Speculations

This thought i canot take ot of my mind for the last days.... ..and i was looking everywhere ..can someone explain me that paradox ..... ...i know that they did it by Gravitional constant...but isnt it a lil bit strange ...cuz than we got another -----> Mass has no influence on gravity forces... In that scenario if it wouldnt be explained by some huge brain cuz iam of course ..crackpot which doesnt understand Physics .... ....Theory of "Frozen Universe" (time) could explain it very easily ...... ...heavy objects has stronger gravity force ,but its mass slows time a bit........than very light objects ....gravity is weak , but ...vuala..time is quic…

http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/newton-stm/

Dark energy IS the explosive 'force' generated by the big bang. The universe is still expanding because the force hasn't reach the point to where the matter in the universe has began to slow yet. Matter is simply still accelerating from the force of the bang. Dark matter is the 'missing' matter of the universe. Why can't dark matter be seen? Because dark matter exists in the 4th dimension. What is the 4th dimension? The 4th dimension is Frequency. All matter in our universe is vibrating on a frequency. Dark matter is matter that is vibrating on a different frequency much like an FM radio station. If you are 'tuned' in on one channel you can't 'hear' th…

The previous century saw the rise of every sphere of electromagnetism; sincere thanks to the works of Tesla and Faraday and of other geniuses. I believe that observing makes you a scientist not solving puzzles alone. The more you observe, the more you imagine becoming more creative. Here, we are all aware that static charge produces electric field, E and the same charge in motion generates magnetic field, B.In E and B, one thing is common i.e. charge ; it raises them.It has been scientifically proved that E and B of dynamic charge in motion are linked and they both give rise to forces. We are devoid of net charge and magnetic poles. Hence we don't feel these forces. How…

Quantum entanglement is what appears to be the instant transmission of information that two particles share, regardless of distance. For instance if one particle is spinning cw, the other is spinning ccw. If one of these particles is forced to reverse direction, the corresponding particle will reciprocate by reversing direction also, instantaneously, regardless of distance. My explanation: these entangled particles are not seperate particles, but instead to them, is one particle. Imagine a stick, a very long stick, that stretches from one side of the universe to the other. At each end of the stick is a dot, when you twirl this stick, one moves up, the other moves dow…

Is it possible that we are but one person? That we are one group particles traveling million time the speed of light around the planet creating humans. If this is the case then infant babes are older then a 100 year old person. But that's if we think of the age of the particles that created us. Just a thought

I'm not sure empty space can exist. Does it exist? Maybe it's not empty? What does "empty space" even mean? Maybe space/locations is/are "space pixels" on a "space screen"? It almost seems like the term "empty space" is a paradox. Maybe "nothing" and "space" are two different terms?

Science is an incomplete investigation into the truths of God's. God created Everything From Nothing and gave mankind some tools to explain a bit of it. Since Science is an explanation of God's elegant creations. The closer we get to Scientific reason, the closer we understand God's Works. So far, "The Big Bang" says it all. .... At 10**-64 sec, science establishes that God finishes all his Plans (Word) then get's on the way to creation, Everything from Nothing. Carry on Science. Copernicus looked to God (not religion) and changed how we look at science and interpretations. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zHUWP9zu4W8

Many of us read the recent Guardian articles by Marcus du Sautoy and Alok Jha that described a potential new 14D geometric ToE. Unlike most ToEs, Geometric Unity has a unique experimental prediction that can verify it or rule it out. CERN is capable of making this measurement with existing equipment. The physics community has been unable to judge the claims directly since they are looking for papers by Weinstein, and there are none. In fact, the theory was developed by another author and Weinstein's contribution has been to popularize the ideas. If you are interested in the truth, I highly recommend reading the first link first. This article is non-scientific and outline…

Question: Is surface tension holding the photosphere together more than the Gravitational fields ??? Judging by the way Solar storms rip thru the Photosphere then contracting back to reform, it seems that the Photosphere is more in surface tension not gravitational compression. http://solarscience..../feature1.shtml Storm watching: http://www.youtube.c...h?v=91H4qgFCauQ zorro

Controversial : Special relativity miss something from General relativity. ( An idiot try to revise EINSTEIN ) Special relativity was promoted 10 years later than General relativity, and in its base formula it doesn’t reflect the relation that it has with gravity. Only indirect Einstein promote idea that change of velocity bring change in mass via: m1 = m0 * γ1; m2 = mo*γ2 etc. The modern physic, this assertion of Einstein, considers a mistake. The modern physic, try to throw out of scene of physic mass particles, and to substitute it with overall energy notion without mass. In fact nobody denied the change of …

Hi, I’m a novice related to science but sometimes you can’t stay „still”. For a long time now I felt the need to work on a theory to explain the human psychic. As far as I know Psychology is not an exact science since doesn’t have a scientific theory to explain the human psychic (like in physics) but is more about observations and borrows elements from exact science like statistics and so on. I hope I’m not offending anyone, this is not my purpose. So, I have worked on a theory for some time now, but I’m stuck because I don’t know what are the scientific methods to validate a theory, or to apply math to a model. Maybe you can help me with that, or, I’m afraid, you might…

Is Current Electricity Theory Wrong? And/Or Could Free Energy be Real? With Possible Explanation/(s) (Warning!……Somewhat Technical) A steel fork does not make spark when touch either side of a battery. Connecting either side of a battery to a steel fork via wire does not make sparks. Sparks occur when circuit stops being fully complete with enough voltage (about 2.7 volts) (2 AA NIMH). (untested) Capacitor charges (only when circuit is near complete separated only by the gap between the plates) Battery-provided electricity lights up an LED through a capacito…

My thought is that we need a Fusion reactor with processes similar to the Photosphere of the Sun where temps are only 7,000 dK.

What is it? What processes go on?? Why does light emanate from there ?? The visible surface of the Sun. It consists of a zone in which the gaseous layers change from being completely opaque to radiation to being transparent. It is the layer from which the light we actually see (with the human eye) is emitted. Speculation: It is my speculation that it is a convective layer where Silicon-Iron-Nickel in fusion are containing the huge energies of the core layers and dispersing these energies thru the Solar storms . If so, it is kind of a volcanic slag formed by the Fusion reaching Iron conditions and in balance. If so, this is a perfect insulator for a Fusion Reac…

I was reading a website called theparkesprinciple.com and it talks about our senses are creating our own evolution with opposing electrical charges based on our contact with our environment. Could this be possible? Does this theory hold any value to Darwin's theory of evolution? I would appreciate any help with this. thanks

Very interesting question. At my knowledge there is no clear answer. Some speculate that gravity relates to electricity but the concept has been debunked many times. My own quest is focused on the "square law". Why are we obliged to use the square of the distance in both laws? The answer is: in order to make results coincide with observation. So "the-distance-that-we-observe" is only the square root of "the-measure-that-we-have-to-use-in-the-equation". And with an outstanding, an incredible, an unbelievable characteristic: the unit of the observed distance is squared. So, the "square law" does not say that you multiply a distance by itself and …

Hello, My name is Roger Larouche. I would like to discuss my projects regarding my dynamic motion models. I would like to get to know members of the community that might be interested in such a concept. If you would like to know more about these models, just reply and I will be happy to answer questions you may have! www.youtube.com/user/ROGER4464 www.youtube.com/watch?v=5nYY9G9C9Mw

Something new, or maybe Something old. I wrote something about the importance of the Observer in "Light, Spacetime, Observer(s)" topic in observing our "Observable Universe". This is another take at this. I read about Special Relativity for instance and there the Observer is just a point of view, for taking measurements. So, the Observer is reduced to basic trigonometry without studding the nature of the Observer (as it may be important). From Special Relativity to General Relativity to Quantum mechanics this shifts a little, but in circle. Anyway, I won't talk about the exactly the same thing, here I will talk a little about the nature of the Observer from …

http://www.realitysandwich.com/does_telepathy_conflict_science Reading this article about how if it was any other phenomenon ESP would've been confirmed scientific fact by 1950. It seems the only reason it gets rejected is in the words of one scientist "it doesn't make sense". Afterall how could it work if there's no physical connection. No one bothered to stop and think but microbes pass between people everyday. And studies show the importance of the gut to how people think. Scientists are calling the gut where most microbes hang out as being the second brain. And there are more non-human cells in our bodies than there are human DNA cells. It's not a…

I published my thoughts , send them to few smart people,forums etc... but....some twisted answers and reactions ...very very strange to me ...everyone is pretending to be the smartes one ,but no one want to understand and listen ....everywhere i tried they banned me calling me crackpot ...so ill try here . ............... To understand quantum world we need to be like Copernicus ... we need first to stop world of MASS(material objects)where we live in ..then put on motion quantum particles ... Idea of ..why quantum world is completly unpredictable is because there are DIFFERENCES IN TIME ...different clocks for quantum mechanics ...other for matter and mass ... and …

Last studies says that decisions are taked before we realize. them Does it mean that they ar only the result of physical laws? So scientists, led by neuroscientist John-Dylan Haynes, located with precision concrete signs of brain activity up to 10 seconds before participants were aware of their own choice. According to what Haynes said to the magazine NewSientist , this study has shown that "our decisions are predetermined unconsciously a long time before our own conscience the launch." As early as 1983, the American neuroscientist Benjamin Libet proposed that "decisions taken by any subject are first carried out in the unconscious and subsequently transferred to t…

Dear all, I have done a successful experiment for perpetual motion but the cost is high because it is slow and use big magnets. I need ideas about how to get any benefit from it because it cannot be used to produce electricity since it is costly. Thanks Frz maw

I found: Pyramid? Lone Mansion? in Saudi Arabia: 17°28'40.97"N 45°10'2.23"E Strange Lines in Yemen: 18°10'20.26"N 50° 6'1.11"E 18° 8'24.67"N 50°12'25.20"E 18°19'21.88"N 50° 8'16.94"E 18° 7'0.10"N 50° 1'55.18"E 18° 7'50.49"N 50°11'38.37"E Square Line in Yemen? 18° 6'3.94"N 50° 3'2.20"E

I was reading this thread: http://lunaticoutpost.com/Topic-Alexander-the-Great-Greek-or-SouthSlav?page=1 And I thought. Did Alexander the Great really even exist at all? So I made this thread just for that. Did Alexander the great exist? How about Christopher Columbus also? Well Christopher Columbus probably existed I think, but Alexander the Great? I think they found Greek knives in Nepal.