPLAINNED EVERYTHING FROM DARK MATTER TO BLACK HOLES AND THE FORMATION OF ALL WE SEE AND DO NOT YET SEE. THIS STILL LEFT ME PUZZLEING OVER WHAT THIS LOWER DIMENSIONAL SPACE WAS, I REALISED THE ANSWER MUST SOME HOW LAY WITHIN THE ELEMENTS/NOBLE GASES, SO I SET ABOUT EXTENDING THE PERIODIC TABLE AND EVERYTHING BECAME CLEAR TO ME. LINK TO TABLES .http://alphaomegadot...panded11111.xls I NOW BELIEVE OUR UNIVERSE IS AN ELECTRON EXPANDING OUT TOWARDS THE NEXT SHELL, YOU WILL SEE I HAVE EXTENDED THE TABLE TO 172 ELEMENTS/ 12 NOBLE GASES, but i can extend the table to fractal inf…

Just curious, if you were to take the Nervous system from every different species of animal, or mammals and connected them, how large a system would you have/??

I'm going to throw out a theory for you guys. A bubble might emerge which would become a new planet

You should shoot by muons and photons in different directions.You should recieve photons reflected by the muons.You should fix arrival time of reflected photons,energy of the photons and energy of the muons.Then calculations can define a direction where a muon can live longer.

has anyone seen this show Ancient Aliens? the show is about the idea that aliens have visited earth and assisted in construction of ancient buildings etc. and they provide enough evidence to make it sound like a sincere hypothesis but still sounds a lot like nonsense what do you all think?

The concept of one Big Bang is a pure fantasy!!! Just one example of Colliding Galaxies which contradicts the concept of the Big Bang that all the mass of the universe had been generated in one point in space. Andromeda is about 2.2 million light-years distant from Milky Way. As it is moving directly to the Milky Way, it is clear that in the past the distant was much longer. Therefore, 13.75 Billion years ago the distant was about 15 Million Light years. So how come that those two Galaxies were so far aware at the moment of the Big bang? Is it possible that there were two or more Big Bangs??? This is only one example for two galaxies which are in colliding d…

Physics is all about why. Why do electric currents flow? Because electrons and protons attract their like, and repel their unlike. Maxwell may have done some handy maths, but he still could not have answered that basic question, because electrons and protons had not been discovered in his time. But surely the biggest question in physics today is: why have physicists stop trying to make sense of the universe, and instead started to believe it is all mystical and mysterious, and can only be understood through maths, and invented more imaginary beings than anybody since the Ancient Greek mythologers

So I was thinking; that if not to be drowned into the scientific “insanity” of universal theory, what else? The more I have been trying to get rid of it, the more I have been trapped into the “crazy” idea! The central idea of this theory postulates that; “With relative frames, all things are; but just different reference frames of the same thing. And with absolute frame, the framework of every thing is oppositely symmetrical and complementary. These opposites are smoothly and recursively circulated through conflicting patterns that are directly proportional to the regulation of the relative frames of the concerned absolute framework and inversely proportional to the coo…

It is one of the properties of waves that they can interpenetrate without loss of identity. That is two (or more) waves can occupy the same space at the same time. Massive objects (matter and particles) are not supposed to possess this property. The consequences of viewing massive objects as waves has interesting implications which are worth discussing.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nothing wikipedia definition of nothing for the linguistically impaired I have been thinking (yes, I know its not a good idea) and I came up with this 1. currently there is a universe 2. it started at the big bang (or something along the lines) 3. it had to start from something 4. that something had to come from something 5. that something had to come from something 6. that something had to come from something 7. that something had to come from something 8. (infinite regression) 9. that something had to come from nothing so the million dollar question is what is nothing *I just thought this was a valid thing to po…

This happen a couple months back when it was raining here in seattle. I was driving home from the store and I notice this huge rainbow in the distance behind me from the mirror of my car. But then I also notice that the rainbow from far distance starts from right behind my car and ends at the far distance. I thought of this when I got home and I find it wierd that even though the rainbow that is faraway is able to connect to the rainbow that was created by the splash of my rear tires. How can those 2 rainbow be connected as 1 when they are so far apart from eachother?

The Scientist is looking for higgs boson.This partical can not exist because we can make conclusion what is small than this partical.The smallest partical is wave.We can make supposition that partrical is two waves positive and negative.They attract each other and form the mass.Is our Universe without end?Over our universe there is field.This field make positive and negative waves exist and to form mass. Is our Universe endless.No it is surrounded by field .This is the only explanation ,in contrary the Universe shall always be expanding.If we think what is beyond the space if the answer is space what is beyond that space if it is substance what is beyond that…

To Deconstruct Atoms: An atom, a collection of positive, nuetral, and negatively charged subatomic particles, each of which, in certain arrangements, give certain properties of structure to certain elements. These are the building blocks of the universe. To break, or split one, causes a massive release of potential energy in a massive exothermic reaction as the energy contained in the atom is released. To deconstruct one is a dangerous task. The hypothesis i propose is simple, yet keep in mind, I'm only in honors chem 1, so much of what I say could be completely wrong. An atoms acts, according to the hypothesis, like the majority of its subatomic …

I recently noticed a mathematical ressemblance between special relativity and bayesian probability: If A and B are events such that P(A) = 1 - P(A') = (1+v1/c)/2 P(B|A) = P(B'|A') = 1 - P(B'|A') = 1 - P(B|A') = (1+v2/c)/2 where v1 and v2 are relativistic one dimentional velocities then according to Bayes formula P(A|B) = (1+v3/c)/2 where v3 = (v1 + v2)/(1 + v1 v2/c^2) witch is the relativistic velocity addition formula. So the math suggest that the quantity 0 < (1+v/c)/2 < 1 is a probability since it behave like probability. This might indicate a fundamental connection between probability theory, special relativity and hyperbolic geometry. …

Split from "Is physics about "why?"" Because you're using incorrect model since beginning. And you can't move further with it, cause it's wrong. Going in circles. Bending of space must happens at any scale either quantum, macro and cosmic scale. When light is passing through water which has refractive index = 1.333, v=c/1.333=0.75c Every mainstream physics is saying that c is const, but while passing through some transparent material photons are constantly absorbed and emitted. That's wrong basement. We know how such absorptions and emissions are looking like in electrons: spectral lines, missing photons at one wavelength, and more photons at other wavelength. Wh…

This is the most interresting subject under the sun. Since I started my investigation in 1989 a lot has been found to make EET move up a few notches. My investigations started from a Biblical point of view as things were revealed to me about how the end of the world, as we know it, is going to come about. I am not a graduate in geology but I had the subject in high school. Plate techtonics never made sense to me because between every two spreads you must have a subduction zone and they are not there. Some years ago I tried to put my theory of the expanding earth and the birth of the moon on a web page together to show were in the Bible I got it from and some prov…

I can think of FAR more than just SIX dimensions. Here is a short list of what I have been painstakingly and laboriously constructing myself: 1. The Universe as we can observe it. 2. The Universe or Universes or Multiverses as we cannot observe them. Within our our Universe itself exist several types or layers of dimensions: 1. Space. 2. Time. 3. Matter. 4. Energy. 5. Spacetime. 6. Gravity. Then there are the species types and layers and their own particular dimensions: 1. The Humans. 2. The Animals. 3. The Aliens (if there are any). 4. The Gods (they are definitely there). Within each of these are four dimensions or types or layers to eac…

With regards to the post: Is Mathematics Alone a safe medium for exploring the frontiers of Science. Or should Observation and Hypothesis lead in front ? Here, as an example, is a hypothesis: The electron, proton and photon are made of the same substance. Are people saying that maths is the only method at our disposal to investigate a hypothesis? Because it strikes me that a lot of non mathematical thinking must surely have to precede any output of equations? In the above example, there are lots of observations that can be used, both for and against the hypothesis, so surely they would be discussed before any use of maths?

Could these videos be considered evidence of time travel? Is there any evidence for the possibility of time travel or that time travel has actually occurred?

New version, "Lorentz symmetry broken": Kindly comment. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Koorosh.shahdaei/sandbox

What if the earth's solar system is not what is understood like nine planets revolving around the sun with their individual moons! What if the solar system, the sun, planets, moons are itself a trajectory in space time continuum!!! And they all move in varied time phases but correspond to one another!!! Like suppose the 'big bang' theory as told by H.G.Wells 'the time machine' author what if the red planet is a time phased disintegrating dead star 'Mars' considered to be earth!!! What if then the solar system are itself the phases of earth's orbiter in varied time zones! Now then how can one explain 3700 satellites orbiting over earth? What if the satellites are not…

I saw today back to back episodes of X-files. Some of these episodes i remembered i had seen when i was 14 year old in 1995! In one episode there is a mention of Bio-technology science, invitro fertilization, genetic replication chromosome mapping! So the professor doctor herself named as a fictional character named mrs kendrick, is of genetic cloning with eight like her even character and memory! Created! So she does some genetic experiments where she clones chromosomes! The story seems fictional with agent scully and mulder running around, but the gist might be that kendrick meaning the accountable knowledge force in universe! So the byzantine empire of 1880s in ind…

At the time of the original event(big bang) there was a breakdown of original matter. This consisted of a massif release of neutrinos and one hydrogen atom from each atom of original matter. This event may be along a plane as opposed to a single point. The neutrinos are able to go through the hydrogen but unable to go through residual original matter. The neutrinos have mass and energy. All of their energy is transfered to the residual original matter that they hit, pushing it in the direction the neutrino was traveling. The residual original matter will clump together very rapidly as it is bombarded by neutrinos. the larger the clump the bigger the defici…